SkyscrapersAmerica

I have a relative in Europe, there is a lot of content that is broadcast on TV that comes from America. This content advertises sex, drugs, violence... which is not okay, because elementary school is compulsory in Europe. I am not complaining about the content that is broadcast in America, but about the content that comes from America and is broadcast in other countries. The laws of other countries must be respected, because those who do not respect the laws of other countries will certainly not respect the laws of their own country either. I like my country to prosper in such a way that the laws will be changed in the right direction, but they cannot be changed properly because of the wrong relationship with other countries.

In Europe educated people in the field of Islam say that Jumma on Fridays is obligatory for all Muslims, regardless of which country they are in.I think it is more logical that Jumma on Fridays is obligatory in a Sharia state (where the laws are just), that is, in a state where the person who leads the prayer in mosques is under the supervision and control of the ruler of that state.And in places where the person who leads prayer in mosques is not under the direct control of the ruler of that country, than that prayer cannot be obligatory in those mosques, because under those circumstances anyone can open a mosque and say that prayer in those mosques is obligatory for muslims.

The idea that the USA sells condoms in other countries only to people who are married. The reason is that elementary school is compulsory for them by law, selling condoms without age restrictions is an advertisement for things that make it difficult for them to comply with what they are ordered to do by law. If America makes it difficult for people in other countries to comply with what they are ordered to do by law, then in this way direct damage is done to those countries, and indirect damage to America. An example, an American resident says: "If I were the president of America, I would do my best that condoms from America only to sell to married people in other countries. Elementary school is is compulsory in most countries, in order to preserve and improve relations with other countries and to respect each other more, US must take care that condoms are sold only to married people in other countries."

There are laws in every country, and there are things that are smart to do with certain laws and there are things that are not smart to do with certain laws. Elementary school is compulsory in most countries from childhood, and countries invest a lot of time, money and effort in school. If the US in other countries broadcasts TV content which harms their school system, it is not smart because over time it will have a negative impact on their own country. An example, an American resident says: "If I were the president of America, I would take care of the content that is broadcast on American channels in other countries. Elementary school is is compulsory in most countries, in order to preserve and improve relations with other countries and to respect each other more, US must take care of the content broadcast from American TV channels in other countries." An example, an American resident says: "I have a private TV channel whose content is broadcast in Europe. In Europe, elementary school is compulsory from childhood and therefore I have to take care of the content that is broadcast on my private channel. If I didn't take care about the content that is being broadcast then in that way I would create problems for myself, my family and the country in which I live."

Idea that Canada not sell firearms or other modern weapons to countries that are not located on the American continent, and to sell to them swords, sabers, shields, arrows and bows, spears ....Trading with swords, sabers, shields, arrows and bows, spears is a much wiser and smarter option, while it can't go wrong with trading with swords, sabers, shields, arrows and bows, spears to the mentioned countries.

Another example, the war between Russia and Ukraine, it would have been correct from Russia if they had cut off the internet and telephone connection with Ukraine before the war, and then started the war with them.

an example for easier understanding, an American resident says: "If I were the president of the United States and wanted to go to war with a certain country, I would first cut off the Internet and telephone connection with that country before the war, and then I would go to war with them after that."

If if the countries of the world are connected by internet and telephone, then it is a sign that they do not want to go to war . And if we don't want to go to war, then there is no sense and logic that basic education is mandatory from the age of 7, because it is an education system intended for war and not for peace.

To make it easier to understand an example, an American resident says: "If I were the president of America, primary education would be mandatory for children from the age of 7 during the war, and when there is no war primary education would be mandatory for adults only, I think it is smarter and wiser that way." .

Primary school is compulsory from childhood in almost all countries of the world. Children are systematically educated from the age of 7, and that is only good when a certain country is at war. The countries of the world are connected by internet and telephone, this means that it is not wise to go to war, and this means that it is not good to send children of 7 years old to school. Why would certain countries connect via the Internet or telephone if they go to war with each other in the future ? The idea to move the compulsory primary school in all countries of the world to some other age group, for example from the age of 18 that primary school is compulsory or that it is compulsory from the time of marriage.

Logical is that a travel with transport facilities which are moving with lower speed costs less than a travel with transport facilities which are moving with higher speed.Logical is for ordinary people to be transported with transport facilities which are moving with lower speed, because they are cheaper.It would be normal for ordinary people in the world to be transported by zeppelins or ships and not by airplanes.

Many people will say to this phone idea in Canada "It will be too expensive". It can be cheaper than it is currently with the proposed idea. What is important is the way in which the costs are calculated in Canada, because of the population of Canada and its area. The population s in relation to the area of the country is different compared to other countries, therefore it is important that the method of calculating costs be different.

Idea for Skyscrapers in Middle East that electricity, water and gas costs are higher in the top floors compared to the lower floors of skyscrapers.On the other hand, when buying, lower floors of skyscrapers should be more expensive, because it is safer to live in them (in case of fire and other accidents).I think with the idea will increase the importance of the height of the skyscraper through the purchase costs and through the costs of electricity, water and gas.

I think that politicians in Europe would be much more successful in their work if they did not speak in front of TV cameras. Idea that Canadian and United States politicians speech in front of TV cameras should not be broadcast to Europe.

Canada has a smaller population in relation to the area it occupies compared to other countries, therefore below are a few ideas that are useful for Canada.1. In Canada people pay the same for long distance phone calls and short distance phone calls, that is not good. Beacuse of that distance betwen people lost an importance and the people change in a negative direction (the desire to become rich is lost).Correct is that long distance phone calls should be more expensive than short distance phone calls.For example:phone call distance 100 miles =0,1 $Phone call distance 1000 miles=1 $Phone call distance 10000 miles=10 $...2. The same problem is with skyscrapers, the hight of the building lost an importance because people who live on the first floor of a skyscraper pay the same for water, electricity and gas like people who live on the top floor of tha same building.Correct is that apartments on the top floor of a building should be more expensive through water, electricity and gas costs.3. The same problem is with water and electricity, the place from where water and electricity are taken lost an importance because people who live near rivers and power plants pay the same for water, electricity like people who live far away from rivers and power plants.Correct is that people who live far away from rivers and power plants should pay more for water, electricity.4. The same problem is with Cable TV, the place from where the TV signal comes lost an importance beacuse people who live near and far away from the place from where the TV signal comes pay the same for Cable TV.Correct is that people who live far away from the place from where the TV signal comes should pay more for Cable TV.