raqqoon

LoL No, obseverving and stating the obvious consequences observed IS NOT supporting it, get real. Well, lets put it this way and stictly as an example: If a person gets a hold of a video of you pleasuring yourself in your bedroom and put it on Youtube-ish site with quirky & degrading remarks, I think you'll be the first one at the barricades and even will want to get a hold of that person. Most anybody would. You see its EASY to say that free-speech should include defamtory and offending remarks, if not its not considered free-speech and that WHEN you are not the one offended. But when your turn comes up, its suddenly a different tune.

Okay back to the topic... Well I will go counter-current a bit on that one, that WITHOUT SUPPORTING the terrorist action commited on that day and say: they asked for it. Do you people know what is Charlie Hebdo? Or you like the thousands of those ignorant 'We are Charlies' type who doesn't even know what they actually are supporting? Lets face it, Charlie is a satirical paper but of the very defamatory kind. If you are a Muslim even of the little to moderate kind, you can't go on and not feel a little insulted. So imagine what its like to an Islamic zealot. In all I'm for free-speech and protecting it but not for free-defamatory and insults. So I guess Charlie reaped what they sowed, its just sad that people are losing lives over this mess.