Pierre is back!

[ExFlyer]

2 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

None of it, it's YOU guys who are disagreeing with it. 

Yet strangely had no problem with the cost of proroguing parliament and then the cost of a snap election to install your guy even tho there's still almost a year left in the term and you were only doing it to try to take advantage of the timing  LOLOLOL

And we're supposed to take it seriously that you're 'deeply concerned about a lousy 2 million. 

Who is disagreeing...Carney was gentlemanly enough to give PP the opportunity.

Oh, you mean like Harper prorogued parliament and called a snap election????

LOSERS LOL

 

[LinkSoul60]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

None of it, it's YOU guys who are disagreeing with it. 

And I'm sure being the totally objective fool that you are you'd think the same if this was a liberal begging for a seat....wouldn't you 

[CdnFox]

Just now, ExFlyer said:

Who is disagreeing...

 

You. 

Quote

Carney was gentlemanly enough to give PP the opportunity.

Carney selfishly cost the taxpayers 570 million dollars to try to take advantage of trump to con his way into power.  But.. 2 million to run a legitimate by election is sooooo upsetting  

Quote

Oh, you mean like Harper prorogued parliament and called a snap election????

THat never actually happened     Which election happened when harper 'prorogued parliament and then called a snap election'?

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

And I'm sure being the totally objective fool that you are you'd think the same if this was a liberal begging for a seat....wouldn't you 

Truthfully i would,  i've spoken out against this kind of stupidity before.  Hence my initial comment that the left always complains about the cost of the democratic process when they don't like the result or that people exercised their democracy.   

Did you see all those posts where i said it was horrible that carney called a snap election almost a year before the election date to take advantage of trump when it happened? No? Me neither.    I'll bring it up now to point out your hypocrisy in being mad over 2 million but saying nothing about the 500 million carney blew to cheat his way into power. 

You're a complete hypocrite and your fear of PP is heartwarming   

[WestCanMan]

On 8/19/2025 at 11:00 AM, LinkSoul60 said:

The Conservatives have a leadership problem, obviously.  

LMAO. The conservatives aren't the party whose best candidate was Chrystia Freeland lol. There's a very good reason they instantly dropped a guy who just got elected a couple weeks ago to get PP back behind the helm. He's the most beloved politician in this country, maybe ever. 

FYI the LPOC only had Chrystia and the cultists to choose from, so they had to choose a barely Canadian liar who wasn't within 2,000 miles of the LPOC for ten years to be their leader.

You guys are reduced to having to lie for a spineless, clueless weasel. 

Quote

Poilievre is just not likeable and has been branded as such.  That's fact.

Stop citing CBC talking points as "fact", Link. You might as well change your username to Cultist Idjut.

[ExFlyer]

Just now, CdnFox said:

You've never had a boss in your life, you're still a kid. 
 

Stoopidity isn’t a crime, so you’re free to go. LOL

You never have anything to say worth reading.  HA HA HA

[LinkSoul60]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

The conservatives aren't the party whose best candidate was Chrystia Freeland lol.

No, the conservatives have had O'Toole, Scheer and now Poilievre, all failures in their own right as the fact of results say. 

Not sure when Freeland was elected as party leader?

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Stoopidity isn’t a crime, so you’re free to go. LOL

You never have anything to say worth reading.  HA HA HA

ROFLMAO!!!  Well you sure spend a lot of time reading and replying for someone who claims to think that

 

I"ve told you before, i'm not your daddy and if your mom doesn't know who is I sure as hell can't help you. Crying to me and begging for my attention won't help  

[ExFlyer]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

LMAO. The conservatives aren't the party whose best candidate was Chrystia Freeland lol. There's a very good reason they instantly dropped a guy who just got elected a couple weeks ago to get PP back behind the helm. He's the most beloved politician in this country, maybe ever. 

FYI the LPOC only had Chrystia and the cultists to choose from, so they had to choose a barely Canadian liar who wasn't within 2,000 miles of the LPOC for ten years to be their leader.

You guys are reduced to having to lie for a spineless, clueless weasel. 

 

But they had Harper that quit in a huff and lost. Then had O'foole that lost, then had scheer that lost then had PP that lost... and then you decide to keep PP....to lose again??

Freeland (although a suckhole), was never a leader. 

Liberals are the government....you don't have to like it but, it is a fact...even the CBC will tell you that LOL

 

 

Edited August 21, 2025 by ExFlyer

[ExFlyer]

4 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO!!!  

Another 5 second wasted cutting and pasting LOL

Stoopidity isn’t a crime, so you’re free to go. LOL

You never have anything to say worth reading.  HA HA HA

[CdnFox]

Just now, ExFlyer said:

But they had Harper that quit in a huff and lost.

Harper never quit in a huff. He was there for 10 years, and won again and again and again.  Everyone loses in the end, unless they quit in shame and ignomany with their tail between their legs like justin    But he won a lot more than he lost

Interesting parallels.   Harper faced a new liberal leader that was supposed to be a financial whiz and was expected to win a majority, and forced him to a minority. Then within two years he took him to the polls again and beat him and the liberal had to hang his head in shame having only been PM for 2 years. 

