Canada Marriage Fraud CPO

So you decided to "marry" your husband because you had an impulse drive for an orgasm, not baby and your son is simply an unintended consequence? Is that a Canadian definition of marriage? If that is the definition of "marriage", then no wonder why women choose to purchase a sex-machine and men purchase women advertising themselves on TV for a night or two rather than getting married.

Peter, see, in Canada whether you are married or not it doesn't make a difference; that is there is no definition for marriage. If there is, have you defined it?

From Wednesday's Globe and Mail May 21, 2008 at 4:08 AM EDT Fighting fraud Anyone who is allowed into Canada as a spouse of a Canadian qualifies for permanent residency. Many other countries take a more restrictive approach. THE UNITED STATES Congress passed the Immigration Marriage Fraud Act in 1986 in response to controversy over so-called sham marriages. For a couple who have been married less than two years, the law allows the status of "conditional resident." Interviews are conducted after two years and, if officials deem the marriage to be genuine, the immigrant receives permanent resident status. AUSTRALIA Immigrants must live with their spouses for two years before receiving permanent partner visas. NEW ZEALAND Immigration New Zealand's website states: "A partner will only be granted residence if both people in the partnership have been living together for at least 12 months." How big is the problem of marriage fraud in Canada? Immigration Minister Diane Finley said she was unable to answer that question when it was posed to her in writing by Toronto-area Liberal MP ROY CULLEN. "Quantifying the rate of marriage fraud is difficult as relationships can break down at any time in a marriage, from the date of entry to Canada to several years into the marriage," the minister said. When a New Democratic Party MLA organized a meeting on the issue in Burnaby, B.C., in 2006, nearly 200 people filled a town hall. An advocacy group called the Canadian Marriage Fraud Victims' Society estimates the number of victims to be in the thousands. Bill Curry

Maybe I have not got the definition of marriage; Would you please explain what does it mean to be husband and wife in Canada? What responsibilities do they have toward each other? Why do people marry in Canada when they have no obligations or commitment staying with one another? Why not just be with each other, why should we name them husbands and wives?

I sponsored the girl to be my wife, I never intended to sponsor a free adult leaving me when her plane lands in Canada.

Why should Canadian citizens be afraid of victimization and not bringing wives from overseas? Why shouldn't the people overseas be afraid of not fraudulently marrying Canadian citizens? My point is that the people overseas should be careful enough to not let "bad" Canadians fool them, not Canadian citizens be careful not to let "bad" people from overseas victimize them and deceive them to get entry into Canada?

Why should the government create such a law to trap the sponsor? Why should there even be a "spousal sponsorship." why not changing it to "adult sponsorship?"

People, I have not provided enough evidence for you to judge and find the guilty. What do you think the government has done to bring the fraudulent people to justice? and yes, what is the responsibility of the sponsored person? and let me tell you what RCMP said to me regarding her responsibility: "she is an adult," "she is free to decide," "there is no marriage commitment," "she is free to go and you have no right to know about her location."

YAHHHHHHH! LET'S KILL THE CANADIAN CITIZEN!!!!!!!!!!! YAAAAAAAAAAAHHH Who said the sponsored is bastard it was the Canadian tax payer sponsor who was foolish enough to spend so much time, money and effort to bring the innocent sponsored to Canada. right? My initial question was not to judge whether I have been the victim or my fraudulent wife has been the victim, my question is that if my fraudulent wife has deceived me to come to Canada, what steps has the government of Canada taken to bring her into justice? Is it by victimizing the citizens to pay for the fraudulent people? or by setting conditional establishment?

Canada is victimizing the citizens; as soon as the spouse lands in Canada, whether true genuine or sham marriage, the person is considered a landed immigrant and the sponsor citizen is victimized for three years to pay pack the social assistance, and the rest of the citizens are victimized to pay for her education and training classes, social services, and healthcare. That's how Canada is inviting people to come to Canada. Do you know who is behind all this? Lawyers. They put 2 contrasting ideas in their fine prints. They say marriage of convenience is illegal, and on the other hand they say no matter what the cause of the immigration is, the person is landed immigrant and is entitled to benefit from the privileges of Canada. Here, the citizen sponsor who is already victimized has to pay a large amount of money to lawyers to take the fraudulent person and the government to court. And then, the government backs the fraudulent sponsor by saying that: it has been a marriage break down! not the marriage of convenience! marriages can last for even a day! That’s how serious and victimizing the sponsorship agreement is! Canadian laws put the sponsored citizen in a very deep dark hole.

Yes both of you are right, married women are not their spouse properties, they are everyone's properties, everyone should benefit from their fresh v... until it is overused; then wemon realize that it is time to forget about their "fantcy wemon's right" and stick to their family and by then no one is going to look at their commonplace so now they have to walk their dogs and enjoy their dog's royalty. That's how "western women's rights" and "western freedom and democracy" value women.

There still can be sponsorship agreement, but without a title of "Spousal Sponsorship." When in Canada you can leave from the airport you are landing, Canada should not force the "spousal sponsor" to support someone who is not his/her spouse. If Canada would tell me that I have sponsored an "adult" (doesn't matter brother, sister, spouse or friend), then that would have been fine, but Canada told me to bring my "wife," my "spouse" and that I am a "spousal" sponsor. Canada should change the "spousal sponsorship" to "general sponsorship" or "adult sponsorship." Or rathar than any sponsorship, have the adult spouse or adult relative apply for immigration themselves rather that sponsorship. Can someone tell me how I can bring this issue to the government? I mentioned "INVISIBLE." But I know now how to read it, as one of you said before through experience (i.e. through victimization). They have conditional establishment of 1 and 2 years; that's how long a true marriage should usually last. That's how you go about fixing it. If there is a violation, then Canada can interview the sponsored person and if he/she says the truth accept him/her for compationate reasons.

I asked whether we should have a marriage sponsorship, I did not ask whether we should have a marriage commitment. As you say, when people are not required to stay with each other even from the day they land in Canada, why there is such thing as spousal sponsorship. There should be only one sponsorship with no spousal title before it. Not just me but other citizens who are paying to support her never read the invisible fine prints. In my previous post I explained why it doesn't likely last in Canada. I don't expect the marriage to last, Canada should, like other countries, namely the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, Germany and many others, grant periods of conditional establishment to spouses of their nationals, if there is going to be a "spousal sponsorship."

I have learned but at a very high cost.

Drea, You wrote a lot but didn't answer my questions 1) When there is no marriage commitment in Canada, how could there be a sponsorship commitment based on marriage? 2) You mentioned husbands and wives are not commodities; would you like to marry someone and after your pregnancy he leaves you and you have to support yourself and the child? The same issue has happened to me; She tricked me to arrive Canada and soon after she arrived she left me for welfare; now I have to pay welfare back for their support and the Canadian tax payers should pay for her health-care and other free services she receives from the government. On top of that, she has access to a lawyer for free to take me to court next year to divide my assets. Should I say to the government that thank you for supporting her and victimizing your own citizens? 3) I trusted the government that marriage fraud is not legal in Canada; but it is as I have never received a response supporting me. Are you happy with sham marriages? What would you do if you support terrorists coming to Canada through marriage fraud by paying your taxes on time and backing up your government being merciful to these fraudulent people and later they blow up your town?