How long before Hegseth uses the military against American citizens?

[Radiorum]

It’s a real war to Hegseth. He’s one paranoid dude. How long before he uses the military against the Left? According to him, they are all Marxists, and should be treated like enemy combatants.

In Battle for the American Mind (2022), he writes:

Quote

 “Yes, our modern social sciences—like ‘political science,’ previously known as ‘politics,’ and ‘social studies,’ previously known as individual disciplines like ‘history, economics, geography, and philosophy’—are byproducts of Marxist philosophy … Let that sink in: the manner in which we study politics, history, and economics in American schools—public and private—today is the product of Marxists. That was always the plan, and it worked.” 

In The War on Warriors (2024), he writes:

Quote

“… rules of war” (are just more woke nonsense.) “Modern war-fighters fight lawyers as much as we fight bad guys … Our enemies should get bullets, not attorneys.” 

American Crusade (2020) calls for the

Quote

“…categorical defeat of the Left,” with the goal of “utter annihilation,” without which “America cannot, and will not, survive.”

Hegseth equates the left to wartime enemies:

Quote

“They do not respect cease-fires, do not abide by the rules of warfare, and do not respect anything except total defeat of their enemy—and then total control … We should be in panic mode. Almost desperate.”

So, anything goes, for as Hegseth says: “The Left has never fought fair.”

 

Donald Trump’s Most Dangerous Cabinet Pick

[User]

56 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

It’s a real war to Hegseth. He’s one paranoid dude. How long before he uses the military against the Left? According to him, they are all Marxists, and should be treated like enemy combatants.

Wow. Be honest, what left-wing source did you copy this from, or did you really cherry-pick each of these together like this to try to dishonestly link it all together to try to argue he is going to use the military against people on the left in America?

 

[DUI_Offender]

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

It’s a real war to Hegseth. He’s one paranoid dude. How long before he uses the military against the Left? According to him, they are all Marxists, and should be treated like enemy combatants.

In Battle for the American Mind (2022), he writes:

In The War on Warriors (2024), he writes:

American Crusade (2020) calls for the

Hegseth equates the left to wartime enemies:

So, anything goes, for as Hegseth says: “The Left has never fought fair.”

 

Donald Trump’s Most Dangerous Cabinet Pick

Sounds like he took a page out of Mein Kampf.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

It’s a real war to Hegseth. He’s one paranoid dude. How long before he uses the military against the Left? According to him, they are all Marxists, and should be treated like enemy combatants.

In Battle for the American Mind (2022), he writes:

In The War on Warriors (2024), he writes:

American Crusade (2020) calls for the

Hegseth equates the left to wartime enemies:

So, anything goes, for as Hegseth says: “The Left has never fought fair.”

 

Donald Trump’s Most Dangerous Cabinet Pick

Paranoid triggered leftie is paranoid. 

[Radiorum]

They are quotes from his books! Talk about willful blindness.

It’s not yet clear to you what Hegseth intends? Perhaps the quotes below - his words! - will make it clearer.

More from Hegseth’s American Crusade (2020):

 

Quote

 

… in the event of a Democratic election victory in the US there would be a “national divorce” in which “The military and police … will be forced to make a choice” and “Yes, there will be some form of civil war.”

… conservatives (are exhorted) to undertake “an AMERICAN CRUSADE”, to “mock, humiliate, intimidate, and crush our leftist opponents”, to “attack first” in response to a left he identifies with “sedition”, and he writes that the book “lays out the strategy we must employ in order to defeat America’s internal enemies”

 

Trump’s Pentagon pick Hegseth wrote of US military taking sides in ‘civil war’

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

It’s a real war to Hegseth. He’s one paranoid dude. How long before he uses the military against the Left?

Has anyone ever seen myata and RadioDumb post in the same thread?

[Radiorum]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

myata

I'll have to watch out for him.

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

I'll have to watch out for him.

Yeah, ok "Radiorum". 

It's just a huge coincidence that myata suddenly stopped creating drivel threads like this right when you came here 😉

Just don't have conversations together, because that would be weird. 

[Radiorum]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

Yeah, ok "Radiorum". 

