Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Rebound said:

Hypothetically, if Biden’s family accepted $22 million in bribes, and he had knowledge of it, then yes, I would support his impeachment.  

It's not illegal for a family member to sell "influence."

What's illegal is for the Federal official to deliver "favors."

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, robosmith said:

^No EVIDENCE. Seeing a story on FOS LIES is NOT EVIDENCE. 

Really? How much in gifts did Sotomayor get and not report?

Willful ignorance. FYI, I don't watch fox news, cnn, msnbc or anyone else. I get my news from an aggragate of sources that are generally reputable, but a lot are left leaning.

As for Biden, there is tons of hard evidence. If you haven't seen it, you've been intentionally avoiding it.

As for Sotomayor, just do a web search. She got millions for books that fell pretty flat. Then she used her tax payer staff to sell those books. A blatant violation of law.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/07/11/justice-sotomayor-book-orders-assocaited-press/70402253007/

Edited by gatomontes99

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Willful ignorance. FYI, I don't watch fox news, cnn, msnbc or anyone else. I get my news from an aggragate of sources that are generally reputable, but a lot are left leaning.

Like what?

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

As for Biden, there is tons of hard evidence. If you haven't seen it, you've been intentionally avoiding it.

RepubliCON house has been claiming to have evidence against Joe for months, but proved NOTHING except they are CLOWNS.

3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

As for Sotomayor, just do a web search. She got millions for books that fell pretty flat. Then she used her tax payer staff to sell those books. A blatant violation of law.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/07/11/justice-sotomayor-book-orders-assocaited-press/70402253007/

Buying 60 of her books is incidental expenses compared to Thomas getting  OVER $4M of unreported "gifts."

You must be joking if you're saying that is a huge ethical violation.

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Like what?

RepubliCON house has been claiming to have evidence against Joe for months, but proved NOTHING except they are CLOWNS.

Buying 60 of her books is incidental expenses compared to Thomas getting  OVER $4M of unreported "gifts."

You must be joking if you're saying that is a huge ethical violation.

No. She got over $3m for books that didn't do that well. But saying there is no evidence of Biden's corruption is like saying there is no evidence the earth is round.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

That is baloney and you know it. 

It's entirely true and YOU know it - or you'd be able to address the differences and you don't. 

Quote


Paying off a judge $4 million is “different”? In what nation, state or county is it legal to give a judge $4 million?

Literally all of them.  Why wouldn't it be.  The only time it would possibly be an issue is if that judge then were go to on and adjudicate a trial that i was in some way involved in.  At that point they would have to recuse themselves. There's lots of other judges. 

There are NOT lots of other presidents.  i listed all the reasons in another thread on this why a business or other person may want to get on the good side of a judge and they are not terribly inappropriate 

Quote

Hate to say it, but you’re corrupt as Nationalist.  

Hate to say it, but your blinded by your hate. 

Lets walk this through.  You're a judge.  I'm a business person.  We know each other and i occasionally pick your brain about various legal subjects to get your 'take' on things but you don't represent me or anything.  So i buy you a 100,000 dollar vacation as a gift, your advice and friendship is worth something to me. 

You never preside over a case i'm involved in .

What exactly do you see happening here that you find such a 'corrupt' and egregious outcome?  What is going to happen that shouldn't happen exactly? SPECIFICALLY - where's the corruption?

Set your hatred and bigotry aside for a moment and walk me through it. Where's the offense here.  

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted
Just now, gatomontes99 said:

No. She got over $3m for books that didn't do that well. But saying there is no evidence of Biden's corruption is like saying there is no evidence the earth is round.

ZERO evidence of Joe's "corruption." Can you post anything other than a story on FOS LIES? LMAO

Do you even know that the RepubliCON House has been trying and FAILING to impeach Joe because THEY have NO EVIDENCE? 

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

ZERO evidence of Joe's "corruption." Can you post anything other than a story on FOS LIES? LMAO

Do you even know that the RepubliCON House has been trying and FAILING to impeach Joe because THEY have NO EVIDENCE? 

You keep saying I'm getting my information from Fox, but I don't watch fox. I don't watch news. I read it.

“I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter Biden groused to daughter Naomi in January 2019. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary.” Pop is Joe Biden.

The NY Post broke the news that Hunter had archived a text message on the laptop he left in Deleware that said they were all giving Joe half their earnings. That is solid evidence.

If you didn't know that, it has to be willful ignorance. There is no other explanation. It was all over the news. It was reported by every major news outlet.

Joe is guilty as sin.

  • Thanks 1

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

Willful ignorance. FYI, I don't watch fox news, cnn, msnbc or anyone else. I get my news from an aggragate of sources that are generally reputable, but a lot are left leaning.

As for Biden, there is tons of hard evidence. If you haven't seen it, you've been intentionally avoiding it.

