cj8

There is very little regulation in this market. Insanity. ? "Wilmott estimates the derivatives market at $1.2 quadrillion, to put that in perspective it is about 20 times the size of the world economy." If it collapse so will everything else in a very short time. https://seekingalpha.com/article/4046338-derivatives-explode-like-bomb

How the injections destroy your immune system. Vanden Bossche explain this in his new paper. https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/predictions-gvb-on-evolution-c-19-pandemic Why are C-19 vaccinated people no longer able to rely on relevant innate immune cells when circulating variants become resistant to the neutralizing capacity of the vaccinal Abs?"Neutralizing anti-S Abs have strong affinity for SC-2 as they are primarily directed at immunodominant epitopes within the S-RBD. Because of their high affinity, these Abs can easily outcompete innate polyreactive IgM Abs that recognize self-like glycans on the surface of CoV. In case there is sufficient match between the immunodominant RBD epitopes and the vaccine-induced Abs, this does not pose a problem to controlling viral infection and spread. In the absence, however, of sufficient virus-neutralizing capacity of vaccine-induced Abs (due to resistance of the virus to potentially neutralizing anti-S Abs), these innate polyreactive IgM Abs can still be outcompeted by non-neutralizing, infection-enhancing anti-NTD Abs that are equally elicited by all S-based C-19 vaccines (see fig. 3).As the enhancing NTD site is relatively conserved (i.e., shared among all different SC-2 variants), the enhancing Abs will be recalled upon re-exposure with new immune escape variants and bind with disproportionally high affinity to S if the neutralizing capacity of the vaccinal Abs towards the circulating variant is low.Unless the functional capacity of the relevant innate immune cells has been sufficiently trained beforevaccination such as to produce relevant polyreactive IgM of higher affinity, the infectious andpathogenic behavior of SC-2 in vaccinees will be largely determined by their vaccine-induced enhancing Abs, especially as those will continuously be boosted by virtue of the dominant circulation of the vaccine-resistant variant."

Look at the studies to. ?

It may have worked well at first. But as the studies show the problem should become obvious over time as the virus mutates. Bossche says abs induced from vaxx outcompete the better protecting abs from infection. Seems like these studies confirm this. Each shot result in less and less antibodies that gives broader protection. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.18.22271936v1

Vanden Bossche links to this blog for explanation and it´s not so difficult to understand what this and the other studies mean. https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r

The study says that if people get infected from a new variant after the shot people still only produce the old variant antibodies. And it looks like more shots makes "immune imprinting" worse. "We find that prior vaccination with Wuhan-Hu-1-like antigens followed by infection with Alpha or Delta variants gives rise to plasma antibody responses with apparent Wuhan-Hu-1-specific imprinting manifesting as relatively decreased responses to the variant virus epitopes, compared with unvaccinated patients infected with those variant viruses. "

That article is debunked. ? By these 50 scientists and probably many others. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422000769

Please people tell your government to start preparing with drugs and treatments. As Vanden Bossche says. Better safe than sorry. How can we look ourselves in the mirror if he is correct and we did nothing? And it looks like he is. The vaccinated are very vulnerable as the virus mutates according to studies. His new interview starts about 1 hour in. https://rumble.com/v13mwqv-episode-266-geert-vanden-bossche-my-final-call.html

Evil people at Moderna knew your immune system gets more damaged by each shot. New study: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/moderna-knew-vaccinated-people-will?s=r From the study:"for any given viral copy number, the odds of anti-N seropositivity were 13.67 times higher for the placebo arm than the vaccine arm (95% CI 5.17, 36.16)"

New interview with Bossche. 64 minutes in. https://rumble.com/v13mwqv-episode-266-geert-vanden-bossche-my-final-call.html

Update from Bosschehttps://voiceforscienceandsolidarity.substack.com/p/why-are-breakthrough-infections-with?s=r"I am herewith reacting to the scientifically simplistic and naïve conclusions drawn in some recent scientific publications:https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.01.486695v1.full.pdfhttps://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.04.29.22274477v1.full.pdfOne has no choice but to react to these papers as their authors reach some dangerous but false conclusions"

Herd immunity. Protect the most vulnerable and the rest continue with life as usual. What they did was the worst possible. Now there are new studies showing that "vaccinated" will not produce antibodies for new variants. Only the old type antibodies are produced. Very bad with a mutating virus obviously. Media forgot to mention this. 3 new studies discussed and linked here: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/aids-like-chronic-covid-is-taking?s=r

Central banks have lost control over their printing experiment. When it all collapses there will be revolution against the establishment. Unless people are sick (or worse) and depend on the government. New studies on the "vaccines" are alarming. This video explains why central banks have lost control. Debt is to high so FED must print. Other central banks to. That makes the Dollar to become more expensive compared to other currencies. But then Dollar denominated debt will be even more expensive. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C008b8iKQ6Q

Robert Malone says many doctors see different health problems after the shots. https://rumble.com/vtd1hn-full-video-covid-19-a-second-opinion-senate-hearing.html

Authors of the study write: "Additional booster doses may be able to compensate for relatively decreased binding to new viral variant antigens, potentially decreasing the public health impact of antibody response imprinting." Not good.

There are some new studies that are worrying. Geert Vanden Bossche has been warning for something like this. I post this here because he says governments must prepare large antiviral campaigns NOW. This study says that the "vaccine" prevent protecting antibodies to be produced for new variants. If you have an infection from a new variant after the shot you still only produce the old variant antibodies. "Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies, but prior mRNA vaccination imprints serological responses toward Wuhan-Hu-1 rather than variant antigens. " https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422000769

Here is the study. Suppose we will see many more soon. "Viral variant infection elicits variant-specific antibodies, but prior mRNA vaccination imprints serological responses toward Wuhan-Hu-1 rather than variant antigens." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867422000769

There are new studies out that seems to show the vaxx cause damage to immunity. And something what is called immune imprinting. Vanden Bossche has been warning for this. He´s now saying nations with many vaccinated must prepare with large antiviral campaigns. That if you take the vaxx and then later have an infection with a new variant the body still only create the antibodies that protect against the first variant. Those studies should of course had been done before they injected billions of people. Insanity. Data also seems to show it´s now vaccinated that more often get infected.