Darwinism: A Fact or a Refuted myth?

[Mad_Michael]

In my previous post ‘Is it up to us to believe in God?’ I said that logically saying that there must be a mighty creator for this universe is much closer to logic than claiming that everything randomly came out of nothing.

Many replies to the post rejected that and almost all of them rested on the Darwinism…

“But just to let you know, Darwin figured it out” replied my friend guyser and advised me to take my own advice ‘Please think...’

So the base on which replies depended is the Darwinism. All of them considered it as a fact…So let is see if it is a solid fact or just a refuted myth…

So for my ‘logical’ and ‘scientific’ friends I want them to give my “logical and scientific” answers to some very basic questions:

1- Did Darwin base his claims on any concrete evidence or finding, or just made some observations and produced some ideas while on board H.M.S Beagle ship based on some primitive understanding of science?

2- What is the origin of life?

3- How did the first protein originate?

I think since Darwin publish his book “The Origin of Species” in 1856, you guys must have had enough time to think and prove your claim….

Evolutionary theory is much larger and more rigorous than Darwinian theory. Much of Darwinism has been debunked or ignored, however, nothing of a critique of Darwin impinges upon the validity of evolutionary theory.

As soon as someone uses the term "Darwin" to represent the entirety of evolutionary theory, I know I'm seeing a creationist playing games.

At best, the term "Darwin" is often used as a pop-culture short-hand for evolutionary theory. It does not imply acceptance of all of Darwin's crackpot ideas.