As for Sotomayor, just do a web search. She got millions for books that fell pretty flat. Then she used her tax payer staff to sell those books. A blatant violation of law.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2023/07/11/justice-sotomayor-book-orders-assocaited-press/70402253007/

Are the unsold books returnable?

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
54 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

No. She got over $3m for books that didn't do that well. But saying there is no evidence of Biden's corruption is like saying there is no evidence the earth is round.

Lol. She wrote multiple NY Times Bestseller books that did well enough to earn $3m, right? You must have very high standards for "doing well."

And doing the work to earn money as an author is decidedly different, is it not, than receiving lavish gifts from politically interested billionaires?

There is no evidence of Biden's corruption. There are tons of unfounded accusations from the Republicans, but like Trump's secret evidence of election fraud, nobody has actually produced anything. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Rebound said:

You sure are trying very hard to defend Clarence Thomas, aren’t you?  

Here’s your problem: You are a corrupt individual. You believe that if someone is on your “team,” then laws and rules don’t apply to them. A judge cannot accept a gift if it creates the appearance of impropriety. You don’t see the impropriety, because he’s on your “team.” But that doesn’t mean impropriety doesn’t exist, and as soon as you saw the precise exact same thing with Harris, you immediately agreed that it was impeachable.  
 

“They’re all the same,” you say.   False! Democrat Senator Robert Menendez was just convicted of receiving “gifts.”  Not one Democrat leader protested this prosecution. Not one. He’s out of the Senate and he’s convicted. Just like that.  No Supreme Court interference, no Federal judges claiming that assigning Federal prosecutors is unconstitutional. Democrats are far from perfect, as Menendez proves, but the Republicans are teeming with corruption right now and you are a part of it, whether you believe it or not.  

Wrong. Menendez was convicted of taking bribes and being a foreign agent.

"Gift" / "bribe and foreign agent"

See the difference?

Sure ya do.

Edited by Nationalist

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
3 hours ago, robosmith said:

The question is NOT about "political donations."

The FACT is, there are strict standards prohibiting gifts for Federal employees EXCEPT JoSCOTUS, who don't even face penalties for not reporting them.

Blah blah whine whine.

Gift / donation.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
27 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Lol. She wrote multiple NY Times Bestseller books that did well enough to earn $3m, right? You must have very high standards for "doing well."

And doing the work to earn money as an author is decidedly different, is it not, than receiving lavish gifts from politically interested billionaires?

There is no evidence of Biden's corruption. There are tons of unfounded accusations from the Republicans, but like Trump's secret evidence of election fraud, nobody has actually produced anything. 

Find one person that read any of her books. Good luck.

Here is an article on how they pump up the numbers: https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/9/13/16257084/bestseller-lists-explained

I don't know that she did that, but it would explain how desperate she was to get some books sold. There are also ways to tike the best seller lost by releasing during down periods and then buying your book.

Being a NYTs best seller is nothing to brag about. Literally anyone with money can do it. And if you want to launder money to someone, it's a very good way.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
11 hours ago, Rebound said:

If it’s true that, while Vice President, Kamala Harris  received millions of dollars worth of gifts from wealthy donors, and didn’t even report half of them, should she be impeached?

I still haven't seen anything about this...

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You keep saying I'm getting my information from Fox, but I don't watch fox. I don't watch news. I read it.

“I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter Biden groused to daughter Naomi in January 2019. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary.” Pop is Joe Biden.

The NY Post broke the news that Hunter had archived a text message on the laptop he left in Deleware that said they were all giving Joe half their earnings. That is solid evidence.

If you didn't know that, it has to be willful ignorance. There is no other explanation. It was all over the news. It was reported by every major news outlet.

Joe is guilty as sin.

Joe Biden is Uncle Sam. We all give him half of our money.  
 

But if that text was about truly paying Joe half his salary, there would be a paper trail.  All we saw is a few months of repayment over a car loan. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Joe Biden is Uncle Sam. We all give him half of our money.  
 

But if that text was about truly paying Joe half his salary, there would be a paper trail.  All we saw is a few months of repayment over a car loan. 

There is a paper trail. That's what the IRS whistleblowers testified about. The Biden's started declaring everything the gave each other loans. However, they didn't actually have loan agreements. So we have the deposits, but they said all the money they got from each other was a loan. They either never repaid it or never asked for payment, depending on how the transactions went.

Those transactions are what led the IRS to start investigating all of the Bidens. That is, before it was shut down.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

There is a paper trail. That's what the IRS whistleblowers testified about. The Biden's started declaring everything the gave each other loans. However, they didn't actually have loan agreements. So we have the deposits, but they said all the money they got from each other was a loan. They either never repaid it or never asked for payment, depending on how the transactions went.

Those transactions are what led the IRS to start investigating all of the Bidens. That is, before it was shut down.

It doesn't really matter what the Bidens did now because they got away with it.

Despite his blatant crimes against America, Biden was able to become president and screw the country for 4 years. The damage is done.

