Trump Nominates Pam Bondi

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

LOL she just happened to decline to investigate claims of Trump U ripping people off and then just happened to get a $25K donation from the Trump foundation after that. Sure. 

I mean it's possible that the donation was unconnected with the Trump U thing; maybe it was payment for not investigating and shielding Trump's good pal Jeffery Epstein?

 

Sharpton's "National Action Network" got $500,000 total from two lump-sum donations from Kamala's campaign before she went on his MSNBC show to be "interviewed". 

https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/us-news/kamala-harris-campaign-gave-500k-to-al-sharptons-civil-rights-group-before-sit-down/

Oprah's "Harpo Productions" got a $1M donation from Kamala right after she went on Oprah's show to be "interviewed". 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-paid-oprah-1-million-failed-bid-help-campaign-report

Maybe Harpo got as much as $2.5M, and other activist groups and podcasts that interviewed her were aid as well:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/kamala-harris-campaign-made-large-donations-to-interviewers-before-sit-downs-report/articleshow/115437971.cms

According to that article, the NYT found over $10M in "donations" to her various interviewers. 

Turns out that she didn't have a bunch of sycophants pimping her after all, she had to pay them all to do it so they were more like employees, but somehow still got 71M votes... Doubtful

Edited November 22, 2024 by WestCanMan

[impartialobserver]

like anyone else, there probably is dirt that someone could dig up on Bondi. Would I vote for her? No. But Trump like any other President-elect is going to appoint folks that align with him. Nothing all that amazing here. 

[Black Dog]

3 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Sharpton's "National Action Network" got $500,000 total from two lump-sum donations from Kamala's campaign before she went on his MSNBC show to be "interviewed". 

https://nypost.com/2024/11/12/us-news/kamala-harris-campaign-gave-500k-to-al-sharptons-civil-rights-group-before-sit-down/

Oprah's "Harpo Productions" got a $1M donation from Kamala right after she went on Oprah's show to be "interviewed". 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-paid-oprah-1-million-failed-bid-help-campaign-report

Maybe Harpo got as much as $2.5M, and other activist groups and podcasts that interviewed her were aid as well:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/kamala-harris-campaign-made-large-donations-to-interviewers-before-sit-downs-report/articleshow/115437971.cms

According to that article, the NYT found over $10M in "donations" to her various interviewers. 

Turns out that she didn't have a bunch of sycophants pimping her after all, she had to pay them all to do it so they were more like employees, but somehow still got 71M votes... Doubtful

You think paying someone for airtime and endorsements is the same as paying a sitting AG off to not look into your crimes? LOL, you are so dumb it's incredible.

Also looking at that spending, it's clear that not only is Bondi a whore, she's a cheap one who couldn't even get six figures out of Trump lol.

 

[CdnFox]

15 minutes ago, ironstone said:

She will certainly be a huge improvement over Merrick Garland.

A rabid inbred Chihuahua with nervous disorder would be better. She set the bar about as low as you can set it

[WestCanMan]

2 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

You think paying someone for airtime and endorsements is the same as paying a sitting AG off to not look into your crimes? LOL, you are so dumb it's incredible.

Also looking at that spending, it's clear that not only is Bondi a whore, she's a cheap one who couldn't even get six figures out of Trump lol.

 

Do you have some more info about this alleged $25k payment to Bondi?

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

I know you. You're an open book, written in crayon with most of the words misspelled.

So sayeth Dumb Dog, the guy who still hasn't posted a link to back up his accusation of a $25k bribe. 

[Black Dog]

19 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Do you have some more info about this alleged $25k payment to Bondi?

It's not alleged: it's a fact.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-pam-bondi-scandal-227823

[CdnFox]

10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's not alleged: it's a fact.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-pam-bondi-scandal-227823

Actually is the story points out trump was a regular donor. The fact that one of the donations happened to come at a time when a decision favorable to him was made it's hardly evidence of wrongdoing. But it was the only time he'd ever made a donation to her then sure that's kind of sus but that's not the case so you have absolutely no evidence that this was in association with anything. 

Has the story notes, when you compare that for example to Hillary Clinton's green lighting the Saudi Arabia weapons deal and immediately the Clinton Foundation receives a huge donation which Bill profits from directly and they only ever did it once at that specific time it is far far less suspect, and democrats insisted that that was perfectly normal

[Black Dog]

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Actually is the story points out trump was a regular donor.

Not to Bondi. It also makes clear that when Trump gives, he expects something in return.

Quote

 

But it was the only time he'd ever made a donation to her then sure that's kind of sus but that's not the case so you have absolutely no evidence that this was in association with anything. 

 

Again the article doesn't say anything about trump making any contributions to her beforehand. It suggests the $25K was the start of their political relationship.

[WestCanMan]

31 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It's not alleged: it's a fact.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/09/trump-pam-bondi-scandal-227823

There's nothing there. It's a small donation and it happened before... an election! DUN dun duuuuuhn. OMG, WHAT A RARE AND SHOCKING COINCIDENCE!!!!!

Just remember that Dems tried to pretend that the tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and the Demi AG Loretta Lynch was random, and it happened on the weekend before Lynch AG decided whether or not to proceed with a trial against Hillary for her known crimes. 

Out of all the 20,000 tarmacs in the US, and all the various days and times that they both could have ended up on that exact one, they just coincidentally bumped into each other at that exact date and time, and they just talked about "their grandkids" (Bill had none). The topic of the measly little criminal trial never even sprang to mind in the 20 minutes they spent together, in complete secrecy lol. 