It's just a huge coincidence that myata suddenly stopped creating drivel threads like this right when you came here 😉

Just don't have conversations together, because that would be weird. 

And still, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Radiorum said:

And still, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation.

What substance could one add to "How long before Hegseth uses the military against American citizens?" 🤣

[User]

36 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

They are quotes from his books! Talk about willful blindness.

It’s not yet clear to you what Hegseth intends? Perhaps the quotes below - his words! - will make it clearer.

More from Hegseth’s American Crusade (2020):

They are certainly quotes from his books, but they don't say what you are saying they say. 

So, what exactly is it you think Hegseth intends?

 

 

6 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

And still, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation.

This thread was not started with any substance... so?

[Radiorum]

1 minute ago, WestCanMan said:

What substance could one add to "How long before Hegseth uses the military against American citizens?"

Violence is the way of the Right. Trump’s embrace of violence is a matter of record. He encourages his rally goers to beat up hecklers. In a speech to law enforcement officers, he advised them to be rough. “Don’t be too nice.” He praised Montana’s governor for assaulting a reporter. “Any guy that can do a body slam, he is my type.”

 

Trump favours torture.

Quote

“Don’t tell me it doesn’t work — torture works,” Trump said … “Half these guys [say]: ‘Torture doesn’t work.’ Believe me, it works.”

And what did Trump mean when he said that his plans for mass deportation will be a “bloody story?”

During the unrest of 2020, Trump wanted to shoot protestors in the legs:

Now, Trump has his man who will not hesitate to carry out that order.

 

Quote

 

"The president was enraged," Esper recalled. "He thought that the protests made the country look weak, made us look weak and 'us' meant him. And he wanted to do something about it.

"We reached that point in the conversation where he looked frankly at [Joint Chiefs of Staff] Gen. [Mark] Milley and said, 'Can't you just shoot them, just shoot them in the legs or something?'

 

 

[Radiorum]

6 minutes ago, User said:

They are certainly quotes from his books, but they don't say what you are saying they say. 

No, you, please, tell me, what you think they mean?

[User]

1 minute ago, Radiorum said:

No, you, please, tell me, what you think they mean?

I have no interest. 

If I did, I would start my own thread. 

Since we are here in yours, I expect you to be able to defend your wild assertions. Its becoming a common theme now, that you keep starting these threads, make outlandish assertions you refuse to defend or support. 

[User]

8 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

Violence is the way of the Right.

Oh man, you must have been on a coma or something and not bothered to catch up on the time you missed during the BLM protests/riots and their associated violence. 

 

[Radiorum]

2 minutes ago, User said:

Since we are here in yours, I expect you to be able to defend your wild assertions. Its becoming a common theme now, that you keep starting these threads, make outlandish assertions you refuse to defend or support. 

You obviously don't know how debate works. I made a backed-up claim that we can expect the military to move against American citizens. You have offered no evidence to the contrary. If you did, I would respond.

[Legato]

17 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

And still, you have nothing of substance to add to the conversation.

Well.. even If you added teeny toad feet and spotted panidoot legs to the cauldron in an attempt to add substance to your post, it would still have the consistency of watered down water.

[User]

10 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

And what did Trump mean when he said that his plans for mass deportation will be a “bloody story?”

What do you think he meant?

You see, you want to play these games of innuendo, where you say something without ever having to actually make an assertion, likely because you are so awful at defending them or backing them up. 

If you want to know what he meant, it helps to know what events were going on at that time he was talking about. 

Hint: The violent thugs in a Colorado apartment complex, caught on camera at the time with guns attacking people. 

You think they are all going to go peacefully?

 

6 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

You obviously don't know how debate works. I made a backed-up claim that we can expect the military to move against American citizens. You have offered no evidence to the contrary. If you did, I would respond.

No, you just made the assertion, nothing you posted said he said what you claimed. 

 

[Radiorum]

11 minutes ago, User said:

Oh man, you must have been on a coma or something and not bothered to catch up on the time you missed during the BLM protests/riots and their associated violence. 

MAGA has been identified as the group at increased risk for violence.

