Rebound Posted September 12 Report Share Posted September 12 Cowardly Trump Says He Will Not Debate Kamala Again Ha! Trump, who lost the 2020 Presidential Election by over seven million votes, and performed like a senile old fool in his last debate, today posted that he will not debate Kamala Harris again. Terrified of having his ass handed to him again, Trump will instead go to rallies half-filled with nursing home patients and Klansmen. Donald Trump is a coward. 1 1 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted September 12 Report Share Posted September 12 They never agreed to any further debates because the coward Harris refused to do so. She would only agree to the ABC debate, and we can see why now. It was the moderators and her vs Trump. 2 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 12 Author Report Share Posted September 12 23 minutes ago, User said: They never agreed to any further debates because the coward Harris refused to do so. She would only agree to the ABC debate, and we can see why now. It was the moderators and her vs Trump. You are suck a f*cking liar. Trump just said, TODAY, that he refuses to debate Kamala Harris again, and you’re lying to us and saying it is Harris who’s refusing. Kamala is willing, Donald is a little biitch who knows he’ll get his ass kicked again. Thats the truth and everybody knows it. Even Fox News admitted that Trump lost. 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted September 12 Report Share Posted September 12 46 minutes ago, Rebound said: You are suck a f*cking liar. Trump just said, TODAY, that he refuses to debate Kamala Harris again, and you’re lying to us and saying it is Harris who’s refusing. Kamala is willing, Donald is a little biitch who knows he’ll get his ass kicked again. Thats the truth and everybody knows it. Even Fox News admitted that Trump lost. Nothing I said was a lie. Trump proposed additional debates before this, including one on Fox news. Harris cowardly refused. Those are facts. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 12 Author Report Share Posted September 12 1 hour ago, User said: They never agreed to any further debates because the coward Harris refused to do so. She would only agree to the ABC debate, and we can see why now. It was the moderators and her vs Trump. 3 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted September 12 Report Share Posted September 12 All bullies are cowards. It's probably a good idea, politically, because he's way out of his depth and he got thoroughly embarrassed last time. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
User Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 1 hour ago, Rebound said: Wow... this has nothing to do with what I said or your trying to call me a liar. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herbie Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 DonOld already said he must've won the debate because only losers ask for a do over. And here's the bleating of the usual mentally defectives claiming he didn't get his face used to mop the floor. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 Meh. Kamala won't take an unscripted interview and a whistleblower has come forward stating she sent ABC the script for the evening 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 17 minutes ago, West said: Meh. Kamala won't take an unscripted interview and a whistleblower has come forward stating she sent ABC the script for the evening Did you see ^this on a tweet from Looner? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 7 hours ago, Rebound said: You are suck a f*cking liar. Trump just said, TODAY, that he refuses to debate Kamala Harris again, and you’re lying to us and saying it is Harris who’s refusing. Harris did refuse. Sorry he's right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 13 Author Report Share Posted September 13 4 hours ago, CdnFox said: Harris did refuse. Sorry he's right. Link? Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzbulls Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 Trump did not mention her prosecutioning record in California. A lot he could have said but did not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 13 hours ago, Rebound said: Donald Trump is a coward. I don't blame him for refusing. She needs to make a bigger name for herself, and needs to steal his thunder in order to do so. Why give her that extra light? First debate was done in a way that only favors Kamala. No crowd. Moderstors which fact checked Trump only. Hostile channel. Harris is close friends with one of those who moderated. If Kamala was serious, she would agree to a debate with a large crowd, on Fox, with moderators that would be republican. She won't. Trump did so knowing they would make him look bad. She's searching for angles, but if she was truly brave she would stray from safety, and enter hostile territory. Let's see her fare as strongly, being forced to backpedal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 13 Author Report Share Posted September 13 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: I don't blame him for refusing. She needs to make a bigger name for herself, and needs to steal his thunder in order to do so. Why give her that extra light? First debate was done in a way that only favors Kamala. No crowd. Moderstors which fact checked Trump only. Hostile channel. Harris is close friends with one of those who moderated. If Kamala was serious, she would agree to a debate with a large crowd, on Fox, with moderators that would be republican. She won't. Trump did so knowing they would make him look bad. She's searching for angles, but if she was truly brave she would stray from safety, and enter hostile territory. Let's see her fare as strongly, being forced to backpedal. They had a crowd at the 2020 debates, and they were told not to applaud or cheer, and they started booing the Democrat