Jump to content

Budweiser hires trans spokesperson and the right loses their mind


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Americana Antifa said:

Pointing out that you move the goalposts a lot? That's your deflection?!

You incels are lazy.

 Oh you don't point it out - those are just your go - to lies when you're losing a discussion badly or you've been caught in a lie.

If someone accurately points out you're a lying scumbag or any of the tricks you like to pull you scream "PROJECTION!!!"

If someone points out you're lying about them or making crap up you cry "DEFLECTION!!"

if someone disproves your point and demonstrates you're wrong it's "GET BACK HERE WITH THOSE GOALPOSTS".

And if you're REALLY emotionally damaged... the memes come out :) That's when we all know you've really been crushed.  :)

Honestly we could probably make a pretty entertaining drinking game just based on your 'tells'.  :)

You never fail to amuse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

 Oh you don't point it out - those are just your go - to lies when you're losing a discussion badly or you've been caught in a lie.

If someone accurately points out you're a lying scumbag or any of the tricks you like to pull you scream "PROJECTION!!!"

If someone points out you're lying about them or making crap up you cry "DEFLECTION!!"

if someone disproves your point and demonstrates you're wrong it's "GET BACK HERE WITH THOSE GOALPOSTS".

And if you're REALLY emotionally damaged... the memes come out :) That's when we all know you've really been crushed.  :)

Honestly we could probably make a pretty entertaining drinking game just based on your 'tells'.  :)

You never fail to amuse!

Looks like somebody needs a nap.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Do you have any proof that CNN knew it was fake? 

CNN knew their M Brown narrative was false because video of his violent robbery was out on Fox on day 1. Now that you know that, why don't you care? 

It's disgusting that they kept fanning the flames when they knew that there were violent riots and communities were being torn apart.

Do you think there's no proof that CNN knew that collusion was fake? Van Jones was caught on camera admitting that it was "a big nothingburger" over a year before the wheels fell off. Then when the FBI was caught committing actual crimes, CNN basically ignored it.

Is it not a big deal when the FBI commits crimes? How does that not make headline news? Weird. Either the FBI commits so many crimes that it isn't news when it happens, or CNN isn't interested in real news. 

You're just sealioning again. Being a liar is everything to you. 

Quote

And CNN never said that happened. What exactly do you think CNN lied about?

TBH, it sounds like you didn't actually watch CNN, you just got second hand news on what they were saying from Fox.

You said that CNN never reported on the witch hunt until after arrests were made, that was false. Also, no arrests for collusion ever resulted in convictions. 

The FBI can charge anyone they want with anything, and it works for political reasons, it just doesn't result in false convictions.... yet.

It seems like we're getting closer and closer every day. Right now they're leaving people in jail for years without a trial. 

Quote

If a cop needlessly murders a civilian, are we not supposed to talk about it? What you're basically saying is that we shouldn't talk about things that might result in violence.

You're lying again.

M Brown wasn't "needlessly murdered" and CNN knew that was a false narrative from day 1. He's a dead idjit, and we knew that he was likely a dead idjit when CNN was pretending that it was almost certain that he was a great guy who was murdered by racist pigs

Quote

Don't get me wrong, there is an irresponsible way to talk about things. If someone was saying "The cops murdered him, now it's time for revenge," that would be dangerous and irresponsible. But to just report on the story and demand justice, that's what should happen.

Doesn't the media narrative sound a lot like "The cops murdered him, now it's time for revenge!"? 

It was literally "The cops in that area have a long history racism and Brown was just a peaceful teenager who was minding his own business when he was shot from a police car while he was unarmed with his hands in the air in front of 'hundreds' of witnesses." 

That's an oddly descriptive narrative, considering they knew that some of it was irrelevant and the key aspect of it was false. 

After the riots burned down buildings all across the country they didn't say stupid crap like "This is comparable to Pearl Harbour and 9/11!", they acted like the violence and destruction was pretty low-key, or understandable under the circumstances.

All in all, it adds up to: "The cops murdered him, now it's time for revenge." During the Floyd riots some people even called the looting "reparations" and the alt-left media never flinched. 

Quote

But to just report on the story and demand justice, that's what should happen.

Not really. They gave misleading reports and then tacitly approved the violence and destruction on a consistent basis. 

Quote

If a cop needlessly murders a civilian, are we not supposed to talk about it? What you're basically saying is that we shouldn't talk about things that might result in violence.

You're describing the situation accurately from the POV of: "What CNN said was real news, accurately reported" but not from the POV of a person who already had a better understanding of the situation based on the knowledge available at that point in time. 

Quote

What you're basically saying is that we shouldn't talk about things that might result in violence.

No, I'm saying that "we shouldn't lie about a situation like that while knowing that our lie will likely result in violence, and then pretend that the resulting violence was understandable". 

Quote

Apology accepted.

Domestic terrorist.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Looks like Bud can't catch a break.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/19/business/hrc-rating-bud-light/index.html 

The left has no mercy. They can see Anheiser is taking massive multi billion dollar losses on this issue and they didn't exactly disavow the trans person, they could let things cool down. But instead they've got to be dinks and kick 'em when they're down.

Maybe they think they're doing them a favor and by pretending the gays and trans are actually really pissed at them people will go back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

Looks like Bud can't catch a break.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/19/business/hrc-rating-bud-light/index.html 

The left has no mercy. They can see Anheiser is taking massive multi billion dollar losses on this issue and they didn't exactly disavow the trans person, they could let things cool down. But instead they've got to be dinks and kick 'em when they're down.

