AntiConservative
-
Posts
33 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by AntiConservative
-
-
I think what it comes down to is, people see Meghan as an imposter. I just don't see Meghan as a trashy girl from the hood. Unlike some of the snobs in the Royal family, Meghan seems organic. They could of used her to help connect with the global community, and instead blew it, by allowing the press to throw her under bus. With Meghan's acting experience, they should of had her traveling the world. She could have made powerful speechs, and that would have improved public relations for the Monarchy.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said:
History repeats itself...this is what happens when the royals insist on banging independently minded American women.
It's very snobby for us to be commenting on who other people fall in love with. At the end of the day, it's no one's business who wealthy people choose to love. Have you ever dated someone, and had a bunch of your friends put your relationship under a microscope? Then you know what it feels like for Harry to constantly be defending Meghan against the world. Maybe we should all just wish the best for them, and leave them alone.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, dialamah said:
So?
Let's say there is a town with 1000 people; 950 of those people call themselves Christian and 50 of them call themselves Muslim. 90% of the population believes that women should be subservient to their husbands. Does that make it a 'Christian-only' practice? Should only Christians be complimented (or criticized, depending on your POV) for this practice? Should the Muslims in the town be ignored for believing and practicing the same be ignored?
If 74% of Christian Copts in Egypt think FGM is a requirement, that's 74% of 10 million people - 740,000. Half of which (more or less) will likely be women - ~370,000. Do we just pretend those 370,000 women/girls aren't at risk because they're "Christian"? Or do we realize that FGM isn't limited by religion and eliminate the practice for both Christians and Muslims, especially for those who come to Canada?
And ask yourself, why is it so important to you to make FGM a "Muslim-only" problem?
Like I said, what I don't understand is why the men of these countries would want woman to have their clitoreses removed. It sounds like a great way to have their wives lose interests in sex, so they're end up with blue balls.
-
13 minutes ago, dialamah said:
I still find female circumcision to be worse.
Yeah, but that's like saying a broken arm is going to hurt more than a broken finger. If both are painful, than both should be outlawed. We need to wake up to our hyprocrisy. If we're appauled by those who take away girls ability to feel sexual pleasure, than maybe it's time to re-think what we've been taught to believe about circumcision.
-
1 minute ago, dialamah said:
None of this is intended to excuse Muslims because "Christians do it to"; FGM is a horrific practice, no matter who does it. But if we are to help these girls and women, we need to understand who may be affected; focusing on the problem is belonging to Muslims means we will miss the risk in other populations.
So if we're so appauled by female genital mutulation, why do we continue to be so tolerant of circumsion in Canada?
-
14 minutes ago, Argus said:
That is silly. It's a silly argument. You can't compare how much pleasure people have with or without unless you can measure the same individual before and after. But in any event, it most certainly does not eliminate pleasure for the male. While the whole purpose of FGM is to eliminate pleasure for females. And it does so.
Look at the origins of circumcision. Religious parents were worried that if their boys started masturbating, they would be spiritually condemed. So they started removing the foreskin, thinking it would reduce the likelyhood of them masturbating. Circumsion was invented to reduce sexual sentation.
The overall reduction in pleasure between loosing the foreskin, and losing the clitoris, is less severe, but the principle is the same. When you amputate nerve endings, it reduces sexual sensitivity. That's why non-consensual circumcision should be made illegal.
There is no basis for allowing for non-consensual circumcision to go on in Canada, other than maintaining a statue-quo that appeases our religious establisments. In Canada like any other Western Nation, Church and State are suppose to be seperate.
-
2 minutes ago, Argus said:
You said you were from Syria. Now you're from Libya. And apparently a supporter of the Gadaffi government?
The tried destablizing a lot of countries at once. Look into the weapons smuggling out of Libya into Syria, and the Benghazi connection.
-
12 minutes ago, blackbird said:
Ask your doctor or google it on the internet. It is not mutilation.
