robosmith Posted August 15, 2025 Report Posted August 15, 2025 3 hours ago, Shady said: This is Orwellian, as you guys were the ones that weaponized the DOJ. But yes, there's definitely legal retribution for anyone that turned the DOJ into an arm of the Democrat party. Unlike Trump who promised to weaponize the DoJ for revenge, Biden never said a word about doing that. IOW, you're just making up crap. 2 hours ago, Nationalist said: Ya gits wut ya pays fer. Suck it up. YOU GOT BUPKIS as USUAL. Quote
CdnFox Posted August 15, 2025 Report Posted August 15, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Unlike Trump who promised to weaponize the DoJ for revenge, Biden never said a word about doing that. But he actually did it. And I directly told you at the time that this was going to result in trump doing the same to them when he got into power if they went through with it. They went through with it, now they're paying the price. 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
robosmith Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: But he actually did it. And I directly told you at the time that this was going to result in trump doing the same to them when he got into power if they went through with it. They went through with it, now they're paying the price. You FORGOT to post ANY EVIDENCE of Biden directing his DoJ to do ANYTHING. The FACT is, IT DOESN'T MATTER what you GUESSED about Trump doing. Not even Trump believed he was innocent in the BIG LIE, but HE FOOLED YOU with HIS DOUBLE TALK. LMAO Quote
gatomontes99 Posted August 16, 2025 Author Report Posted August 16, 2025 10 minutes ago, robosmith said: You FORGOT to post ANY EVIDENCE of Biden directing his DoJ to do ANYTHING. The FACT is, IT DOESN'T MATTER what you GUESSED about Trump doing. Not even Trump believed he was innocent in the BIG LIE, but HE FOOLED YOU with HIS DOUBLE TALK. LMAO Yes, there is evidence: https://aflegal.org/press-release/america-first-legals-investigation-reveals-the-biden-white-house-was-involved-with-the-mar-a-lago-raid-and-that-nara-misled-congress-afl-launches-additional-investigation/ However, new NARA records obtained through AFL’s investigation into the circumstances surrounding the Mar-a-Lago raid further confirmed that the FBI obtained access to these records through a “special access request” from the Biden White House on behalf of the Department of Justice (DOJ). https://aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SS-1-1024x880.png This stunning revelation suggests that NARA was misleading Congress about the White House’s role in the shocking raid of President Trump’s home, and the fact that the Biden White House was acting “on behalf of” the DOJ raises significant legal concerns. That coordination got the case dismissed. Are you just not aware of reality or do you say these things hoping no one will notice? Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 5 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: Yes, there is evidence: https://aflegal.org/press-release/america-first-legals-investigation-reveals-the-biden-white-house-was-involved-with-the-mar-a-lago-raid-and-that-nara-misled-congress-afl-launches-additional-investigation/ However, new NARA records obtained through AFL’s investigation into the circumstances surrounding the Mar-a-Lago raid further confirmed that the FBI obtained access to these records through a “special access request” from the Biden White House on behalf of the Department of Justice (DOJ). https://aflegal.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SS-1-1024x880.png This stunning revelation suggests that NARA was misleading Congress about the White House’s role in the shocking raid of President Trump’s home, and the fact that the Biden White House was acting “on behalf of” the DOJ raises significant legal concerns. That coordination got the case dismissed. Are you just not aware of reality or do you say these things hoping no one will notice? ALL I SAID was "You FORGOT to post ANY EVIDENCE of Biden directing his DoJ to do ANYTHING" which is 100% TRUE, that NO EVIDENCE was POSTED, lDIOT. WTH is "aflegal.org" and why do you believe them? You got ANY CREDIBLE SOURCE? LMAO 1 Quote
robosmith Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 So AFL Foundation IS STEPHEN MILLER, and you're a FOOL and a LYING PARTISAN HACK if you believe they are OBJECTIVE. LMAO Thanks for reminding me to NEVER TRUST your naked LINKS. Stephen Miller's legal army outside the White House Axios https://www.axios.com › Axios › Politics & Policy Mar 8, 2025 — Miller's America First Legal is a key part of his larger mission to make DEI programs illegal across the country — based on the argument ... Quote
gatomontes99 Posted August 16, 2025 Author Report Posted August 16, 2025 (edited) 7 hours ago, robosmith said: ALL I SAID was "You FORGOT to post ANY EVIDENCE of Biden directing his DoJ to do ANYTHING" which is 100% TRUE, that NO EVIDENCE was POSTED, lDIOT. WTH is "aflegal.org" and why do you believe them? You got ANY CREDIBLE SOURCE? LMAO That information was literally the reason the case got dismissed. How much more credible do you need? It was submitted and accepted in a court of law. And there you go, trying to derail another thread by making it about semantics and sources. The source is credible. It is a legal foundation. The information came from FOIA filings. Also, you know you implied that the information was bad because sources weren't posted. Now you are trying to save face by trying to use semantics to get out of it. All so you can derail a thread and distract from the fact that your fantasy world isn't real. Wake up. Stop dreaming. Edited August 16, 2025 by gatomontes99 Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