Maybe they think they're doing them a favor and by pretending the gays and trans are actually really pissed at them people will go back

Dylan Mulvany is a man in a dress pretending to be a 6 year old girl. Don't know cnn calls him a woman. Denial of reality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/3/2023 at 12:06 PM, I am Groot said:

It sounds to me as if your view of 'left wing' requires a hammer and sickle on the page.

CNN is part of AT&T and Time-Warner. It’s part of a mega-mega-billion dollar empire.  THAT is the system. It is mainstream. It is corporate. It is Wall Street. CNN makes their money from Madison Avenue dollars.  
 

Here’s how fooled you are:  OAN was started by AT&T.  So the corporate masters of OAN and CNN are the same. Same puppet master, same hand, same puppets. Just a different show.  
 

Do you see it now? It’s like going to Grocery store, and there’s two brands of spaghetti sauce, but they’re really made in the same factory by the same company.  Get it? 

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rebound said:

CNN is part of AT&T and Time-Warner. It’s part of a mega-mega-billion dollar empire.  THAT is the system. It is mainstream. It is corporate. It is Wall Street. CNN makes their money from Madison Avenue dollars.  

The Left creates the mainstream. Progressives are hugely overrepresented in media and arts and skew the news to their preferences. It doesn't matter if it's owned by a mega corporation. They don't care about news quality or being unbiased. They only care about money. Not all corporations are right wing, and many are infested with progressives (see Disney) who are willing to sacrifice profit for pushing out 'the message'. Amazon is just as bad. Enormous corporation but controlled by people who are social progressives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Holy shit. Now - i'm the first to admit that i, like most people, thought this was a bit of a flash in the pan and things would go back to relative normal after a few weeks.  Bud would have lost a few billion in sales which really sucks but they'd get most of their market back and their stock would start to recover and that would be the end of it.

Nope! IT's actually getting WORSE.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/hsbc-downgrades-anheuser-busch-stock

HSBC just DOWNGRADED their stock, and others are following suit shortly apperently. This will seriously affect their stock value compared to what it would have been.

"In a note, HSBC analyst Carlos Laboy, managing director for the global beverage sector at the bank, justified the downgrade by questioning the ability of Anheuser-Busch InBev executives to understand their consumer base."

Sales have undergone their SIXTH WEEK OF DECLINE.

https://abcnews.go.com/Business/boycott-bud-light-hammering-sales-experts-explain/story?id=99505649

The boycott grew even larger, meanwhile, after the initial response from the company was perceived as conciliatory by some LGBTQ advocates, prompting a wave of frustration on the left, the experts added.

So the left is pushing the boycott as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/20/2023 at 10:09 PM, West said:

Dylan Mulvany is a man in a dress pretending to be a 6 year old girl. Don't know cnn calls him a woman. Denial of reality

Why do people who were born with a penis wearing a dress get you so riled up?

Do people who were born with a vagina wearing pants have this affect on you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Why do people who were born with a penis wearing a dress get you so riled up?

they don't. Never have - men have worn dresses throughout history. Scotsmen and their kilts are beloved even till this day.

I remember what Sean Connery said when a girl asked him what he wore under his kilt - "On a good day, Lipstick!"

8 minutes ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Do people who were born with a vagina wearing pants have this affect on you?

Awwww.... you're mad aren't you.  You were trying to sell the idea that this was nothing and there is no such thing as get woke go broke and that's not working out for you is it.  This is a GIANT warning to companies everywhere not to get involved in politics, and it's coming on the heels of some other big cases of that.

So you're pissed.  We get it. You should have a drink. Why not go buy yourself a case of bud?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Why aren't you so incensed over Woman dressing like men? 

Why do you suppose it is, that it's only people born with penises wearing dresses that's a road to far for you?

Transphobia is the logical answer.

 

Just to clarify - you think that transgender issues are ONLY wanting to dress like the other sex?  You think that people who are experiencing gender dysphoria ONLY want the right to wear clothing associate with the opposite sex and nothing more?

I think you need to educate yourself on the issues a bit more there missy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Bad advice. Do that and you may just get your face kicked in. This goes far beyond the stock market.

You should buy two then :)  (nyuck nyuck nyuck :)  )

Well seeing as sales are down 25 percent that must mean that 75 percent of the people who used to buy still do and we're not exactly hearing of daily assaults. It's probably pretty safe.

but if the left is genuinely concerned about proving that going woke doesn't mean going broke - if they're not willing to stand up for brands who did go woke when they start to go broke then that's going to be something the business community is going to notice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You should buy two then :)  (nyuck nyuck nyuck :)  )

Well seeing as sales are down 25 percent that must mean that 75 percent of the people who used to buy still do and we're not exactly hearing of daily assaults. It's probably pretty safe.

but if the left is genuinely concerned about proving that going woke doesn't mean going broke - if they're not willing to stand up for brands who did go woke when they start to go broke then that's going to be something the business community is going to notice.

Two people were assaulted in seperate incidents at beer stores

was in the news

 but since you live under a rock

you wouldn't know rhat

so doncarry on blathering

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Two people were assaulted in seperate incidents at beer stores

two people.  At one beer store.  Out of literally billions of dollars worth of beer sold.  And you're in a panic about your safety.

Never EVER take public transit. Toronto alone has about 1 assault a day it seems. Buying bud is clearly a much safer option

3 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

was in the news

Oh well in that case you should totally panic.

You're a special kind of stupid aren't ya little guy :)   A trans person shoots up a church and kills a bunch of people, you don't say "don't go to church" and "its just one time".   Two people get into a minor scuffle outside a beer store and it's NEVER BUY BUD - ITS" TOOOOO DAAAAANNNGEROUUUS!!!!   :)  :)


Given your personal situation i would say the bigger threat to your safety is you forgetting how to breathe and suffocating.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...