CITIZEN_2015
-
Posts
4,515 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
13
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CITIZEN_2015
-
-
31 minutes ago, suds said:
When it comes to rights the Supreme Court has to consider the rights of everyone, not just the majority. When rights conflict they usually tend to side with minority or marginalized groups which is not a bad thing in my opinion. Societies are judged by how their minorities and marginalized groups are treated.
Minorities are treated much better in Canada than many other advanced or industrial countries. The Supreme Court must protect the right of everyone not just the minorities. Women are treated relatively well in Canada though there is room for improvements.
I apologize for my earlier outburst. I didn't know you were quoting someone (if you were, still not sure). I thought it was your own comment. I am very sensitive to women's rights and issues I may have overreacted.
-
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
He literally represents the supreme court of canada.
What is the matter with you? It is a She not he in the picture!!!
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
You are a misogynist bigot
Same insults to you. This board allows every stupid idi*t like you to comment and get away with it.
-
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:
Well the supreme court of Canada disagrees with you, bigot.
That stupid justice does not represent the entire Supreme Court of Canada. And be civilized. Do not insult poster, just debate like a civilized person.
-
1 minute ago, Goddess said:
I agree.
I feel like my gender is being erased and distilled down to a body part.
I felt ashamed reading the comment. Not in my Canada.
-
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:
The only sexist here is you.
If being a feminist demanding equal rights and freedom for women is sexist then I am a sexist and proud of it too.
-
5 minutes ago, Goddess said:
No one is "promoting" it.
If you click the link CdnFox posted above - most people think it's ridiculous and were making fun of it.
Sorry you missed it in the news. Suds' comment is funnier when you know the background.
We must NOT address women or anyone else in that context. One stupid comment was made by one stupid person who was wrongfully placed in a position of power. Repeating it especially without a reference to fiercely criticize it was wrong.
-
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:
That is literally the recogized correct term. What a sexist pig you are.
And if you're going to downvote me for using court -approved language as per the article i posted proving it then two can play at that game.
You are a male chauvinist pig. You are promoting that stupid comment. And you are so childish. You started downgrading my comments soon AFTER I downgraded one of your posts. So childish and stupid.
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Especially to people with vaginas.
You are as bad if not worse for promoting a bad comment. SHAME ON YOU TOO.
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, suds said:
Well obviously then, you have something against trans people. I do not. Although the sports thing with biological men competing against biological women really isn't fair.
I do not have anything against the people of Iran but the hated imposed terrorist Islamic system in that country. We must defend women's struggle in Iran and all over the world not to fuel hate against them or demean them with unwarranted comments,
Victory to women in Iran and all over the world and destruction to any person, religion, ideology or leader who denies them of their equal rights and freedom.
- 2
-
1 minute ago, CdnFox said:
Why would they need to? I don't reference the SCC when i refer to first nations people as 'first nations'. I don't reference the supreme court or the human rights councils when i use someone's preferred gender.
Why would you NEED to reference a court to use accepted terms? Odd thing to say really.
I meant that he made comments of his own and has not so far denied that there were not his comments but an SCC idi*t justice. And even so do not promote bad comments by repeating them. Criticize them.
- 1
-
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:
Sorry kiddo but yours is the sexist remark. We don't call them 'women' any more, they're people with vaginas.
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/supreme-court-decision-say-word-woman-is-confusing-unfortunate
How very insensitive of you. You should be ashamed.
I remind you that the poster did not reference the SCC.
I don't know about the details of this SCC justice comment as I don't live in BC but if it is true then it is unfortunate such an idi*t is appointed to such position. I never thought it would happen in Canada but there are bad apples everywhere,
- 1
-
12 minutes ago, Aristides said:
Would't hurt. I think Campbell would have made a pretty good PM but she inherited the Mulroney government baggage and put too much trust in the incompetents running the Conservative campaign.
Not Freeland though, she would just keep spending us into bankruptcy.
Her biggest mistake was to acknowledge in the middle of her campaign that unemployment will remain double digits in Canada till the end of century at a time that the nation needed hope not despair.
2 minutes ago, suds said:I meant no offense to anyone. You gotta lighten up a bit bud! 😉
There are some things you do not joke about. You crossed the red line.
Right now women in Iran are being assaulted by their security forces for refusing to wear the hated Islamic hijab and judges there are calling them names and comments like this only fuel more anti-women actions in such dictatorships.
- 1
- 1
-
4 minutes ago, Goddess said:
I think the person is referring to a recent Supreme Court of Canada justice who said women are to be referred to as "persons with vaginas."
He spoke on his own without any reference to anyone's comment and if the SCC justice said such thing then he must be fired immediately and put on trial.
- 1
-
11 minutes ago, suds said:
You mean one that has a vagina?
