Canada Marriage Fraud CPO

So you decided to "marry" your husband because you had an impulse drive for an orgasm, not baby and your son is simply an unintended consequence? Is that a Canadian definition of marriage? If that is the definition of "marriage", then no wonder why women choose to purchase a sex-machine and men purchase women advertising themselves on TV for a night or two rather than getting married.

Peter, see, in Canada whether you are married or not it doesn't make a difference; that is there is no definition for marriage. If there is, have you defined it?

From Wednesday's Globe and Mail May 21, 2008 at 4:08 AM EDT Fighting fraud Anyone who is allowed into Canada as a spouse of a Canadian qualifies for permanent residency. Many other countries take a more restrictive approach. THE UNITED STATES Congress passed the Immigration Marriage Fraud Act in 1986 in response to controversy over so-called sham marriages. For a couple who have been married less than two years, the law allows the status of "conditional resident." Interviews are conducted after two years and, if officials deem the marriage to be genuine, the immigrant receives permanent resident status. AUSTRALIA Immigrants must live with their spouses for two years before receiving permanent partner visas. NEW ZEALAND Immigration New Zealand's website states: "A partner will only be granted residence if both people in the partnership have been living together for at least 12 months." How big is the problem of marriage fraud in Canada? Immigration Minister Diane Finley said she was unable to answer that question when it was posed to her in writing by Toronto-area Liberal MP ROY CULLEN. "Quantifying the rate of marriage fraud is difficult as relationships can break down at any time in a marriage, from the date of entry to Canada to several years into the marriage," the minister said. When a New Democratic Party MLA organized a meeting on the issue in Burnaby, B.C., in 2006, nearly 200 people filled a town hall. An advocacy group called the Canadian Marriage Fraud Victims' Society estimates the number of victims to be in the thousands. Bill Curry

Maybe I have not got the definition of marriage; Would you please explain what does it mean to be husband and wife in Canada? What responsibilities do they have toward each other? Why do people marry in Canada when they have no obligations or commitment staying with one another? Why not just be with each other, why should we name them husbands and wives?

I sponsored the girl to be my wife, I never intended to sponsor a free adult leaving me when her plane lands in Canada.

Why should Canadian citizens be afraid of victimization and not bringing wives from overseas? Why shouldn't the people overseas be afraid of not fraudulently marrying Canadian citizens? My point is that the people overseas should be careful enough to not let "bad" Canadians fool them, not Canadian citizens be careful not to let "bad" people from overseas victimize them and deceive them to get entry into Canada?

Why should the government create such a law to trap the sponsor? Why should there even be a "spousal sponsorship." why not changing it to "adult sponsorship?"

People, I have not provided enough evidence for you to judge and find the guilty. What do you think the government has done to bring the fraudulent people to justice? and yes, what is the responsibility of the sponsored person? and let me tell you what RCMP said to me regarding her responsibility: "she is an adult," "she is free to decide," "there is no marriage commitment," "she is free to go and you have no right to know about her location."

YAHHHHHHH! LET'S KILL THE CANADIAN CITIZEN!!!!!!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAAAAHHH Who said the sponsored is bastard it was the Canadian tax payer sponsor who was foolish enough to spend so much time, money and effort to bring the innocent sponsored to Canada. right? My initial question was not to judge whether I have been the victim or my fraudulent wife has been the victim, my question is that if my fraudulent wife has deceived me to come to Canada, what steps has the government of Canada taken to bring her into justice? Is it by victimizing the citizens to pay for the fraudulent people? or by setting conditional establishment?

Canada is victimizing the citizens; as soon as the spouse lands in Canada, whether true genuine or sham marriage, the person is considered a landed immigrant and the sponsor citizen is victimized for three years to pay pack the social assistance, and the rest of the citizens are victimized to pay for her education and training classes, social services, and healthcare. That's how Canada is inviting people to come to Canada. Do you know who is behind all this? Lawyers. They put 2 contrasting ideas in their fine prints. They say marriage of convenience is illegal, and on the other hand they say no matter what the cause of the immigration is, the person is landed immigrant and is entitled to benefit from the privileges of Canada. Here, the citizen sponsor who is already victimized has to pay a large amount of money to lawyers to take the fraudulent person and the government to court. And then, the government backs the fraudulent sponsor by saying that: it has been a marriage break down! not the marriage of convenience! marriages can last for even a day! That’s how serious and victimizing the sponsorship agreement is! Canadian laws put the sponsored citizen in a very deep dark hole.