robosmith Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: That information was literally the reason they case got dismissed. How much more credible do you need? It was submitted and accepted in a court of law. And there you go, trying to derail another thread by making it about semantics and sources. The source is credible. It is a legal foundation. The information came from FOIA filings. Also, you know you implied that the information was bad because sources weren't posted. Now you are trying to save face by trying to use semantics to get out of it. All so you can derail a thread and distract from the fact that your fantasy world isn't real. Wake up. Stop dreaming. No, I'm making it about YOUR DISHONEST SOURCE that YOU POSTED HERE. Duh So you ARE A FOOL because you DO BELIEVE MILLER is an OBJECTIVE SOURCE. Apparently you are IGNORANT of all the LIES that MILLER TELLS. Here are a FEW OF THEM: Stephen Miller's bushels of Pinocchios for false voter-fraud ... The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com › ... › Fact Checker Feb 12, 2017 — White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller appeared on ABC's “The Week” on Sunday, spouting a bunch of false talking points on alleged voter fraud. Quote
gatomontes99 Posted August 16, 2025 Author Report Posted August 16, 2025 7 hours ago, robosmith said: No, I'm making it about YOUR DISHONEST SOURCE that YOU POSTED HERE. Duh So you ARE A FOOL because you DO BELIEVE MILLER is an OBJECTIVE SOURCE. Apparently you are IGNORANT of all the LIES that MILLER TELLS. Here are a FEW OF THEM: Stephen Miller's bushels of Pinocchios for false voter-fraud ... The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com › ... › Fact Checker Feb 12, 2017 — White House senior policy adviser Stephen Miller appeared on ABC's “The Week” on Sunday, spouting a bunch of false talking points on alleged voter fraud. Talk about derailing a thread, but ok. First, Stephen Miller is one of three on their leadership page. Even if you are arrogant enough to beleive he was wrong that one time, doesn't mean he's wrong every time. If you think he was lying, then how did he fake the documents that came from a FOIA request and were used in a court case to dismiss charges? Finally, democrats have continuously lied about Trump and have been proven liars, so why should I beleive your article? We now know that China was sending forged IDs, using real names and real ID numbers to Chinese nationals here in the US with the expressed purpose of voting for Joe Biden. We also know that millions of illegal aliens did register and vote. So how, exactly, is Stephen Miller wrong? https://nypost.com/2024/06/14/us-news/how-non-citizens-are-getting-voter-registration-forms-across-the-us-and-how-republicans-are-trying-to-stop-it/ Welfare offices and other agencies in at least 46 US states are providing voter registration forms to migrants without requiring proof of citizenship, leading Republicans and conservatives to call for swift federal action to stop the handouts. Every state but North Dakota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin and Wyoming gives applicants for either welfare benefits, driver’s licenses, or in some cases, mail-in ballots federal voter registration forms without demanding proof of citizenship. https://nypost.com/2025/06/17/us-news/fbi-delivers-intel-to-congress-on-alleged-chinese-plot-to-interfere-in-2020-election/ FBI delivers intel to Congress on alleged Chinese plot to interfere in 2020 election Your article is a lie. Stephen Miller was not wrong that there was a lot of fraud. Quote Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it?
Nationalist Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 The whole Libbie house of cards is crumbling. They were in such a panic to "get Trump" that they crossed several legal lines and now it's Trump's turn. What people think is forest fire smoke, is really all the Libbies roasting in their own juices of illegality. So Libbies...sit back and enjoy the proceedings. It's gonna be... Enlightening. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 4 hours ago, Nationalist said: The whole Libbie house of cards is crumbling. They were in such a panic to "get Trump" that they crossed several legal lines and now it's Trump's turn. What people think is forest fire smoke, is really all the Libbies roasting in their own juices of illegality. So Libbies...sit back and enjoy the proceedings. It's gonna be... Enlightening. Thanks for proving once again your have no idea about what's going on here. And you completely missed Trump's disastrous performance in Alaska. He completely FAILED to get ANY concessions from Putin and said it's all up to Zelinskyy now. 🤮 Quote
Nationalist Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Thanks for proving once again your have no idea about what's going on here. And you completely missed Trump's disastrous performance in Alaska. He completely FAILED to get ANY concessions from Putin and said it's all up to Zelinskyy now. 🤮 Lol...you're such a sh1tty American. It was always going to be up to The Green T-shirt. If a deal isn't struck, I figure his own people will revolt. But ya...you stick to your story. It shows the world...yet again...what a sh1tty patriot you are. Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 1 hour ago, Nationalist said: Lol...you're such a sh1tty American. It was always going to be up to The Green T-shirt. If a deal isn't struck, I figure his own people will revolt. But ya...you stick to your story. It shows the world...yet again...what a sh1tty patriot you are. The shitty PATRIOT is Trump: the guy who took Putin's side AFTER threatening severe sanctions if Putin didn't agree to a cease fire. But TACO. 🤮 Like I said, YOU ARE COMPLETELY IGNORANT about what is happening here. Or else you're on Putin's side and just making lame excuses for Trump's FAILURE. 🤮 Quote
CdnFox Posted August 16, 2025 Report Posted August 16, 2025 2 hours ago, robosmith said: The shitty PATRIOT is Trump: So you agree that trump is a patriot? 1 Quote "That which doesn't kill me... Had better start running."
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.