Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For starters, it's obvious that government sluts are going to hate this, but I don't understand why some of you are trying to throw this at us if it were a bad thing.

At first glance, Project 2025 doesn't look aggressive enough, so maybe you crybabies should be grateful with the project as it stands now. 

https://www.project2025.org/

 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Deluge said:

For starters, it's obvious that government sluts are going to hate this, but I don't understand why some of you are trying to throw this at us if it were a bad thing.

At first glance, Project 2025 doesn't look aggressive enough, so maybe you crybabies should be grateful with the project as it stands now. 

https://www.project2025.org/

 

Wow! You're even further off your rocker than I thought possible. LMAO

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Wow! You're even further off your rocker than I thought possible. LMAO

robowoke thinks the total federal government workforce should be 28.7 million, not 2.87 million. 

Edited by Deluge
Posted

It's very amusing for a centrist to lean back and watch people throw accusations around "Agendas".  First it was the Chuds screaming about Agenda 2030 from the UN and now liberals screaming about Agenda 2025.

The only difference is that the UN Agenda says things like "we need sustainable energy" and the Heritage one says "No abortion pills" so it's more specific and arguably more scary.

But we actually have a public forum for discussing and screaming about ideas.  We still have that.

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

It's very amusing for a centrist to lean back and watch people throw accusations around "Agendas".  First it was the Chuds screaming about Agenda 2030 from the UN and now liberals screaming about Agenda 2025.

The only difference is that the UN Agenda says things like "we need sustainable energy" and the Heritage one says "No abortion pills" so it's more specific and arguably more scary.

But we actually have a public forum for discussing and screaming about ideas.  We still have that.

And that's the only difference in the minds of centrists because they are weak and easily manipulated by the Left.

The truth is, when the UN says "we need sustainable energy" what they really mean is "no fossil fuels" which is much scarier than telling selfish degenerates that they can't murder their unborn with abortion pills. 

Edited by Deluge
  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

And that's the only difference in the minds of centrists because they are weak and easily manipulated by the Left.

The truth is, when the UN says "we need sustainable energy" what they really mean is "no fossil fuels" which is much scarier than telling selfish degenerates that they can't murder their unborn with abortion pills. 

Tmyiu know who wants to reduce fossil fuel use? Countries that don't have fossil fuels. This is a power grab by outlawing the resources other countries control.

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Fluffypants said:

What annoys me about Project 2025 they keep trying to link it to Trump and Trump has nothing to do with it.

I like Trump's Agenda 47. That's a good place to start. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Wow !  You made a demon laugh... hellfire in 10... 9.. 8.. 7..

Ok ok...

We all know that alternate energy sources are going to be part of the landscape. We also know that abject refusal to allow birth control is not gonna sell. What to dooo...

Here's a novel idea. "Compromise".

The climate-cult stops lying and allows fossil fuels to be used without tossing tomato soup on priceless art, and the anti-birth control folks live with states' decisions. No more blocking access to abortion clinics in states that allow it.

And with that settled...think I'll go outside and enjoy a cigar...

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted

Project Mental Illness

3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

It's very amusing for a centrist to lean back and watch...

Toronto conservative! 🙂

  • Thanks 1

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
22 hours ago, robosmith said:

Wow! You're even further off your rocker than I thought possible. LMAO

22 hours ago, Deluge said:

robowoke thinks the total federal government workforce should be 28.7 million, not 2.87 million. 

 

And still DELUGINAL as USUAL.

Posted
1 minute ago, robosmith said:

And still DELUGINAL as USUAL.

democrats are trying to kill Donald Trump. You a$$holes should be ashamed of yourselves. 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

It's very amusing for a centrist to lean back and watch people throw accusations around "Agendas".  First it was the Chuds screaming about Agenda 2030 from the UN and now liberals screaming about Agenda 2025.

The only difference is that the UN Agenda says things like "we need sustainable energy" and the Heritage one says "No abortion pills" so it's more specific and arguably more scary.

But we actually have a public forum for discussing and screaming about ideas.  We still have that.

It may be amusing until Trump invokes the insurrection act on day one and orders the military to start murdering protesters.

Just now, Deluge said:

democrats REGISTERED REPUBLICONS are trying to kill Donald Trump. You a$$holes should be ashamed of yourselves. 

ftfy....

Posted
20 hours ago, Fluffypants said:

What annoys me about Project 2025 they keep trying to link it to Trump and Trump has nothing to do with it.

What annoys me is MAGA CULTS like ^this who believe Trump's LIES to distance himself from platforms he KNOWS are UNPOPULAR before an election.

IF he gets elected only then will YOU discover the truth, but STILL defend his LIES.

1 minute ago, Deluge said:

We know, pervert, we know. ;) 

You know BULLSHIT, and that's ALL.

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You know BULLSHIT, and that's ALL.

 

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

We both know you're a shill, and THAT is all. ;) 

Thanks for proving me right with you BULLSHIT, again.

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Thanks for proving me right with you BULLSHIT, again.

It's no secret, robowoke; you're a shill for all things democrat; no specialization like being an AOC or Clinton shill, you're just a one size fits all kind of democrat shill. ;) 

Edited by Deluge
  • Like 1
Posted
44 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Very unclear that this would happen or succeed.

 

He has said he will do that.

Quote

Donald Trump has made clear that, in a second term, he would govern differently than any president in U.S. history. He has hinted at suspending the Constitution, building vast deportation camps, weaponizing the Department of Justice, and mass firing career civil servants

Here’s one you might have missed: he reportedly plans to invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the president to use the military as a domestic police force, on his first day in office.  

 

Posted
On 7/15/2024 at 1:01 PM, Deluge said:

For starters, it's obvious that government sluts are going to hate this, but I don't understand why some of you are trying to throw this at us if it were a bad thing.

At first glance, Project 2025 doesn't look aggressive enough, so maybe you crybabies should be grateful with the project as it stands now. 

https://www.project2025.org/

 

It's just a collection of platitudes and cliches that are too vague to inform a serious platform.

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, robosmith said:

NYT is full of shit on that suspending the constitution piece, and I'd have to see more about what he wants to do to bring the fat asses Bragg and James to justice, as well as Engeron and any other TDS piece of shit that weaponized the legal system. 

On the other hand, vast deportation camps and mass firing career civil servants is an excellent idea - especially those in the Board of Education and FBI; maybe even the IRS if we can get a clean tax system in place. 

Edited by Deluge

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,833
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    maria orsic
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Majikman earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • VanidaCKP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • maria orsic earned a badge
      First Post
    • Majikman earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • oops earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...