Jump to content

Transgender commits hate crime by shooting up a Christian school


Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, West said:

Leftist lunatics still trying to change the subject to gun control when the whacko killed kids because they were Christians. Sad

What Bullshit.

 

So all the kids killed in non religious school shootings were killed because they weren’t Christians. It’s only logical. 

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Deluge said:

psst! Hey dumba$$! Do you see the words "The right to bear arms shall not be infringed."? 

That makes "well regulated" mean "combat ready". ;)

Dufus buys a gun so automatically Dufus is “combat ready”. Enough Dufus’s buy guns and you automatically have a Dufus army. Too funny. 
 

A country full of wannabe Rambo’s. What could possibly go wrong.

Edited by Aristides
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Deluge said:

No restrictions until you f*ckup like that tranny did in Tennessee. 

See, gun ownership is a constitutional right - it's necessary in the event that a piece of sh*t democrat goes tyrannical on our citizenship. We're not going to cave in to the bleeding hearts just because they hate guns and the constitution. 

Like I said, dead kids are just the cost of you getting to play soldier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Deluge said:

Red flag laws are a gateway to increased control over our right to bear arms. 

No, we stick with DL's and state ID's with occasional background checks as a security measure. 

Yes and no.

Done properly, red flag laws would make people safer, which would lessen the attack on your right to bear arms.

But... could you trust the Dems/FBI not to "red flag" you if you just posted something on FB that they don't like? Of course not. They're lying about what people did on Jan 6th and there's 40,000 hours worth of video evidence of that. If they're willing to lie in the face of all that evidence, will they lie about things that aren't on camera? Of course.

The FBI's lies and crimes of the Russian collusion witch hunt are well documented. Their constant stream of lies and crimes of Jan 6th are still going on 2 years later. The constant invective about white male conservative terrorism is complete nonsense but they don't let the fact that they don't have any evidence of it get in the way of their story.

In all honesty, it's ironic/alarming that the Dems are going after gun rights, because the 2nd amendment is in place specifically as a check on gov't power. Your guns are literally supposed to be a threat to them and/or the Republicans if they become tyrannical, and it doesn't seem as though that's out of the question after seeing Adolf Biden's speech:

 

 

 Joe %22Adolf%22 Biden.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Contrarian said:

Video of the police, effective enter and execution of the task:

Video of the unedited version, warninggraphic footage.

A commentator said this video will be most likely used for training across the United States: 


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muz2EDhqEhs

via Forbes

Edited by Contrarian
edit design
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

Authoritarianism is authoritarianism, no matter the specific version.

indeed

but logically extrapolated, the consequences of Molotov von Ribbentrop world is the Ostfront

two mass mobilized totalitarian Utopian forces on trajectory to a catastrophic total war of annihilation

I don't think anarchism is a realistic objective in the near to mid term

none the less, faced with Ostfront 2.0, I would choose anarchism over socialism

I simply don't have faith in collectivism not to be captured by the Tankies in the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

That's the slippery slope fallacy.

agreed

bear in mind however, that Red Flag laws result in less than 10 removals per 100,000 gun owners

almost half of Red Flag requests are rejected by the judge

and even if the judge allows it, the average time of removal is only for two weeks

so the effects of Red Flag are being vastly exaggerated by its proponents

I would also assert that prior restraint to abridge the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms based on mental health 

that's unconstitutional, just because you might be distraught, that doesn't strip you of your rights therein

furthermore, Fascists & Tankies will invoke "mental health" as a lever of totalitarian repression

so Red Flag laws could be turned against your interests nefariously as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

What are you trying to argue here?

This:

Quote

Oh Christmas came early for republicans finally they have an ACTUAL trans spree shooter unlike the lies they’ve told about past killers 

Did a pretty good job too. Unless someone wants to stand in line holding hands with you chanting "There are no tranny mass shooters, there are no tranny mass shooters..." thinking, wishing it to be true will make not it true. I don't see anybody lining up to do it though. Too bad, so sad, your majesty.

Come to think, and speaking of king lies, you might want to check out this one:

"Never mind that 99.9% of mass shooters are straight white males -that’s not a pattern - the ONE trans mass shooter who identifies as a white male “proves”  that trans people are the real safety problem! 🙄"

 That's definitely not true or to those of us who believe wanting something to be true doesn't make it so, it's what we like to refer to as "a lie." 

Edited by Infidel Dog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

agreed

bear in mind however, that Red Flag laws result in less than 10 removals per 100,000 gun owners

almost half of Red Flag requests are rejected by the judge

and even if the judge allows it, the average time of removal is only for two weeks

so the effects of Red Flag are being vastly exaggerated by its proponents

Times change though, right?

The Dems go to sleep at night and wake up in the morning trying to think of new ways to convince the American people of ridiculous things like "Little children have the maturity and wisdom to opt for a sex change and sterilization, but university students lack the wisdom to understand the concept of "paying loans back", and therefor they can't be held accountable!"