Quote

The analytic sample (n = 7,255) included 1,128 (15.0%) MAGA Republicans, 640 (8.3%) strong Republicans, 1,571 (21.3%) other Republicans, and 3,916 (55.3%) non-Republicans. MAGA Republicans were substantially more likely than others to agree strongly/very strongly that “in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States” (MAGA Republicans, 30.3%, 95% CI 27.2%, 33.4%; strong Republicans, 7.5%, 95% CI 5.1%, 9.9%; other Republicans, 10.8%, 95% CI 9.0%, 12.6%; non-Republicans, 11.2%, 95% CI 10.0%, 12.3%; p < 0.001) and to consider violence usually/always justified to advance at least 1 of 17 specific political objectives (MAGA Republicans, 58.2%, 95% CI 55.0%, 61.4%; strong Republicans, 38.3%, 95% CI 34.2%, 42.4%; other Republicans, 31.5%, 95% CI 28.9%, 34.0%; non-Republicans, 25.1%, 95% CI 23.6%, 26.7%; p < 0.001).

MAGA Republicans’ views of American democracy and society and support for political violence in the United States: Findings from a nationwide population-representative survey

[Radiorum]

10 minutes ago, User said:

Hint: The violent thugs in a Colorado apartment complex, caught on camera at the time with guns attacking people. 

A few criminals arrested. That's not what Trump was talking about. Here's what he was talking about:

Quote

As President I will immediately end the migrant invasion of America. We will stop all migrant flights, end all illegal entries, terminate the Kamala phone app for smuggling illegals (CBP One App), revoke deportation immunity, suspend refugee resettlement, and return Kamala’s illegal migrants to their home countries (also known as remigration). I will save our cities and towns in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and all across America. MAGA2024!

Lol, that CBP One App that he's talking about, is merely a phone app to access services with your phone, and it came into effect during Trumps' presidency!

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Radiorum said:

They are quotes from his books! Talk about willful blindness.

It’s not yet clear to you what Hegseth intends? Perhaps the quotes below - his words! - will make it clearer.

More from Hegseth’s American Crusade (2020):

 

Trump’s Pentagon pick Hegseth wrote of US military taking sides in ‘civil war’

Kid taking their sentence or two out of context just shows that you are weak minded. It's not a legitimate discussion or debate technique.

Your side lost the election do insignificant part to his tendency to lie and make shit up about what other people said. Maybe it's time to move on to more legitimate criticisms and more factual issues rather than just this kind of trash

[User]

21 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

MAGA has been identified as the group at increased risk for violence.

That is not what the study concluded. 

Also, you are changing the subject. This is not what we were discussing. I can understand why you would want to, since almost everyone I have ever talked to on the left loves to pretend like the summer of violence associated with the BLM protests/riots never happened by ignoring it. 

 

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

A few criminals arrested. That's not what Trump was talking about. Here's what he was talking about:

 

From your own source:

I will invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to target and dismantle every migrant criminal network.

Migrant criminals. A networks that facilitate.

In other words criminals.

ANd other nations:  broadcasting our weaknesses to our enemies: "You don't want to tell your enemy you have no ammunition... If you feel like you're a little weak, you gotta strengthen it up, but you don't do reports that we're going to lose to China in a war. 

So other nations he's talking about in those quotes you provided

And it goes on and on. You have once again provided a source that in no way shape or form addresses your argument and in no way shape or form refutes anyone else's. You seem to think that just posting a link that doesn't have anything to do with what you're talking about somehow proves what you're talking about

[User]

19 minutes ago, Radiorum said:

A few criminals arrested. That's not what Trump was talking about. Here's what he was talking about:

So, you go from a comment he made at a rally, where he was talking about the violence from illegal immigrants at a Colorado apartment complex... to a tweet he made that doesn't mention bloody at all. 

 

[Radiorum]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Kid taking their sentence or two out of context just shows that you are weak minded. It's not a legitimate discussion or debate technique.

Your side lost the election do insignificant part to his tendency to lie and make shit up about what other people said. Maybe it's time to move on to more legitimate criticisms and more factual issues rather than just this kind of trash

This says nothing.