downtoit

I thought this was about the immigrant vote how did we get so sidetracked it does not compute. The vote against the hate crime bill was for fear of limiting free speech and freedom of religion, such is allready limited in Canada, we do not have the first amendment rights. I do not agree with apologizing for policies long ago enacted, I'm sure it was to court the immigrant vote to draw them from the Liberals. All governments do such things to win votes it is not particular to the conservatives.

I thought that too so they will probably just block it and send it back to the HOC but then what happens. Another vote?

Naw, anti-death is inaccurate. Judging by the anti-abortion contingent around here and their positions on other issues, its not so much about perserving life as just waiting until after the kid's exited the vagina before taking a shot at 'em. Maybe abortion is simply not very sporting? No capice! It does not compute ?

abolishing the Senate is second choice for me but if we can't limit terms or reform it I'd go for abolishing it. And the GG office.

I had never heard of this Dominionist thing until reading on here, it is rather humerous. I see it as just another attempt at demonzing Christians and an example of the art of propaganda.

Oh yes, good ole Svend wonder if he'll be taking any more trips to support terrorism. I gear that there is a national day of action against Israel and picketing of Chapters. In this case it is my imperative duty to purchase something from Chapters that day.

Agreed. I've heard of him before he was involved with Dudley Laws.

The referendum could be on the ballot, not a problem similar to the referendum to be conducted in Ontario. I would also bet that the majority of Canadians want limited terms at least. If people choose not to vote then its their problem no one elses.

I have been reading here for a while and notice that they do not answer questions but avoid the issue and try to change the subject. This is typical of the heads in the sand mentality no pun intended -

http://www2.aljazeera.com/news/newsfull.php?newid=9373 I found this, it is an Arabic magazine so should be okay so why would you not want to look, don't want to see the truth? I would bet that ajnet would not report on it at all. What you and others are doing is just twisting reality to pretend that there is no a significant number of radical Islamists around the world who do want to destroy civilization as we know it,and in some cases, have stated their cause. That is, Sharia law and a caliphate Hizb-ut-Tahrir is one group which wants worldwide Sharia law http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=170&printer=Y I believe this group has been banned in Britain, there are others who are like minded.