FCC chair says that Saturday Night Live violated FCC rules with the Kamala Harris appearance

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, herbie said:

They should've invited Trump.
I would've got a kick out of seeing the SNL audience throw rocks at him.

Well democrats propensity for violence aside,  at least it would have been legal then

Edited November 4, 2024 by CdnFox

[Rebound]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

I would imagine that it takes a little bit of time to prepare that. It was like 4 years later that they went after trump for the stormy payouts, give this a couple of days  

He’s the FCC Chair.  It’s his job to DO things, not whine like a little biatch.  

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, West said:

They only "gave" Trump free air time because they were ordered to do so

Trump has had plenty of free air time on SNL. LIAR

6 hours ago, West said:

Considering the Democrats have put their political opponents in prison for much less and totally destroyed people id say that's a slap on the wrist. 

JURIES DID THAT. 

They wouldn't be in prison if there wasn't EVIDENCE of their CRIMES. Duh

[robosmith]

5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Really? Does Zuck Bucks ring a bell? How about the CIA, FBI and other government agencies embedding their surrogates in Facebook, Twitter and so on, to direct these speech platforms to censor users? And you are mad that Musk let an actual official say that NBC and Harris may have violated the law? Are you fn kidding me?

Do you have ANY EVIDENCE for ^these fantasies?

[robosmith]

50 minutes ago, Rebound said:

He’s the FCC Chair.  It’s his job to DO things, not whine like a little biatch.  

He's not the Chair, just a Commissioner. West LIED about that in his OP title.

[CdnFox]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Trump has had plenty of free air time on SNL. LIAR

During an election? When was that

Quote

JURIES DID THAT. 

Based on the Instructions of the judge

[West]

27 minutes ago, robosmith said:

He's not the Chair, just a Commissioner. West LIED about that in his OP title.

Lied implies intentionality, son. 

You are making a big deal about a minor detail.. bottom line is what SNL did probably violated FEC rules. 

[robosmith]

13 minutes ago, West said:

Lied implies intentionality, son. 

You are making a big deal about a minor detail.. bottom line is what SNL did probably violated FEC rules. 

I'm NOT your "son." Just STOP LYING in your OPs, and I'll never call your "mistakes" a LIE.

IF you took the time even read your "evidence" you would not make the "mistake" of contradicting what it says.

The ONLY reason I called this one out is you are continually starting threads with claims that include NO EVIDENCE.

IF you actually took the time to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE, you MIGHT figure out what you're posting IS NOT TRUE.

Random tweets are NOT EVIDENCE.

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

I'm NOT your "son."

Suicide prevention lines should lead with that.  "hey, lets calm down. After all it's not like Robosmith's your son or anything...."   (snif', you're right things aren't THAT bad...)

[gatomontes99]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Do you have ANY EVIDENCE for ^these fantasies?

https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/54689-fcc-chair-says-that-saturday-night-live-violated-fcc-rules-with-the-kamala-harris-appearance/?do=findComment&comment=1763997

[West]

32 minutes ago, robosmith said:

I'm NOT your "son." Just STOP LYING in your OPs, and I'll never call your "mistakes" a LIE.

IF you took the time even read your "evidence" you would not make the "mistake" of contradicting what it says.

The ONLY reason I called this one out is you are continually starting threads with claims that include NO EVIDENCE.

IF you actually took the time to LOOK FOR EVIDENCE, you MIGHT figure out what you're posting IS NOT TRUE.

Random tweets are NOT EVIDENCE.

The guy clearly sits in a position of authority with the FEC. Why you are making such a big deal and trying to deflect to personal attacks on me is pathetic. You are a disgrace. 

I provide evidence in every threat i start. This one was from someone in a position of authority at the FEC stating this is likely a violation. 

You are so used to your sad little echo chamber that any time someone criticizes you, you lash out. Pathetic 

Edited November 4, 2024 by West

[robosmith]

25 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

https://repolitics.com/forums/topic/54689-fcc-chair-says-that-saturday-night-live-violated-fcc-rules-with-the-kamala-harris-appearance/?do=findComment&comment=1763997

Nothing ^here about "CIA, FBI and other government agencies embedding their surrogates in Facebook, Twitter and so on, to direct these speech platforms to censor users."

17 minutes ago, West said:

The guy clearly sits in a position of authority with the FEC. Why you are making such a big deal and trying to deflect to personal attacks on me is pathetic. You are a disgrace. 

I provide evidence in every threat i start. This one was from someone in a position of authority at the FEC stating this is likely a violation. 

You are so used to your sad little echo chamber that any time someone criticizes you, you lash out. Pathetic 

You OFTEN provide ONLY random tweets. That is NOT EVIDENCE, it is just some random interested party's OPINION.

[West]

10 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nothing ^here about "CIA, FBI and other government agencies embedding their surrogates in Facebook, Twitter and so on, to direct these speech platforms to censor users."

You OFTEN provide ONLY random tweets. That is NOT EVIDENCE, it is just some random interested party's OPINION.

This is from an FEC Commissioner bud. I may have mixed up chair and commissioner and you went off about how I "lied". 

Pretty vile. You've shown you have zero ability to debate and only sling mud whenever someone criticizes the Democrats and their actions. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, West said:

The guy clearly sits in a position of authority with the FEC. Why you are making such a big deal and trying to deflect to personal attacks on me is pathetic. You are a disgrace. 

I provide evidence in every threat i start. This one was from someone in a position of authority at the FEC stating this is likely a violation. 

You are so used to your sad little echo chamber that any time someone criticizes you, you lash out. Pathetic 

It's your posting from your echo chamber with NO EVIDENCE that I'm calling out, because they are LIES.

[robosmith]

57 minutes ago, West said:

This is from an FEC Commissioner bud. I may have mixed up chair and commissioner and you went off about how I "lied". 

Pretty vile. You've shown you have zero ability to debate and only sling mud whenever someone criticizes the Democrats and their actions. 

You posted NO EVIDENCE that the man was the Chair of the FCC and he's NOT. You STILL have not fixed your thread title. Duh.

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

Nothing ^here about "CIA, FBI and other government agencies embedding their surrogates in Facebook, Twitter and so on, to direct these speech platforms to censor users."

You OFTEN provide ONLY random tweets. That is NOT EVIDENCE, it is just some random interested party's OPINION.

Latest Twitter Files shows CIA, FBI have spent years meddling in content moderation

[gatomontes99]

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

You posted NO EVIDENCE that the man was the Chair of the FCC and he's NOT. You STILL have not fixed your thread title. Duh.

What is telling is that you are more concerned with his officialntitle than the apparent FEC violation at SNL and the Harris campaign. Obviously, NBC hustled to correct the issue, but they clearly had no intention to fix it until they got called out.

[West]

48 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

What is telling is that you are more concerned with his officialntitle than the apparent FEC violation at SNL and the Harris campaign. Obviously, NBC hustled to correct the issue, but they clearly had no intention to fix it until they got called out.

Exactly. 

The fact is roboliar called me a liar. Then when it turned out NBC did in fact violate FEC rules and had to offer up free ad space to Trump he doubled down. 

Very dishonest character