Jump to content

Easterner

Member
  • Posts

    22
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Easterner

  1. Hey jdobbin, do you think the Liberals are finally getting past their challenges in making headway in Alberta? Gotta maintain that "truly national party" commitment, after all.

    I found your comment about Harper being only elected in his own riding quite interesting. It implies that a party leader is only a factor in his own riding.

    Last election, I rather thought that Dion had proved otherwise.

    Whatever, we may be witnessing just how apathetic or not Canadians really have become! Toppling Harper is really a minor moment in history. Governments have fallen many times before. What makes this situation different is the use of a 'coalition' to avoid allowing the people an immediate and direct say in the result.

    The Opposition apparently believe that the majority of Canadians don't care, will become convinced by the coalition's spectacular good governance over the time before the next election, or share their hate for Harper anyway. They also seem to believe that Canadians in general will not believe that it has anything to do with election financing.

    I find myself wanting to see how this plays out! It will be a direct test of different philosophies of government. Darwinism at it's finest. As I've posted before, since Reform died I haven't had an inspiring choice anyway. I would prefer that the Opposition be royally punished for a move that I consider undemocratic, if not immoral. Still, if the majority of my fellow Canadians are going to be happy with this occurrence then perhaps it would be best to know that for certain and let it dictate future actions.

    Very well said!!!!!!!!!!!

  2. Or rather the 10% of the vote they got, IC. I would say they have just as much legitimacy as any other party, even if I don't like one of their goals.

    Their only goal as stated is to break away from Canada and to look after only Quebec until that is done. Do they run outside of Quebec? In my view to have a say in this issue you have to have Canada's best interest at heart and I don't believe you can honestly say they care.

  3. I fought for this country and have certain beleifs and one of them is the hope that our Government and our Constitution would never be abused like this.

    Thank you very much for your contribution in the military, and I do agree that our electoral system is first past the post, not pick up the scraps. This is a shabby way to do the business of government.

    Thank you.....and it is

  4. They voted for their own MP.

    Our system is set up so that the PM can be decided without an election. If Harper was to die on office and the the Tories would appoint one of their own to be be acting PM and have a leadership convention. They are not compelled to go to an election.

    It is democratic because people choose MPs not PMs.

    Previous post

  5. This assumes that Dion will be asked to be PM. Regardless, a lot of people also "voted" against Harper; hence, the composition of the parliament is the way it presently is.

    Exactly my point. If we look at it purely from that point....people had the opportunity to vote for or against a person they wanted to represent the country as PM. That may be taken away from them and have a unknown PM appointed for them without the vetting process. Is that democratic?

  6. I'd rather not be led by someone who doesn't know where they're going, thanks. Rather, it's you who should be walked through a quick refresher of the present situation and a lesson in Canadian civics: the House of Commons is made up of Members of Parliament who were each recently elected to represent a riding. The person who has the support of the most Members of Parliament is generally asked by the Governor General to form a government. If any person other than Stephen Harper can hold that confidence, they become PM, supported by the majority of the elected representatives in parliament, regardless of what party they belong to. That's called representative democracy, not random wheel-spinning, as you put it.

    The majority of people in Canada voted for the Conserative Party to run the Government....period. Not for the three stooges to sit in a back room and plan the overthrow of the peoples wishes. Now you can say it is allowed for in the Constitution however most people in this country believe that the winner is the ONE Party with the most votes.

  7. OK. I will walk you through this. Who will be the PM? How many votes did their party get? Historically is that their party best or worse showing? Is the PM in Canada not the head of the Government? The PM is still the leader of the country unless you think that when the PM gets an invite to the White House he brings along Duceppe and Layton.

    When people vote in this country they do not vote for 3 parties to govern and then spin the wheel for who is the PM....

    You don't quite have that right, we do not vote for a PM, we vote for our local representative, the PM is the leader of the party with the most representatives, unlike the US for example where the house representatives are elected separately and the President could technically from a different party. If the US had many parties, it could get far messier than Canadian politics.

    If a coalition is formed in Canadian parliment they effectively become one party, choosing their own leader, doesn't make it any prettier though.

    Yes you are quite right however I as well as alot of people voted against Dion as they had Zero confidence in his abilities. In doing this they voted for the person running in any party with the exception of the Liberal Party to ensure Dion was not the PM. This is all I was saying and here now he may just become the PM. I use to vote Liberal until he became the leader and doubt I will ever again with what is going on.

    I fought for this country and have certain beleifs and one of them is the hope that our Government and our Constitution would never be abused like this.

  8. What?? the lowest vote in Canadian history??

    For the record here are the facts on the popular vote for the last election:

    Conservative 37.65%

    Liberal 26.26%

    Bloc Québécois 9.98%

    New Democrats 18.18%

    Green 6.78%

    So the coalition would actually represent 44.44% of the votes cast.

    If the Liberals and New Democrats adopt the same platform I would agree but they are so far apart hence separate party. This is just plain the seizing of power. The GG should reject and send it back to an election and let the democratic process work. I am sure the liberal Party would not exist afterwards.

  9. OK. I will walk you through this. Who will be the PM? How many votes did their party get? Historically is that their party best or worse showing? Is the PM in Canada not the head of the Government? The PM is still the leader of the country unless you think that when the PM gets an invite to the White House he brings along Duceppe and Layton.

    When people vote in this country they do not vote for 3 parties to govern and then spin the wheel for who is the PM....

    ...........oh I forgot to mention the Green Party leader to make cookies

  10. Er, the Liberal, New Democratic, and Bloc Quebecois parties actually won more votes than the Conservative Party alone. The NDP and Liberal MPs were elected in exactly the same manner as the Conservative MPs were, thereby representing Canadians no less legitimately. Perhaps you are just confused about how governments are formed in this country.

    [ed. to add BQ]

    OK. I will walk you through this. Who will be the PM? How many votes did their party get? Historically is that their party best or worse showing? Is the PM in Canada not the head of the Government? The PM is still the leader of the country unless you think that when the PM gets an invite to the White House he brings along Duceppe and Layton.

    When people vote in this country they do not vote for 3 parties to govern and then spin the wheel for who is the PM....

  11. I suggest you read the constitution. I also suggest that you realize that its up to government to keep the confidence of the house, not the other way around.

    The Constitution needs to be updated when it allows a party with the lowest vote in Canadian history to seize the power of Government.....or the people. Bad things could happen to a country when the peoples vote is overturned and control is seized by an unpopular party with the help of a party the wants Canada separated anyway. We do not have to look far in this world to find issues with people and unpopular Governing parties

  12. We have a Separatist a Socialist and a bumbling Idiot threatening to take over the Canadian Government in what I see as a political coup. The Liberals have the lowest vote numbers in Canada and they feel they have the right to now seize power. I understand that they technically can legally do it however why have an Election if the results of what the people want is thrown out. As far as I am concerned this is just one step above one of our Generals seizing power in the name of democracy.

×
×
  • Create New...