CBC Reporter at National Citizens' Inquiry Admits that the CBC Betrayed Canadians During Covid

[WestCanMan]

She admits that the CBC was only allowing people to promote certain "experts" while demonizing others, regardless of their level of expertise. 

[eyeball]

5 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

She admits that the CBC was only allowing people to promote certain "experts" while demonizing others, regardless of their level of expertise. 

Nice try but, seriously?

 

Did she present the emails and transcripts of meetings amongst CBC executives as evidence of this demonization that was being allowed?

Of course she's not testifying in any sort of official inquiry so who needs evidence? This inquiry is just a right-wing whack-job witch-hunt started by Presto Manning.

I guess the CBC's human resources department just fu cks up on occassion and hires a right-wing loon. Take Rex Murphy for example.

[CdnFox]

25 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Nice try but, seriously?

 

Did she present the emails and transcripts of meetings amongst CBC executives as evidence of this demonization that was being allowed?

Of course she's not testifying in any sort of official inquiry so who needs evidence? This inquiry is just a right-wing whack-job witch-hunt started by Presto Manning.

I guess the CBC's human resources department just fu cks up on occassion and hires a right-wing loon. Take Rex Murphy for example.

What a pathetic little liar you are.

Here's a fine example of the left people. Nothing but lies, dishonesty, denial. Doesn't follow the science, doesn't follow the facts, has an expert giving him straight up testimony as to what happened and all they can do is deny.

That's why these people must be flushed from the halls of power and no matter what we have to do they can never be allowed to have power again.

[DUI_Offender]

3 hours ago, eyeball said:

 

I guess the CBC's human resources department just fu cks up on occassion and hires a right-wing loon. Take Rex Murphy for example.

or Jian Ghomeshi, who was ironically left wing. 

[myata]

CBC was a shameful parody of a responsible and objective source information at that period with incessant fear-mongering including peddling quasi-vaccines to very young children, never recommended or even approved in more responsible jurisdictions. This couldn't be a small matter in a real, responsible democracy but nothing happened, just doing jobs getting the paycheck and who should care about the truth. Shameful. No excuses.

To be fair, to my knowledge, none of the mainstream media in Canada were able to retain integrity and objectivity on this matter.

[Zeitgeist]

15 hours ago, eyeball said:

Nice try but, seriously?

 

Did she present the emails and transcripts of meetings amongst CBC executives as evidence of this demonization that was being allowed?

Of course she's not testifying in any sort of official inquiry so who needs evidence? This inquiry is just a right-wing whack-job witch-hunt started by Presto Manning.

I guess the CBC's human resources department just fu cks up on occassion and hires a right-wing loon. Take Rex Murphy for example.

Rex Murphy was a Pierre Trudeau fan.  He wasn’t right wing.  He did call out Justin’s totalitarian behaviour.  You make assumptions about the former CBC employee because you liked the CBC propaganda.  

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Zeitgeist said:

Rex Murphy was a Pierre Trudeau fan. 

He was like a Canadian Russell Brand - a speaker with eloquence beyond our time who's sharp as a tack - but while Russell can go way off on a tangent, Rex was stoically grounded left-of-center in the mainstream (not left of today's center lol). 

[eyeball]

2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Rex Murphy was a Pierre Trudeau fan.

Wokism fried his brain in the end.

2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

You make assumptions about the former CBC employee because you liked the CBC propaganda.  

No, it's the ongoing lack of any physical evidence of collusion between the CBC editorial boardroom and the PMO.

BTW is it CBC propaganda or PMO propaganda? It seems there's always this little question mark around who's pulling who's strings.

[WestCanMan]

23 minutes ago, eyeball said:

Wokism fried his brain in the end.

It's like you're trying to do this to yourself.

Quote

No, it's the ongoing lack of any physical evidence of collusion between the CBC editorial boardroom and the PMO.

If there was a 1% variance in messaging from the PMO and CBC you'd have a point, but the CBC was like Trudeau's own loudspeaker. Everything that came out of Trudeau's ass was preached as gospel on the CBC.

And the more draconian Trudeau got, the more the CBC loved him, and when peaceful protesters were being beaten, or Trudeau was on TV calling people "racists and misogynists" for no reason, and people who were forced to take unnecessary jabs were getting grievously injured or dying from them, the CBC - along with help from their fellow TNI members in social media - shut talk of those things down.

