Kamala's Billions

[Fluffypants]

Did her relative die and tell her if she spends a 1.5 billion in 3 months she will get 100 billion dollars? (if you get the movie reference, good on you.)

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt? Did she pay everyone to actually endorse her and run glowing stories about her? I hope somebody audits that campaign there is definitely something going on there.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/harris-campaign-spend-debt-democrats-b2648680.html

Edited November 26, 2024 by Fluffypants

[Legato]

1 minute ago, Fluffypants said:

Did her relative die and tell her if she spends a 1.5 billion in 3 months she will get 100 billion dollars? (if you get the movie reference, good on you.)

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt? Did she pay everyone to actually endorse her and run glowing stories about her? I hope somebody audits that campaign there is definitely something going on there.

It's probably climate change.

[DUI_Offender]

10 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Did her relative die and tell her if she spends a 1.5 billion in 3 months she will get 100 billion dollars? (if you get the movie reference, good on you.)

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt? Did she pay everyone to actually endorse her and run glowing stories about her? I hope somebody audits that campaign there is definitely something going on there.

It would be wonderful if you could share a source, or link with us about this. I have no idea what you are talking about, and my assumption is that I am probably not alone. 

[Fluffypants]

5 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

It would be wonderful if you could share a source, or link with us about this. I have no idea what you are talking about, and my assumption is that I am probably not alone. 

Added a link to the original post

[DUI_Offender]

4 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Added a link to the original post

I read a couple of paragraphs, and died inside. Kamala should crawl under a rock, and stay there. 

I could have have a better job.  I mean I certainly would have not been the first President with a DUI. 

Edited November 26, 2024 by DUI_Offender

[robosmith]

24 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

Did her relative die and tell her if she spends a 1.5 billion in 3 months she will get 100 billion dollars? (if you get the movie reference, good on you.)

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt? Did she pay everyone to actually endorse her and run glowing stories about her? I hope somebody audits that campaign there is definitely something going on there.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/harris-campaign-spend-debt-democrats-b2648680.html

How the hell do you make up bullshit when your cite says the OPPOSITE? LMAO

Quote

The campaign’s chief financial officer, Patrick Stauffer, said in a statement to the Times that there were “no outstanding debts or overdue bills” as of Election Day and that “there will be no debt” on the next DNC or Harris for President campaign filings in December.

 

5 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

I read a couple of paragraphs, and died inside. Kamala should crawl under a rock, and stay there. 

I could have have a better job.  I mean I certainly would have not been the first President with a DUI. 

She had plenty of money and not much time to spend it. Why should she not go all out?

It would be much worse for her to not spend all the money.

[DUI_Offender]

51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

How the hell do you make up bullshit when your cite says the OPPOSITE? LMAO

 

She had plenty of money and not much time to spend it. Why should she not go all out?

It would be much worse for her to not spend all the money.

The Democrats should have forced Biden out in early 2024, held a primary, and selected a competent Presidential candidate. Kamala was never a winner.

[ironstone]

It would be really interesting to see a detailed breakdown of how all that money was spent. 

Exactly how much went to celebrities for their endorsements?

How much was spent on detailing her policies to the American public? Probably not much, if anything.

[Fluffypants]

1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

The Democrats should have forced Biden out in early 2024, held a primary, and selected a competent Presidential candidate. Kamala was never a winner.

They were behind the eight ball but Biden polled better than anyone else and they were going to ride that corpse till the end but when he shit the bed at the debate big time donors were threatening to turn off the money spigot they had to get a new candidate to keep the money flowing.

Biden screwed them because he endorse her in his dropping out speech.

They accepted it and they tried their damnedest to turn Honey Boo Boo into a supermodel and they largely succeeded in fooling people into thinking she was a real contender. I never saw that much gaslighting done by the liberal media in my life. Thing is they ended destroying what little credibility they had left and they lost a ton of viewers.

 

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

 

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt?

 

And still lose.

Quote

Did she pay everyone to actually endorse her and run glowing stories about her?

Yes. Pretty much all of the celebrities and other people who endorsed to received massive cash payments to do so. Some have actually released the numbers and many of them are in the 10 million or more bracket.

They really leaned into the celebrity endorsement and thought that would deliver a win. If anything it seems to have turned the American public off. It made her seem fake and like a fictional character rather than a real person, while trump's talks with the likes of elon musk and joe Rubin made him seem like more of a person and more relatable.

It really is hard to imagine how the democrats could have screwed up this campaign anymore than they did. But it was a perfect storm for them, Kamala was always a horrible candidate. She was a horrible candidate when she was forced to step down due to lack of interest in 2020. And on top of it this was dropped on her out of the blue with no time to prepare. People don't realize it but it generally takes a good solid year of work to really plan up for and organize a good campaign.

So it's not like it's a surprise. A bad candidate starting from a disadvantage ran a bad campaign. She overspent in all the wrong places trying to sell herself on popularity rather than policy or engaging with the public. And trump ate her alive.

Maybe when he gets into power he can lend her that 20 million she short

[DUI_Offender]

On 11/26/2024 at 3:08 PM, Fluffypants said:

Did her relative die and tell her if she spends a 1.5 billion in 3 months she will get 100 billion dollars? (if you get the movie reference, good on you.)

 

Brewster's Millions.

[Nationalist]

On 11/26/2024 at 5:34 PM, robosmith said:

How the hell do you make up bullshit when your cite says the OPPOSITE? LMAO

 

She had plenty of money and not much time to spend it. Why should she not go all out?