Impeaching him now serves no purpose. He's gonna live out his days in luxury, and will just wake up every morning not even remembering that he was charged or convicted of anything. 

  • Haha 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted
44 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Joe Biden is Uncle Sam. We all give him half of our money.  

So was this just all BS? Was this thread just started to get people to say "KAMALA HAS TO GO!" so you could turn around and say "Nah, it's just actually Thomas that has to go"?

In other words, the Demonrats are worried that Trump's gonna win, and they want to take one last run at ousting Thomas while they still have enough time to get another justice in there 🤣

If the Dems can get Thomas out in Oct, it would be a HUGE election issue for them. "We need to win so that we can get a good justice on the SC! (I.e., a Democrat who will always vote along party lines, regardless of the constitution)"

Not owning the SC is really a thorn in the Dems' side. It's the only thing standing between the Dems and total control of everything right now. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

"I don't hate American's, I pointed out the literacy rate to Uncle Sam." - LinkSoul

"It's just a parable about rocks and trees talking to muslims to help them kill Jews who are trying to hide. It's open to interpretation." - robobigot

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Find one person that read any of her books. Good luck.

Here is an article on how they pump up the numbers: https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/9/13/16257084/bestseller-lists-explained

I don't know that she did that, but it would explain how desperate she was to get some books sold. There are also ways to tike the best seller lost by releasing during down periods and then buying your book.

Being a NYTs best seller is nothing to brag about. Literally anyone with money can do it. And if you want to launder money to someone, it's a very good way. 

Don't be silly. Being a NY Times bestselling author is absolutely something to brag about. That's why the publisher mentions it in the marketing of every subsequent book--usually right on the cover. 

And making three million dollars as an author is pretty damn good. 

I'm not surprised that you don't people who would buy such a book, but my MIL has her memoir on the shelf. Plenty of other people read it as well. You're spinning up a very weird conspiracy theory here.

 

Edited by Hodad
Posted
Just now, Hodad said:

Don't be silly. Being an NY Times bestseller is absolutely something to brag about. That's why the publisher mentions it on the front cover of every subsequent book. 

And making three million dollars as an author is pretty damn good. 

I'm not surprised that you don't people who would buy such a book, but my MIL has her memoir on the shelf. Plenty of other people read it as well. You're spinning up a very weird conspiracy theory here.

 

No you don't.

Don't you think that if I were wrong that I would know it? 

 

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Hodad said:

That's almost a coherent response. I'm sure it's made sense in your head. 

If it didn't make sense in yours, maybe you should ask the other voices if they got it?

"That which doesn't kill me...

Had better start running."

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

You keep saying I'm getting my information from Fox, but I don't watch fox. I don't watch news. I read it.

“I hope you all can do what I did and pay for everything for this entire family for 30 years,” Hunter Biden groused to daughter Naomi in January 2019. “It’s really hard. But don’t worry, unlike pop, I won’t make you give me half your salary.” Pop is Joe Biden.

The NY Post broke the news that Hunter had archived a text message on the laptop he left in Deleware that said they were all giving Joe half their earnings. That is solid evidence.

If you didn't know that, it has to be willful ignorance. There is no other explanation. It was all over the news. It was reported by every major news outlet.

Joe is guilty as sin.

Words in computer file are NOT any kind of evidence. Duh

Anyone can write any fantasy in a computer file, just like you post yours on the Internet.

FYI, NYP is just as bad or worse than FOS LIES. Murdoch's National Enquirer. Haven't you noticed their BULLSHIT?

You said your sources are reputable. You LIED.

Edited by robosmith
Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Wrong. Menendez was convicted of taking bribes and being a foreign agent.

"Gift" / "bribe and foreign agent"

See the difference?

Sure ya do.

We see that you IMAGINE there's a difference. Thomas wanted more money or he would leave the bench.

Crow gave him the lifestyle he wanted. Quid Pro Quo.

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Blah blah whine whine.

Gift / donation.

^BUPKIS, as USUAL. LMAO

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

Find one person that read any of her books. Good luck.

Here is an article on how they pump up the numbers: https://www.vox.com/culture/2017/9/13/16257084/bestseller-lists-explained

I don't know that she did that, but it would explain how desperate she was to get some books sold. There are also ways to tike the best seller lost by releasing during down periods and then buying your book.

Being a NYTs best seller is nothing to brag about. Literally anyone with money can do it. And if you want to launder money to someone, it's a very good way.

All you got is ^this SPECULATION.

Posted
4 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I still haven't seen anything about this...

You haven't seen where it's stated it's a hypothetical question? LMAO

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

There is a paper trail. That's what the IRS whistleblowers testified about. The Biden's started declaring everything the gave each other loans. However, they didn't actually have loan agreements. So we have the deposits, but they said all the money they got from each other was a loan. They either never repaid it or never asked for payment, depending on how the transactions went.

Those transactions are what led the IRS to start investigating all of the Bidens. That is, before it was shut down.

^BUPKIS speculation.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...