Will Kamala Alienate Her Cultists Faster Than She Wins Over Centrists and Conservatives?

[WestCanMan]

Walls are theoretically racist. They're a waste of money. They're symbols of white supremacy. 

Biden shut down construction on the first day of his presidency, and sold off materials for pennies on the dollar.

Kamala was the border czar when the border went from being an effective to Swiss cheese. She openly spoke against walls in the past.

Now she wants a wall.

 

Kamala cast the deciding vote in the senate to give the IRS more power to track down tip money so that the gov't could tax it. Then after Trump said that he was going to stop taxing tips, Kamala said the same thing.

 

After JD Vance talked about raising the child tax credit for $2,000 to $5,000, "which could cost the US gov't $250B in the next tens years" according to CBS, Kamala siad that she was going to raise to $6k, and CBS reported that Kamala was going to go to work for voters to get that done" lol. 

 

Conservatives weren't brainwashed by CNN. We all know where she stands and who she is. We know how much of a snake she is, from watching her support the destruction of Minnesota, and there's no way that she's dipping into the conservative voting pool.

Are centrists going to respect her flip-flopping, forgive all her costly mistakes, and believe that she has suddenly become a person who can get things right the first time after she was so wrong about everything throughout the past 3.5 years? I don't think so. Centrists who want a strong economy, global peace, and a secure border will lean towards the person who already provided those things.

So what about her cultists? They all believe that walls are racist. How can they support this? They all know that she's following Trump like a lost puppy. How can they support that? Surely they can see the dichotomy in how the MSM covers Trump policies and then reconsiders them after Kamala adopts them. Is she going to hire trump as an advisor if she gets elected? I don't see cultists leaving the flock, but what I can see is them just not being amped to vote for Trumpette.

[DUI_Offender]

For the love of God, can't you post a interesting topic?

[Hodad]

No, Trump will be busy making license plates. Which will, by the way, finally be a Trump product made in the USA, so that's nice.

 

And this phony "Harris wants a wall" bullshit is not helping. Nobody is buying it.

[WestCanMan]

9 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

For the love of God, can't you post a interesting topic?

What part of that isn't interesting to you?

Don't you wonder what effect Kamala's flip-flopping will have on the cult?

Do you find it just a little bit racist that she's building a wall now?

Did walls suddenly become non-racist, or is she building it because too many Latinos are voting for Trump? 

Kamala: "OMG, the majority of those people are family-oriented Christians. They're not going to vote for us! We need a wall and we need it NOW!"

[WestCanMan]

19 minutes ago, Hodad said:

And this phony "Harris wants a wall" bullshit is not helping. Nobody is buying it.

So you don't think Kamala plans to build a border wall? 

You don't think that Kamala's new stance on the border is an utter refutation of the first 3 years of Dem border policy?

Not only is her new stance on the border an admission that their border policy was a dismal failure, she's also campaigning on fixing the cost of living crisis that her current administration inflicted on Americans. 

Nobody is buying your fiction about Harris not being a first-time failure in the WH and also a press-dodging policy thief. 

Edited August 30 by WestCanMan

[CdnFox]

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Walls are theoretically racist. They're a waste of money. They're symbols of white supremacy. 

Biden shut down construction on the first day of his presidency, and sold off materials for pennies on the dollar.

Kamala was the border czar when the border went from being an effective to Swiss cheese. She openly spoke against walls in the past.

Now she wants a wall.

 

Kamala cast the deciding vote in the senate to give the IRS more power to track down tip money so that the gov't could tax it. Then after Trump said that he was going to stop taxing tips, Kamala said the same thing.

 

After JD Vance talked about raising the child tax credit for $2,000 to $5,000, "which could cost the US gov't $250B in the next tens years" according to CBS, Kamala siad that she was going to raise to $6k, and CBS reported that Kamala was going to go to work for voters to get that done" lol. 

 

Conservatives weren't brainwashed by CNN. We all know where she stands and who she is. We know how much of a snake she is, from watching her support the destruction of Minnesota, and there's no way that she's dipping into the conservative voting pool.

Are centrists going to respect her flip-flopping, forgive all her costly mistakes, and believe that she has suddenly become a person who can get things right the first time after she was so wrong about everything throughout the past 3.5 years? I don't think so. Centrists who want a strong economy, global peace, and a secure border will lean towards the person who already provided those things.