Now PP is following exactly the same track. 

History repeating itself? Is that why you're so sad?

 

Just now, ExFlyer said:

Another 5 second wasted cutting and pasting LOL

Stoopidity isn’t a crime, so you’re free to go. LOL

You never have anything to say worth reading.  HA HA HA

Plus the 2 minutes it took you to read my post    We all know you have to go slow and move your lips when you read   LOLOL

[ExFlyer]

23 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You. 

Carney selfishly cost the taxpayers 570 million dollars to try to take advantage of trump to con his way into power.  But.. 2 million to run a legitimate by election is sooooo upsetting  

THat never actually happened     Which election happened when harper 'prorogued parliament and then called a snap election'?

Oh phk, your level of stoopid just gets worse and worse LOL

9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Harper never quit in a huff..

Stoopidity isn’t a crime, so you’re free to go. LOL

You never have anything to say worth reading.  HA HA HA

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Oh phk, your level of stoopid just gets worse and worse LOL

LOL awww muffin, you butthurt again that you can't actually refute the facts?   

Poor guy, you've already suffered emotional damage and it's not even noon! 

[WestCanMan]

22 minutes ago, LinkSoul60 said:

No, the conservatives have had O'Toole, Scheer and now Poilievre, all failures in their own right as the fact of results say. 

It's obviously our democracy that failed, because our hyper-partisan media propped up losers (Trudeau & Carney) who got us into trade wars with the US & China and put us on shaky diplomatic ground with India.

Quote

Not sure when Freeland was elected as party leader?

Not sure if you can't read or if you're ret4rded, but I just described how toxic the LPOC politburo is right now.

They had to recruit a self-proclaimed European who Canadians associate more closely with Stephen Harper than the LPOC to lead them. 

If it wasn't for the CBC's strong brainwashing game (you can't deny that - it worked like a charm on you), Carney and the LPOC wouldn't have won 12 seats. 

28 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

ROFLMAO!!!  Well you sure spend a lot of time reading and replying for someone who claims to think that

 

I"ve told you before, i'm not your daddy and if your mom doesn't know who is I sure as hell can't help you. Crying to me and begging for my attention won't help  

Stop replying to down-arrow boy. Just ignore his posts. It's a waste of bandwidth, and everyone's time. 

[ExFlyer]

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

LOL awww muffin, you butthurt again that you can't actually refute the facts?   

Poor guy, you've already suffered emotional damage and it's not even noon! 

Nope...just stating facts. 

LOSERs like you are so much fun to troll

 

 

Edited August 21, 2025 by ExFlyer

[Shady]

This thread is a perfect example of why Canada is in the shape it’s in, and why everything has gotten worse over the past decade.  Too many people are fixated over individuals with no legislative power, while ignoring or giving a pass to those who do.  You’d think Pierre had been PM since 2015 the way libtards are obsessed with him and everything he does.  Meanwhile, the actual party in power destroys the housing market, destroys the immigration system, destroys the health care system and puts Canada in economic decline, and nary a peep from these people.  

[ExFlyer]

39 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's.....

Stop replying to down-arrow boy. Just ignore his posts. It's a waste of bandwidth, and everyone's time. 

Been telling him that for a year but he must be as deaf as he is a stoopid LOSER LOL

I have told him and others that I only respond to posts to me...stop posting to me and I will not have to respond.

It takes me 5 seconds to cut and paste to him and his obsession with me seems to need for him to carry on.

Edited August 21, 2025 by ExFlyer

[herbie]

The puke in the bucket was the best comment ever.

Edited August 21, 2025 by herbie

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Been telling him that for a year but he must be as deaf as he is a stoopid LOSER LOL

I have told him and others that I only respond to posts to me...stop posting to me and I will not have to respond.

It takes me 5 seconds to cut and paste to him and his obsession with me seems to need for him to carry on.

so once again you're claiming i control you like a puppet? You have no ability to control yourself? Hmmmm

[ExFlyer]

11 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

so once again you're claiming i control you like a puppet? You have no ability to control yourself? Hmmmm

Nope, just letting them know that I am in your head and you are obsessed with me.

The only one not seeing that is you LOL

Your buddies are telling you to stop but your addiction with me prevents you for that LOL

You gotta go back to those steps of addiction recovery program LOL 

 

[I am Groot]

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

All PP has ever done is complain. As a former boss (and so many bosses also) said, don't come to me with complainants all the time, come to me with solutions...and PP does not do that. 

Yes, he absolutely does and has. Did you miss all the policy proposals he made during the last election?

4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

You clearly miss the point. The conservatives have lost 4 elections, with 4 leaders. Perhaps the conservatives need to find a leader that most Canadians can believe in and see as a leader of the country. So far they have not and now, they have the same one that lost as a leader again.

