Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 42 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Imagine not pursuing this because of fear of what might happen. That's basically Canada, in a nutshell. 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
Nationalist Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 3 minutes ago, Goddess said: That's basically Canada, in a nutshell. Indeed. Hence as we've retired, we're going to sell off properties and leave this messed up country. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
ExFlyer Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 1 hour ago, Barquentine said: Algorithms can be manipulated to produce wanted results. You can always phrase your questions and sift through the results to pick the answer you want. Oh...you are saying google AI has been manipulated to tell lies?? 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: This is true. AI is dangerous because it is created by people who's belief systems are programmed into the end product. Imagine someone like @robosmith or @ExFlyer programming an AI app. Even worse...imagine you, nationalism or confux or hostess programming the AI app LOL It is a good thing AI is not just programmed but a fact gathering algorithm. Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Nationalist Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 1 hour ago, ExFlyer said: Oh...you are saying google AI has been manipulated to tell lies?? Even worse...imagine you, nationalism or confux or hostess programming the AI app LOL It is a good thing AI is not just programmed but a fact gathering algorithm. I agree that I should not be programming AI apps. It good you dont too...since you know jack about it. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
ExFlyer Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 Just now, Nationalist said: I agree that I should not be programming AI apps. It good you dont too...since you know jack about it. No need to be an insulting a$$ but I agree, I should not but I do quote it since it carries facts Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Nationalist Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 Just now, ExFlyer said: No need to be an insulting a$$ but I agree, I should not but I do quote it since it carries facts My dear Flyer...I just recently retired from the IT industry. I know there are spider-bots...crawlers...in some AI apps. I also know that those apps are simplistic and only constitute a small portion of the overall process. Web crawlers are not really AI. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
John Stone Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: This is true. AI is dangerous because it is created by people who's belief systems are programmed into the end product. Imagine someone like @robosmith or @ExFlyer programming an AI app. Imagine not pursuing this because of fear of what might happen. ..............'not pursuing'? Rather than apologize, Oppenheimer justified pursuit of an atomic bomb as inevitable, stressing that scientists must expand man’s understanding and control of nature. Be grateful the royal 'we' got there first. ..........suppose an argument can be made that 'fat boy' and 'little man' saved lives. The guy that gave the order to drop the crowd pleaser is rumored to have at one time run a men's clothing store. The argument always rages whether Germany would have got the same treatment - being Caucasian and all. Quote
ExFlyer Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Nationalist said: My dear Flyer...I just recently retired from the IT industry. I know there are spider-bots...crawlers...in some AI apps. I also know that those apps are simplistic and only constitute a small portion of the overall process. Web crawlers are not really AI. OK??? AI still has facts that seem to be indisputable because when quoting I ask if they are not true, please provide proof of them being false and never get a response. Edited February 4 by ExFlyer Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
Nationalist Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 55 minutes ago, John Stone said: ..............'not pursuing'? Rather than apologize, Oppenheimer justified pursuit of an atomic bomb as inevitable, stressing that scientists must expand man’s understanding and control of nature. Be grateful the royal 'we' got there first. ..........suppose an argument can be made that 'fat boy' and 'little man' saved lives. The guy that gave the order to drop the crowd pleaser is rumored to have at one time run a men's clothing store. The argument always rages whether Germany would have got the same treatment - being Caucasian and all. Agreed. All im saying is, be very selective of who programs AI and it would be a good idea to set rules around the scope of tasks for AI. giving a computer sentience would be a bad idea. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Goddess Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 20 minutes ago, Nationalist said: giving a computer sentience would be a bad idea. Did we learn nothing from the Terminator movies? 1 Quote "There are two different types of people in the world - those who want to know and those who want to believe." ~~ Friedrich Nietzsche ~~
