cop shoots person in the back of the head in jail

[guyser]

You know whats funny? A whole airport of hippocrites filming police taking care of a problem that apparently existed for ten hours, but none of these pathetic wretches could help the poor guy out.

Im guessing you havent watched the film. Too bad, because then you wouldn't put in print how people in a non-secure are are wimps for not getting into a secure area.

[sideshow]

s

Edited March 19, 2008 by sideshow

[Riverwind]

Im guessing you havent watched the film. Too bad, because then you wouldn't put in print how people in a non-secure are are wimps for not getting into a secure area.

The guy was outside of the secure area when the woman tried to talk to him. The guy who shot the video could have tried to help too but decided to film everything instead. Sideshow is right. If they believed this guy was truely harmless then the bystanders who sat around and did nothing are wimps. If they actually felt he was dangerous then they are wimps for bashing the police after the fact. Edited December 2, 2007 by Riverwind

[Guest American Woman]

I posted in the other thread about how Pritchard simply stood by watching and filming instead of offering any assistance or trying to get help. Furthermore, he initially said that he agreed with how the RCMP handled the situation while it was happening.

I seriously would be embarrassed about the fact that I did nothing but watch and film, making comments like 'He did that in front of the cops! Jesus Christ!' rather than doing anything to help. One has to wonder why he was filming it in the first place. I can't imagine why he would do that other than for entertainment. But he's been paid by the news media for his video. He's profited from all this.

I think it says a lot about our society too, that we look upon someone who does nothing other than film a man's distress as a 'hero.' It also bothers me that he's out there giving his take on the situation, as if he has any idea of police procedure; as if he had any idea of why Dziekanski's was acting the way he was. Now he talks as if he did. No one knew. No one knew beforehand who he was or why he was acting the way he was. They didn't even know he was speaking Polish.

But evidently the RCMP should have somehow known everything beforehand. They should have known that Dziekanski had surrendered, because so many have decided after the fact that he had. They should have known that Dziekanski wasn't going to throw the stapler, because again, people decided that he wasn't going to do that. Of course there's no "fact" to what people are saying, but that hardly matters. People have made up their minds, and they're not about to let anything change it.

From what I've read, the procedure of tasering someone in an excitable state is actually to prevent worse injury/death. So it wasn't done out of malice, it was done in his best interest-- as far as the information they had regarding tasing at the time. They may have been wrong about that, but their intentions weren't bad. Yet so many are making the police out to be 'murderers' who love to throw their weight around without care or regard for anyone.

As I've said, it's a lynch mob mentality and I find it all very unsettling.

Edited December 2, 2007 by American Woman

[sideshow]

s

Edited March 19, 2008 by sideshow

[no queenslave]

I posted in the other thread about how Pritchard simply stood by watching and filming instead of offering any assistance or trying to get help. Furthermore, he initially said that he agreed with how the RCMP handled the situation while it was happening.

I seriously would be embarrassed about the fact that I did nothing but watch and film, making comments like 'He did that in front of the cops! Jesus Christ!' rather than doing anything to help. One has to wonder why he was filming it in the first place. I can't imagine why he would do that other than for entertainment. But he's been paid by the news media for his video. He's profited from all this.

I think it says a lot about our society too, that we look upon someone who does nothing other than film a man's distress as a 'hero.' It also bothers me that he's out there giving his take on the situation, as if he has any idea of police procedure; as if he had any idea of why Dziekanski's was acting the way he was. Now he talks as if he did. No one knew. No one knew beforehand who he was or why he was acting the way he was. They didn't even know he was speaking Polish.

But evidently the RCMP should have somehow known everything beforehand. They should have known that Dziekanski had surrendered, because so many have decided after the fact that he had. They should have known that Dziekanski wasn't going to throw the stapler, because again, people decided that he wasn't going to do that. Of course there's no "fact" to what people are saying, but that hardly matters. People have made up their minds, and they're not about to let anything change it.

From what I've read, the procedure of tasering someone in an excitable state is actually to prevent worse injury/death. So it wasn't done out of malice, it was done in his best interest-- as far as the information they had regarding tasing at the time. They may have been wrong about that, but their intentions weren't bad. Yet so many are making the police out to be 'murderers' who love to throw their weight around without care or regard for anyone.

As I've said, it's a lynch mob mentality and I find it all very unsettling.

Looks like you are satisfied with a police state ; where the police can do no wrong.

A taser interrupts the braine from controlling the bodies muscle's. Repeated tasering one who has already lost their ability to control their muscle's is a very dangerous practice.

Then when a person has no control over their muscle's to jam your knee on a persons neck , is a practice of braking someones neck.

A lot of companies have claimed their products safe only to be proven unsafe later.

So are you wanting the general public to do the work of the union people who (work) hang out in the airports, You are truley something else.

Edited December 3, 2007 by no queenslave

[sideshow]

s

Edited March 19, 2008 by sideshow

[no queenslave]

queenslave, it is past your bedtime. Get off your parents computer and practice your spelling and grammar for tomorrows lesson.

My bedtime is whenever I want to go to bed. My computer is not my parents.

http://www.detaxcanada.org/kuhl.htm

QUOTE"The queen pays me to post that lawyers and judges do their job. I am not going to take any position contrary to the one I'm paid to take" by jbg

what is your excuse?

[sideshow]

s

Edited March 19, 2008 by sideshow