Jump to content

Jeshan

Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jeshan

  1. On 9/19/2021 at 6:33 PM, OftenWrong said:

    Maybe we just misunderstood Jesus, and what he died for. Some say he died for our sins. I get that it’s symbolic, if you need a place to forgive and give up your guilt, there is a way. 

    Its like, when Stan was paying the bill on everyone’s credit card. Stan had the mastercard with no limit. No... limit.  An he paid for everyone else’s debts. He knew it was his end, but that didnt matter anymore. For what was his message then, other than, screw the banks?

    No, I dont refer to the religious aspect of the resurrection. I mean in terms like, if Jesus came back from the dead, as indeed did Lazarus, how was it done? If we view the human body as a complex energy symposium, then resurrection means the ability for energy forms to go on co existing as a system repeatedly without being subject to decay. Yet decay is a proven fact, irreversible. Does ressurection mean then an exalted form of growth? Wherin the growth of new cells overtakes the rate of decay? Or does life in a human body mean something deeper?

  2. On 9/22/2021 at 10:43 PM, WestCanMan said:

    A good idea would be to have enough housing for all of the legal and illegal immigrants coming into the country, regardless of where they're coming from, but it makes no difference either way to Pelosi, Schumer, AOC, Biden and Harris because they'll always be able to afford multiple luxury homes no  matter what. Pelosi's husband is a really shrewd investor ? 

    A bad idea is to allow people into the country faster than you can create infrastructure and housing for them all. It makes a huge difference to the poor people who the Dems pretend to care about. 

    There's no one complaining about vacancy rates - homelessness is rampant. 

    Harris's plan to favour immigrants of her own stripe is just a racist idea, plain and simple. There are people in 200 countries who'd love to go to America. Why should she favour people from the birthplace of one of her own parents if not from racism? 

    She is in fact planning to bring in indian immigrants, and I don't think that's racist. She's the first Indian american VP, and its more like a sense of pride in her indian roots, like love for family and friends that prompts that decision IMO. Why is it racist? Racism is a negative word that means against race, wheras kamala's decision is all about FOR race. 

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...