robosmith Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: This is true. AI is dangerous because it is created by people who's belief systems are programmed into the end product. Imagine someone like @robosmith or @ExFlyer programming an AI app. Imagine not pursuing this because of fear of what might happen. Imagine gnat girl pretending to know something about AI when it is so counter intuitive to her because she judges it based on the ONLY archaic programming experience she has. LMAO 1 Quote
John Stone Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 58 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Agreed. All im saying is, be very selective of who programs AI and it would be a good idea to set rules around the scope of tasks for AI. giving a computer sentience would be a bad idea. China has released a concept video of a futuristic space carrier that it says can deploy unmanned fighter jets (pi$$ down our neck and say it's raining) capable of flying to the edge of the Earth’s atmosphere. And then there's the concept of A.I. Lunar launch cites, China is actively pursuing its goal of landing astronauts on the Moon by 2030 - rumor is it is the dark side. The ultimate threat - as Oppenheimer stated, 'it's inevitable'. China's science programs and by extension technology is on steroids. .............. it ain't paranoid if its real. It's real. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted February 4 Author Report Posted February 4 2 hours ago, robosmith said: Imagine gnat girl pretending to know something about AI when it is so counter intuitive to her because she judges it based on the ONLY archaic programming experience she has. LMAO Lol...if I programmed AI, it would tell people you have herpes. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted February 4 Report Posted February 4 31 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Lol...if I programmed AI, it would tell people you have herpes. It would take longer than you have to live for you to learn the basics, let alone actually write AI programs. LMAO You don't even know the name of an AI framework to get started. Quick, tells us what language you would use. 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted February 5 Author Report Posted February 5 24 minutes ago, robosmith said: It would take longer than you have to live for you to learn the basics, let alone actually write AI programs. LMAO You don't even know the name of an AI framework to get started. Quick, tells us what language you would use. I would use kornhole shell just for you Sweetie. 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 30 minutes ago, Nationalist said: I would use kornhole shell just for you Sweetie. ^LYING as USUAL. Thanks for proving you don't know the first thing about AI development and can't even fake it. LMAO 1 Quote
Nationalist Posted February 5 Author Report Posted February 5 (edited) 20 minutes ago, robosmith said: ^LYING as USUAL. Thanks for proving you don't know the first thing about AI development and can't even fake it. LMAO Oh nooo...Im not a programmer! No you silly git, I was a data center architect. Now go pi55 you pants. Edited February 5 by Nationalist 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Oh nooo...Im not a programmer! No you silly git, I was a data center architect. Now go pi55 you pants. You don't even know how to architect a data center for AI. Must be why you retired. LMAO 2 Quote
ExFlyer Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 On 1/23/2026 at 1:25 PM, Goddess said: The majority of us here would far rather see the odd anecdote or personal experience posted, than pages and pages of LOOOOOOSSSERRRRR!!!!! LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LLOOOOOOSER!!!! LOSER! LOSER LOSER LOSER LOSER LOSER LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSERRRRRRR LOL LOL LOL LOSER LOSER LOL LOL Both of you need to grow the fuque up. And respect the founder and moderators of this board, who, I'm sure, set it up as a place where adults could discuss adult subjects in adult ways. I do...when discussing and asked. If confux would respond with intelligence....he would get that back in turn but,...he is incapable of that so,... he gets what he deserves As nfor "founder and moderator"...I have been here for a long time and don't know what a founder is and have never seen or heard form a moderator. LOL Quote You are entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to tell me what mine should be.
