Don Cherry

M.Dancer There is an official state religion in Great Briton and the Queen is head of the church of England. Like it or not but Canada was founded by, built by Christians with Cristian values. Up until the 60s when everything started going to hell most Canadians considered themselves and our country very much British and Christian. If they went by Roman values then homosexuality would have been accepted.

http://www.preventivelawyer.org/main/defau...?pid=Edling.htm " The worldview that birthed the English common law tradition based its jurisprudence on universal principles of the moral law, including the Ten Commandments, and natural law, the law as written on men’s hearts by their creator, that, if followed, is consistent with the natural order of the world. Numerous jurisprudential principles still extant in the practice of law today find their origins in biblical principles. A defense attorney may well argue the principle of lex talionis (an eye for eye, a tooth for a tooth) as restitution exceeding the nature of an act. Similarly, punitive damages find their historical root in the Mosaic code of Exodus, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy. Even the burgeoning field of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) has recognizable roots in the wise counsel Moses received from his father-in-law Jethro in Exodus 18:13-26 and in Jesus’ teaching, in the eighteenth chapter of Matthew’s gospel, concerning how the church can help people solve problems between themselves. "

'guyser' said] It is illegal because the gene pool gets very murky. Marry your offspring, who is asking for that? NO one is and to introduce it as the same as gay marriage is fruitless. Reply 30YO son with 50 YO Dad has nothing to do with passing on genetics. Again on what moral ground can you say yes to same sex marriage and not to a father son marriage? Guyser said The bible has nothing to do with this. It is a book, a book for christians, and has many wonderful stories and ten commandments that are pretty good for people to follow. But it is irrelevant in this discussion. Reply The Bible is what this countries legal system was built on and based on. The far left since the 60s seems to want to base our legal system on "whatever floats your boat". Drea asked Kengs (or the new guy Don Cherry), being you're the ones espousing "morals" please answer... If no one is harmed, is an action considered immoral? If no harm occurs during an action is it still immoral? And if so, what makes it immoral? Reply Children are harmed from incest regardless of their age. Children are harmed by multiple partners being married at the same time. Children are harmed from gay marriage because they can go out and adopt children. If you ever become a parent your view of the world will change. BTW I dont even go to church but the way our society is headed down the toilet scares the hell out of me. We were a lot better off when we were a Christian Nation. Now we are just a sad joke. No wonder so many in the world looks at us as infidels. Heck im even disgusted at us. We are a Joke. Haha We used to look down on Commie Pinko you know whats. Haha Now I wonder what they call us? Were worse right now than they ever were. Boy that Bay Booming Generation that had everything given to them sure made a mess out of our country.

I hope it is genetic. Hope they can find the marker to screen for it before birth. Like I said, abortion might not be as bad as I used to think it was.

Think about what im saying. If it is okay for two men to marry one another then why is it not okay for a 30yo son to marry his 50yo dad? Of course its illegal. Homosexuality used to be illegal to. Why is one group any more moral than the other? Why not do the multiple marriage thing. Why cant 6 guys marry each other? Why not marry a horse? Thats what you liberals want isnt it? A big party? On what moral ground can you say one group is better than the other? About shooting an animal. The Bible is clear about giving us dominion over animals. They are not our equal. Well not my equal anyway.

I used to be against abortion. That was until I found out that Rosie ODonald types could and do adopt children as part of their agenda. About teaching kids to be gay. Do a web search on "Amerika the Gay"

You know back a few years when the debate was same sex marriage my arguement was if we allow it then how can we not allow a Father and Son to get married. Why not allow people to marry barnyard animals? How can we say yes to one and no to the other because when we move away from the Bible as a guide then anything goes. There is no moral right or wrong. Just what happens to be popular with the public. What a joke we are in North America.

So they called a gay guy gay and threatened to beat him up. Come on what did this guy expect to happen? What would happen to me if I went to North Preston NS, Lower East Side Vancouver or some other leftest district and held up a big sign saying I thought Preston Manning was the greatest Canadian in history? The trouble with Nova Scotia is that all the ones with sense and gumption have already moved to Alberta and mostly whats left down east are the Looney Left. Anyway as you might have guessed im a homophobe. They scare the hel.l out of me. Its scary stuff what there doing in some public schools. At the very least when you give kids books like Jimmy has two dads well no darn wonder they dont want to read. Then there is gay marriage. People will be marrying barnyard animals next. Then they are going out and adopting children just to prove a point. Plus its these same homo groups like the aclu who are going around from town to town threatening them with lawsuits if they dont take down there Christmas displays. Anyway if you say anything about it your a Nazi which is quite funny when you think about it because its the PC crowd who is always hollering for tolerence but yet they have no tolerence for anyone who doesnt agree with them. Ever read "America the gay"? I would post it but I would probable be arrested for some type of a hate law. Anyway if thats what is going on in certain parts of the States then its only a matter of time before it happens up here.

http://www.kennewick-man.com/kman/series/s...p-3304645c.html The key point in the report - and the one that sparked a 3-year-old lawsuit over whether scientists get to study the bones - is that Kennewick Man's cranium doesn't match those typical of modern American Indians - which is what Chatters said soon after inspecting the bones. Kennewick Man's features likely came from the Ainu, a near-extinct band in Japan that bears Caucasoid characteristics, or from Polynesians, the federal report said. "I never said he was European," said Chatters, who blames much of the controversy following the discovery on what he calls "the absolute mess" the press made of the findings. "I said he had European-like features." http://www.kennewick-man.com/kman/news/sto...p-9333951c.html Hastings believes that although the 9th Circuit Court ruling cleared the way for Kennewick Man to be studied, future actions by federal agencies, Congress or the courts could jeopardize the study of Kennewick Man or other ancient remains that he believes may not be clearly connected to any present-day Indian tribe.

So he wasnt European he was Japanese. Its still the same arguement isnt it? Japanese have different bones that "Natives". Right? What happened to all the Japanese North American Natives of 9000 years ago?

I was told{Rutherford Show-Calgary} kennewick man was important because he pre dates regular North American Natives. In other words "Natives" as we know them were not here first. There was another race of people here first who apparently didnt do so well. Example Kennewick man was speared to death. What happened to all of Kennewick people? Was there some kind of genocide going on? Anyway nothing is proven. But the "Natives" are sure doing everything they can to prevent anything from being studied.

Im no expert on this subject but what about Kennewick Man? If you do a web search you will find lots of info on him. Been a few years since I have read anything about it but to sum it up it the way I remember it. Seems like a lot of native people are scared of allowing any research to be done.