In terms of presentation what they need to do is find creative ways of using less words, such as a consolodated "terms" bill. Normally at the start of an act definitions are given on what words of special note mean. What they need to do is consolodate all those special terms in various bills into a master encyclopedia.
If the Tories respected parliamentary practice, having each issue as a separate bill would make sense; however, this is a government that has been in contempt of Parliament and still got voted back in, with more seats and a majority, should we believe the votes were actually counted.
Due to the unique nature of this government and its use of Parliament as a rubber stamp and gallery for lobbing nonsensical insults, it is of public interest to limit debate in an omnibus bill and we can sum it up that there are traces of idiocy in the bill before it even hits the press and there will remain traces of idiocy well after the courts dilute it. We cannot presume that the opposition will do all to much even in a minority government to remove that albeit rejection of the bill.
I think the fact these things are dragging on so long is issued as it would be better that the stupid complacent public got the full taste of a Conservative Canada instead of bit by bit as their brains are washed with some form of white. The sad thing is in the Conservatives emulating US style budgets it is undoubted the paper and wasted time and energy on the omnibus budget bill will be far less than those things after the bill has passed.
