Jump to content

crobbins26

Member
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

crobbins26's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Judging by the U. S. Govt and the way it uses it's military, I assumed that prostitution is already legal. Oh, are you meaning the actual oldest profession angle? Same answer.
  2. Lobbies in America represent groups, whether they be special interest groups, or corporations. These lobbies get to meet with our Representatives, in offices that the citizens these Representatives are supposed to be working for, have paid for. Isn't the term representative form of government self explanatory? The instant that our elected representatives meet with anyone other than one who is represented by them... A conflict of interest exists. Their presumed intent at that moment is not to represent the people, is it? There need to be strict rules, with the force of law, regarding who is allowed to discuss U. S. intended legislation, upcoming legisllation and non citizens being represented in order to present that groups point of view. For instance, if a lobby or group representing a corporation, or other business entity, has donated campaign funds to a candidate, at no point in time, during their term, should they be allowed to vote upon any legislation that the group, entity or corporation presents for consideration. The obvious problem there is, once again, conflict of interest. In effect, the appearance of votes being for sale would be effectively removed. Any thoughts on this topic? Suggestions on how to better separate the influence peddling/bribery which runs rampant upon capitol hill? I do not present any reference due to this being purely my opinion on the subject.
  3. Hi, this is my first post. Let me know if there is anything I could do to improve my communication skills. This debate, if you can actually call it a debate, left much to be desired, in my opinion. The moderator acted as more of a debate member of Biden's than a moderator. The two debating should have been allowed to debate with no obvious bias displayed by the moderator. He seemed intent upon inflaming the subject matter he introduced. He then argued with Trump and demanded answers. No moderator in history has been so obviously in favor of one candidate over the other. Politics in the United States has become a very soap opera type of affair.
×
×
  • Create New...