So what about her cultists? They all believe that walls are racist. How can they support this? They all know that she's following Trump like a lost puppy. How can they support that? Surely they can see the dichotomy in how the MSM covers Trump policies and then reconsiders them after Kamala adopts them. Is she going to hire trump as an advisor if she gets elected? I don't see cultists leaving the flock, but what I can see is them just not being amped to vote for Trumpette.

You mustn't underestimate the democratic ability for forgetting whatever they thought or said 5 minutes ago. The fact that walls were evil for the longest time means nothing, thanks to their memory of a goldfish anything that they said or thought 5 minutes ago is long gone. 

I think the center and the mushy middle will see her for what she is more and more as the campaign progresses.

 

[Hodad]

24 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

So you don't think Kamala plans to build a border wall? 

You don't think that Kamala's new stance on the border is an utter refutation of the first 3 years of Dem border policy?

Not only is her new stance on the border an admission that their border policy was a dismal failure, she's also campaigning on fixing the cost of living crisis that her current administration inflicted on Americans. 

Nobody is buying your fiction about Harris not being a first-time failure in the WH and also a press-dodging policy thief. 

She pledged to push the bipartisan border bill through. That doesn't mean she "wants" a wall. It means she's a farking grown up who understands that things get done through compromise.

In a bipartisan bill, there are things for both sides. That's the way reality works. Republicans want a stupid wall? Fine. If that's a necessary price to pay to get meaningful immigration reform, so be it. Unless Trump manages to lose the Republicans a lot of seats in the legislature as well and they lose their leverage. 

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

She pledged to push the bipartisan border bill through. That doesn't mean she "wants" a wall. It means she's a farking grown up who understands that things get done through compromise.

In a bipartisan bill, there are things for both sides. That's the way reality works. Republicans want a stupid wall? Fine. If that's a necessary price to pay to get meaningful immigration reform, so be it. Unless Trump manages to lose the Republicans a lot of seats in the legislature as well and they lose their leverage. 

There's really no point is arguing about WCM's FANTASIES. His IGNORANCE has NO EFFECT on American politics.

[Rebound]

8 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What part of that isn't interesting to you?

Don't you wonder what effect Kamala's flip-flopping will have on the cult?

Do you find it just a little bit racist that she's building a wall now?

Did walls suddenly become non-racist, or is she building it because too many Latinos are voting for Trump? 

Kamala: "OMG, the majority of those people are family-oriented Christians. They're not going to vote for us! We need a wall and we need it NOW!"

I want a leader who changes their views.  I don’t want a leader who’s caught up in some dogmatic nonsense and never thinks about doing what’s best. Circumstances change, opinions change, the world changes, and policies change with them.  
 

We used to have people fully committed to slavery. It changed. 
We used to have people fully committed to segregation of black people.  It changed. 
We used to outlaw interracial marriage. It changed. 
We used to outlaw gay marriage.  It changed.  
 

Change is good.  

[CouchPotato]

8 hours ago, Hodad said:

She pledged to push the bipartisan border bill through. That doesn't mean she "wants" a wall. It means she's a farking grown up who understands that things get done through compromise.

But to compromise with racism..... I don't think I can vote Democrat anymore.

Edited August 30 by CouchPotato

[CouchPotato]

55 minutes ago, Rebound said:

I want a leader who changes their views.  I don’t want a leader who’s caught up in some dogmatic nonsense and never thinks about doing what’s best. Circumstances change, opinions change, the world changes, and policies change with them.  

This is true. But what is going on with Kamala doesn't come across as some natural progression toward new view points. Most of these flip flops occurred after she became a presidential candidate. So it makes one question the legitimacy of her shift toward certain policies and whether she will actually follow through.

[ironstone]

12 hours ago, Hodad said:

And this phony "Harris wants a wall" bullshit is not helping. Nobody is buying it.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/28/harris-border-wall-trump-illegal-immigration/74964956007/

I thought I was reading a headline from The Babylon Bee when I saw on Tuesday that Vice President Kamala Harris now wants to build the border wall. 

But it wasn’t satire. 