You want a leader who will lie to them, throw out tens of billions in promises, and promise to be everyone's mommy? We already have one Liberal party. We don't need two. Eventually, people are going to start looking at how much of the budget is going to debt, at how high the deficits are, at the massive waste, the healthcare crisis, the housing crisis, the rising unemployment rate as foreign workers pour into the country and realize this probably isn't a good thing and will never change under the Liberals.

[I am Groot]

4 hours ago, LinkSoul60 said:

What part of sending him to the safest riding they could find and spending $2M to do it do you disagree with? 

Two million bucks is an excellent investment if it will bring in someone who will turf the Liberals and their massive vote buying schemes. We dump billions every year into every racial, ethnic, gender, cultural, environmental, poverty, and social welfare activist group in the country, not to help people, but so those people who get the money can help persuade the people in that voting bloc to vote Liberal. 

We're going to spend over half a billion buying back rifles, shotguns and air rifles so the Liberals can sooth the fearful brows of urban lefties who know nothing about guns other than they're afraid of them.

We spend billions on processing and taking care of hundreds of thousands of fake refugees every year because the Liberals want them and their families, relatives, and expatriate groups to vote for them.

Yeah, spending a couple of million for a leader who can hopefully help point out the corruption and incompetence of the Liberals is a very worthy investment. Chump change.

Now suppose you tell me why you're thrilled by all the above, but are aghast at spending $2m on a byelection?

Edited August 21, 2025 by I am Groot

[ExFlyer]

1 minute ago, I am Groot said:

Yes, he absolutely does and has. Did you miss all the policy proposals he made during the last election?

You want a leader who will lie to them, throw out tens of billions in promises, and promise to be everyone's mommy? We already have one Liberal party. We don't need two. Eventually, people are going to start looking at how much of the budget is going to debt, at how high the deficits are, at the massive waste, the healthcare crisis, the housing crisis, the rising unemployment rate as foreign workers pour into the country and realize this probably isn't a good thing and will never change under the Liberals.

Nope, I want a leader that has solutions, not complaints.

I want a leader for all of Canada and not for his own political career.

I want a leader that is abut Canada, not about himself.

Yes we have problems in Canada, many of which are from outside forces and many of which are shared by most countries in the world. We are not alone and certainly not capable of going it alone. Our southern neighbours are one of the prime reasons we are where we are.

As I said in a previous post, I think had the conservatives chosen Rona Ambrose  who was all about Canada, they would have been the government. But Harper lost so they chose O'Foole, then Scheer and then PP, twice...all guys that like themselves more than Canada.

[I am Groot]

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

Nope, I want a leader that has solutions, not complaints.

And Poilievre has given solutions. 

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

. We are not alone and certainly not capable of going it alone. Our southern neighbours are one of the prime reasons we are where we are.

Not really. We've been heading downhill compared to the Americans since the Liberals came to power. It didn't start with Trump and it won't end if Trump keels over and dies today and takes all his tariffs with him. We're going downhill because that's what happens to a country with high taxes, a huge bureacracy, and an enormous regulatory system that makes doing business highly expensive and time-consuming.

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

As I said in a previous post, I think had the conservatives chosen Rona Ambrose  who was all about Canada,

Yeah, yeah, yeah. After every election people talk nostalgically about how they would have voted for this or that person if they'd been in charge. But they never do.

"We want someone nice, not like Harper!"
Here's smiley Scheer!
"No, not that one!"
Here's friendly O'Toole!
"No, not that one!"
Here's Poilievre!
"We want someone nice!"

[ExFlyer]

19 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

And Poilievre has given solutions. 

Not really. We've been heading downhill compared to the Americans since the Liberals came to power. It didn't start with Trump and it won't end if Trump keels over and dies today and takes all his tariffs with him. We're going downhill because that's what happens to a country with high taxes, a huge bureacracy, and an enormous regulatory system that makes doing business highly expensive and time-consuming.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. After every election people talk nostalgically about how they would have voted for this or that person if they'd been in charge. But they never do.

"We want someone nice, not like Harper!"
Here's smiley Scheer!
"No, not that one!"
Here's friendly O'Toole!
"No, not that one!"
Here's Poilievre!
"We want someone nice!"

OK, I must have missed them...please provide me with solutions PP has proposed.

I think you need to look at facts and yes, Trudeau has made some very skeptical decisions based on his personal feelings but, he is gone and we need to gather our $hit and make it right. I think Carney is on the road to that.

Looking at our election is not nostalgic... the evidence is clear as to what the country wanted. Our economy was not good, our immigration was not good, our housing situation was not good, our costs of living was high.

Yet, we did not vote conservative. You need to dig deep and ask why. I am not saying this for argument sake, it happened and why? 

We don't want someone "nice" we want a leader with some smarts, not just a life long political resume.

Lets be frank...if PP would have gotten his security clearances, he would be far more informed than he is now and may have been able to speak with knowledge rather than rhetoric.

I have said this before but many have forgotten but  I am not a liberal... (I play devils advocate on this fourm and love winding up some of the posters), I am a westerner and have never been liberal since Trudeau Snr travelled through BC and gave us the finger and told us to fuddle duddle but i have not had any respect for a conservative leader since Mulroney.