Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

 

And the left will justify the violence.

Of course they will, just like the left justified giving blanket pardons to people for any crime they may have committed, yet when Trump was leaving office that was their fear that he would give blanket pardons to his people and yet didn't.

Its always "different" when they do it. But but but Trump really did commit crimes even though everyone and their grandma had classified documents in insecure areas. Hilary and her server and Biden in his garage and in a closet at a college. What I want you to remember is they were throwing a hissy fit that Trump had these documents for less than a year and raided his home while Biden had them for decades and he had no authority to take any of them home with him, hell he had some from when he was a Senator that in order to even read them he has to be in a secure room in Congress and can't take them out of that room.

Edited by Fluffypants
Posted
6 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Of course they will, just like the left justified giving blanket pardons to people for any crime they may have committed, yet when Trump was leaving office that was their fear that he would give blanket pardons to his people and yet didn't.

Trump gave 144 pardons, including 74 on his final day of office:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_granted_executive_clemency_by_Donald_Trump#:~:text=Trump issued a total of,and 74 in January 2021.&text=N%2FA – Arpaio's pardon was,prior to his being sentenced.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Trolls be trolling.  Trolls also attract... trolls.

 

And here you are. 

  • Like 1

LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... 

From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."

 

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

Barack Obama pardoned or granted clemency to 1927 people.

Clinton 459

Carter 556

Trump is a lightweight compared to Democrats when it comes to pardoning people.

 

Edited by Fluffypants
  • Like 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

Of course they will, just like the left justified giving blanket pardons to people for any crime they may have committed, yet when Trump was leaving office that was their fear that he would give blanket pardons to his people and yet didn't.

Its always "different" when they do it. But but but Trump really did commit crimes even though everyone and their grandma had classified documents in insecure areas. Hilary and her server and Biden in his garage and in a closet at a college. What I want you to remember is they were throwing a hissy fit that Trump had these documents for less than a year and raided his home while Biden had them for decades and he had no authority to take any of them home with him, hell he had some from when he was a Senator that in order to even read them he has to be in a secure room in Congress and can't take them out of that room.

The difference is Biden returned EVERYTHING when discovered, and Trump continually tried to HIDE HIS and fought against returning them for over a year while "hiding" them in his bathroom.

I'll grant that could be a secure location since no one in their right mind would venture there. LMAO

Oh, and some of his classified documents were found in HIS DESK DRAWERS despite his claims he never looked them.

Don't forget he was caught ON TAPE discussing/showing highly classified documents to an UNCLEARED REPORTER.

That is for what General Petraeus was convicted.

On April 23, 2015, Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of mishandling classified materials. He was given a two-year probationary period and a fine of $100,000.
Posted
4 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Trolls be trolling.  Trolls also attract... trolls.

 

Trump's secret weapon.

Shhhhh.

  • Haha 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
On 12/7/2024 at 5:57 AM, gatomontes99 said:

 

And the left will justify the violence.

I stopped at "soooo we've been attacked". lol

You want to see a real attack lady? Keep trying to cram your marxist bullshit down America's throat. ;) 

On 12/7/2024 at 6:44 PM, eyeball said:

Trump's secret weapon.

Shhhhh.

eyeball thinks transsexualism is the crux of science. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Deluge said:

eyeball thinks transsexualism is the crux of science. 

I said Trump is the consummate troll, but transsexual? I wouldn't be surprised in the least.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I said Trump is the consummate troll, but transsexual? I wouldn't be surprised in the least.

We know what you say, and it's almost always wrong - just like your belief that transsexualism is the crux of science. ;) 

Edited by Deluge
  • Like 1
Posted
On 12/7/2024 at 12:57 PM, Michael Hardner said:

Trolls be trolling.  Trolls also attract... trolls.

If she's actively calling for people to commit violence against the government, that's textbook sedition. That's the beginning and end of what you have to do to be guilty of the crime of sedition. FYI being a part of a mob that attacks the capitol does not meet any criteria of the definition of sedition.

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth. 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If she's actively calling for people to commit violence against the government, that's textbook sedition. That's the beginning and end of what you have to do to be guilty of the crime of sedition. FYI being a part of a mob that attacks the capitol does not meet any criteria of the definition of sedition.

I'm honestly not sure what the hell she's advocating. At first glance it seems like she's referring to the election as being an attack but if you listen to it again she says we have been attacked and the orange man isn't the one to handle it. That suggests she thinks the attack is something else, but after that she just kind of gets weird about how they can't let it happen and ???? 

I think the attack she should be worried about is the brain worm that is obviously chewing on her cerebral cortex

And the evidence continues to pile up that democrats really do have more mental health issues

Edited by CdnFox
  • Like 1
Posted

It's amazing how right wingers have decided that random strangers on social media and daytime talk show hosts are the most important representatives of the Democratic party lmao.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted
7 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's amazing how right wingers have decided that random strangers on social media and daytime talk show hosts are the most important representatives of the Democratic party lmao.

It's amazing how now that you realize after the election how terrible they make you look that you're desperately trying to disavow them  :) 

We also think of you as a representative sample.  That doesn't make things better of course.

Posted
3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

It's amazing how now that you realize after the election how terrible they make you look that you're desperately trying to disavow them  :) 

We also think of you as a representative sample.  That doesn't make things better of course.

Who is this person in this video? Why should we care about what they say anymore than you care about the various psychos on the right?

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect." - Francis M. Wilhoit

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

If she's actively calling for people to commit violence against the government, that's textbook sedition. That's the beginning and end of what you have to do to be guilty of the crime of sedition. FYI being a part of a mob that attacks the capitol does not meet any criteria of the definition of sedition.

You keep sticking with that.

Meanwhile...

§2384. Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

 

^^Good thing none of that happened before or on Jan 6. 🙄

Edited by Hodad
Posted
1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

Who is this person in this video? Why should we care about what they say anymore than you care about the various psychos on the right?

Random democrat or a talk show host according to you  :)  And I don't recall saying that you should care about what the various psychos on your side of the fence think.

I just noticed that it was very interesting how suddenly you distance yourself when you realize they cost you an election. The talk show host especially. They're even crazier than the random psychos :) 

Posted

I just saw it with the volume on, she wasn't threatening anyone, she just thinks that WWIII will break out when Trump gets into the WH. She's just stupid, she wasn't making threats. 

I don't think the threat title is accurate at all. 

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

Kamala didn't get where she is because of her achievements or anything that came out of her mouth. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,844
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    beatbot
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Radiorum went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • SkyHigh went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Venandi earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Proficient
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...