Jump to content

Would Leftists Support Biden If He Called Off The 2024 Election?


Would leftists support Biden of he called off the 2024 election?   

14 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Hodad said:

You are lying. Again and again and again.

The MFF is NOT specifically for protesters, let alone rioters, yet you claim it is and underline the word. You are a liar.

I never claimed the MFF is specifically for rioters, I said that Kamala was urging people to donate specifically so that they could get rioters out. That's an absolute, indisputable fact, stupid. Just look at her tweet and stop lying just for one second in your worthless life.

That's your first lie.

Quote

Despite what you read in your looney chain emails, Harris did not "gleefully" predict anything about riots. She discuss protests and the justice movement, but unsurprisingly never mentions riots or voices any support for violence. Watch the interview, you are a liar.

There's a video of that hideous skank "GLEEFULLY" proclaiming that the BLM activity would continue for 6 months.

If you want to make the case that she is so stupid that she wasn't aware of the violence, looting and destruction, that's probably your best defence, because apparently you're that stupid as well.

She also advocated for people to donate to the MFF SPECIFICALLY to help get RIOTERS out of jail. She specifically said in her tweet that teh MFF bail money for people from the riots (she said 'protesters', but she knew that zero peaceful protesters were ever thrown in jail).

Quote

I'm sure it was probably hard to see Democrats condemning violence with your head up your ass, nevertheless it happened publicly and at the highest levels. Again, you are liar.

Listen to you being stupid, hypocritical, and lying again.

Trump told protesters to "march peacefully", then when they got unruly he sent 2 or 3 tweets and a video message over the next 3 hrs. Still, retards like you contend that meant he wanted bloody carnage and to overthrow the US gov't.

Conversely, Biden made one or two mild calls for peace over the course of several months, but the majority of comments from the Dems and their MSM toadies was "FIGHT THE INJUSTICE! DEFUND POLICE! A BIT OF COLOURFUL PROTESTING IS TO BE EXPECTED!", and retards like you think that those were peaceful, harmless protests and the Dems and their MSM tried to put a stop to the violence. 

Quote

In October, Biden and Harris issued a joint statement following the fatal police shooting of Walter Wallace Jr., a Black man in Philadelphia who was carrying a knife during what his family said was a mental health crisis. Biden and Harris said that "no amount of anger at the very real injustices in our society excuses violence" and that "looting is not a protest, it is a crime."

My God you're stupid.

They called for peace right before an election and you think they're heroes. 

Quote

Michael Brown's family and friends described him as a gentle giant, not the "MSM" and as already shown too you, essentially every network and site publicized the robbery video on the day it was released. You are a liar.

The MSM referred to him as the gentle giant, stupid.

They also let people come on their shows and call him that, while never letting on that they were aware of his violent crime until well into the rioting. 

They knew for a fact that he was anything but a gentle giant, and they built up the gentle giant narrative as uch as they possibly could.

ALL of the M Brown riots were predicated on the false narrative that "a racist cop drove up on some unarmed teens and just killed one of them for no reason." People weren't rioting because "a violent criminal tried to wrestle a gun away from a cop and then got shot." Even a racist hate monger like Joy Reid wouldn't have tried to use his death to incite violence if the rest of the MSM was telling the truth. 

Quote

AFAIK, Mays shooting is unsolved. You're welcome to post evidence (lol) to the contrary. But why would you expect national commentary on it anyway? Perhaps your Special TV that shows you news from the future has shown you more of the story. You are (probably) a liar, but I'll withhold judgement pending any substantiation. I won't hold my breath.

Of course it's unsolved. BLM "police" cleared the crime scene of evidence. At least they got there within 6 hrs that time though, they never even got to collect evidence from the first murder scene in CHAZ: https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/everybody-down-what-happened-at-the-chop-shooting-that-killed-a-teenager-and-led-to-the-areas-shutdown/

 

This is a perfect example of how the MSM treats a murdered black child of no political consequence: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/29/chop-chaz-shooting-seattle-police-free-zone

Quote

A 16-year-old is dead and a 14-year-old is in critical condition in the latest of a series of shootings inside Seattle’s self-proclaimed police-free zone, known as the Capitol Hill Organized Protest (Chop).

Initially home to hundreds of peaceful protesters, in the last 10 days, four other people were shot in the area, including a 19-year-old man who was killed. 