Rather, the Democratic presidential nominee has decided she supports one of former President Donald Trump’s signature ideas − and one despised by progressives.

Here's how left-leaning Axios described Harris' newfound desire to build the wall: "It's the latest example of Harris flip-flopping on her past liberal positions such as supporting Medicare for All and banning fracking – proposals that aides say she now is against."

We haven’t gotten any explanations, either, as Harris hasn’t done a single interview or press conference since President Joe Biden dropped out of the race last month.

[Hodad]

13 minutes ago, ironstone said:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/28/harris-border-wall-trump-illegal-immigration/74964956007/

I thought I was reading a headline from The Babylon Bee when I saw on Tuesday that Vice President Kamala Harris now wants to build the border wall. 

But it wasn’t satire. 

Rather, the Democratic presidential nominee has decided she supports one of former President Donald Trump’s signature ideas − and one despised by progressives.

Here's how left-leaning Axios described Harris' newfound desire to build the wall: "It's the latest example of Harris flip-flopping on her past liberal positions such as supporting Medicare for All and banning fracking – proposals that aides say she now is against."

We haven’t gotten any explanations, either, as Harris hasn’t done a single interview or press conference since President Joe Biden dropped out of the race last month.

Yes, I know that is a now a popular claim in right-wing kookville. Thanks for reinforcing that by posting an opinion piece.

What none of you can produce is a single quote from Harris even remotely indicating that she "wants" to build a wall.

 

Again, that dumb claim is extrapolated from her continued support for the bipartisan border bill. Which is not even a "flip flop." The Biden administration supported the bill all along. Bipartisan bills are compromises that include things for both parties. 

If you had actually read the Axios article instead of a conservative pundit's recharacterization, you would understand this. Let me get my spoon out...

 

Driving the news: In her speech to the Democratic National Convention last week, Harris said she would sign the recent bipartisan border security bill — which Trump had ordered his allies to kill, fearing it would help Democrats in the November elections.

• That bill, negotiated by senators such as James Lankford (R-Okla.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), requires hundreds of millions of dollars of unspent funds to be used to continue building a wall on the border.
• "It requires the Trump border wall," Lankford told Axios. "It is in the bill itself that it sets the standards that were set during the Trump administration: Here's where it will be built. Here's how it has to be built, the height, the type, everything during the Trump construction."
• Harris' campaign says the border deal is a whole lot more than continuation of wall funding — and a tiny fraction of what Trump has proposed.

Lankford's office estimated the legislation would spend $650 million on a wall, down from the $18 billion Trump requested in 2018.

• The bill, which Murphy described as a "compromise" also included provisions with more money for asylum lawyers and judges for the overloaded immigration system. It also gave the president the authority to shut down the border if more than an average of 5,000 migrants crossed per day.

The other side: Harris advisers note that the bipartisan border proposal didn't include any new money to continue building the wall.

• It just extended the timeline to spend funds that had been appropriated during Trump's last year as president, they say, although the legislation has new restrictions to ensure the money is spent on barriers.

 

After reading this^^ if you can't understand why saying that Harris "wants" a wall is wildly dishonest then I can't help you with that. It's teaching your parents should have done.

 

[CdnFox]

5 hours ago, Rebound said:

I want a leader who changes their views.  I don’t want a leader who’s caught up in some dogmatic nonsense and never thinks about doing what’s best.

Nonsense. First you absolutely do want a leader that is set in their views. Second off indecisiveness and flip-flopping isn't flexibility, it's insecurity

Quote

Circumstances change, opinions change, the world changes, and policies change with them

.  What you mean is they have no moral convictions and change their policies to suit what they think will get them power today
 

Quote

We used to have people fully committed to slavery. It changed. 
We used to have people fully committed to segregation of black people.  It changed. 
We used to outlaw interracial marriage. It changed. 
We used to outlaw gay marriage.  It changed.  

Not in a year it didn't.
 

Quote

Change is good.  

Agreed, we've had Kamala for 4 years now it's time for change

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

I want a leader who changes their views.  I don’t want a leader who’s caught up in some dogmatic nonsense and never thinks about doing what’s best. Circumstances change, opinions change, the world changes, and policies change with them.   

So, you want someone who did everything wrong for 4 years, so now she's just doing everything Trump's way... 

Got it.

