Deluge
-
Posts
5,754 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Deluge
-
-
18 hours ago, impartialobserver said:
both sides play the game of supposing one data point describes the whole... one abnormally cold day in February supposedly says that there is global cooling. Its quite silly but internet forum posters are not world renowned for their big picture thinking.
My side is simply saying "stfu and leave the economy alone".
The U.S. really has zero use for leftism. It's a cancer, and it just needs to be cut out.
-
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:
Well, it's a set of ideas, like Marxism, fascism, democracy , postmodernism..
The way these things work is you go after the ideas. You can call the adherent dangerous, say the idea is insidious and evil.
But that doesn't say anything about the idea.
The idea itself is insidious and evil.
I didn't read the article because I don't need to read the article. The heading itself told me everything I need to know: You have a billionaire saying "everyone should". When a scumbag like that has said "everyone should" it means "everyone will" has already been set in motion.
Gates isn't the only global cultist who's in on this, which makes this "idea" that much more dangerous.
-
9 hours ago, Aristides said:
Pretty thoughtful article. Maybe you should read it instead of just quoting the headline.
Here's a much better headline: Bill Gates is shifting entirely to synthetic beef.
See, that way, he is leading by example rather than trying to drag "everyone" into what he thinks his best.
The article serves two purposes:
1. it's a call to action for woketards, like you.
and
2. it's an opportunity for real Americans, like me, to help expose this piece of shit as a wannabe dictator.
-
Oh, nice, another climate freak trying to force everyone into his woke hellhole.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2021/02/14/1018296/bill-gates-climate-change-beef-trees-microsoft/
-
1
-
-
29 minutes ago, robosmith said:
Have you "impartially" STUDIED the laws of atmospheric physics
Nope, because there's nothing "impartial" about anything you moonbats come up with.
You woketards have been screaming for over a 100 years and we're all still here, living our lives, just like people did back then.
Nobody believes you people.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Hodad said:
It's not because they couldn't have gotten a cake elsewhere. It's because they shouldn't have to--so that everyone else shouldn't have to, because that's not always an option.
See, people like you think that ALL businesses should have little, if ANY rights. If one little special interest loses his shit over something, then EVERYONE needs to be put on notice. That might be the stupidest thing that has ever come out of your party.
Yes, they should have to go elsewhere, because business providers also have rights. They reserve the right to refuse service for ANY reason. Don't like it? Then f*ck off.
-
18 minutes ago, robosmith said:
Weather is NOT climate. Duh
Climate Change is NOT real. Duh.
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, impartialobserver said:
1. No, I would not have. Another aspect to modern politics that I thoroughly loathe is the faux victimhood. Yes, the gay couple were met with resistance but they could have easily have went elsewhere. If I was the couple.. I would not let one religious zealot ruin my day. I would have brushed him off like pocket lint, found someone else, and then wrote a negative review. The review would let others of like mind to myself know that he is not welcoming. That is free enterprise at its finest.
2. The usual line is "I should not have to do that". The "that" is choosing an alternative. When I point out that they have a choice.. the indignation and whining is epic. You should not have to choose an alternate route to work but the interstate is closed going westbound so you can either figure out another way or sit in traffic and whine. I find that most people today prefer the latter.
3. as an example, I have two websites (one political like this and one centered around music) that recently went live... I love the fact that I do not allow comments. I have the right to block trolls, hackers, and ignorant types.1. You "loathe faux victimhood" yet you're still butt-hurt enough to broadcast the "zealot's" transgressions because he won't bake a cake for your homosexual wedding? When you say the guy is "not welcoming", you're basically saying he is hostile to queers and will kick their asses out on sight. All he did was refuse one particular request because he disagrees with the homosexual community distorting the proper meaning of marriage. Apparently, he's STILL being harassed by godless a$$holes because he stood his ground on ONE issue.
2. So what the hell are you saying here? That you should not have to do your best to take a piece out of the baker's ass? That he should just step down and be compliant with the homosexual agenda?
3. Yes, you do have the right to now allow comments. But are you really so fragile that you can't sift through the bullshit and find genuine opinions?
-
On 5/2/2024 at 4:02 PM, Michael Hardner said:
I never understood why you had to declare an allegiance when you register for voting in the USA. Seems to favor status quo.
Is that information public?
You're not required to do anything here Mike, except follow some forum rules.
Why do you feel oppressed?
-
It feels like global cooling is imminent.
-
1 hour ago, NakedHunterBiden said:
LAST WARNING
The former president is all out of chances to avoid prison for violating his gag order, the judge said in court Monday morning as he found Trump in contempt one more time.
Judge Gives Trump Final Warning: Jail Is Next
The former president is all out of chances to avoid prison for violating his gag order, the judge said in court Monday morning as he found Trump in contempt one more time.www.thedailybeast.com
“I’ll find you in criminal contempt for the tenth time,” Merchan said in a stark tone. “It appears that the $1,000 fines are not serving as a deterrent. Therefore, going forward, this court will have to consider a jail sanction. Mr. Trump, it’s important to understand the last thing I was to do is put you in jail. You are the former president of the United States, and possibly the next one as well.”