Yes both of you are right, married women are not their spouse properties, they are everyone's properties, everyone should benefit from their fresh v... until it is overused; then wemon realize that it is time to forget about their "fantcy wemon's right" and stick to their family and by then no one is going to look at their commonplace so now they have to walk their dogs and enjoy their dog's royalty. That's how "western women's rights" and "western freedom and democracy" value women.

There still can be sponsorship agreement, but without a title of "Spousal Sponsorship." When in Canada you can leave from the airport you are landing, Canada should not force the "spousal sponsor" to support someone who is not his/her spouse. If Canada would tell me that I have sponsored an "adult" (doesn't matter brother, sister, spouse or friend), then that would have been fine, but Canada told me to bring my "wife," my "spouse" and that I am a "spousal" sponsor. Canada should change the "spousal sponsorship" to "general sponsorship" or "adult sponsorship." Or rathar than any sponsorship, have the adult spouse or adult relative apply for immigration themselves rather that sponsorship. Can someone tell me how I can bring this issue to the government? I mentioned "INVISIBLE." But I know now how to read it, as one of you said before through experience (i.e. through victimization). They have conditional establishment of 1 and 2 years; that's how long a true marriage should usually last. That's how you go about fixing it. If there is a violation, then Canada can interview the sponsored person and if he/she says the truth accept him/her for compationate reasons.

I asked whether we should have a marriage sponsorship, I did not ask whether we should have a marriage commitment. As you say, when people are not required to stay with each other even from the day they land in Canada, why there is such thing as spousal sponsorship. There should be only one sponsorship with no spousal title before it. Not just me but other citizens who are paying to support her never read the invisible fine prints. In my previous post I explained why it doesn't likely last in Canada. I don't expect the marriage to last, Canada should, like other countries, namely the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany and many others, grant periods of conditional establishment to spouses of their nationals, if there is going to be a "spousal sponsorship."

I have learned but at a very high cost.

Drea, You wrote a lot but didn't answer my questions 1) When there is no marriage commitment in Canada, how could there be a sponsorship commitment based on marriage? 2) You mentioned husbands and wives are not commodities; would you like to marry someone and after your pregnancy he leaves you and you have to support yourself and the child? The same issue has happened to me; She tricked me to arrive Canada and soon after she arrived she left me for welfare; now I have to pay welfare back for their support and the Canadian tax payers should pay for her health-care and other free services she receives from the government. On top of that, she has access to a lawyer for free to take me to court next year to divide my assets. Should I say to the government that thank you for supporting her and victimizing your own citizens? 3) I trusted the government that marriage fraud is not legal in Canada; but it is as I have never received a response supporting me. Are you happy with sham marriages? What would you do if you support terrorists coming to Canada through marriage fraud by paying your taxes on time and backing up your government being merciful to these fraudulent people and later they blow up your town?

