jawapunk Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 But Palestinians did not have control over this area called Palestine, the British did at that time. Quote Leg room, there is none.
no queenslave Posted November 28, 2007 Author Report Posted November 28, 2007 But Palestinians did not have control over this area called Palestine, the British did at that time. And the British had control over Canada till 1931 as its colony; so what are you arguing. Canadians did not have control over Canada so it was not a country or state. Quote
AngusThermopyle Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 (edited) Rue Perhaps you should come spend some time out here. Ask them for yourself what they want. I have, it doesn't much match the idealized vision you have of them. Actually quite a few of them have expressed a desire to kill every whitey they come across. Sylvan statements from a decidedly sylvan people. Edited November 28, 2007 by AngusThermopyle Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
Posit Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 And by your argument you imply the U.S.Has total rights to the moon no matter what anybody else does. The U.S. are the aboriginals of the moon. Imply nothing of the sort. The legal aspect of land is held in the Crown - the Sovereign that is above the Corporation of Canada and the Corporation of [name a province]. Canadian citizens only have access to land and title rights at the pleasure of the Crown. Quote
jawapunk Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 Canada has governed itself since 1867. Palestine never has. Quote Leg room, there is none.
no queenslave Posted November 28, 2007 Author Report Posted November 28, 2007 and the treaties were signed by who? a dictator or what would you call the chief? Is the same way of head of their leadership done ? Civilization has moved along; and so has aboriginal governments, but some want to go back to the bow and tomahawk days. Quote
jawapunk Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 I think it would be hard to fire a tomahawk out of a bow. Quote Leg room, there is none.
no queenslave Posted November 28, 2007 Author Report Posted November 28, 2007 (edited) I think it would be hard to fire a tomahawk out of a bow. how many scalps have you taken? and when police are issued guns and tasers you would be the only one to post it would be hard to fire a taser out of a gun. Edited November 28, 2007 by no queenslave Quote
kengs333 Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 I think the majority of Indians just want to get on with their lives and contribute to Canadian society and not live in the past like the activist members of their communities want them to. Unfortunately, all we really hear is the screech of the activist who insist that their land was "stolen" all Canadians are "racist" and that we should all "go back to Europe". In case anyone is interested, there's an interesting looking doc about Indians in the Canadian Forces airing on Saturday: http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/show...071126/20071126 Quote
jawapunk Posted November 28, 2007 Report Posted November 28, 2007 My point was that it shoudl have read "bows AND ARROWS" not tomahawks, or bows and arrows, and tomahawks. Or Tomahawks, bows and arrows. Are you on meds? You seem to freak out about everything. Quote Leg room, there is none.
M.Dancer Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 And by your argument you imply the U.S.Has total rights to the moon no matter what anybody else does. The U.S. are the aboriginals of the moon. Not withstanding your irrelevant and factually wrong info....the USA along with dozens of other nations are party to an United Nations treaty which outlines the exploration of the moon, the planets and the stars. The US and every other signatory (around 80) do not claim any sovereingnty over the moon. I know I know....you were just maikng a point....that you don't know what you're talking about. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
no queenslave Posted November 29, 2007 Author Report Posted November 29, 2007 My point was that it shoudl have read "bows AND ARROWS" not tomahawks, or bows and arrows, and tomahawks. Or Tomahawks, bows and arrows.Are you on meds? You seem to freak out about everything. And the canadian government should of resigned and allowed the sovereign people of Canada to write and ratify a constitution that they wanted . Quote
no queenslave Posted November 29, 2007 Author Report Posted November 29, 2007 (edited) Not withstanding your irrelevant and factually wrong info....the USA along with dozens of other nations are party to an United Nations treaty which outlines the exploration of the moon, the planets and the stars. The US and every other signatory (around 80) do not claim any sovereingnty over the moon.I know I know....you were just maikng a point....that you don't know what you're talking about. And your point is relevant because you can post a treaty the United states along with dozens of other nations are party to a treaty to a U.N. treaty which outlines the rights of the canadian people or some of its inhabitants. And who signed the treaty on behalf of the Aboriginals? Edited November 29, 2007 by no queenslave Quote
no queenslave Posted November 29, 2007 Author Report Posted November 29, 2007 and where is the U.N. when crimes are committed on cruse ships on the high seas?Captins become dictators and rule. Yet in other cases charges are laid in the first port of call, as Canada has done in some cases.. Quote
no queenslave Posted November 29, 2007 Author Report Posted November 29, 2007 The Americans trained the 9/11 pilots to fly planes and we all know how that turned out. Now Canada has a special program to train First Nation people for war; and only time will tell what the outcome will be. Quote
Posit Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 The Americans trained the 9/11 pilots to fly planes and we all know how that turned out. Now Canada has a special program to train First Nation people for war; and only time will tell what the outcome will be. Ha ha ha ha Good One. The Natives have been training the Americans for war for nearly two hundred years. Perhaps we are lucky to have an Armed Forces. It may be filled with pimply-faced society missfits but they know which end of the gun to point at themselves...ummmm....well they did before they were sent to Afghanistan..... Quote
kengs333 Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 (edited) Ha ha ha ha Good One.The Natives have been training the Americans for war for nearly two hundred years. Perhaps we are lucky to have an Armed Forces. It may be filled with pimply-faced society missfits but they know which end of the gun to point at themselves...ummmm....well they did before they were sent to Afghanistan..... Actually much of the modern training for infantry tactics originated with German sturmtruppen tactics during the First World War, which the Germans further refined during the Second World War to accomodate a more fluid battlefield. Everything else has been a modification of that basic theory. Any influence the Indians had ended with the War of 1812; although, in all fairness, during World War One the Canadians had to employ some Indians as snipers--they were the only people who could come close to the supremacy of the German sniper (and only if they could score themselves a Mauser). Edited November 29, 2007 by kengs333 Quote