Eyeball, when a member of the CBC comes out and explains why all of the above was happening, why don't you believe her? You're a leftists ffs. When you hear stories like "an anonymous source who attended a meeting at the WH claims to have heard Trump say something that no one else heard", you say: "Mommy! You won't bewieve what Twumpie just said!"

Where do you get the chops to just suddenly not believe something that a member of the CBC says?

Quote

BTW is it CBC propaganda or PMO propaganda? It seems there's always this little question mark around who's pulling who's strings.

The PM gave the CBC 675M just after Trudeau got elected in 2015. That probably had nothing to do with the CBC playing Duffygate up as the biggest political scandal in the history of the world though. Then the PMO gave another $600M to "select media outlets to help keep them afloat" just before the 2019 election. Then the PMO gave another $60M to media outlets whose identities were kept secret just before the 2021 election. 

"I don't think that Trudeau could have done any more to ensure the media's impartiality over the past ten years. They definitely weren't regurgitating his propaganda. He invested over 1.3 Billion taxpayer dollars to ensure that." - eyeball

[eyeball]

8 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Eyeball, when a member of the CBC comes out and explains why all of the above was happening, why don't you believe her?

The lack of concrete evidence...email trails...meeting minutes...recorded discussions with people from the PMO and CBC executives unambiguously saying things like..."we need to lie to the people"..."they can't be told the truth"..."we'll make it all up"..."it's all a scam to make us and Mr Fauci rich and powerful"...

A mailing list of Ivermectin shipments to all people in-the-know would really nail it.

[ExFlyer]

"Former CBC reporter claims broadcaster shut down stories critical of lockdowns"

A disgruntled fired reporter.... yup, credibility gone LOL

[CdnFox]

1 minute ago, ExFlyer said:

"Former CBC reporter claims broadcaster shut down stories critical of lockdowns"

A disgruntled fired reporter.... yup, credibility gone LOL

Credibility is just fine. CBC is gone. 11 months or less. 

[ExFlyer]

39 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Credibility is just fine. CBC is gone. 11 months or less. 

A fired employee disparaging their former employer...yup, classic credibility issues LOL

[CdnFox]

6 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

A fired employee disparaging their former employer...yup, classic credibility issues LOL

I whistleblower turfed because she wasn't Woke enough. Credibility is fine  

Worse she's not the only one. A number of people have quit and made it public that they're specific reasons were doing so were that the cbc's ethics had fallen below a standard that could live with and they had become a propaganda arm for the government. She's the latest one but she's hardly the only one.

Further, what she's claiming is verifiably true. We know a lot of people have come forward and said that they were silenced and we know that the CBC did not publish their stories.

Just one more reason to turf the CBC. Sorry, but it's absolutely way too late to even begin to suggest that it's a credibility issue

[ExFlyer]

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

I whistleblower turfed because she wasn't Woke enough. Credibility is fine  

Worse she's not the only one. A number of people have quit and made it public that they're specific reasons were doing so were that the cbc's ethics had fallen below a standard that could live with and they had become a propaganda arm for the government. She's the latest one but she's hardly the only one.

Further, what she's claiming is verifiably true. We know a lot of people have come forward and said that they were silenced and we know that the CBC did not publish their stories.

Just one more reason to turf the CBC. Sorry, but it's absolutely way too late to even begin to suggest that it's a credibility issue

A fired employee disparaging their former employer...yup, classic credibility issues LOL

And an online troll buys it all LOL

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

A fired employee disparaging their former employer...yup, classic credibility issues LOL

And an online troll buys it all LOL

She wasn't fired kiddo, she resigned. And more specifically she resigned for the reasons she's now speaking about.

And she had a long and storied career with the CBC. It's not like she was there for 5 minutes.  She's been a reporter and worked with them for 25 years i believe. 

So a long-term reporter sees grossly unethical behavior, resigns, and then talks about it and you being a liberal supporter choose to lie about it and pretend she resigned and then dismiss it as uncredible with absolutely no reason.

Rather than admit the truth and have an honest discussion about it.