We only accept circumsision, because we're use to it in our culture. When you look at it scientifically, there is no legitament reason to remove the foreskin. The foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis. When you remove it, sexual pleasure goes down.
I think it should be illegal, until the child can make an informed choice.
-
2 minutes ago, Argus said:
Why? Do you think Muslims instantly change their cultural views the moment they set foot in Canada? 95% of Egyptian women have had this procedure and they're one of the more moderate Arab states.
Well the men who want their women to undergo female genital mutulation are idiots. What good is having a less horny wife around? Imagine hearing, i'm sorry but i'm not in the mood all the time. If a guy wants to enjoy sex, it's more fun, when the girl smiles back at you. It's not fun when your girlfriend looks back at you with an uncomforable stare.
-
2 minutes ago, blackbird said:
Well, we won't go into that here. It's a bit off in more ways than one.
It shows the hypocrisy. Circumsision is technically male genital mutilation. The only reason why our ancestors did, it was to prevent children from masturbating, because they thought it would bring them bad luck.
-
1 minute ago, blackbird said:
Circumcision is not male genital mutilation by any stretch of the imagination. It simply removes the foreskin which does not effect the amount of pleasure. You have been told lies by those who try to defend female genital mutilation, which is really harmful.
As a guy who's uncut, I can tell you from first hand experience that your wrong. Having the foreskin caressed is a lot more pleasurable than having a girl grip the middle of your shaft.
-
9 minutes ago, blackbird said:
No, you are way off base. FGM is practiced on millions of Muslim girls in Muslim countries. Why try to twist the truth and say is is practiced by Christians There are no Christians in the west who practice FGM. Now it is possible it is practiced on some Christians in Muslim countries as a cultural thing, but it is certainly not a Christian teaching, but it is mainly a Muslim thing to try to control girls and women. It could be partly cultural but it is still mainly in Islamic countries.
Canada fully supports Male Genital Mutilation. Don't you see the hypocrisy here? Studies show that went you amputate the foreskin, males lose a significant amount of pleasure. It's almost like removing the clitoris. We're so brainwashed, we're told that uncut guys look growse. I think all genetical mutulation should be made illegal. If a guy over 18 wants his foreskin removed, let him have it removed. It should be a choice made by the individuals, and not the parents at birth.
You're saying Muslims are barbaric for removing girls clitorises, yet the Canadian government allows for boys to have a part of their penises removed at at birth.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, blackbird said:
I sure glad she lost the election in 2016. But that video just has a few words pulled out of larger conversations and so it doesn't really tell much. But I don't support her anyway.
It was an election between the worlds greatest narcasist, and a war criminal. Pick Your Poison. This is why I sometimes vote independant.
-
11 minutes ago, blackbird said:
I have no knowledge of all that, so can't really comment. I don't know if that is really true. There is also a lot false information around and you have to be careful. I am not a fan of Obama and Hillary Clinton. They are globalist elite.
Here's Hillary Clinton celebrating her own war crimes. Did it have anything to do with your visit? "I'm sure it did."
-
11 minutes ago, blackbird said:
OK, well to be honest I don't know anything about the civil war in Syria. Don't know what Hillary Clinton had to do with the Arab Spring. Not sure what all that accomplished. I never heard of the west promoting the war in Syria. Wasn't there a number of groups involved there. They seem to have a lot of wars in the middle east. But that is a whole different subject. Back to immigration. I don't agree with allowing a lot of immigration from countries that don't share our culture or beliefs. We are a country built on Judeo-Christian civilization. If you came here, I hope you will support that. The Bible supports respect for the rights in the individual. We have human rights and democracy which most countries in other parts of world don't have if you follow my thinking.
Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton though it was a good idea to fund militia groups who were protesting their governments policies. When the government tried to clamp down, they made it seem like the government was persecuting innocent protestors. This gave them justification for the Air Strikes in Lybia, which led to their Civil War. Once Gaddafi was killed, they switched over to helping destabilize Syria. Hillary Clinton helped pit one group of protestors against another, which escolated into an all-out civil war. If it wasn't for western interference, our civil war would have never happened.
