AlienB Posted May 24, 2013 Report Posted May 24, 2013 (edited) If I'm a federalist it's because in a federal state, the package deals are smaller. Coyne Coyne's error is to believe that he (or anyone) can design a system to have honest politicians. That's not the problem. What's the real problem? When a voter chooses a politician/political party, it's a package deal. Like a shared pizza, you get the anchovies too. This is a very good point, however one would question whether this was a controversy or if there were any acts or omissions required for the money being provided. If either is the case, you have a case. I have no confidence it would see the light of day in a real court though, or that that court would be impartial. Although Stephen Harper being upset about it, maybe the attorney general, or public prosecutor, both conservatives would let it proceed. Imagine if it finally got to the all conservative appointed supreme court of Canada, what would they say? Edited May 24, 2013 by AlienB Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.