and cheering the Republican, and that’s just nonsense. That’s not a debate, it’s a show. And in 2016, they had a debate with an audience, and Trump put all of Bill Clinton’s accusers in the front row. Can you imagine Harris filling the front row of a Melania speech with E Jean Carroll, Stormy Daniels, Karen McDougal and all the others? No, because Donald Trump is a disgusting, vile sack of shlt and Kamala Harris is a decent human being. Edited September 13 by Rebound Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 8 minutes ago, Rebound said: That’s not a debate, it’s a show. She was playing up the split cameras, with her facial expressions. She understood this, and how memes could be done with this, so exaggerated it at times. Moderators didn't go after her. News channels further propped her up, singing her graces. She put on a show on friendly territory. The media did the rest. If she really wants a debate, she should show the same bravery in entering enemy territory. She would be picked apart on policy and knows it. Picked apart by the crowd. And picked apart on policy by the biased moderators. She needs the media to prop her, as she literally has nothing to stand on for herself. Only reason she isn't running away with voter confidence. Trump was eaten by her in the debate, yet his final statement where he picks her apart on hypocrisy is going viral. His name holds far more weight than hers. He is only doing her favors by doing another hostile debate. Why waste his time, when he can campaign aggressively and do hostile and friendly interviews? JD Vance can do the same. 16 minutes ago, Rebound said: And in 2016, they had a debate with an audience, and Trump put all of Bill Clinton’s accusers in the front row. Boss move. He had the crowd laughing, cheering and quickly deflated her confidence with nobody to prop her up. He would do the same to Kamala. He should set the terms on the 2nd debate or skip it. Expect JD Vance to eat Walz for breakfast, putting more pressure on Kamala to secure that 2nd debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 13 Author Report Share Posted September 13 1 minute ago, Perspektiv said: She was playing up the split cameras, with her facial expressions. She understood this, and how memes could be done with this, so exaggerated it at times. Moderators didn't go after her. News channels further propped her up, singing her graces. She put on a show on friendly territory. The media did the rest. If she really wants a debate, she should show the same bravery in entering enemy territory. She would be picked apart on policy and knows it. Picked apart by the crowd. And picked apart on policy by the biased moderators. She needs the media to prop her, as she literally has nothing to stand on for herself. Only reason she isn't running away with voter confidence. Trump was eaten by her in the debate, yet his final statement where he picks her apart on hypocrisy is going viral. His name holds far more weight than hers. He is only doing her favors by doing another hostile debate. Why waste his time, when he can campaign aggressively and do hostile and friendly interviews? JD Vance can do the same. Boss move. He had the crowd laughing, cheering and quickly deflated her confidence with nobody to prop her up. He would do the same to Kamala. He should set the terms on the 2nd debate or skip it. Expect JD Vance to eat Walz for breakfast, putting more pressure on Kamala to secure that 2nd debate. The moderators only fact checked Trump over glaring lies. If the Republicans have the right ideas, why do they continually tell lies to make their points? Illegal immigrants aren’t eating cats and dogs, and doctors aren’t murdering babies after they’re born. That’s just the truth, you dimwit. 2 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 What I'm seeing here is conservatives admitting that on his own he's not smart enough to debate Harris. Only if he can hide behind a friendly mob. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Dog Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 (edited) 1 hour ago, Matthew said: What I'm seeing here is conservatives admitting that on his own he's not smart enough to debate Harris. Only if he can hide behind a friendly mob. Which is interesting because before the debate they were crowing about how he was going to wipe the floor with her. And now they're doing it with the VP debate, they never learn lol. Edited September 13 by Black Dog Quote America...."the worlds largest, best-armed shopping mall."-Ivor Tossell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 4 hours ago, zzbulls said: Trump did not mention her prosecutioning record in California. A lot he could have said but did not. Because she baited him and he swallowed the hook. Trump spoke for five more minutes than Harris and spent most of it b*tching about his grievances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 3 hours ago, Rebound said: over glaring lies. She made glaring lies, and was allowed to debate unscathed. Trump should have been afforded the same courtesy, even though his glaring lies dwarfed the quantity of hers. She also skipped around questions, and he was on the hot seat in comparison. Like I said. She is a superior debater. She likely would beat him on preparation alone. But a true test, is in hostile territory. He is built for conflict and hostility. 