-
3 minutes ago, blackbird said:
Good question. I think al Qaida is an international organization, not supported by the Saudi Arabia government. They were training in Afghanistan I believe and led by bin Laden. So there wasn't much the Saudi government could have done to stop them.
Well some of the most screwed up Muslims come from Saudi Arabia. I hate how the west coddles them, yet promoted the civil war in Syria, and demoralizes the people of Iran. If it wasn't for Hillary Clinton and her Arab Spring, we would have never had our civil war.
-
2 minutes ago, blackbird said:
I don't know what wars Conservatives have "promoted". That sounds like fiction. The Conservatives did support the war on terrorism in the world because it was necessary to stop violent extremists which kill a lot of innocent people as in 9-11. Do you think Canada should have gone to Afghanistan to fight against the terrorists?
Most of the Hijackers were born in Saudi Arabia. Why wasn't Saudi Arabia held accountable for harboring extremist?
-
32 minutes ago, blackbird said:
Well, that's fine. I don't believe in being racist myself. You make much out of the subject of skin colour. I don't think skin colour means anything. But what people believe does mean something in today's world. But just curious why you call yourself "AntiConservative". Conservatives have many good reasons for opposing the Liberals and NDP, if that is who you support. Conservatives support free enterprise and oppose Socialism. If you have a construction company, the Conservative Party would be your strongest supporter. They strongly support small business and free enterprise. Liberals and NDP, no so much. The NDP and Liberals are more into virtue signaling about how much they support diversity and minorities, but a lot of it is just vote-getting propaganda. NDP and Liberals falsely accuse Conservatives of being racist. I have been a Conservative many years, but don't agree with everything they support these days. I am not sure I will be able to give them much support in the immediate future as they support abortion and O'Toole sounds more like a liberal. As a King James Version Bible believer myself, we probably agree on a few things. We believe there is one God who created the universe. A lot of people don't even believe that much. I find the NDP and Liberals totally opposed to Biblical truth. Only Jesus can save a person and give eternal life through believing in him.
Why I don't like the conservatives
They don't have enough support for unions or workplace safety
They don't support progressive wages
The new conservatives are becoming more interested in identity politics, than government efficiency. They rather scapegoat immigrants, than do what conservatives use to do best.
They promote xenophobia, instead of acknowledging the good things about diversity.
They're stuck in the past.
They don't take environmental protection seriously.
They do the bare minimum for Indigenous Canadians. When there is a problem with their drinking water. It seems like the NDP, are the only ones taking it seriously.
They have seriously cut funding for Autism, and people with disabilities.
They have promoted wars in the past. Just look at Harpers trigger-happy desire to join the Iraq war. How many Canadians would have died, and how greater would our deficit be, if we had joined that war?
-
8 minutes ago, bcsapper said:
How many of them have sent their daughters abroad to be married to a man they have never met, or have their genitals mutilated?
I don't know either.
You make it sound like a large percentage of Muslims in Canada, want to have their daughters clitorises be removed. Maybe you should conduct some research. Go to the local Mosque, and ask some of the members, if they want to see a member of their family undergo Female-Genital-Mutilation. The gap between your misconceptions and realty, is astonishing.
-
4 hours ago, blackbird said:
Did you know that in Islamic countries, it is the religious minorities that are the ones who are persecuted? In fact, large numbers of Christians are being killed in different countries around the world constantly. They are the real refugees, not the majority religions. Canada was founded and built as a Christian nation.
I havn't persecuted any Christians. My parents are Muslim. I go to the Mosque a few times a year. It's time to judge people on their actions, instead of their religious background. As far as racism is concerned, it's a double-edge sword. Treat people the way you want to be treated. How would you like to visit our countries, and see creepy locals calling you "Whitey". You wouldn't feel comfortable. No one wants to be singled our because of the colour of their skin, or religious background. I don't preach any of that nonsense. I own a construction company. Three of my employees are Irish-Canadians. My father tought me everything I needed to know about construction back in Syria. Now I support seven employees. Five of them were born in Canada. I think i'm helping your economy.