Trump keeps ignoring the judge’s order forbidding him from speaking publicly about witnesses and jurors in a menacing way, something the former president keeps doing anyway on social media. Merchan last week fined Trump $9,000 for nine separate violations of a previous gag order—a step he only took after making repeated warnings.
******************************************
Do you think he will stop or he will end up in jail over this?Keep going, Trump. These cultists know their facade is coming to an end.
-
1
-
-
On 5/3/2024 at 8:20 PM, herbie said:
But but, it's so easy to defend someone who sleeps and farts through his own trial as a hero.
He should've spit on the smug fat ass sitting behind him with the stupid grin on its face.
-
On 5/1/2024 at 11:43 AM, robosmith said:
Trump Threatens to Shut Down Pandemic Preparedness Office Launched by Biden
Of course there were MANY other things Trump didn't do, which CAUSED the virus to spread much faster than it otherwise would have.
Such as pretending it was no worse than the flu while privated admitting to Woodward ON TAPE how it was much worse.
And promoting NUMEROUS super-spreader events like travel "bans" which allowed tens of thousands to fly back to the US without testing, tracking, nor quarantining.
IGNORANT right wingers: ^this is what you SUPPORT.
Good. Pandemics are WAY overrated and there is no way in hell that the US would survive another bullshit shutdown.
Pandemic Preparedness should be 100% Private - free of ANY governmental involvement.
-
Just now, robosmith said:
^Juvenile name calling is all you got. LMAO
Free speech is what I'VE got, and you hate that. lol
Don't be a little b*tch, robowoke, just admit that you want global marxism.
-
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:
^This proves you're "easily traumatized and readily insecure." LMAO
Oh, no. That's ALL left ALL of the time. You pussies can't even handle free speech.
-
Joseph Robinette Stalin, as he should more appropriately be viewed, "is the authoritarian kleptocrat and dictator of the United States".
It's an interesting choice of words: "authoritarian kleptokrat" and "dictator".
So how is Joseph Stalin Biden an autoritarian kleptocrat and dictator?
Well, we have two references: The Great Reset by Glenn Beck, and this:
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/14/business/media/fox-news-biden-dictator-trump.html
Now, who here believes that Joe Stalin Biden is a wannabe dictator? I do, because he's trying to throw his political opponent in jail. It makes sense, doesn't it?
-
24 minutes ago, robosmith said:
What's raionalwiki?
Looks like a safe space for the easily traumatized and readily insecure. lol
-
It's time to take a closer look at the White House occupier, and we'll use Conservapedia as our source.
Keep in mind that Trump isn't the only one who's had people turn on him.
Joseph Robinette “Joe” Biden, Jr., aka Pops, The Big Guy, Robert L. Peters, Robin Ware,[14] J. R. B. Ware[15][16][17] and My Chairman[18][19] (born November 20, 1942) is the authoritarian kleptocrat and dictator of the United States.[20][21] Biden has been described by a close confidant as an "egomaniacal autocrat"[22] and by his own Justice Department as incompetent and unfit.[23]
https://www.conservapedia.com/Joe_Biden
I've never heard anyone refer to Robinette as a "kleptocrat", but when you think about all the shit he and his offspring have gotten into, it certainly makes sense.
Thoughts?
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, robosmith said:
The Trumpification of the Supreme Court
Or they can just punt it until after the election giving Trump impunity instead of immunity. 🤮
You know why this immunity stuff is an issue, right?
Wrong.
It's because deranged psychopaths want Trump's head and they've weaponized the legal system to get him.
See, all you woketards have to do is call off the witch hunt, and this all goes away.
But that's not what you woketards want, is it?
-
1
-
1
-
-
On 5/2/2024 at 3:40 PM, impartialobserver said:
nobody can be truly impartial. You have to care about something. However, I do not belong to either party and register as an independent. So generally when I view a topic.. I have no party line to agree with. I come up with my views on my own.
Well, you come up with your own views from a left-wing slant - your agreeing with the homosexuals and not the baker confirms that.
You recognize the baker's rights, but I'm sure you wish there was some way you could erase those rights, and I'm quite certain you also would've sued his ass if you were in the same situation.
-
Woketard vs Cuban
-
4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
Ok, so then you get the point. No matter my beliefs about the LGBTQ community.. the right of the business to refuse service trumps that. Its a matter of core economics.. if the transaction is not voluntary then the supplier vs. consumer dynamic that you learn in microeconomics falls apart.
I already had that point. I just wanted to see where you stand, politically.
It's all good.
-
2 hours ago, Fluffypants said:
I am worried that my taxes are going to go up along with anyone who pays taxes when he lets the Trump tax cuts expire. I am worried that he will destroy investment in the US through increasing Capital Gains taxes to 45%.
Legit concern. God knows what that fossil is capable of doing, and it's best not to find out.
MAGA '24!!!
-
8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:
In short, I respect the right of the business to refuse service above all. Do you?
Absolutely. It's not even a discussion as far as I'm concerned.
Bill Gates: Rich nations should shift entirely to synthetic beef
in Federal Politics in the United States
Posted
I was going to make that point as well.
Not one of these a$$holes wants to live the standards they set for "everyone" else as they think they are above it - as if they're royalty.
My God, do they really want to live through a full scale revolt?