FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 13, 2009 Report Posted August 13, 2009 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7040453665540929835 Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 13, 2009 Report Posted August 13, 2009 (edited) He's a kook. Possibly harmless but should laughed at from a safe distance anyway. Edited August 13, 2009 by M.Dancer Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 13, 2009 Author Report Posted August 13, 2009 Lots of folks are kooks, but they don't get "disassociated" from Canada. The Law Society of British Columbia obviously sees him as a threat. http://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/8v..._canada_by_the/ Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 13, 2009 Report Posted August 13, 2009 Lots of folks are kooks, but they don't get "disassociated" from Canada. The Law Society of British Columbia obviously sees him as a threat.http://www.reddit.com/r/canada/comments/8v..._canada_by_the/ Notice howthe link isn't from the law society? In any case it sounds like they determined that his suits are vexatious and want him to stop being a pest, or that he is a kook and one day will find himself at the wrong end of a legal argument. I would say he's a poster child for those who don't take their prescribed anti psychotic meds. Speaking of posters..he used to post here but got mistaken for an unemployable stand up comedian. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 13, 2009 Author Report Posted August 13, 2009 Can you link to any of his threads here? Quote
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Posted August 14, 2009 I searched them out myself.. http://www.mapleleafweb.com/forums//index....sult_type=posts When I looked at his profile, I see M Dancer looked at it last night. I can only assume he took the time to search it out, but then thought better of posting a link. That in itself speaks volumes about integrity, don't you think? Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 14, 2009 Report Posted August 14, 2009 When I looked at his profile, I see M Dancer looked at it last night. I can only assume he took the time to search it out, but then thought better of posting a link.That in itself speaks volumes about integrity, don't you think? So you're one of those who can read other people's thought? No of course you can't. You are only able to make idiotic assumptions...Here I will help you out. Manage your ignored usersThis section allows you to set up your ignored users list. When you add a user to your ignore list, any posts they make will be masked until you specify that you wish to read them. You may not be able to ignore users if they are in a member group which doesn't allow them to be added. FreemanMenard Members 29 Remove Now see if you have enough brains to figure out why I did not bother to link any of the fruitcakes posts.... Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 14, 2009 Author Report Posted August 14, 2009 You seem to be taking the time to repeatedly insult him though... I have yet to see you refute him. Is marginalizing the best you can do? Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 15, 2009 Report Posted August 15, 2009 You seem to be taking the time to repeatedly insult him though...I have yet to see you refute him. Is marginalizing the best you can do? Why would I waste any time refuting a crack pot? When you encounter someone who appears schizophrenic and they are having a heated debate with thin air, do you go up to them and say "hey, there's no one there!"? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Craig1 Posted August 15, 2009 Report Posted August 15, 2009 Why would I waste any time refuting a crack pot? When you encounter someone who appears schizophrenic and they are having a heated debate with thin air, do you go up to them and say "hey, there's no one there!"? history has proven time and time again the schizophrenic crack pot is useally right Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 15, 2009 Report Posted August 15, 2009 history has proven time and time again the schizophrenic crack pot is useally right History may or may not have proven such a thing, but it is certain you have not proven such a thing. If anything history has shown that schizophrenic crack pots who fail to take their meds are prone to hurt them selves or others Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Craig1 Posted August 15, 2009 Report Posted August 15, 2009 (edited) History may or may not have proven such a thing, but it is certain you have not proven such a thing. If anything history has shown that schizophrenic crack pots who fail to take their meds are prone to hurt them selves or others how about we use Nikola Tesla over 700 patents a the guy who brought to you AC power. medicaly he was a schizophrenic crack pot but if not for him you wouldn't have half what you do have today. Nobody 100 years later to the day can match him. they are still developing off his patents. Edited August 15, 2009 by Craig1 Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 15, 2009 Report Posted August 15, 2009 how about we use Nikola Tesla over 700 patents a the guy who brought to you AC power. medicaly he was a schizophrenic crack pot but if not for him you wouldn't have half what you do have today. Nobody 100 years to the day can match him and are still developing off his patents. 1) You are going to have to prove tesla was a schizophrenic. 2) Telsa was a genius. Not an Edison like genius, but a genius none the less. Shame though he had so many crack pot ideas which eventually led him to failure and ruin. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
Craig1 Posted August 15, 2009 Report Posted August 15, 2009 1) You are going to have to prove tesla was a schizophrenic.2) Telsa was a genius. Not an Edison like genius, but a genius none the less. Shame though he had so many crack pot ideas which eventually led him to failure and ruin. Actually what led to his ruin was. he lied to JP. MORGAN who gave hime money to build a radio transmision tower but instead he tried to give people power by wireless technology almost 80 years ago. I'm not about to pull up 1890-1930 newspaper adds about what people said about him like Edison but if you look into his history you will see many of his invenstions came from states of dreaming that made him fear man and why the pigeon was his best friend but i will look that up for you, mainstream right media thought he was a crack pot Quote
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 15, 2009 Author Report Posted August 15, 2009 (edited) Why would I waste any time refuting a crack pot? When you encounter someone who appears schizophrenic and they are having a heated debate with thin air, do you go up to them and say "hey, there's no one there!"? This schizophrenic is drawing a crowd. While I may be like the guy at the edge of the crowd asking passers-by if they have taken a moment to listen to this guy, you are just running around telling people not to listen to him because he is crazy. I find what he says to make a lot of sense. I ask you to convince me otherwise, and you ask me why approach the crazy guy. Admittedly, it is a huge can of worms, and many are seeing it with opportunistic eyes, as opening it gives them great wiggle room. I can understand how giving what he says any credibility might seem as the path to anarchy. If this is your fear, say so outright, or at least admit it to yourself. Edited August 15, 2009 by FuzzyOnDetails Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 17, 2009 Report Posted August 17, 2009 Actually what led to his ruin was. he lied to JP. MORGAN who gave hime money to build a radio transmision tower but instead he tried to give people power by wireless technology almost 80 years ago. I'm not about to pull up 1890-1930 newspaper adds about what people said about him like Edison but if you look into his history you will see many of his invenstions came from states of dreaming that made him fear man and why the pigeon was his best friend but i will look that up for you, mainstream right media thought he was a crack pot So then you admit Tesla was not schizophrenic? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
M.Dancer Posted August 17, 2009 Report Posted August 17, 2009 I can understand how giving what he says any credibility might seem as the path to anarchy. If this is your fear, say so outright, or at least admit it to yourself. I have no fear that the path of anarchy will be taken. Most people are not nuts. He's a kook. Possibly harmless but should laughed at from a safe distance anyway. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 18, 2009 Author Report Posted August 18, 2009 So basically, you maintain the man has nothing of value to say, and refuse to refute him with reason, but will do so with insults. Nice. Quote
M.Dancer Posted August 18, 2009 Report Posted August 18, 2009 So basically, you maintain the man has nothing of value to say, and refuse to refute him with reason, but will do so with insults. Nice. Why would I waste time refuting someone who has nothing of value to say? Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
FuzzyOnDetails Posted August 18, 2009 Author Report Posted August 18, 2009 Why would I waste time refuting someone who has nothing of value to say? I would have a hard time answering why I am doing it. I certainly can't speak to your motivation. Cheers! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.