-
Posts
2,843 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by CrakHoBarbie
-
My responses dont change that humans are animals, halfwit. Are you mentally challenged? Wtf is the matter with you? And? Wtf does that have to do with anything? We are still animals you f_cking halfwitted troglodyte. You're coming very close to monkey time again. Keep posting irrational, dishonest crap... And, you're gunna get the monkey.
-
Because, halfwit, humans are animals. Humans are classified biologically within the kingdom Animalia, phylum Chordata, class Mammalia, order Primates, family Hominidae, genus Homo, and species Sapiens. While we possess unique traits like advanced language and complex reasoning, we share the all same fundamental biological characteristics as other animals. You have a World of information at your fingertips, yet you remain wilfully and obstinately ignorant of the World around you. You're a f_cking embarrassment to mankind. A worthless empty vessel.
-
Youre an id1ot. We're talking about sexual orientation, halfwit. Get your shit together dumbass. You said sexual orientation is a choice. Damn, you and User are some stup1d motherf_ckers. True. We can choose what behavior is appropriate for us. But, we cant choose our sexual orientation, douche nozzle. I see. Being obstinately immature is who you are. Great!! I have a "cymb-alic" response for you that sums you up . Enjoy, Karen. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=video&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwibvafm1suTAxU_JUQIHYy_C-8Qo7QBegQIERAF&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DMFOVtWgKznc&usg=AOvVaw2m-_eGZ46s-vFuTEbwTXLq&opi=89978449
-
You said we have the ability to choose. Which implies that we are all at one time bisexual. Thus, you think we choose our sexual orientation. Its the logical conclusion to your id1otic contention. Sure I did. Its the title of this thread, Einstein. I know yall get confused easily. But, try to stay on topic.
-
For the same reason many humans do, betty. Animals do not use a human, cognitive concept of consent. They mostly rely on courtship rituals to to mate, while others exhibit behaviors resembling sexual coercion to increase reproductive success. So, while coercive mating behaviors exist in the animal kingdom, trying to interpret them through human ethical frameworks is fairly pointless. You and your mentally deficient buddy's here keep attempting to equate murder to sexuality. While I think we all agree that taking another's life without just cause is wrong, I cannot agree that ones sexuality, as decided by nature, should be seen as "wrong". For one, there's no victim. With murder and rape there are clear victims. So the parallels youre attempting to draw, simply do not exist. Your m0ronic statements laid bare, exposed as the id1otic drivel they are.