Quote

We used to have people fully committed to slavery. It changed. 

Yes, the Dems were fully committed to slavery, but now they have illegal immigrants who live in crappy homes and do sh1t jobs for low pay.

Quote

We used to have people fully committed to segregation of black people.  It changed. 

Yes, the dems were fully committed to segregation, but now they just tell black kids that crackers hate them, pigs hate them, pigs wanna kill them, and no one will hire them, so the blacks keep themselves in the ghetto now, it's just unofficial. 

Quote

 Change is good.

So changing to Trump's policies is good, you just want to vote for someone who is saying that they'll follow Trump's policies, but who isn't Trump. Got it. 

[herbie]

Oh yes, fear the "Cult of Sanity".

[CouchPotato]

3 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Nonsense. First you absolutely do want a leader that is set in their views. Second off indecisiveness and flip-flopping isn't flexibility, it's insecurity

To me it just sounds like a strategy to win now. She hasn't changed her mind. Protecting the border, fracking, etc. None of these will really be priorities for the Democrats once she gets in.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, CouchPotato said:

To me it just sounds like a strategy to win now. She hasn't changed her mind. Protecting the border, fracking, etc. None of these will really be priorities for the Democrats once she gets in.

Well obviously she doesn't intend to keep her word on any of this.

But I'm not so sure it is a sound strategy. It can be successful for sure, we've seen Justin Trudeau in Canada doing the same thing. He literally would not release his platform last election until Aaron had released his and then basically just said I will do everything he does but also add an extra million dollars to all of his spending commitments. If Erin was going to build a million homes Trudeau said he'd build 1.2. And he did win the election.

But it can also blow up in your face very quickly. It is a very dangerous strategy and it's such an extreme switch I just don't think she'll be able to pull it off. She's obviously hoping to reach the mushy middle but she needs to differentiate herself from trump and she's not doing that.

We're already seeing her numbers drop. That's pretty normal before september to see an end of august drop where both people will lose voters to the undecided category. But she's really going to struggle to win voters back and I just don't see this being an effective way

[robosmith]

14 hours ago, ironstone said:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/28/harris-border-wall-trump-illegal-immigration/74964956007/

I thought I was reading a headline from The Babylon Bee when I saw on Tuesday that Vice President Kamala Harris now wants to build the border wall. 

But it wasn’t satire. 

Rather, the Democratic presidential nominee has decided she supports one of former President Donald Trump’s signature ideas − and one despised by progressives.

Here's how left-leaning Axios described Harris' newfound desire to build the wall: "It's the latest example of Harris flip-flopping on her past liberal positions such as supporting Medicare for All and banning fracking – proposals that aides say she now is against."

We haven’t gotten any explanations, either, as Harris hasn’t done a single interview or press conference since President Joe Biden dropped out of the race last month.

Here's your explanation and now your IGNORANCE has been cured.

Harris Has Not Flipped on Trump Border Wall

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

So, you want someone who did everything wrong for 4 years, so now she's just doing everything Trump's way... 

Got it.

Your STRAWMAN proves you don't "got it."

[DUI_Offender]

Kamala Harris continues to ride a wave of momentum, heading into September. She is over 3 points up on Trump, and even 270toWin.com has revised their electoral map, and now states that Harris has ttaken the lead. For the first time this election, Harris now leads 226-219, with 93 electroral votes too close to call.

 

Of the states too close to call:

Harris leads in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada.

Trump leads in Arizona, with North Carolina and Georgia in a virtual tie.

Even if Trump wins Georgia and NC, it would not be enough for Trump, as Harris would win 276 electoral votes.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

Kamala Harris continues to ride a wave of momentum, heading into September. She is over 3 points up on Trump, and even 270toWin.com has revised their electoral map, and now states that Harris has ttaken the lead. For the first time this election, Harris now leads 226-219, with 93 electroral votes too close to call.

 

Of the states too close to call:

Harris leads in Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Nevada.

Trump leads in Arizona, with North Carolina and Georgia in a virtual tie.

Even if Trump wins Georgia and NC, it would not be enough for Trump, as Harris would win 276 electoral votes.

That was several days old now.  The aggregates say no, about 1.8 above trump and both are falling, indicating the electorate is moving back to an 'undecided' position. And realclear with the latest data shows trump winning by a nose.  Not that that means much  statistically it's still a tie. 