If I knew I was going to be defrauded, I wouldn't have fallen into this trap. I wished I could read her mind. I wished I could foresee her plans. But I got deceived. Why should I, a Canadian Citizen and Tax Payer, be victimized when someone else from another country deceived me and the government? Why shouldn't the criminal get victimized? Should the Canadian citizens back their own citizens rather than backing the criminal deceiver? When people tell me get over it, that means either no one can question the government or the government won't listen to me, or they are sympathizing with the criminal deceiver, or they have been one of those who are benefiting from these laws of the government. That is one of the reasons why I am concern regarding marriage sponsorship. When in Canada, there is no such thing as marriage commitment, and "everyone is free to come and go as they pleases," why there is even a sponsorship commitment based on marriages? The government could have just made one sponsorship agreement saying no matter who you bring you have to be responsible for. When people can even walk away from you right after their plane land in the airport as in Abdullah's case, why should someone like Abdullah get victimized if the Canadian government doesn't want to enforce the law of immigration? When people could land in a different province than their spouse's, leave and apply for welfare as they didn't like their husband after their arrival, do you still say that the marriage was genuine and she married her husband not because of Canada but because of Abdullah? Of course she married Canada not Abdullah; and good for Canadian citizens who support her with the taxes they pay. The Canadian government has been very ruthless to the sponsor and so merciful to the sponsored. I would never say that Government of Canada is at fault because she has deceived us. I believe that the Canadian government is at fault for some other reasons: If she had no intention in marrying me, she would not have married me - if she knew that she would be sent back home, leaving me after landing, as the marriage of convenience is illegal in Canada. - if she knew that there would be no support from the Canadian government such as social assistance and free healthcare, leaving me after landing. - if she knew that she would have been responsible for supporting herself (as written in the sponsorship agreement), leaving me after landing. - if she knew that there wouldn't be any asset division, leaving me after landing. - if she knew that there wouldn't be a free lawyer to back all her prearranged plans and actions, leaving me after landing. - if she knew that simple excuses such as I don't like my husband after arriving Canada and leaving me would not work to get all the free services payed by the Canadian tax payers, leaving me after landing. Unfortunately, with the name of freedom, the Canadian government provides all of the services above even to those people committing marriage fraud. This encourages all criminals and terrorists come to Canada with simple solutions such as marriage.

If we wouldn't be victimized by the Canadian government, we wouldn't even give a shit to such spouses deceived us to come to Canada. The government makes many lies and really doesn't care. Do you know why? Because, the government makes the citizen sponsor and all other tax payers victimized.

There are many other fraudulent people welcomed by the government. Canada's population is droping; in order to increase the population, the Canadian government invites all criminals to join the party in Canada. Canadians do not realize that while Canada might have brought a criminal into canada (Population + 1), Canada is going to lose an honest caring family, my family (population - 6). Has Canada gained any? Yes, Canda gained 1 criminal and lost 6 caring tax payers. Why should we stay in Canada while working hard and paying our taxes on time, and at the end, Canada gives all the taxes collected from us to the fraudulent people? However, the fraudulent person is not entirely guilty, the law makers are the main guilty people. The Canadian laws encourages them to do so. Let us talk about the marriage. Other countries and cultures value family, marriage commitment and the statement below: “I shall take you to be my wife/husband, to have and behold from this day on, for better or for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, to love and to cherish; until death do us part.” In Canada, you basically lie in all the parts. In Canada you can walk away from your marriage commitment anytime you fill to do so and take away half of your spouses assets. Your spouse who is with you at this minute, could be walking away with another person in the next minute. With all respect and apology to all animals, if Canada's law doesn't change, the population of dogs in Canada will be greater than the population of human beings (if it is not greater now). Let us go back to legal marriages fraud issue in Canada: Here is a story from StopMarriageFraud.ca victims list. Abdollah a Canadian Citizen Married Arezou a native of IRAN in December 27, 2005. His wife arrived in Canada on October 25, 2007 without letting him know. Should Abdollah be victimized, the Canadian tax payers be victimized, or the fradulent wife? Stories: Abdollah Abdollah was intrudes to Arezou by her brother Sayyed Samad whom immigrated to Canada not long before and encouraged him to seek relationship with Arezou as she was a good woman and he would have a happy life with her. Abdollah had seen and known Arezou before as the used to live in same City. They have started and continued their romantic relationship by talking on the phone e-mails and letters for some times. Shortly after their wedding he started the process of sponsorship for her. During this period, she used to keep telling him that she loved him, and he would do many things for his now wife such as sending her cash and gifts, trying to make her life happy and easy and hoping that soon they will join and start their life together. She arrived in Canada on October 25, 2007 without letting him know. On October 26, 2007, while he was checking the status of the application for her sponsorship on Immigration's website, he discovered following message in his file:” Arezou entered Canada at Lester B. Pearson International Airport, Terminal No. 3 on October 25, 2007 and became a Permanent Resident.” He immediately called her in Iran and he was advised by her mother that she (Arazou) was sleeping and when he insisted that he wished to speak with her, her mother hung up the phone. On the same day, (October 26, 2007) in search of her brother he, ran into her and saw her with another man holding hands with. He entered into nervous shock and even considered suicide. Prior to seeing her in Toronto on October 26, 2007, she gave no indication that she did not wish to continue with the marriage. In fact, some weeks prior her arrival to Canada, she asked him for $1000.00 Cad. Because she said that she wanted to buy some house wares for their home in Canada. At no time she advise him that she had received her immigration visa, or when she received it, or when she was coming to Canada or that she had arrived in Canada. As a result of her deceit, he suffers from a deep depression. He lost his job, dropped out of university where he was taking some courses. Immediately after her arrival, she has started receiving welfare. On November 13, 2007, she sent a short email to him ” I wish you a good life.” more on: http://stopmarriagefraud.ca/victims.html