robosmith Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 On 2/4/2026 at 4:39 AM, Nationalist said: Don't forget, these are the same people who think attacking federal officers is a good idea. And you're the guy who believes them when they LIE about being attacked and then kill the fake "attacker." Quote
Nationalist Posted February 5 Author Report Posted February 5 5 minutes ago, robosmith said: And you're the guy who believes them when they LIE about being attacked and then kill the fake "attacker." Lol...go suck a zucchini fembot. These traitors are indeed attacking ICE officers in many ways. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 16 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Lol...go suck a zucchini fembot. These traitors are indeed attacking ICE officers in many ways. You'll have to take off your blinders to see that agents like Ross set up his own fake "attack." That's why he obviously was NOT injured. Did you even see the video of him briskly walking over two blocks with no sign of injury right after he pretended to be hit by Good's vehicle? He wasn't even knocked to the ground, he just braced himself on her hood with his left arm, which didn't even dislodge his phone from his left hand. IOW you're a FOOL. Quote
Nationalist Posted February 5 Author Report Posted February 5 (edited) 29 minutes ago, robosmith said: You'll have to take off your blinders to see that agents like Ross set up his own fake "attack." That's why he obviously was NOT injured. Did you even see the video of him briskly walking over two blocks with no sign of injury right after he pretended to be hit by Good's vehicle? He wasn't even knocked to the ground, he just braced himself on her hood with his left arm, which didn't even dislodge his phone from his left hand. IOW you're a FOOL. Dweebles... 1. This thread is about Helium deposits. Please try harder to be semi-relavant. 2. I saw the video. Many times. Most people have by now. The difference is WHAT YOU choose to "see". Everyone sees an uppity biatch and her fat biatch girlfriend, blocking the path of a federal law enforcement and laughing in their faces when the federal officers were ordering them to cease and decist from BREAKING THE FCKING LAWS OF THE NATION! Then, when the officer has finally had enough and moves to confiscate her vehicle and arrest her. Fat biatch girlfriend tells Good to drive away, and in her haste to get away...also a crime BTW...the uppity biatch pulls out and hits another officer who was evidently trying to aid in the pending arrest. The officer reacts instinctively...and blasts a big fat hole in the uppity biatch's head. This...Dweebles...is exactly what you saw too. Did the officer have to shoot? Not my call. Not yours either. He made a decision to protect himself...and his partner, who's hand was in the vehicle as she took off, based on training and instinct. And THAT...my dear ANTIFA terrorist, IS the blatant truth of what happened. Edited February 5 by Nationalist Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted February 5 Report Posted February 5 22 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Dweebles... 1. This thread is about Helium deposits. Please try harder to be semi-relavant. YOU ARE the one who turned it about ICE officers with this post, lDIOT: On 2/4/2026 at 4:39 AM, Nationalist said: Don't forget, these are the same people who think attacking federal officers is a good idea. 22 minutes ago, Nationalist said: 2. I saw the video. Many times. Most people have by now. The difference is WHAT YOU choose to "see". Everyone sees an uppity biatch and her fat biatch girlfriend, blocking the path of a federal law enforcement and laughing in their faces when the federal officers were ordering them to cease and decist from BREAKING THE FCKING LAWS OF THE NATION! Then, when the officer has finally had enough and moves to confiscate her vehicle and arrest her. Fat biatch girlfriend tells Good to drive away, and in her haste to get away...also a crime BTW...the uppity biatch pulls out and hits another officer who was evidently trying to aid in the pending arrest. The officer reacts instinctively...and blasts a big fat hole in the uppity biatch's head. This...Dweebles...is exactly what you saw too. You MISSED a LOT of VIDEOS which showed Ross standing 2 feet away from the vehicle as it passed. Duh He leaned forward to brace himself on her hood with his left arm and didn't even drop the cell phone in his left hand. He OBVIOUSLY FOOLED YOU. 22 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Did the officer have to shoot? Not my call. Not yours either. He made a decision to protect himself...and his partner, who's hand was in the vehicle as she took off, based on training and instinct. And THAT...my dear ANTIFA terrorist, IS the blatant truth of what happened. The truth of what happened is you seeing ONLY what you want to see. Shooting a driver never protects anyone because it never stops the car. That's why there are POLICIES PROHIBITING shooting into vehicles. Duh Quote
Nationalist Posted February 5 Author Report Posted February 5 22 minutes ago, robosmith said: YOU ARE the one who turned it about ICE officers with this post, lDIOT: You MISSED a LOT of VIDEOS which showed Ross standing 2 feet away from the vehicle as it passed. Duh He leaned forward to brace himself on her hood with his left arm and didn't even drop the cell phone in his left hand. He OBVIOUSLY FOOLED YOU. The truth of what happened is you seeing ONLY what you want to see. Shooting a driver never protects anyone because it never stops the car. That's why there are POLICIES PROHIBITING shooting into vehicles. Duh You truly are hopeless. Meh...eventually you too will challenge a cop and...go bye bye... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.