B. Max Posted August 1, 2007 Report Posted August 1, 2007 I'll bet the list of contributors to Edwards campaign reads like a who's who of ambulance chasers. With their man in the white house the prospect of new laws to sue America out of business is endless. http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...4019.shtml?s=po Quote
guyser Posted August 1, 2007 Report Posted August 1, 2007 I'll bet the list of contributors to Edwards campaign reads like a who's who of ambulance chasers. With their man in the white house the prospect of new laws to sue America out of business is endless.http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...4019.shtml?s=po What would you expect? If he was a money market guy then he would have reams of Wall Street types paying the freight. Would it be surprising to think that historically that Labour gives cash to the Dems? ...or that the medical industries overwhelmingly give money to the Reps the same as the military/industrial companies pay Reps? Quote
SkyhookJackson Posted August 2, 2007 Report Posted August 2, 2007 I'll bet the list of contributors to Edwards campaign reads like a who's who of ambulance chasers. With their man in the white house the prospect of new laws to sue America out of business is endless.http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...4019.shtml?s=po I'm not an Edwards fan, but this post is a cheap shot. All the candidates, from all parties, get questionable contributions. What matters is whether there is quid quo pro. I don't care where a candidate gets his or her money from, I only care if there's payback when they're elected. If you look at the current administration, it's obvious where their contributions came from. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.