... yeh, i've heard that one before: why would you think the minister of finance received the illegal payoffs since the cheques are only made out to the minister of finance? this notion that since the illegal payoffs have been remitted to the minister of finance, that automatically means colin hansen, the minister of finance, can't possibly be the recipient of the unlawful kickbacks is quite comically naive. it's hilarious really. and it's especially naive considering the allegations in the basi/virk breach of trust corruption trial in the supreme court of british columbia that the british columbia liberal party is guilty of laundering the proceeds of illegal drug profits. when i do a google search of "british columbia's minister of finance" it's the minister himself, colin hansen, who comes up. not a government bank account. is colin hansen not the minister of finance? yes he is. i can't interpret the name of the payee of the illegal payoffs literally, as the name is written? get lost. there's no evidence to suggest these laundered payoffs weren't taken by the minister himself. of course the minister of finance received the laundered funds. that's what the letter says ...
... the evidence says it all. the documentation tells us the kickbacks were remitted by pricewaterhousecoopers inc. to the minister of finance by way of a vancouver attorney, a lawyer who does not represent the minister of finance in any legal capacity. the evidence i've posted shows a vancouver, bc attorney who represents neither pricewaterhousecoopers inc. nor the crown accepting in excess of a quarter million dollars from pwc on behalf of the minster of finance pursuant to nothing more than -- A PHONE CALL!!! sure, that sounds like nothing more than basic, lawful, compliant remittance of taxes to the crown and nothing more. gimme a break already ...
... we have to assume that the office of the minister of finance does have administrative bank accounts for day-to-day operations of the office opened in the name "minister of finance" and/or colin hansen, the current minister of finance in british columbia. is there any reason to believe that if someone attempted to deposit a cheque made out to "the minister of finance" into the administrative account of the minister himself, an account the minister and his staff can drawn on, that the cheque wouldn't be accepted by the bank? of course the cheque would be deposited. do you think for one minute a banker would question the office of the minister of finance? the cheque would be accepted as a payment to the minister of finance, either personally or otherwise, with no questions asked ...
... am i not getting through here? we're not children anymore. just take another look at the pwc document i posted. the letter screams fraud, money laundering, breach of trust, theft, conspiracy to defraud and a host of other criminal offenses to anyone with half a brain and it WILL be reported to the police in the near future as proof of an ongoing organized crime problem originating out of the supreme court of british columbia ...
... campbell's government has been busted yet again. the government of bc is lying face down in the gutter with its head blown clear off its shoulders ...
... read more about this government corruption matter here: 9 YEARS OF BOGUS BC SUPREME COURT JUDGMENTS