I have sponsored my wife to immigrate to Canada and soon after she landed, she abandoned me. Before sponsoring my wife, I visited the CIC website: http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/department/me...ts/marriage.asp "Marriages of conv[en]ience are not allowed under Canada's immigration law. It is illegal to be married simply to immigrate to Canada. Spousal sponsorship is a serious legal commitment." "If a person enters into a marriage of convenience and comes to Canada as an immigrant, enforcement action can be taken. This enforcement action could result in deportation, and is the responsibility of the Canada Border Services Agency." After sponsoring my wife, and after my wife abandoned me, I contacted Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) and I have been told by the representative on the phone that "We are sorry that she has used you to come to Canada; there is nothing that can be done as she has already landed in Canada; she is recognized as a legal immigrant and you have to support her for three years although you might have been abused." What does this mean? Has the government of Canada deceived me? Why is the marriage of convenience "illegal" before the sponsored persons land in Canada and "legal" after they land in Canada? When the sponsorship principle is based on the truthfulness of the relationship between the wife and the husband, why the sponsorship is not void although the relationship has not been genuine? I am writing to express my deepest concern that there is no marriage commitment in Canada, marriage fraud is legal in Canada, and the Canadian system is victimizing the citizen sponsors by supporting marriages of Convenience with sole purpose of immigrating to Canada. My family and I are victims of the Canadian System that is not enforcing Canadian Immigration Law. I have been told by the RCMP that: my wife is an adult; she is free to decide; there is no such thing as a marriage commitment; there is no support for the sponsor; there are various supports for the sponsored; the sponsor should carry the burden of marriage fraud. Canadian system deceives the sponsor by providing an opportunity to the fraudulent sponsored people to enter Canada and then victimizing the Canadian citizens by supporting those criminals with tax payers' income. Other countries, namely the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany and many others grant periods of conditional establishment to spouses of their nationals. The sponsorship agreement should be void and the sponsored person's visa should be void if there are sufficient evidences proving that the relationship has not been genuine and the sponsored person has married the sponsor only to immigrate to the sponsor's country. The free services the Canadian government provide to the sponsored and the poor enforcement of the Canadian law by the Canadian government, make it so attractive to the sponsored people to fraud. As soon as the sponsored person arrives in Canada, if over 18 years of age, he/she is considered an adult and he/she is not abide by any agreement including the sacred marriage agreement and the sponsorship agreement. Why? It is because our laws are this way. Whether the sponsor has been abused, the sponsor and the rest of the Canadian tax payers should carry the burden of the sponsored. We all Canadians should ask the government to change the law and we can make it happen if we understand how our laws are misused, if we understand on what our taxes are spent, and most importantly if we care! The important issue is that there is no definition for the sacred marriage in Canada. As I have been told by the RCMP, my wife is an adult and is free to decide as there is no marriage commitment. My sponsorship has been based on my marriage commitment; when there is no marriage commitment in Canada, how can there be a sponsorship agreement based on marriage commitment? Canada Marriage Fraud NPO [email protected] http://canadamarriagefraud.blogspot.com/