Dissenter

You mean like a "final solution"? Communism killed more people than WWI and WWII combined and it was based on a fanatical devotion to egalitarianism. Its influence can STILL be found throughout the media, education system and government. Political Correctness is Communist in origin. The people that preach tolerance are the least likely to exhibit any. So now I'm using another name on another forum, too? LOL I've never heard of the name Lictor until mentioned here, and I have never said anything about nuking Israel. But while on the subject of WMD, let's not forget that the US invaded Iraq for WMD, which did not exist, but DOES exist IN Israel.

I believe that white people have as much right to exist as blacks or Asians. Anti-whites call this supremacy. There are more than fifty predominantly black countries in the world. Black people have the second largest continent in the world that's rich in resources - Africa. Africa has weather that allows for farming year around. They also have nations that they are not indigenous to, but nobody demands that they be more diverse because of that, or go back to Africa. Jamaicans are proud of the black ethnic identity of their nation, but nobody calls this racist. Yet black people rather live as minorities in predominantly white countries, where the weather drops well below zero, and we are a minority. Jews insist that Israel be recognized as a "Jewish state." If you were consistent, you'd call this Jewish supremacy, for which you'd be called an anti-semite.

No evidence to support the assertion that I am someone I am not either.

So you're saying that it's anti-semitic to use mainstream sources and quotes from Jews? In YOUR OPINION it's anti-semitic rhetoric. That's just a smear word that's used against anyone that says something critical about Jews.

It's called white flight dumbass. White people are more than willing to do the moving, but immigration and integration is forced on every predominantly white country and community and ONLY predominantly white countries and communities. Marin county California is under pressure to increase its non-white population because it's too white. Detroit is more than 80% black, but nobody DEMANDS that Detroit be more diverse.

Throughout history people have fought and killed for a variety of reasons - land being one of them - took slaves, etc. This is not unique to white people, but since 1948, international law has stated that conditions calculated to bring about the physical destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group is genocide. There is no justification for genocide.

Immigrants cost $23B a year http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/05/17/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report/ But apparently this is somehow going to pay for the retirement of the baby boomer generation so they're willing to sell out future generations.... The goal of any decent parent is to provide a better life for the children. If immigration continues on the current trend, white people will be a minority in the US by 2042 and in Canada around the same time. This means that young white children today will become minorities by the time they're in their mid 30s. I think the people that support this have an obligation to explain how it will make their lives better, and if they cannot, they ought to be ashamed of themselves. Of course, when white people defend their own interests, there's always an anti-white around to call it white supremacy. So, let's look at what these words mean. The definition of "white supremacy," according to Webster's dictionary, is: "the belief that the white race is superior and thus should have control over people of other races." By this definition, the argument FOR diversity ONLY in predominantly white countries is based on white supremacy. The argument for it is so that these people can have better lives. In other words, it's based on the belief that they cannot develop comparable living standards on their own. The same anti-whites like to argue that everyone should blend together, ONLY in predominantly white countries of course, to eliminate race and thus problems with "racism." This runs in complete contradiction with what they SAY they are for, which is diversity. Genocide is the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group. The objective is to eliminate or reduce the population of a specific group of people. It is often associated with killing, but killing is a means not the objective. What anti-whites are for is a white minority in nations where white people are the majority. In reality, what they're for is genocide.

Depends on whether or not your religion is political correctness.

Up until the 1960s, 90% of the US population was of European descent. In Canada, the percentage was even higher.

What you point out is not unique to white people. Slavery has been around for thousands of years, it's been universal, and still exists in parts of Africa a couple hundred years after Britain abolished it. The Turks were not invited to the Gates of Vienna, yet nobody is saying that because you did that, we're going to create a blended humanity ONLY in Turkey and turn Turks into a minority. On the contrary, the Turks are still trying to flood into Europe - just through immigration this time.

In YOUR OPINION it's white supremacy. That's just a smear tactic. The definition of "white supremacy," according to Webster's Dictionary, is the belief that the white race is superior and should have control over people of other races. Wanting white people to be able to have control over their OWN future in predominantly white countries is not white supremacy. On the other hand, we are told that all of these people are flooding into predominantly white countries so that they can have better lives. In other words, it's based on the belief that they cannot develop comparable living standards on their own. That, if you think about it, IS white supremacy.

Typical anti-white response: 1) Race is just a social construct - white people don't exist. 2) Everything bad that has happened throughout history has been the fault of white people... who don't exist. 3) Justify genocide. 4) Wish for genocide. 5) White people who object should not be allowed to speak because they're evil people!

In your opinion it's racist. Anti-racist is just code for anti-white.

So focusing on 90% of the population, up until the 1960s, is narrow?

As I have said before, it is double-standards that I do not like. I have pointed out the fact that Jews have played a prominent role in what I think has been, and continues to be, harmful to white Christians, and others for that matter, but I have supported that argument with mainstream sources and quotes from Jews themselves. I would certainly not compare them to donkeys the way that an influential rabbi did with gentiles: http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=191782 Nor would I suggest that ALL Jews are the same, but Jews have played a prominent role in policies that are harmful. Why is it OK to criticize Christians and Muslims all day long for everything that they have done, but one must not criticize Jews?

