Unsealed: 3 charged in Iran-linked plot to assassinate Donald Trump as revenge for killing Qassem Soleimani: DOJ

[User]

Of course... how convienent to unseal this until just after the election. 

3 charged in Iran-linked plot to assassinate Donald Trump as revenge for killing Qassem Soleimani: DOJ

https://www.aol.com/news/3-charged-iran-linked-plot-171600710.html?fbclid=IwY2xjawGbNa9leHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHUPmC0dOc9gCivPC8tXw7SOy9x6uG5m0nX4KSE0SSwR3jNzMP2E3GDuYiw_aem_ebKrs4YTOpxXgtXVyr6jKQ

"Three people have been charged in an alleged Iran-linked plot to assassinate President-elect Donald Trump, an Iranian-American activist and two Jewish Americans living in New York, according to a criminal complaint unsealed Friday in New York."

[WestCanMan]

Like I said at the time: by starting a regicide-style war instead of the usual "war of attrition among the peons", Trump put his own life on the line.  

[sharkman]

I love it.  You started this thread 10 hours ago and not one poster from the left probably even knows about this.  They are too busy avoiding the truth and facts regarding the Trump win, instead wallowing in left wing Trump conspiracies and Trump derangement.  Well folks, this is truth.  3 different attempts on a presidential candidate's life, and arrests made.  Now that Trump will soon be in power I will be interested to see these assassination attempts get investigated and pursued to the fullest extent of the law. 

[eyeball]

12 hours ago, sharkman said:

Well folks, this is truth.  3 different attempts on a presidential candidate's life, and arrests made.  Now that Trump will soon be in power I will be interested to see these assassination attempts get investigated and pursued to the fullest extent of the law. 

I'll be interested in seeing a test of this legal theory about presidential immunity and if Biden orders a hit on Trump while he still has the authority to do so.

What has Biden got to lose? He could easily plead diminished capacity and between the length of the investigation and court case he'd likely be dead and gone too.

[User]

3 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I'll be interested in seeing a test of this legal theory about presidential immunity and if Biden orders a hit on Trump while he still has the authority to do so.

What has Biden got to lose? He could easily plead diminished capacity and between the length of the investigation and court case he'd likely be dead and gone too.

This is a fictional creation of your own making, as there is no such presidential immunity. 

It is also quite absurdly disgusting that you would even suggest something like this. I hope you never pretend to have any moral position on anything on the forum ever again. You don't. 

[gatomontes99]

5 minutes ago, eyeball said:

I'll be interested in seeing a test of this legal theory about presidential immunity and if Biden orders a hit on Trump while he still has the authority to do so.

What has Biden got to lose? He could easily plead diminished capacity and between the length of the investigation and court case he'd likely be dead and gone too.

That's not what the ruling says. Why do you think it says that?

[User]

12 hours ago, sharkman said:

I love it.  You started this thread 10 hours ago and not one poster from the left probably even knows about this.  They are too busy avoiding the truth and facts regarding the Trump win, instead wallowing in left wing Trump conspiracies and Trump derangement.  Well folks, this is truth.  3 different attempts on a presidential candidate's life, and arrests made.  Now that Trump will soon be in power I will be interested to see these assassination attempts get investigated and pursued to the fullest extent of the law. 

They are too busy starting threads trolling the forum with BS they are too cowardly even to bother defending. 

[eyeball]

32 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

That's not what the ruling says. Why do you think it says that?

The same reasons that people who wrote articles like these - they certainly got you right wing snowflakes to hold your pearls even closer to your hearts.

What is presidential immunity? The get out of jail free card Biden could use to assassinate Trump

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/07/01/joe-biden-donald-trump-immunity-us-election-2024/

[CITIZEN_2015]

Western governments are stupid thinking that they can negotiate with Islamic Republic regime and reach a diplomatic solution. These are bunch of murderous hateful terrorists whose goal is destruction of Israel and destruction of West and do not understand diplomacy and will cheat and the only language they understand is the language of force. The West must do whatever necessary to remove this cancerous organ and help Iranians to rise up again and remove these criminals. Now soon they will have nuclear weapons and means to deliver them everywhere in the world. Wake up people.

[sharkman]

1 hour ago, User said:

This is a fictional creation of your own making, as there is no such presidential immunity. 

It is also quite absurdly disgusting that you would even suggest something like this. I hope you never pretend to have any moral position on anything on the forum ever again. You don't. 

That’s just more trolling, eyeball thinks he’s being clever.  Give yourself another pat on the back eye-guy, and go off to your crab pots…

[gatomontes99]

42 minutes ago, eyeball said:

The same reasons that people who wrote articles like these - they certainly got you right wing snowflakes to hold your pearls even closer to your hearts.

What is presidential immunity? The get out of jail free card Biden could use to assassinate Trump

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/07/01/joe-biden-donald-trump-immunity-us-election-2024/

The ruling said the exact opposite. Per your link:

Quote

Trump’s lawyers have previously argued that a president could assassinate his political rivals without criminal prosecution, as long as they were not impeached first. However, the court ruled against this.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/politics/2024/07/01/joe-biden-donald-trump-immunity-us-election-2024/

There is no constitutional power to assassinate. Only Sotomayors's childish rant brought that unconstitutional power to life.

 

[eyeball]

5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

There is no constitutional power to assassinate.

Of course there isn't. Just like there's no constitutional right to incite a mob to interfere in the certification process of a new president elect who just kicked your ass. 

[gatomontes99]

15 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Of course there isn't. Just like there's no constitutional right to incite a mob to interfere in the certification process of a new president elect who just kicked your ass. 

Ok. But no one has ever done that, so what is the point?

[eyeball]

9 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Ok. But no one has ever done that, so what is the point?

What do you mean it's never been done before? It's patently clear people have kicked Trump's ass.

[User]

48 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Of course there isn't. Just like there's no constitutional right to incite a mob to interfere in the certification process of a new president elect who just kicked your ass. 

No mob was incited anymore than Democrats incited a summers long violence from BLM "protests"

[CdnFox]

8 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

That's not what the ruling says. Why do you think it says that?

Because he's not a big fan of thinking for himself. I mean it's not like this hasn't been explained a million times