Every now and then somebody asks why we can't just fix the CBC instead of destroying it. This is why. It's supporters and the left wing supporters are simply not rational people

[WestCanMan]

7 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

"Former CBC reporter claims broadcaster shut down stories critical of lockdowns"

A disgruntled fired reporter.... yup, credibility gone LOL

🤣 You'd be the expert on not having credibility.

If she was fired from CBC that would actually be considered proof of her credibility. 

Edited November 4, 2024 by WestCanMan

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

She wasn't fired kiddo, she resigned. And more specifically she resigned for the reasons she's now speaking about.

And she had a long and storied career with the CBC. It's not like she was there for 5 minutes.  She's been a reporter and worked with them for 25 years i believe. 

So a long-term reporter sees grossly unethical behavior, resigns, and then talks about it and you being a liberal supporter choose to lie about it and pretend she resigned and then dismiss it as uncredible with absolutely no reason.

Rather than admit the truth and have an honest discussion about it.

Every now and then somebody asks why we can't just fix the CBC instead of destroying it. This is why. It's supporters and the left wing supporters are simply not rational people

He's gonna come back with "But sometimes people throw away lucrative 25-yr careers for no reason" 😉

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 You'd be the expert on not having credibility.

If she was fired from CBC that would actually be considered proof of her credibility. 

 Jody Wilson-Raybould was fired and we all know SHE had no credibility right? 🙄

And in this case the person actually resigned BECAUSE of the dishonesty she saw at the CBC. 

[ExFlyer]

9 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 You'd be the expert on not having credibility.

If she was fired from CBC that would actually be considered proof of her credibility. 

Ha Ha Ha

Says the least credible person on these forums

LOL LOL LOL

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, CdnFox said:

 Jody Wilson-Raybould was fired and we all know SHE had no credibility right? 🙄

At the very least, she had more credibility than anyone in the LPOC. I'm not sure if that makes it a yes or no though. 

Quote

And in this case the person actually resigned BECAUSE of the dishonesty she saw at the CBC. 

That's gonna make some folks cry here. 

[CdnFox]

45 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

 

That's gonna make some folks cry here. 

True but in fairness they were emotionally damaged before I showed up

[WestCanMan]

@vaxtards: @Hodad @eyeball 

In case you missed it, "the science" on TNI outlets was actually just propaganda. They gave you the mushroom treatment: they kept you in the dark and fed you bullshit.

FYI, if you restrict the "science" on selected topics to "what some id10ts are saying" (which makes perfect sense for the likes of you), CBC could have you dummies believing that the world is flat, men can have babies, etc. 

NVM. At the rate eyeball changes his opinions to keep up with science, he definitely still believes the earth is flat. 

[Michael Hardner]

On 11/2/2024 at 7:36 PM, eyeball said:

Nice try but, seriously?

 

Did she present the emails and transcripts of meetings amongst CBC executives as evidence of this demonization that was being allowed?

Of course she's not testifying in any sort of official inquiry so who needs evidence? This inquiry is just a right-wing whack-job witch-hunt started by Presto Manning.

I guess the CBC's human resources department just fu cks up on occassion and hires a right-wing loon. Take Rex Murphy for example.

If she was testifying that the CBC did a great job, people wouldn't buy it.

In a post political world, there are only alliances.  Objectively is a quaint curio in a roadside shop ...

 

 

[Moonlight Graham]

On 11/2/2024 at 7:36 PM, eyeball said:

I guess the CBC's human resources department just fu cks up on occassion and hires a right-wing loon. Take Rex Murphy for example.

And yet did you EVER hear Rex be allowed to voice any rightwing opinions on the CBC?  I can't recall any.  And it certainly wasn't anything like what he wrote for the National Post.  So you just proved the journalist's point.

On the CBC go find any mention of negative side effects beyond a sore arm (i had some after both primary shots, but none on the boosters) or any quote of a doctor showing anything other than positive things about the vaccine.

We live in a world where saying ANYTHING possibly bad or cautionary about any vaccine, even from doctors or scientists, is "rightwing".  That's insane.  The same is true when pushing back against any climate change claims.  This doesn't mean vaccine don't generally work or that man-made climate change isn't real.

We need to stop politicizing science.  Science is not based on "belief" or "ideology", its based on evidence.