raz395 Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 Actually much of the modern training for infantry tactics originated with German sturmtruppen tactics during the First World War, which the Germans further refined during the Second World War to accomodate a more fluid battlefield. Everything else has been a modification of that basic theory.Any influence the Indians had ended with the War of 1812; although, in all fairness, during World War One the Canadians had to employ some Indians as snipers--they were the only people who could come close to the supremacy of the German sniper (and only if they could score themselves a Mauser). http://www.vac-acc.gc.ca/general/sub.cfm?s.../native/snipers Much of his time was spent in "No Man's Land", the dreaded area between opposing forces. As well, Norwest and his observer often slipped behind enemy lines. I just looked to see and boy ... war is hell ... spending your war time in no man's land? brutal. Quote
Posit Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 Actually much of the modern training for infantry tactics originated with German sturmtruppen tactics during the First World War, which the Germans further refined during the Second World War to accomodate a more fluid battlefield. Everything else has been a modification of that basic theory.Any influence the Indians had ended with the War of 1812; although, in all fairness, during World War One the Canadians had to employ some Indians as snipers--they were the only people who could come close to the supremacy of the German sniper (and only if they could score themselves a Mauser). Well, since you're wrong ~again~, I would suggest that you talk to US Special Ops. About 1 in 10 of the trainers are native. As well, in Canada native peoples have enlisted in the Armed Forces in greater proportion than any other ethnic group. And you wonder why our government is so afraid of the Mohawks....? Quote
AngusThermopyle Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 Well, since you're wrong ~again~, I would suggest that you talk to US Special Ops. About 1 in 10 of the trainers are native. Ahhh, more fantasy. give it up, you obviously dont have a clue what you're talking about. Either that or you genuinely believe this propaganda non-sense. Of course this is a safe claim to make since the identities of special forces personel are classified so it's not possible to check the veracity of your claims. By the way, just where do you come by your information? That reminds me, you never did answer my question from the other thread. So how long did you serve exactly? Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
Posit Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 (edited) Ahhh, more fantasy. give it up, you obviously dont have a clue what you're talking about. Either that or you genuinely believe this propaganda non-sense.Of course this is a safe claim to make since the identities of special forces personel are classified so it's not possible to check the veracity of your claims. By the way, just where do you come by your information? That reminds me, you never did answer my question from the other thread. So how long did you serve exactly? I'm an anthropologist and have been known to write a report or two on the history of war and the human response for ~some~ Armed Forces.....if you know what I mean. I don't answer questions about my career in the military other than to say I served in a capacity. If you put your thinking cap on then you might figure out why. Hmmmm.... an anthropologist in the Armed Forces....I wonder how it ties together...... However, what I did find out in my service leaves me with a bitter taste in my mouth about the deliberate recruitment and enlistment of society misfits. They are targeted because the recruiters pretend that the CAF offers them something more than just a body bag. It is disgusting the tactics used to enlist recruits.....really..... Edited November 29, 2007 by Posit Quote
AngusThermopyle Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 (edited) Woohoo! HAHAHAHA! Just dont give up do you, you and I and the majority of posters here know that you're full of it. If I were you I'd give it up. All you're doing is making a laughing stock of yourself. Go watch some more movies, get some fresh ideas for your fictitious persona. Oh yes, of course you dont answer questions about being military, because you were never military. Nice defence buddy, if we were all five years old and brain dead that is. Edited November 29, 2007 by AngusThermopyle Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
Posit Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 Woohoo! HAHAHAHA! Just dont give up do you, you and I and the majority of posters here know that you're full of it. If I were you I'd give it up. All you're doing is making a laughing stock of yourself.Go watch some more movies, get some fresh ideas for your fictitious persona. Oh yes, of course you dont answer questions about being military, because you were never military. Nice defence buddy, if we were all five years old and brain dead that is. Talk about a bogus persona....... However, you don't have to believe me. That is what the internet is all about and it keeps people like you locked in your myths and delusions. Good one on ya, buddy! Quote
M.Dancer Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 A lot of forums have a voting system for people's posts. Posits would get -10 Bullshit. Quite frankly this bullshit artist and liar bores me. Quote RIGHT of SOME, LEFT of OTHERS If it is a choice between them and us, I choose us
AngusThermopyle Posted November 29, 2007 Report Posted November 29, 2007 Talk about a bogus persona.......However, you don't have to believe me. That is what the internet is all about and it keeps people like you locked in your myths and delusions. Good one on ya, buddy! Nice answer, full of absolutely no substance at all, just like everything else you post. Give it up pal, you're busted. Here's a little secret I'll let you in on. After spending extensive time in the military you get to the point where you know, without having to be told, if a person is one of you or not. You decidedly are not. Like I said before, give it up, everyone around here knows you're full of it. Like your comment about recruiting, looks like you lifted that one straight out of a Michael Moore flick. It's obvious you've never been within ten miles of a recruiting office otherwise you'd know thats not how we do it in Canada. The vast majority of our recruits come from the middle class. Thats okay though, you just continue spreading your bull, no one believes you anyway. Quote I yam what I yam - Popeye
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.