Tony

I understand your point but, I,m sure that the homosexual community does't practice the religions that oppose their beliefs. I really don't see it being pushed onto churches that are opposed to such a union. But, the issue is more about the rights of a married couple as opposed to a "union" between same sex couples. I personally believe that they should have all of the benefits of an opposite sex marriage. I don't think it will ever come to forcing a certain church to perform the ceremony. I still don't understand the significance of a ban on it anyways. I understand that laws are not set in stone and are meant to be changed but, this seems more of a fear tactic. Afraid of something different, so it must be wrong. ALL rights of a opposite sex marriage should also apply to same sex couples. That I believe is the issue. P>S> Thanks for the welcome

I am not a homosexual but, I believe that 2 people in love have a right to marry. As far as a ban on this well, I think that a ban on opposite sex marriage would be in order also. You can't accept one but not the other. That would be discrimination. Anyways, isn't there supposed to be a seperation of the government from the church? This sounds like a religious issue to me! I don't see how anyone has the right to decide who another person should love. Anyways thats my 2 cents on this!