Carney yelling at Lib MPs, centralizing power

[LinkSoul60]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

So you admit to watching CBC's political coverage 😂

FYI that's no different from watching the NoKo political shows and calling them "information". 

When the CBC gets "conservatives" who work for Ford, and just want to complain about about Poilievre, that doesn't count as a "conservative" POV 😉

Yes, I've watched them, like I've watched most news outlets programs.  So, tell me when CBC does not have a cross section of political stripes with each of those shows?  Should be easy enough for you..

[WestCanMan]

30 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Yes, I've watched them, like I've watched most news outlets programs.  So, tell me when CBC does not have a cross section of political stripes with each of those shows?  Should be easy enough for you..

Their "conservative" is usually an LPoC flunkie, and the topic is always conservative-bashing.. 

These shows all start off with praise to the exalted one, a glossing over of his failures, omitting any mention of his lies, damage control for the LPoC, blame-shifting, and then they move to criticisms of Poilievre.

That's the formula.

Can you find me a show that breaks the mould?

Note that Carney got caught on MULTIPLE huge lies before the last election: they didn't make the news. 

Edited yesterday at 05:31 PM by WestCanMan

[eyeball]

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So you admit to watching CBC's political coverage

 

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I can't find their story now,

So you also admit to enjoying CBC's political coverage or do you have to force yourself?

[LinkSoul60]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Their "conservative" is usually an LPoC flunkie, and the topic is always conservative-bashing.. 

These shows all start off with praise to the exalted one, a glossing over of his failures, omitting any mention of his lies, damage control for the LPoC, blame-shifting, and then they move to criticisms of Poilievre.

That's the formula.

Can you find me a show that breaks the mould?

Note that Carney got caught on MULTIPLE huge lies before the last election: they didn't make the news. 

Aaahhhhh....   they only bring in conservatives who couldn't cut it as a liberal.  

So again... Who and when did CBC blame Poilievre for anything?  He's captain irrelevant with zero impact on anything except for conservative MP's and the publics less than flattering opinions.  There is nothing to blame him for....except the embarrassing election loss, is there?

[Army Guy]

8 hours ago, CdnFox said:

????  For carney?  They only voted for him once so far i think.

August call justin a loser, and i asked what does that say for the people that voted for him....

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Aaahhhhh....   they only bring in conservatives who couldn't cut it as a liberal.  

According to the information that was distorted enough to get bast your "iron dome of dumb" confirmation bias, the conservatives there are just plain wrong, yeah?

They don't understand the importance of all the various taxes that are driving up the cost of our fuel, or the need for Karbon Kapture Kompanies and their limitless funding from the LPoC, or the need to force teens and 20-yr-olds to take a jab they didn't need even though it was known to be unable to prevent infection or the spreading of the disease, right? 

 

They only bring in fake conservatives, like MH and apparently John Stone now.

Quote

So again... Who and when did CBC blame Poilievre for anything?  He's captain irrelevant with zero impact on anything except for conservative MP's and the publics less than flattering opinions.  There is nothing to blame him for....except the embarrassing election loss, is there?

Buddy, you watch the CBC regularly, so if you don't know now, how could I possibly explain it to you?

The best I could do would be to explain it to you: I can't understand it for you. 

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, eyeball said:

 

So you also admit to enjoying CBC's political coverage or do you have to force yourself?

I never watch it. I just see their propaganda being roasted on social media.

That camera should say CBC, but editing would be unfair to the original author. 

[eyeball]

36 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

I never watch it. I just see their propaganda being roasted on social media.

And who do you suppose roasters use for their source?

[CdnFox]

4 hours ago, Army Guy said:

August call justin a loser, and i asked what does that say for the people that voted for him....

Ahhh my bad then, i misread that. 

[Barquentine]

On 6/7/2026 at 2:50 PM, WestCanMan said:

Poilievre's support from inside the party is extremely strong

Oh, that explains the defections.

[LinkSoul60]

13 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

According to the information that was distorted enough to get bast your "iron dome of dumb" confirmation bias, the conservatives there are just plain wrong, yeah?

They don't understand the importance of all the various taxes that are driving up the cost of our fuel, or the need for Karbon Kapture Kompanies and their limitless funding from the LPoC, or the need to force teens and 20-yr-olds to take a jab they didn't need even though it was known to be unable to prevent infection or the spreading of the disease, right? 

 

They only bring in fake conservatives, like MH and apparently John Stone now.

Buddy, you watch the CBC regularly, so if you don't know now, how could I possibly explain it to you?

The best I could do would be to explain it to you: I can't understand it for you. 

Not sure how to respond to.... whatever it is you're mumbling about, so I won't 🤡

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Oh, that explains the defections.

No, bribery explains the defections.

1 hour ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Not sure how to respond to.... whatever it is you're mumbling about, so I won't 🤡

It's all stuff that bounced off of your "iron dome of dumb" confirmation bias.

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, bribery explains the defections.

It's all stuff that bounced off of your "iron dome of dumb" confirmation bias.

Sure, go with that...

Do you wear your helmet in the house, or just when you go outside?  I can almost picture you banging your head against the TV and computer screen because they're not talking about Trudeau or Covid any more....

[WestCanMan]

32 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

Sure, go with that...

Do you wear your helmet in the house, or just when you go outside?  I can almost picture you banging your head against the TV and computer screen because they're not talking about Trudeau or Covid any more....

No joke Link: you really should be wearing a helmet.

FYI vax-fascism was Canada's Kool-ade drinking moment, and you were stirring the pot. 

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Barquentine said:

Oh, that explains the defections.

Bribery explains the defections

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

No, bribery explains the defections.

LOL just said the same thing    I think deep down he knew that as well

[eyeball]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

...bribery explains the defections.

Some evidence would explain the bribery. Unfortunately there's just no way to really gather any is there? It seems there's little to nothing to prevent bribery either.

Someone should do something about that someday.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Some evidence would explain the bribery. Unfortunately there's just no way to really gather any is there? 

Sure there is. We can see them being offered cabinet positions committee positions and their constituencies receiving significant benefits as a result. In the case of the territories her company received hundreds of thousands of dollars in new contracts from the government as well.

None of which is technically illegal as long as it wasn't an official condition of their crossing.  You can legally say "gosh it wouldn't' SURPRISE me to see someone of your talent being given a bunch of committee seats and double your current income! (wink wink!)"

But there's no doubt we can absolutely 100 percent see that they derrived very very substantial benefits personally from their crossing.  So... yeah  There really is a way to verify it. 

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Sure there is.

....

There really is a way to verify it. 

Well that's good to know.

How're the investigations and prosecutions going?