There's no heart-warming/heart-wrenching backstory about "a gentle, happy child" or a sad story of  a "troubled, impoverished youth..." in either story to stir up emotions, no anger or judgement, no skepticism against the CHAZ police, and the story is riddled with lies in favour of the CHAZites.

FYI Chaz didn't start off peacefully at all, it was born of violence, and its 3-week existence was riddled by episodes of deadly violence. 

If you do the math, two people were killed in that 7-block radius of the country in 3 weeks... that's 0.666 people a week in just a few acres. 

If all of America's urban areas were that violent, there would be several million people shot and killed every year in the US. 

And honestly, we both know that you had to look up that kid's name because you didn't know it, and you still know nothing about that kid or his life before the CHAZ cops killed him. Do you know why? Because the MSM can't profit from his death, and politicizing it will do more harm than good to the Dems. 

Quote

I don't know how a person gets the way you are, just constitutionally incapable of telling the truth. Jeebus.

A person gets the way I am by refusing to be sucked in by CNN's lies and spin. 

The fact that you think Kamala was just randomly advocating for that particular bail fund at that exact time, and it had nothing to do with getting rioters out of prison even though she specifically mentioned the protests (riots) in her tweet, proves what a shameless liar and worthless loser you are.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

That’s the whole premise of this post is it not?

It's a rhetorical question. How many leftists here would support Biden if he tried?

His rhetoric points to it: "The threat of extreme MAGA terrorists blah, blah, blah..." and the FBI's dire warning that "white supremacists are America's greatest terror threat"...

Quote

Only Trumptards couldn’t see that tried to steal the presidency while publicly musing he should be president for more than the 2 terms. And only Trumptards are too dumb to understand that if Trump had been able to steal the presidency it would have remained stolen forever regardless of how long Trump himself managed to stay in the office. 

Says Wushin cowushin boy. 

Quote

It’s all true. 

Sure thing 🤡

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

How many Trump Vaccines did you take?

They won't be considered "Trump vaccines" until the length and breadth of the side effects are fully understood. 

At the time being, they're "The life-saving vaccines that Biden heroically delivered to the American people after Trump failed dramatically."

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

They won't be considered "Trump vaccines" until the length and breadth of the side effects are fully understood. 

At the time being, they're "The life-saving vaccines that Biden heroically delivered to the American people after Trump failed dramatically."

Silly fcks...

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Silly fcks...

Part of me can't blame people for believing what they see on almost every single news channel all the time, but at some point people also have to notice that Kamala is advocating for violence at some level.

Or they should have noticed Fauci's massive conflict of interest once they found out that he funded GOF research on the coronavirus long before he ever casually stated "We know that covid came from a bat and mutated through an intermediary species to become infectious to humans."

That reads like "It isn't the virus that I helped create which is killing millions of people!", with the benefit of hindsight.

Anyone who can't see that shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions publicly. There should be an IQ test for people who want to post on social media lol. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Part of me can't blame people for believing what they see on almost every single news channel all the time, but at some point people also have to notice that Kamala is advocating for violence at some level.

Or they should have noticed Fauci's massive conflict of interest once they found out that he funded GOF research on the coronavirus long before he ever casually stated "We know that covid came from a bat and mutated through an intermediary species to become infectious to humans."

That reads like "It isn't the virus that I helped create which is killing millions of people!", with the benefit of hindsight.

Anyone who can't see that shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions publicly. There should be an IQ test for people who want to post on social media lol. 

I think a lot of this dumb-assery stems from an overwhelming hatred of Orangemanbad. 

The Democrats, the DOJ, the FBI, the media, all have bombarded the public with the idea that if you do not agree with and follow the doctrine, you are sub-human and should be in jail. Now...for as absurd as that sounds, just take stock in what's happened the last decade. These people willingly believe the destruction of not just America, but the entire western world, is justified because...Orangemanbad.

I wish just one Libbie would find a way to explain this raw hatred and how that justifies what is obviously a series of very bad decisions.

Please...someone rationalize this display of self-destructive BS?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

His rhetoric points to it: "The threat of extreme MAGA terrorists blah, blah, blah..." and the FBI's dire warning that "white supremacists are America's greatest terror threat"...

Only in your conspiracy-addled uneducated mind does criticizing right wing extremists “point to” the suggestion that the president is going to try and cancel the next election.
 