This is a very sexist remark. Shame on you and the board which allows you to be here to spread anti feminism and make chauvinistic comment. This is how you view women? You only see that part not the rest of 99%. SHAME ON YOU.
You offended half the population of Canada and half the population of the world.
- 3
-
Leaders of all three major parties who stand a chance to win the next election are male. There has been 23 Prime Ministers in Canada's history all of them male with the exception of Kim Campbell who served for a short time (and really screwed up but that had nothing to do with her gender).Half of Canada's population is female and this statistics is unfortunate and unacceptable in an advanced country such as Canada. This is not a backward Islamic country where women cannot be elected or served in high positions.
It seems things are not going well in Canada in this century. We need a female Prime Minister.
Empowered Women is empowered world.
- 1
- 2
-
46 minutes ago, eyeball said:
The level of democracy enjoyed by the average world citizen in 2022 is back to 1986 levels. This means that 72 percent of the world's population, 5.7 billion people, live under authoritarian rule”, according to Staffan I. Lindberg, Director of the V-Dem Institute.
https://www.gu.se/en/news/the-world-is-becoming-increasingly-authoritarian-but-there-is-hope
The number of democratic countries has increased significantly. Eastern Europe, South America and some other Europeans like Spain and Greece now enjoy democracy compare to 50 years ago. However, the number of people under dictatorships remain the same because people in dictatorships mostly third world countries are reproducing like animals. Seven children like dogs and cats and cattle. and various diseases don't kill them anymore so all seven children live a long life.
-
Israel had a timid response. Sending a few missiles into a single army base in Iran.
The world does not recognize the danger posed by Islamic Republic until it is too late. Americans and Europeans are cowards.
-
55 minutes ago, eyeball said:
Neither did the west really which is why the world is now so full of with dictators.
No courage no conviction = more dictators.
This is not true. The world has significantly less dictators than the cold war era. Dictatorships in Eastern Europe like East Germany, Poland, etc. fell and replaced by democracy. South American dictatorships like Argentina fell and replaced by democracy. Many other examples. like Spain and Greece. Few countries fell and replaced by worse dictatorship and unfortunately Iran was one of them.
-
21 hours ago, eyeball said:
This gentleman did not have the will or strength to fight off spread of communism (the Soviet stooge Tudej party was an ally of him against Shah) or delay these Islamic bastards to take over. Under him very likely the black evil Islamic forces would have taken over much sooner rather than 25 years later. The Shah did make a mistake of not sending these bastards to hell when he had the chance.
-
28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:
Ya I doubt that.
It looks to me like the Iranians fired American made missiles at Israel.
No they are not American made. American made missiles don't kill Israelis.
No seriously they have been developing their missiles past few decades with the help of terrorist regimes such as North Korea, China and Russia. Those American made missiles purchased during the 70's by the Shah are too old and very short range.
-
Israel had every right to attack Islamic Republic consulate in Damascus in retaliation for Islamic Republic attack on Israeli embassy in Argentina in which hundreds of civilians were killed.
Israel attacked the so called consulate and only killed military leaders. What the f*ck military doing in a consulate other than planning attack on Israel.
Israel must now retaliate for Islamic Republic massive attack on Israel. It must attack the officials and leaders of Islamic Republic and send them to hell even though many of them are in hiding. Do not bomb civilian targets. The nation of Iran taken hostage by Islamic Republic is friendly to Israel.
-
21 hours ago, Nationalist said:
Can anyone make out the writing on that missile fuel cell in this video?
I thought I saw English writing on it behind the reporter.
It says "Death to Mullahs"
-
14 hours ago, August1991 said:
Disagree on both points.
1. Biden is not a coward.
2. Iran is a large country of many people.
Biden started a policy of appeasement which didn't work out because these subhuman mullahs only understand the language of force. OVER THE PAST 3 YEARS THEY HAVE BECOME MORE AGGRESSIVE AND MORE DESTRUCTIVE INTERNATIONALITY AND MORE OPPRESSIVE AT HOME THANKS TO POLICIES OF APPEASEMENT.
Iran is a country but Islamic republic is a paper tiger. They are very unpopular, hated at home and abroad and I told you how to help the nation of Iran to overthrow these bastards. BLOCK IRANIAN PORTS AND STOP THEIR EXPORT OF OIL.
Canada needs a female leader
in Federal Politics in Canada
Posted
Maybe proportional representation of the public being half female but I do accept the comment that whoever best qualifies best for the job. That said women should be given equal opportunities from birth to reach that stage. Women are smarter than men. They have bigger hearts (generally speaking), less criminals (backed by statistics),
Look at how the men-dominated world has been (past 25 centuries) and how it is now (wars, suffering, hunger, pain). Maybe it is time for change. Men are physically stronger (and so is a gorilla) but that doesn't make them better governors or decision makers.