Lobbies in America represent groups, whether they be special interest groups, or corporations. These lobbies get to meet with our Representatives, in offices that the citizens these Representatives are supposed to be working for, have paid for. Isn't the term representative form of government self explanatory? The instant that our elected representatives meet with anyone other than one who is represented by them... A conflict of interest exists. Their presumed intent at that moment is not to represent the people, is it? There need to be strict rules, with the force of law, regarding who is allowed to discuss U. S. intended legislation, upcoming legisllation and non citizens being represented in order to present that groups point of view.
For instance, if a lobby or group representing a corporation, or other business entity, has donated campaign funds to a candidate, at no point in time, during their term, should they be allowed to vote upon any legislation that the group, entity or corporation presents for consideration. The obvious problem there is, once again, conflict of interest. In effect, the appearance of votes being for sale would be effectively removed.
Any thoughts on this topic? Suggestions on how to better separate the influence peddling/bribery which runs rampant upon capitol hill?
I do not present any reference due to this being purely my opinion on the subject.