Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Embryonic stem cell research is available in Canada and is attracting people here because of the ban in the U.S.

Stem cell research in Canada is made even more attractive in view of the availability and quality of research facilities, the lower cost of conducting research in Canada than in the U.S., and the government tax credits. Mind you, the dollar might change that this year.

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/stor...s_name=&no_ads=

Even in Sweden there are groups opposed to it, including both left wing and greens.

Does anyone here think that Canada should ban it, not fund it, or but any restraints on it at all or let it go on as is? Britain allows the creation of human embryos for stem cell procurement, should Canada, or does it matter?

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted

For.

What reason is there to be against it?

Almost three thousand people died needlessly and tragically at the World Trade Center on September 11; ten thousand Africans die needlessly and tragically every single day-and have died every single day since September 11-of AIDS, TB, and malaria. We need to keep September 11 in perspective, especially because the ten thousand daily deaths are preventable.

- Jeffrey Sachs (from his book "The End of Poverty")

Posted (edited)

Personally I don't have a problem, but many people from all persuasions have a problem with using live embryos, as they are considered a life., they don't have a problem with stem cell research other than that issue.

Health Minister Anne McLellan introduced a bill in 2005 to regulate assisted human reproduction and related science I'll have to look it up.

The governing council of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research has given conditional approval for a controversial project to use "fresh" as well as frozen human embryos for stem cell research, officials said

here the health agency has for the first time authorized the use of days-old human embryos for a stem cell project.

The $523,000 project, which has been under review for a year, will use surplus embryos donated by people who have undergone fertility treatment. The tiny embryos, composed of just a few cells, would be destroyed as the researchers try to harvest embryonic stem cells. The hope is that understanding the potent cells might one day lead to treatments for everything from Parkinson's disease to heart disease.yesterday.

http://www.wednesday-night.com/STEMCELL-Notes.htm

Edited by scriblett

Hey Ho - Ontario Liberals Have to Go - Fight Wynne - save our province

Posted

When you have a daughter with a year to live, one who may not live and a cousin who did not, this is leukemia. Embryonic stem cell research would improve dramatically the treatment of this disease.

Until you walk in my shoes be very careful how you judge.

Posted

I think this cartoon says it best: Link to Funny Cartoon

Almost three thousand people died needlessly and tragically at the World Trade Center on September 11; ten thousand Africans die needlessly and tragically every single day-and have died every single day since September 11-of AIDS, TB, and malaria. We need to keep September 11 in perspective, especially because the ten thousand daily deaths are preventable.

- Jeffrey Sachs (from his book "The End of Poverty")

Posted
Does anyone here think that Canada should ban it, not fund it, or but any restraints on it at all or let it go on as is?

Nope. If anything, we need to encourage more. The payoffs of stem cell research will save lives.

Guest chilipeppers
Posted
stem cells are as much a human being as an acorn is a tree. Every single day there are plenty of stem cells thrown in the dumpster.

True for the most part, the problem for some is the slippery slope, or taking it to the extreme there would be farming of live human embryos grown for just that purpose, maybe in a woman's womb, then deliberately aborted for research? I can empathize with some of the arguments, but to say that Harper is 'against stem cell research' is wrong or simply spin on the part of our resident spinmeister. I havn't read about Harper's stance on this but would assume they are against the harvesting of live embryos for stem cell research which is dependent upon the destruction of human embryos. There are other methods of harvesting stem cells.

The belief is this.

http://www.cbhd.org/resources/stemcells/po...n_statement.htm

Whereas researchers using fetal tissue are not responsible for the death of the fetus, researchers using stem cells derived from embryos will typically be implicated in the destruction of the embryo. This is true whether or not researchers participate in the derivation of embryonic stem cells. As long as embryos are destroyed as part of the research enterprise, researchers using embryonic stem cells (and those who fund them) will be complicit in the death of embryos.16
Posted

Pragmatically, if the embryos are likely to be destroyed anyway (say, leftovers from in-vitro), you might as well put them to use.

I do have some issue collecting embryos to conduct experiments on. I figure there are enough leftovers to do the job.

RealRisk.ca - (Latest Post: Prosecutors have no "Skin in the Game")

--

Posted

Personally I don't have any major issues with Embryonic stem cell research...I think its best to put this issue in perspective. The embryos we are talking about are basically left overs from fertility clinics that are locked in a perpeteul state of limbo given the current moral situation. Probabley best to put them to good use before they die of freezer burn. uhmm...but seriously, Scientists are now able to harvest Embryonic stem cells with out actually killing the embryo. Meaning that the scinetists get what they want for research and the embyo's still get to sit around all day. I personally feel that this removes any major ethical dillema, Although I am not so sure there was one to begin with...given the treatment of left over embryo's by fertility clinics in the first place.

The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. - Ayn Rand

---------

http://www.politicalcompass.org/

Economic Left/Right: 4.75

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.54

Last taken: May 23, 2007

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...