Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The big fuss around the new arms race unleashed by the US is nothing compared to what will come when experts prove mini-nukes were used by them in Iraq during the latest military operation!!

That’s the reason of strange diseases of the Ukrainian soldiers deployed by Al Kut at the Delta military base. The symptoms are similar to those caused by uranium bombs in Kosovo, but the disease develops more rapidly and starts with hair and teeth shedding. The people just glow with radiation. There are already several lethal cases among the Ukrainians mentioned in reports as “losses”. Those to change them will be soldiers from Georgia and Azerbaijan - disfranchised newcomers of the big family of “democratic” states. No wonder the Yankees have been backing them one after another.

There’re some ‘top secret’ sites in Iraq and even whole areas by Al Kut and Al Hayy, which have been subjected to massive attacks during the first days of war, prohibited to enter. The radiation grade registered there is so high that it’s dangerous for people to stay there. Guess how high the death number by the indigenous population is there. Some say there’re US laboratories there making tests and checks on the influence of the new weapon on people. They work under the guise of medical and humanitarian aid centers.

Let’s see how the Americans are going to justify themselves this time. They’ve already managed to wiggle out of many things starting from invention of AIDS and Bin Laden and ending with the secret weapons tests which caused tsunami disaster.

Having caught the World’s attention with the far-fetched nuke problems of Iran and North Korea the Americans started their new nuke program. I bet they will tame IAEA by dismissing intractable El Baradei and passing the radioactive contamination in Iraq caused by their mini-nukes for the consequences of Iranian nuclear tests.

Posted

Well, let's see now. You're saying that America.....

1) Invented AIDS

2) Held nuclear test blasts and actually cause the tsunamis

3) Used small nukes in Iraq

4) Is running labs using living people as guinea pigs to test these "mini-nukes", all under the guise of medical lab testing

5) Created Bin Laden

I am a pretty skeptical guy, but even I have a hard time buying into some of this "World Weekly News" quality tripe.

While it can be reasonably argued that the USA gave Bin Laden support and some credibility in the 80's, they can hardly be said to have "created" him. Bin Laden already had the resources and the contacts to find support from other sources. It just so happened that the USA stepped up to the plate with what seemed like a good idea at the time.

What alarms me more than anything you've pointed out, is the fact that the USA seems not to learn the lessons of history.

It seems that every time they "help out" with a country's internal affairs by supporting one faction or another in some conflict, then the party they've supported turns around and bites them in the tail a few years later, or at the very least, turns into a worse menace than they were set up to displace.

I need another coffee

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
What alarms me more than anything you've pointed out, is the fact that the USA seems not to learn the lessons of history.

It seems that every time they "help out" with a country's internal affairs by supporting one faction or another in some conflict, then the party they've supported turns around and bites them in the tail a few years later, or at the very least, turns into a worse menace than they were set up to displace.

That's one of my main worries. Seems like the USA always get's stabbed on the back. It first supports one faction for economic reasons and later it betrays the USA and it gives one good excuse to kill them. I've had enough with the USA in international affairs...

Posted

Pocket Rocket,

May I reiterate my earlier suggestion that we stop feeding the trolls. Especially those that are using more then one name to push the same tripe and/or having conversations with themselves in the one thread.

Trolls do not deserve a response nor do they deserve your time in responding,

Posted

TAWASAKM: A good suggestion, I agree.

But, being less experienced than most with internet forums, I sometimes do not recognize a troll at first sight.

Additionally, if there's a point I feel I can address, I will usually address it, regardless of the source.

But, if it's any comfort, generally once I've done that I get the hell out.

I need another coffee

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...