-
4 hours ago, Argus said:
And I'd dump the brainless leftoids who hate their country and see our immigration system as yet another opportunity to virtue signal about how noble they are.
Defending people against persecution isn't hating their country. They're actually defending the values that make Canada so great. You're worried about seeing people who have a different skin colour in shopping malls. Well I got news for you. Their DNA is almost exactly like yours. They just happen to have a different skin colour, like dogs have different types of fur. No one is making a big deal over black or white dogs. To most people their just Dogs! So why can't humans treat themselves the same way? I judge people by their character. I know very nice white people, and I know very nice brown people. I know very scary white people, and I know very scary brown people. I've met good people who go to church, and i've met cult-like Christians. I've met good people who go to the Mosque's, and i've met idiots who preach Sharia law. It's time to judge people on the content of their character, instead of the colour of their skin, or their religious background.
Don't act like brown people are invading Canada. I've been to Cusco, Ecuador. The colonial district is full of white people. If you visit certain parts of Central America, there're large clustors of white people buying up property. We live in a differnt world now, and people should be able to enjoy moving to different countries. Treat people how you want to be treated. If you go on vaccation to South America, do you want everyone calling you Gringo, or do you want strangers happy to spark up a conversation with you?
I moved to Canada from Syria. You people keep calling it a shithole. Does this look like a shithole to you?
-
1
-
-
34 minutes ago, Argus said:
You need to learn that there is a distinction between a group being disapproved of due to their behaviour or because of their race. For example, I would rather bring over ten thousand Lebanese Christians than two thousand Lebanese Muslims. Same goes for Iraqis and Egyptians.
How about judging people on their actions, instead of their religious background? Many Muslims in Canada live peaceful and productive lives. We own businesses and employ other Canadians.
-
2
-
-
15 minutes ago, Army Guy said:
No where in my post did i say i was not getting a shot, you should re read my post, and stop going off half cocked .. you assumed i did .... the topic was about you forcing people to take the vaccine.... by taking the rights of others away to make a lawful decision.. But liberals are good at taking away rights. So long as it fits in with the left wing agenda.
I don't support the Liberals. Justin Trudeau is part of the problem. Canada is seriously lagging behind other countries for vaccinations. They should have built a vaccine manufacturing facility, at the start of the pandemic. Then we would have domestic supply.
If we don't have manditory vaccinations, there's a serious risk of re-emergence next winter. I personaly not worried about getting sick from the virus. I have an amazing immune system. I'm only getting the vaccine, because I consider it my patriotic duty to help end this pandemic.
Some people don't want to get the vaccine for religious reasons. Well screw them. Unless you're pregnant, or have a legitate medical reason for not taking it, it should be manditory.
-
2 hours ago, Army Guy said:
You sound like a typical entitled liberal, always whining about everything, but to lazy to change any thing that you find is a problem......... the liberals can not be responsible for this shit show, it's harpers fault....
As soon as my age group is allowed to get the vacine, i'm getting it. So I'm the one who's entitled? So it's good for everyone else to get it, but just not you. Just as long as enough suckers get vaccinated, you don't have to feel guilty about passing on the responsibilty to someone else? You have the same sense of entitlement as a freeloader, who thinks they don't have to do anything, just as long as the majority fills that gap.
If everyone thought like you, this pandemic would go on for years. At least we'll know who's to blame.
So you believe that the vaccines are designed to hurt us? Do you even know how these rumors start. Have you heard of the "Broken Telephone" game? Stop believing the fake news, that's being propagated by website owners who are desperate for traffic.
NDP leader Jagmeet Singh says the Constitutional Monarchy does not benefit Canadians
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted · Edited by AntiConservative
Don't tell me that you're one of those conspiracy nuts.