Speaking of rhetoric though, Trump calling for “death and destruction” idf he’s arrested. Funny how you hypocritically ignore the constant direct and literal calls to violence from the right as simply harmless free speech while interpreting even the mildest criticism dorm the left as definite signs of doom. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Part of me can't blame people for believing what they see on almost every single news channel all the time, but at some point people also have to notice that Kamala is advocating for violence at some level.

Or they should have noticed Fauci's massive conflict of interest once they found out that he funded GOF research on the coronavirus long before he ever casually stated "We know that covid came from a bat and mutated through an intermediary species to become infectious to humans."

That reads like "It isn't the virus that I helped create which is killing millions of people!", with the benefit of hindsight.

Anyone who can't see that shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions publicly. There should be an IQ test for people who want to post on social media lol. 

Can you cite where and when Fauci said that he knew the source of Covid? I Googled that comment as a direct quote and no responses came up.  

Rather than call you out as a bald-faced liar, I’d like you to show us where and when Fauci said that.  Or, just admit the truth, which is that you made it up.  
 

How do you trace Covid-19 to its origin? I do not know. I do know these things:

1) There have been other pandemics before which were naturally-occurring;

2) The lab leak can only be ascertained through process of elimination. Only by comparing the genetic structure to naturally occurring Covid can scientists conclude that Covid came from a lab.  It’s yet another classic Republican conspiracy theory: “Aha!!! It cannot be proved, so it must be true!”  How do you prove it? By disproving every other possibility.  

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In another thread, I'd made the following arguement when accused of "manipulation" of the facts.

Quote

I and many many others have tried for years to reason with Libbies about the damage they are doing. They do what you have done. They accuse us of "manipulation". Show me the "manipulation".

Did Hunter leave his laptop with that repair shop? Yes.

Did he ever respond when the repair shop called him to pick it up? No.

Did the repair shop call the FBI about it? Yes.

What did they do with it? They buried it and called it "Russian Disinformation".

Was that a bald-faced lie? Yes.

Did it swing the election? All polls say the act did, indeed, swing the election.

THUS...

Was the election "fraudulent"? YES!

Its as simple as that and its undeniable by any reasonable measure. So...

Show me the "manipulation".

@Contrarian - said I was going off topic. OK, this appears to be the thread in which to debate this "manipulation".

Show me the manipulation please.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

In another thread, I'd made the following arguement when accused of "manipulation" of the facts.

@Contrarian - said I was going off topic. OK, this appears to be the thread in which to debate this "manipulation".

Show me the manipulation please.

 

Ok, half lazy then.

Is easy, I showed you 3 examples, Federal Cases: 

  • In Pennsylvania, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate millions of mail-in ballots, alleging that the state's election was marred by widespread fraud. The case was dismissed by a federal judge who cited a lack of evidence to support the campaign's claims.
  • In Michigan, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the certification of the state's election results. The case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that the campaign had failed to provide evidence of fraud or irregularities.
  • In Arizona, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to have some ballots disqualified due to alleged errors in the way they were filled out. The case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that the campaign had not provided evidence of widespread irregularities.


And then you keep insisting the elections were not "Real".

The FBI are looking for the hooligans that tried to stop it, but is not "Real".

Right here, they are looking for them: 

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/capitol-violence

  • You were checkmated man, long time ago, learn how to lose already, if not, you will end up in a corner alone, you won't even talk to me soon. You have 1-4 people now that are in the same mob. 😄
  • All you keep going on about some laptop.
  • You are a sports fan that can not accept a result, that's all. 
Edited by Contrarian
edit design
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

Ok, half lazy then.

Is easy, I showed you 3 examples: 

 

  • In Pennsylvania, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to invalidate millions of mail-in ballots, alleging that the state's election was marred by widespread fraud. The case was dismissed by a federal judge who cited a lack of evidence to support the campaign's claims.
  • In Michigan, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to stop the certification of the state's election results. The case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that the campaign had failed to provide evidence of fraud or irregularities.
  • In Arizona, the Trump campaign filed a lawsuit seeking to have some ballots disqualified due to alleged errors in the way they were filled out. The case was dismissed by a judge who ruled that the campaign had not provided evidence of widespread irregularities.


And then you keep insist the election were not "Real".