It would be much worse for her to not spend all the money.

She had plenty of money...she spent it all like Zelinsky's wife on a spending spree in Paris.

She lost miserably...You lost miserably...and I'm enjoying every delicious moment of it all.

So cry for us robo-dweeb. Cry us a river. Scream at the sky. Then...

Wait for Karma to come calling.

[robosmith]

On 11/26/2024 at 3:26 PM, DUI_Offender said:

The Democrats should have forced Biden out in early 2024, held a primary, and selected a competent Presidential candidate. Kamala was never a winner.

The primary was held; Biden won.

[robosmith]

On 11/26/2024 at 4:58 PM, Fluffypants said:

They were behind the eight ball but Biden polled better than anyone else and they were going to ride that corpse till the end but when he shit the bed at the debate big time donors were threatening to turn off the money spigot they had to get a new candidate to keep the money flowing.

Biden screwed them because he endorse her in his dropping out speech.

They accepted it and they tried their damnedest to turn Honey Boo Boo into a supermodel and they largely succeeded in fooling people into thinking she was a real contender. I never saw that much gaslighting done by the liberal media in my life. Thing is they ended destroying what little credibility they had left and they lost a ton of viewers.

The POLLS showing Harris doing better than Biden didn't lie (like you do).

Of course the dumping on Biden AND  him dropping out gave him NO CHANCE to recover.

The mistake was believing Harris had a better chance of winning.

 

[Legato]

51 minutes ago, robosmith said:

The POLLS showing Harris doing better than Biden didn't lie (like you do).

Of course the dumping on Biden AND  him dropping out gave him NO CHANCE to recover.

The mistake was believing Harris had a better chance of winning.

 

But the Joy!

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Legato said:

But the Joy!

There is no joy in ^TROLLville.

[DUI_Offender]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

The primary was held; Biden won.

You misunderstood me.

I meant that the Primary should have been held after Biden announced that he would not be seeking re-election in 2024. Preferably he would have announced this in late 2023.

[gatomontes99]

On 11/26/2024 at 4:08 PM, Fluffypants said:

Did her relative die and tell her if she spends a 1.5 billion in 3 months she will get 100 billion dollars? (if you get the movie reference, good on you.)

How the hell do you spend that much money in 3 months and end up in debt? Did she pay everyone to actually endorse her and run glowing stories about her? I hope somebody audits that campaign there is definitely something going on there.

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/harris-campaign-spend-debt-democrats-b2648680.html

Inflation....duh.

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

The POLLS showing Harris doing better than Biden didn't lie (like you do).

Of course the dumping on Biden AND  him dropping out gave him NO CHANCE to recover.

The mistake was believing Harris had a better chance of winning.

 

What do you mean, not chance to recover? She was supposedly leading the whole time from the DNC convention on.

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, DUI_Offender said:

You misunderstood me.

I meant that the Primary should have been held after Biden announced that he would not be seeking re-election in 2024. Preferably he would have announced this in late 2023.

Hindsight is often sharper....

However, there is no guarantee anyone else could have done better....

Edited November 29, 2024 by robosmith

[Fluffypants]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Inflation....duh.

What do you mean, not chance to recover? She was supposedly leading the whole time from the DNC convention on.

Her campaign decided to hide her for a month after she got the nod. If you have a limited amount of time you have got to hit the ground running, she should have been doing a media blitz not hiding. The media went straight into gaslighting mode, telling us how wonderful she was and how much joy there was.

She had over a billion dollars behind her, almost all the main stream media and tons of famous people just gushing over her and still lost to a man who spent a 1/5 of what she did.

[DUI_Offender]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Hindsight is often sharper....

However, there is no guarantee anyone else could have done better....

Better than Kamala? I would say that most candidates could have done better. Same thing with Hilary. I mean when Pew Research pools reveal that Hilary was the most unpopular first lady in the history of the White House, it should have been a hint not to run with her. In 2016, Trump did not win, as much Hilary lost. The election was hers to lose, and she did.

With Kamala, it would have been a miracle if she won. The election was pretty much the American people either choosing or rejecting Trump. Biden should ahve rode with a better vice president. Even now, her inner circle advisers are proving that not only Kamala was the wrong candidate to go with, but how clueless the Democrats are, when it comes to competing in elections. 

 

[ironstone]

Guess who's name is being brought up for the Dems in 2028 lol.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/aoc-for-president-in-2028-furious-speculation-sweeps-social-media/ar-AA1v0G45

[DUI_Offender]

55 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Guess who's name is being brought up for the Dems in 2028 lol.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/world/aoc-for-president-in-2028-furious-speculation-sweeps-social-media/ar-AA1v0G45

They aren't going to run with AOC.

If they do, that just proves that the Democratic party needs to be eradicated.

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is no joy in ^TROLLville.

Sorry to hear that. Hope things get better for you over there

[CdnFox]

35 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

They aren't going to run with AOC.

If they do, that just proves that the Democratic party needs to be eradicated.

She's basically everything that went wrong with kamala's taken to the next level.

She would run on hatred and anger towards republicans, financial plans that will take all of eight seconds to prove to be a complete disaster, and rely heavily on celebrity endorsements and dancing like republicans are watching.

All of which as we just learned will not win you a federal presidency. People are utterly sick of her kind of nonsense. As an example she campaigned super hard for mondaire jones and used exactly that vibe and he got slaughtered. Like just punished. 

The country isn't interested in a marxist-lite ideologue at the moment.