justme4567

Guns like drivers licences are a privileged NOT A RIGHT! Lets quit giving guns to physco's and drivers licences to drunks...seems reasonable.

u ladies still arguing semantics and b.s?.....gezzzz simple we dont and wont support part of society walking about with their faces covered....worse if it legal for 1 then it is legal for all. i was hopin all the chattering meant the stay happened, anybody got any info on that? i hate reading papers too

nah we r horrified by someone who insists on disrespecting our country...ya know it was tried in the states and they sent them packing. that and has it occurred to u that a ruling giving peeps the right to cover their faces. there's a whole if she can- we can thing happening..the bank must be shitting themselves. this is a very very bad ruling and not just for it's legal implications.

and 10 lawyers will argue it when it's signed...if it was oral the judge doesnt write it at all but the winning lawyer does and then sends it to the losing lawyer who can object to the wording 3 times before the judge will address it. gong show. ever word is open to the individuals interpretation. Interesting, do u know if the judge gave a written ruling? i am curious. If they mean business they usually write it down. If they dont it's usually a lawyers field day. The wording has to be killer.

ahhh they r getting a stay... look that up... and what do u mean color blah.....the ruling regarding all legal documents MUST be on blue paper is only a recent one. AND very very import since the inception of our legal system. Most Lawyers still send their emails in blue. It confused me for years but you can do thousands of hours of work on a single document and if it isn't to the letter and till recently on blue paper it wasnt legal. also 10 different lawyers will give u 10 different interpretation of any ruling if u pay them enough. and a Judge has to address it. our justice system is F*ed. pardon my french I am a Lady...ba ha ha ha

http://www.qp.alberta.ca/documents/rules2010/Rules_vol_1.pdf off hand i have this one...there are many many many..u will notice volume 1?.criminal, civil, provincial, federal blahblahblah....when u r done reading them...let me know andddd if it's an older version the documents no longer have to be on blue colored paper to be legal binding....

well considering the govt announced they would appeal it before the 60 days probably a good reference. and yes i do have a number of court rulings in my favor I either had to wait out or address it's the process of our court system....read the book. andd it's been fun chow for now .

oh the legal yes a single person and the legal wording is. I have knowledge in evidence or ...belief. it is purfectly legal to file such a claim and it is hard to comprehend what some people believe. LMAO

60 day appeal of any ruling, they can NOT address, change of modify it to suit their purpose. It's called "the process" nothing can over rule it. well maybe the govt but they shall follow proper procedure and r. ummm my writing well i had to produce legal documents to the courts for 5 years where top legal minds spent days going over.... every..... word. when i retired i promised myself i would NEVER write that crap again. i prfurr to babble. lolololololol..oh stalking, theft of govt documents andddd the right of any crazy person to file whatever they want in our courts. our civil process is a gong show. i dont ...do...spell check either....lmao...

Now who's being racist...i think your numbers r wrong with the 3% but most just want to BE CANADIANS! A small number that is growing rapidly are destroying the chances of others staying in our country. This crazy crap is shutting door fast and loud. And mostly for the abandoned woman, anybody who's sponsor has withdrawn are being told to pack their bags and go home. sad but true.

ahhh on the subject of alcohol there would be a great support from our own citizens on that one. Prohibition was in our lifetime...i was little...lololol beer drinkers r quivering. lmao.....

you r more than correct. The laws in other cultures are often punishable by death and they can ban hookers all they like here but in our country it's more of a suggestion...at least by the looks of the hooker presently standing on the corner across the street from my store...

what pivot....I've argued the legality from the beginning. All things considered a moot point presently as the govt is in court today filing the appeal AND the proper process. The ruling will go into limbo and at the end of the day what it really effects is all the other poor refuges who just want to come here and live out their lives as Canadians. oh the issue is..... the ruling that said the 60 days we must ALL must adhere to was to be waived so an individual could vote in 30 days...That is against the rules of the court. Try going into court and ask to have anything done...right now...lmao. and i am too a nice thing!!!!!! huh

And a single person and 3 unelected Judges over threw our court system. It is a process. I really aint political i am legal, All the racist ranting and political b. s. has zip to do with the FACT no Judge can over rules the process of the courts...... and I just think it's hilarious that the issue of where do our rights stop and others rights begin...appears to...beer. baaahhhhhaaaaa

http://100percentfedup.com/muslim-petitions-to-cancel-oktoberfest-in-germany-as-munich-police-plan-to-keep-refugees-and-revelers-apart/ no worries people, our laws can be adjusted to suit others beliefs and demands. Over rule the process on our courts?,,, no problem,,,,,,,but this is one of is THE prioritys of those that insist their beliefs be "respected"....baaahhhhhhaaaaa ya I think that's funny. U can mess with our laws and our customs but oh my mess with our beer drinkers and there will be trouble. Sadly when people wake up and smell the roses it will be too late. I don't drink but I support peeps right to, alot of our own citizens will support bans on alcohol.