Leftard logic:

Small donation before a campaign.... Dems: "MASSIVE COINCIDENCE!" (but it happens ten times out of ten)

Two people's planes refuelling at the exact same time, on the exact same tarmac, out of all the 20K tarmacs in the US, on the one weekend before one of those people decides whether or not to start a criminal trial against the other person's wife... Dems: "That could happen".  (1/20,000 tarmacs x 1/365 days/yr x 1/16 waking hours = 1/116,000,000).

[Black Dog]

4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

There's nothing there. It's a small donation and it happened before... an election! DUN dun duuuuuhn. OMG, WHAT A RARE AND SHOCKING COINCIDENCE!!!!!

The fact she's a cheap whore doesn't really change the fact that she's a whore.

[WestCanMan]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

The fact she's a cheap whore doesn't really change the fact that she's a whore.

While there's ample evidence to suggest that Kamala whored herself out to gain 2 lucrative political appointments from a 60-yr-old man when she was 29, there's no known evidence of Pam Bondi ever whoring herself out like a Demi skank. 

[Black Dog]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

While there's ample evidence to suggest that Kamala whored herself out to gain 2 lucrative political appointments from a 60-yr-old man when she was 29, there's no known evidence of Pam Bondi ever whoring herself out like a Demi skank. 

What about what about what about, you boneheads really have nothing else, huh?

 

[WestCanMan]

13 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

What about what about what about, you boneheads really have nothing else, huh?

 

My point about Bondi/Clinton wasn't a "whataboutism". 

A whataboutism means that someone's saying "I/we did it, but you did too", and this isn't the same thing.

It's a case of:

• When you made this accusation, you said that a completely normal thing constituted "a completely unlikely and incriminating coincidence",
• then in defence of your cult-leader, you said that "a one-in-100-Million coincidence was surely just a random meeting, and not pre-planned... " 

The Bondi thing looks normal on paper. 

The Clinton-Lynch thing was an impossible farce. 

I just proved that, by the left's own standards, established in the Clinton incident, you have to admit that Bondi is free and clear. 

 

My point about Bondi/Kamala wasn't a whataboutism either...

• Kamala appears to have whored herself out entirely
• There's no evidence whatsoever to suggest that Pam Bondi exchanged her **** for any kind of money or favours

Edited November 22, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Black Dog]

So if i have this right, most of Trump's male nominees are sex pests and his woman ones have weird baggage around dogs.

https://www.businessinsider.com/rnc-speaker-pam-bondi-custody-battle-dog-with-katrina-victims-2020-8

[CouchPotato]

She's just a year shy of 60. Looking pretty cute, I'd say.

 

Edited November 22, 2024 by CouchPotato

[Black Dog]

12 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

She's just a year shy of 60. Looking pretty cute, I'd say.

 

She looks a bit like an older Ivanka which means Don is definitely gonna try and get his pinky stinky.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Not to Bondi. It also makes clear that when Trump gives, he expects something in return.

Bondi one, there wasn't a need to again. But he often makes these kinds of donations and gets nothing in return. You didn't even donate directly to her but rather to a pac that was trying to get her elected. There's not even any indication that she would have been directly communicating with him to agree to anything in return. The sum total evidence of this is one person's opinion that he thinks trump would probably want something in return with no evidence to support his position

.Like I said this bar has already been set in the past with democrats like the clintons and this doesn't even remotely come close to that.

But it's no surprise that you hate whoever he picks

 

 

28 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

She looks a bit like an older Ivanka which means Don is definitely gonna try and get his pinky stinky.

Everything is about sexual fantasies with you.

[Black Dog]

Just now, CdnFox said:

Bondi one, there wasn't a need to again. But he often makes these kinds of donations and gets nothing in return. You didn't even donate directly to her but rather to a pac that was trying to get her elected. There's not even any indication that she would have been directly communicating with him to agree to anything in return. The sum total evidence of this is one person's opinion that he thinks trump would probably want something in return with no evidence to support his position

That person being Trump himself lol.

Quote

 

But it's no surprise that you hate whoever he picks

 

Look it's not my fault he's a shitty person who picks other shitty people, but that's kind of a feature.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

That person being Trump himself lol.

 

Trump never commented on this donation in that respect. Swing and a miss  

Quote

Look it's not my fault he's a shitty person who picks other shitty people, but that's kind of a feature.

As shitty as he is in your opinion, it looks like everyone agreed that he was still better than the democrats. Which raises the question if you think trump is so bad why are you on the side that's worse?

[Black Dog]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Trump never commented on this donation in that respect. Swing and a miss  

As shitty as he is in your opinion, it looks like everyone agreed that he was still better than the democrats. Which raises the question if you think trump is so bad why are you on the side that's worse?

It actually looks like not even 50% of the voters agreed with that.

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

It actually looks like not even 50% of the voters agreed with that.

It actually looks like they did. No matter how you slice it more of them did than disagreed with it that's for sure.

So that still brings us back to the question, if you think trump is shitty why did you support the even shittier person?

[robosmith]

18 hours ago, Nationalist said:

And you can prove that right?

Or is this just another Libbie accusation...

It has been known for YEARS. Duh

Of course NOT to IGNORANT Canucks. LMAO

17 hours ago, Legato said:

So you spent all night scouring the internet for dirt on Bondi when it's always been on the beach. 

No need to scour anything by US citizens who KNOW Trump, Troll.

[robosmith]

16 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You know squat Pup.

What I know is you Libbies will lie with an ease that would startle any mother.

Your whining, screaming and empty accusations are nothing more than sweet music to us now. 

Perhaps you should fall back on the obligatory Libbie accusation of "NAZI!"

enjoy watching the mess Brandon made, get cleaned up.

^The cry of the IGNORANT jackass.

[robosmith]

15 hours ago, ironstone said:

She will certainly be a huge improvement over Merrick Garland.

You mean cause she's total MAGA CULT....