are Canadians educated enough to write their own constitution?

[bk59]

Why are you giving court cases when you said it was not a court case that determined I owed money? You just defeated your post; as you stated the court case was not the determining evidence,

Why am I not given the same fair trial or any trial at all ? If I appointed the judge I would win my court case too . When you write your own laws and appoint your own corrupt judge what do you expect the outcome to be; no different than SADDAM'S laws.?

AS you stated it was not a court case-- now you want to use fixed court cases by appointed corrupt judges. I am talking personal federal income tax and you are using gst.

get over it you can't even allow a individual without legal council to challenge the tax laws. What is your problem? If you think I am breaking a law then charge me >

Those court cases show that the federal income tax is a valid exercise of federal authority. The law says you owe money. These cases show that this law is a valid law.

No, you would not win your case if you appointed the judge. Not unless the judge you appointed had no concept of the law, logic, or even common sense.

Perhaps you should actually look at those cases. They do deal with personal federal income tax. Some of the cases also deal with the GST. But if you cannot even read those cases then stop posting.

Maybe your problem is that you should be using legal counsel. Because if you did have legal counsel you would realize how foolish you are being. The tax laws have already been challenged and found valid.

If it was in my power to charge you, I would. But it is not within my power. So feel free to go to your local Canada Revenue office and declare that you have never filed tax returns. Then you will get your day in court.

[g_bambino]

Maybe your problem is that you should be using legal counsel. Because if you did have legal counsel you would realize how foolish you are being.

Legal counsel are government-paid posters; they are brainwashed with government propaganda; they are slaves of the Queen.

See, I'm learning!

Edited November 11, 2007 by g_bambino

[Pliny]

No Queenslave. You are a little loose with the terms. You must be a little less scattered if you wish to argue a point.

For instance:

"Federal persomel income tax is a form of slavery-control by a corrupt dictatorship Canadian government."

You are being specific here about "Canadian government", most governments are corrupt. I can't think of any that aren't at the moment.

I agree federal personal income tax is a form of "control" but it is not peculiar to Canada.

I do not understand you particular concern with Canada and the Queen?

[no queenslave]

No Queenslave. You are a little loose with the terms. You must be a little less scattered if you wish to argue a point.

For instance:

"Federal persomel income tax is a form of slavery-control by a corrupt dictatorship Canadian government."

You are being specific here about "Canadian government", most governments are corrupt. I can't think of any that aren't at the moment.

I agree federal personal income tax is a form of "control" but it is not peculiar to Canada.

I do not understand you particular concern with Canada and the Queen?

So if you recognize most governments are corrupt don't you think something should be done to stop governments from being corrupt?. Don't you think it is time for Canadians to exercise their right of sovereignty; as provided by the Statute of Westminster and put in place a constitution to stop the government from saying one thing and doing something else?. Do you believe a constitution should control what the government can do; or do you think they should do whatever they want , like a dictatorship government?

The only reason for federal personal income tax is for the government to control people who question their right to govern.

[ScottSA]

The only reason for federal personal income tax is for the government to control people who question their right to govern.

I think it might have something to do with maintaining your ability to spit illiterate fury at it over the internet. You, know, paying for stuff like the streets that you have to go on to buy your computer, and that the power companies use to instal power, telephone, or cable that you're using. Alternatively it might be paying for your welfare while you yowl at the queen. The government certainly isn't doing a very good job of controlling you, is it?

[no queenslave]

I think it might have something to do with maintaining your ability to spit illiterate fury at it over the internet. You, know, paying for stuff like the streets that you have to go on to buy your computer, and that the power companies use to instal power, telephone, or cable that you're using. Alternatively it might be paying for your welfare while you yowl at the queen. The government certainly isn't doing a very good job of controlling you, is it?

I am not on welfare; and your saying so demonstrates you have no credibility, but think federal personal income tax is for telephone, power etc; when in fact it is not..You sound like someone who thinks federal personal income tax is a necessity when it is not , as other countries have no personal income tax and have all the infrastructure we do.

IT IS NOT A COURT CASE THAT DETERMINED YOU OWED MONEY quote by bk 59

just another corrupt government slave.