But he's got lots of room to rise, she's stalled and there's not much she can to do to get a boost now unless she really kills at the debates which is unlikely. 

[Rebound]

On 8/30/2024 at 12:23 AM, WestCanMan said:

Walls are theoretically racist. They're a waste of money. They're symbols of white supremacy. 

Biden shut down construction on the first day of his presidency, and sold off materials for pennies on the dollar.

Kamala was the border czar when the border went from being an effective to Swiss cheese. She openly spoke against walls in the past.

Now she wants a wall.

 

Kamala cast the deciding vote in the senate to give the IRS more power to track down tip money so that the gov't could tax it. Then after Trump said that he was going to stop taxing tips, Kamala said the same thing.

 

After JD Vance talked about raising the child tax credit for $2,000 to $5,000, "which could cost the US gov't $250B in the next tens years" according to CBS, Kamala siad that she was going to raise to $6k, and CBS reported that Kamala was going to go to work for voters to get that done" lol. 

 

Conservatives weren't brainwashed by CNN. We all know where she stands and who she is. We know how much of a snake she is, from watching her support the destruction of Minnesota, and there's no way that she's dipping into the conservative voting pool.

Are centrists going to respect her flip-flopping, forgive all her costly mistakes, and believe that she has suddenly become a person who can get things right the first time after she was so wrong about everything throughout the past 3.5 years? I don't think so. Centrists who want a strong economy, global peace, and a secure border will lean towards the person who already provided those things.

So what about her cultists? They all believe that walls are racist. How can they support this? They all know that she's following Trump like a lost puppy. How can they support that? Surely they can see the dichotomy in how the MSM covers Trump policies and then reconsiders them after Kamala adopts them. Is she going to hire trump as an advisor if she gets elected? I don't see cultists leaving the flock, but what I can see is them just not being amped to vote for Trumpette.

Kamala’s supporters know that everything you post is a lie.

The border opened for two reasons:

Reason One: The emergency Covid restrictions were removed by a Federal judge. 
Reason Two: The bipartisan law that would have enabled those restrictions was scuttled by Donald Trump. 
 

We get that Donald’s solution is to ignore the rule of law.  He said so. He’s gonna be our dictator, and it will be great! No swamp! No red tape! Stuff gets done.  
 

Except that’s exactly the same as Adolph Hitler, Mao and Joseph Stalin.   

Edited August 31 by Rebound

[Deluge]

On 8/29/2024 at 10:23 PM, WestCanMan said:

Walls are theoretically racist. They're a waste of money. They're symbols of white supremacy. 

Biden shut down construction on the first day of his presidency, and sold off materials for pennies on the dollar.

Kamala was the border czar when the border went from being an effective to Swiss cheese. She openly spoke against walls in the past.

Now she wants a wall.

 

Kamala cast the deciding vote in the senate to give the IRS more power to track down tip money so that the gov't could tax it. Then after Trump said that he was going to stop taxing tips, Kamala said the same thing.

 

After JD Vance talked about raising the child tax credit for $2,000 to $5,000, "which could cost the US gov't $250B in the next tens years" according to CBS, Kamala siad that she was going to raise to $6k, and CBS reported that Kamala was going to go to work for voters to get that done" lol. 

 

Conservatives weren't brainwashed by CNN. We all know where she stands and who she is. We know how much of a snake she is, from watching her support the destruction of Minnesota, and there's no way that she's dipping into the conservative voting pool.

Are centrists going to respect her flip-flopping, forgive all her costly mistakes, and believe that she has suddenly become a person who can get things right the first time after she was so wrong about everything throughout the past 3.5 years? I don't think so. Centrists who want a strong economy, global peace, and a secure border will lean towards the person who already provided those things.

So what about her cultists? They all believe that walls are racist. How can they support this? They all know that she's following Trump like a lost puppy. How can they support that? Surely they can see the dichotomy in how the MSM covers Trump policies and then reconsiders them after Kamala adopts them. Is she going to hire trump as an advisor if she gets elected? I don't see cultists leaving the flock, but what I can see is them just not being amped to vote for Trumpette.