In the last 8 years in Canada the Liberal gov't arbitrarily made a lot of guns illegal that were previously allowed for no real reason, they've started to openly discriminate against people and inflict serious punishments on them because of their pseudovax status, and we've even seen people have their bank accounts frozen for donating to a peaceful protest.

No one saw Canada on this trajectory in 2015.

Between Aug 2020 and Jan 2021 the Democrats/American DOJ went from "Let's bail rioters out of jail!" to "Let's keep rioters in jail for two years without a trial!".

Your belief in common sense, reasonability, accountability and the status quo is commendable, but major events in recent history tell me it's completely unfounded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Americana Antifa said:

True, the only hot ones are the ones working for Fox until they get molested and fired.

The animal comes out again. It's ok, you will deal with the centrist animal too. 

Your statement seems to imply that all women working for Fox News are not attractive, except for the ones who have been sexually assaulted and fired.

It is not fair to dismiss the experiences of women who work for Fox News or any other media outlet. They deserve to be taken seriously and their voices should not be silenced or invalidated. Maybe some are just starting their careers? 

I thought you were for women's rights and the idealism that goes with that. 

  • Are you like Don Lemon, that preaches Women's rights then he makes sexist comments about Nikki Haley? 

So, why are you dismissing or devalue the experiences of women who work at Fox News simply because of their employer? I don't watch them either, but this is about women, a topic that you probably preach about in real life too. 

Are you a hypocrite in regards to women? 

Edited by Contrarian
edit design
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

What are you trying to argue here?

So the right wing media has claimed the shooter is trans.  You don’t have to go very far at all to find that.   They are doing the happy dance because the right has been looking for a trans boogeyman (boogeyperson?) for years now ever since their Muslim terrorist hysteria kinda wore off. 
 

Some of the MSM are also claiming the shooter is trans or is unconfirmed trans

There are layers upon layers of stupidity in your post. 

The shooter is trans, that's been known for a long time now, but the MSM is waiting for the emotion to fade before they allow that connection to be made. They do the same with islamic terrorist attacks. "Just because he yelled 'allahu akbar' before he blew himself up at the Ariana Grande concert doesn't mean that he was a muslim." That confusion sticks with people. The association isn't made. 

The shooter's manifesto would have been online within hours of the shooting if there was even one sentence in it that could be editorialized into aiding the Dems' false narratives about "ULTRA SUPER DUPER EXTREME MAGA TERRORISTS!!!!!!!!"

For whatever reason, we aren't allowed to know what it says. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aristides said:

What Bullshit.

 

So all the kids killed in non religious school shootings were killed because they weren’t Christians. It’s only logical. 

In this case the nut bar's manifesto states clearly he killed these kids in retaliation to the laws passed by Christian lawmakers. So yes. Killed because they were Christians. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Times change though, right?

The Dems go to sleep at night and wake up in the morning trying to think of new ways to convince the American people of ridiculous things like "Little children have the maturity and wisdom to opt for a sex change and sterilization, but university students lack the wisdom to understand the concept of "paying loans back", and therefor they can't be held accountable!"

In the last 8 years in Canada the Liberal gov't arbitrarily made a lot of guns illegal that were previously allowed for no real reason, they've started to openly discriminate against people and inflict serious punishments on them because of their pseudovax status, and we've even seen people have their bank accounts frozen for donating to a peaceful protest.

No one saw Canada on this trajectory in 2015.

Between Aug 2020 and Jan 2021 the Democrats/American DOJ went from "Let's bail rioters out of jail!" to "Let's keep rioters in jail for two years without a trial!".

Your belief in common sense, reasonability, accountability and the status quo is commendable, but major events in recent history tell me it's completely unfounded. 

I asserted that Red Flag laws are unconstitutional

simply being mentally ill in some form or another, cannot be a rubric to abridge your rights

bear in mind, Red Flag has not been tested at the SCOTUS yet

I in fact predict that it will be overthrown in the end

a Judge in Rochester New York has just ruled that Red Flag is unconstitutional

because it simply cannot be that suffering from some sort of illness or distress

is a legitimate reason to negate your God given rights

once again, bad law making by the Democrats will be their undoing

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, West said:

In this case the nut bar's manifesto states clearly he killed these kids in retaliation to the laws passed by Christian lawmakers. So yes. Killed because they were Christians. 

Have you been over at WestCanMan's house watching his TV that shows the future?

No fair, the rest of us have to wait until the "manifesto" is released. 

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, West said:

In this case the nut bar's manifesto states clearly he killed these kids in retaliation to the laws passed by Christian lawmakers. So yes. Killed because they were Christians. 

Of course, no outrage over the various mosque and synagogue shootings. Couldn't be because they were Muslims or Jews.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Of course, no outrage over the various mosque and synagogue shootings. Couldn't be because they were Muslims or Jews.

We are talking about a trans shooting Christians. Please stay on topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,538
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    mercurygermes
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...