3 hours ago, Rebound said: If the Republicans have the right ideas The economy was better off under Trump, when you ask many Americans. Its not about ideas, its delivering on your promises. She literally has failed on policy, so is fully pivoting on strongly held stances, which won't be lost on voters. If Trump is smart he hammers that home until November, and gives her zero oxygen in the means of another debate where she can outshine him. On policy, which voters care for--she is dismal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 4 hours ago, Rebound said: The moderators only fact checked Trump over glaring lies. And why not fact check her on her glaring lies? There were many. If democrats are such a superior party and why not treat both equally in a debate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 13 Author Report Share Posted September 13 (edited) 28 minutes ago, CdnFox said: And why not fact check her on her glaring lies? There were many. If democrats are such a superior party and why not treat both equally in a debate? And yet you cannot name one of these "glaring lies." No doubt, not everything Harris said was 100% correct. She said that Trump's tariffs would be 20%, when the truth is that Trump has been so vague about his plan that it's impossible to be sure.... he's stated that he would put a tariff of 10-20% on EVERY SINGLE IMPORT plus a whopping 60% on all Chinese imports. So the 20% figure may be too high and it may be too low. But not in the same ballpark as "They kill babies after they're born and they're eating dogs and cats." In fact, it's not even in the same ballpark as Trump's ridiculous claim that his proposed tariffs wouldn't increase the price of anything, because the foreign nations would pay the tariffs. That's a Big Whopper of a Lie. On Roe v. Wade: “Every legal scholar, every Democrat, every Republican, liberal, conservative, they all wanted this issue to be brought back to the states where the people could vote — and that’s what happened.” That's just absurd. 70% of the American public did not want Roe v Wade overturned. Edited September 13 by Rebound Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted September 13 Report Share Posted September 13 50 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: She made glaring lies, and was allowed to debate unscathed. Trump should have been afforded the same courtesy, even though his glaring lies dwarfed the quantity of hers. She also skipped around questions, and he was on the hot seat in comparison. Like I said. She is a superior debater. She likely would beat him on preparation alone. But a true test, is in hostile territory. He is built for conflict and hostility. You're contradicting yourself. IF "He is built for conflict and hostility," and it was "hostile territory" to him, Trump should have had the ADVANTAGE. The FACT is, whatever "hostile territory" there was, was mostly Harris' doing. Of course the mods are going call out Trump MORE because he LIED a LOT MORE as you admit. 50 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: The economy was better off under Trump, when you ask many Americans. Many Americans have faulty memory. They've forgotten how the economy collapsed in the last year primarily due to Trump's HORRIBLE management of the pandemic which primarily amounted to ignore it and hope it goes away. 50 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: Its not about ideas, its delivering on your promises. Where is the wall that "Mexico was going to pay for"? LMAO Trumptastrophe: The 'infrastructure week' that never was People For the American Way https://www.peoplefor.org › blog-posts › trumptastrophe... May 23, 2024 — People For's Peter Montgomery discusses how frequently former President Trump allows his ego and self-interests to stand in the way of ... 'Infrastructure Week' has become a running joke on the ... CNN https://www.cnn.com › 2019/05/23 › politics › donald-t... May 23, 2019 — Trump's White House declared that its chosen theme of a week would be infrastructure – only to see those plans thwarted, often by the President himself. The Many Times It's Been 'Infrastructure Week' in Washington The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics Apr 1, 2020 — From the moment President Trump made his 2016 campaign pledge to start a $1 trillion effort to rebuild the United States' roads and bridges, infrastructure has ... 50 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: She literally has failed on policy, so is fully pivoting on strongly held stances, which won't be lost on voters. POTUS makes policy. VP carries out some of it 50 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: If Trump is smart he hammers that home until November, and gives her zero oxygen in the means of another debate where she can outshine him. If Trump was a competent debater, she wouldn't "outshine him." Duh 50 minutes ago, Perspektiv said: On policy, which voters care for--she is dismal. On abortion policy, Harris beat Trump badly. And A LOT of people care about that. RvW has won EVERY time it's been on the ballot here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted September 13 Author Report Share Posted September 13 1 hour ago, Perspektiv said: She made glaring lies, and was allowed to debate unscathed. Trump should have been afforded the same courtesy, even though his glaring lies dwarfed the quantity of hers. She also skipped around questions, and he was on the hot seat in comparison. Like I said. She is a superior debater. She likely would beat him on preparation alone. But a true test, is in hostile territory. He is built for conflict and hostility. The economy was better off under Trump, when you ask many Americans. Its not about ideas, its delivering on your promises. She literally has failed on policy, so is fully pivoting on strongly held stances, which won't be lost on voters. If Trump is smart he hammers that home until November, and gives her zero oxygen in the means of another debate where she can outshine him. On policy, which voters care for--she is dismal. The economy was not better under Trump. We peaked at over 14 percent unemployment and we couldn’t even buy toilet paper. People were getting massive unemployment benefits, the biggest ever, so maybe they were really happy getting paid lots of government money for not working, but that’s not building an economy, it’s building $5 Trillion in debt. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.