Well, to be fair, Kameltoe wants a wall until November 6, and then she'll want it down, regardless of who wins. lol

[WestCanMan]

Just now, Rebound said:

Kamala’s supporters know that everything you post is a lie.

That's odd, because everything I posted was true. 

If there was something false there you would have proven it instead of just firing off a snotty insult.

FACT: Dems called the wall 'racist', and Kamal called it a waste of money.

FACT: Biden signed an executive order to shut down construction of the wall on day 1, and ended up selling off materials for pennies on the dollar

FACT: Kamala was the "border czar". Here's Axios getting roasted by Fox News:

• Axios went viral Wednesday with its report about the "border confusion" that has haunted Harris, telling readers "the Trump campaign and Republicans have tagged Harris repeatedly with the 'border czar' title — which she never actually had."
• However, critics cited Axios' own reporting from 2021 saying that Biden had appointed Harris "border czar." Axios later added an editor's note stating "This article has been updated and clarified to note that Axios was among the news outlets that incorrectly labeled Harris a ‘border czar’ in 2021."

See what I just did there? I proved that what I said was true. Now I can call you a liar and it's not an insult, it's a proven observation.

Quote

The border opened for two reasons:

Reason One: The emergency Covid restrictions were removed by a Federal judge. 
Reason Two: The bipartisan law that would have enabled those restrictions was scuttled by Donald Trump.

Regarding your alleged "Reason one": FYI Title 42 didn't end until May 11 2023, two years into his presidency and just one year ago. The border crisis didn't suddenly start in May of last year.

Regarding your alleged "Reason two": FYI the border bill that you're talking about didn't defeated until February 2024. That's 3 years into the Biden presidency, and just 6 months ago. 

Your two "reasons" were pure BS, and that's another perfect reason to say that you're a liar again. 

 

See Rebound, when someone's lying it's way more fun to prove that they're a liar than to just make snotty insults. If I was actually lying you definitely would have relished the chance to prove it, not just spew insults like a petulant child. 

[Rebound]

16 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

That's odd, because everything I posted was true. 

If there was something false there you would have proven it instead of just firing off a snotty insult.

FACT: Dems called the wall 'racist', and Kamal called it a waste of money.

FACT: Biden signed an executive order to shut down construction of the wall on day 1, and ended up selling off materials for pennies on the dollar

FACT: Kamala was the "border czar". Here's Axios getting roasted by Fox News:

• Axios went viral Wednesday with its report about the "border confusion" that has haunted Harris, telling readers "the Trump campaign and Republicans have tagged Harris repeatedly with the 'border czar' title — which she never actually had."
• However, critics cited Axios' own reporting from 2021 saying that Biden had appointed Harris "border czar." Axios later added an editor's note stating "This article has been updated and clarified to note that Axios was among the news outlets that incorrectly labeled Harris a ‘border czar’ in 2021."

See what I just did there? I proved that what I said was true. Now I can call you a liar and it's not an insult, it's a proven observation.

Regarding your alleged "Reason one": FYI Title 42 didn't end until May 11 2023, two years into his presidency and just one year ago. The border crisis didn't suddenly start in May of last year.

Regarding your alleged "Reason two": FYI the border bill that you're talking about didn't defeated until February 2024. That's 3 years into the Biden presidency, and just 6 months ago. 

Your two "reasons" were pure BS, and that's another perfect reason to say that you're a liar again. 

 

See Rebound, when someone's lying it's way more fun to prove that they're a liar than to just make snotty insults. If I was actually lying you definitely would have relished the chance to prove it, not just spew insults like a petulant child. 

November 15, 2022:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/11/15/border-ruling-title-42/
 

The border bill was the bipartisan effort to control the border. The President cannot force Congress to pass bills. It would have been signed into law faster except, as you know… Trump. And Trump’s reasoning for blocking this bill and continuing this chaos at the border is that Trump doesn’t give a shlt about the border or illegal immigration, he only cares about whatever political issue he can benefit from. So if being the direct cause of increased illegal immigration helps him, then he’s for it. One day he’s anti-abortion, the next day he’s pro-choice. One day he’s opposed to Project 2025, the next day he’s the keynote speaker at their convention. He has a health care plan, then he doesn’t. He’s against socialized medicine but wants to give away IVF for free at $20,000 a pop.