In order to be an immigrant, a host nation has to exist. Thus the founding people were not immigrants. Up until the 1960s, when the American government caved to Jewish pressure to open the flood gates of immigration from around the world, America was 90% white, or, if the word "white" offends you, of European descent. Moreover, every founding father was white, or, again, of European descent. In the preamble of the U.S. Constitution, it states, "...secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." This is what America was built on NOT the 1960s counter-culture movement or Jewish influence. Now, I ask you, WHO do you suppose they were talking about when they used the words, "ourselves and our posterity," anchor babies? America and its culture were created by people of European descent.

Is that what mommy professor taught you? Diversity is forced on predominantly white countries and ONLY predominantly white countries. Our society is based on forcing white people to accept this, and suppressing dissent by smearing people who object to it and you know it.

It's not hyperbole at all. The US is projected to have a white minority by 2042, Canada around the same time and the UK by 2066. Our culture is predominantly European. If the Chinese founded Canada and the US, do you think they'd be the same countries?

You don't get it. Nobody is saying that it's just skin colour so we're going to turn black people into minorities in predominantly black countries. Nobody is saying that it's just skin colour so we're going to turn Asian people into minorities in Asian countries. Try this for constructive: "In 1912, a fledgling organization, the American Jewish Committee, wrote the president of the United States challenging the country's restrictive immigration system. From the 1880s to the early 1920s, Jews were in the forefront in opposing efforts to curtail immigration and institute a national origin quota system. Jewish opposition continued until immigration quotas were eliminated in 1965." http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?sid=1&id=253954 1965 Bill: "Our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the purposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same. Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset. Contrary to the charges in some quarters, S500 will not inundate America with immigrants from any other country or area, or the most populated and economically deprived nations of Asia and Africa. Only haters would make such assertions." -- Senator Edward Kennedy "Today, largely because of immigration, there is no majority race in Hawaii or Houston or New York City. Within five years, there will be no majority race in our largest state, California. In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time ..." -- President Bill Clinton (1998) http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2009/01/the-end-of-white-america/7208/ But legal immigration isn't enough: "The organization [American Jewish Committee] supports a pathway for citizenship for many of the estimated 11 to 12 million individuals who are in this country [The United States] illegally and would like to see a moratorium on deportations, which is not included in Obama's bill." http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?sid=1&id=253954 "Nearly 90 Jewish Organizations and Individuals Condemn Arizona Immigration Law: Sign-on letter forwarded to congressional leaders today" http://www.hias.org/en/post/press-releases/90-jewish-organizations-individuals-condemn-a Meanwhile: "...victims of torture, rape, war and genocide are to be imprisoned indefinitely, without the supervision of a judicial authority and against the international treaty on the protection of refugees...." "But interior minister Eli Yishai warned that if action was not taken, THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF IMMIGRANTS WOULD EVENTUALLY REACH A MILLION AND THREATEN ISRAEL'S JEWISH MAJORITY." http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/world/2010/1129/1224284370678.html In Canada: Think Trudeau came up with multiculturalism? Think again: "It [Canadian Jewish Congress] originated the concept of multiculturalism...." Source: Vancouver Sun: Canadian Jewish Congress fights for its survival In Europe: "Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural... which is a transformation that MUST take place. Jews will be resented because of our leading role." -- Barbara Lerner Spectre (Israeli activist) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9DBmP86vAM So you see, it's one standard that leads to a white Christian minority in predominantly white Christian countries, and another to preserve a Jewish majority in Israel. If you want to call that constructive.... Try this: "The sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews, according to Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the head of Shas’s Council of Torah Sages and a senior Sephardi adjudicator." http://www.jpost.com/JewishWorld/JewishNews/Article.aspx?id=191782 It's double-standards that I hate, and there's nothing constructive about a double-standard. Here's another double-standard: America invades Iraq supposedly over WMD, which didn't exist, yet supports Israel as it sits on nuclear weapons. Israel can violate international law, but should there be any UN resolution that's critical of Israel, America will veto it even if ALL other Security Council members support it. Is this a constructive influence on American politics?

Genocide is: the deliberate destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious or national group. It is often associated with killing, but that's a means not the objective. The objective is to eliminate or reduce the population of a specific group of people. All of this mass immigration and forced integration is for predominantly white countries and ONLY predominantly white countries. It is projected that the US will have a white minority around 2042, Canada around the same time, and the UK by 2066. It is demanded that Marin County California increase the non-white population because it's too white, but according to the U.S. Census Bureau, Detroit is 81.6% black, yet it's not demanded that Detroit become more diverse. Detroit is already diverse because diversity is just code for white population reduction. They can call it whatever they like, but I call it what it is: genocide.

Asian countries for Asians. Black countries for blacks. Israel for Jews or you're an anti-Semite! White countries for everyone or you're a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews! Nobody is flooding Asian countries with immigration and saying: Gee, it's 2011... no group should dominate the other. Nobody is flooding predominantly black countries with immigration and saying: Gee, it's 2011... no group should dominate the other. This forced diversity is ONLY for predominantly white countries with the end result being admittedly white minorities. It's genocide. In YOUR OPINION it is anti-Semitism. That's just a smear word that's used against anyone that says something critical about Jews - as if they can do no wrong. Arabs are Semites, which means that people who complain about the way the Palestinians are treated are actually PRO-Semite NOT anti-Semite. Not that accuracy matters because, as I've already said, it's just a smear word.