The FBI are looking for the hooligans that tried to stop it, but is not "Real"

https://www.fbi.gov/wanted/capitol-violence

  • You were checkmated man, long time ago, learn how to lose already, if not, you will end up in a corner alone, you won't even talk to me soon. 😄

What do these refusals to hear the arguments in court, have to do with the laptop from hell?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nationalist said:

What do these refusals to hear the arguments in court, have to do with the laptop from hell?

Evidence that you engage in manipulation tactics, accept the elections are real and your reputation will increase.

  • As for the laptop, today I actually need to work, but will have some time to look into it later, as I did not read exactly what you said, too many lines of text, code. But trust me, when I will read it, will find so many holes in it, you might have to send an e-mail to the FBI to apologise. 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The Democrats, the DOJ, the FBI, the media, all have bombarded the public with the idea that if you do not agree with and follow the doctrine, you are sub-human and should be in jail. Now...for as absurd as that sounds, just take stock in what's happened the last decade. These people willingly believe the destruction of not just America, but the entire western world, is justified because...Orangemanbad.

It lends a lot of credibility to the whole "deep state" theory, because permanent Washington really went to great lengths to get him/keep him out of the oval office, including the FBI committing serious crimes, the 50 ex-intel members signing the bogus laptop letter, banning the NYPost from social media, all the BS about Jan 6th, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Only in your conspiracy-addled uneducated mind does criticizing right wing extremists “point to” the suggestion that the president is going to try and cancel the next election.

OMG, there you go again Beave, accusing other people of being conspiracy theorists ffs.

Do you completely lack self-awareness? You're the most credulous, gullible, programmable person on this forum and it's not even close. No one else believes in Wushin cowushin or the tooth fairy anymore. 

And FYI, long before the 2020 election happened, leftists were saying that "Trump won't accept the election". Did you jump off the couch in your mustard-stained wifebeater, sending a hail of Cheezie and Dorito crumbs flying in every direction, and shriek about their "CONSPIRACY-ADDLED BRAINS"?

Of course not. 

Everything that tickles your conspiracy-addled, confirmation bias-addicted 'brain' is "A HUNNERD BILYUN PUHSENT KERECT!", right?

"OH Mah God momma, come downstairs quick! You gotta see what them cracka-ass Trumpists did ta poor Jussie Smollett! And look at that white supremacist teenager, running up ta that poor ol' injun fella and smilin' at his drum! Aw hell momma, the werld'z gon insayn! And can you believe it? Now them crackas iz sayin' that Jussie's a liah, an thet kid ain't ta blame nietha. They just kant stop lyin momma. What's a feller ta do?"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Evidence that you engage in manipulation tactics, accept the elections are real and your reputation will increase.

  • As for the laptop, today I actually need to work, but will have some time to look into it later, as I did not read exactly what you said, too many lines of text, code. But trust me, when I will read it, will find so many holes in it, you might have to send an e-mail to the FBI to apologise. 

Huh...

Quote

accept the elections are real and your reputation will increase

What you obviously do not understand is, I don't care about my reputation. I care about truth and common sense. I care about what's best for the nation as a whole. I care because due to a fraudulent election, Biden is tearing the USA and potentially the world...to flippin' shreds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It lends a lot of credibility to the whole "deep state" theory, because permanent Washington really went to great lengths to get him/keep him out of the oval office, including the FBI committing serious crimes, the 50 ex-intel members signing the bogus laptop letter, banning the NYPost from social media, all the BS about Jan 6th, etc.

I don't think its a "theory" anymore actually.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Huh...

What you obviously do not understand is, I don't care about my reputation. I care about truth and common sense. I care about what's best for the nation as a whole. I care because due to a fraudulent election, Biden is tearing the USA and potentially the world...to flippin' shreds.

Not buying it, as someone that keeps his word, will look at what you said later, will post my view and respond via bullet points dismantling your argument that "THE FBI HID THE LAPTOP".

That's what democracy is about. We agree to disagree. 

but also in democracy there are courts, federal courts, which said there was no valid argument towards "Fake" elections. 

Maybe the Supreme Court did not hear it because those people are such professionals, why would a referee from a major league come down and ref something that the Federal Courts can handle?!

We can also continue to disagree, as long as your actions do not become that of the hooligans on January 6th. 

Edited by Contrarian
edit design
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Contrarian said:

Not buying it, as someone that keeps his word, will look at what you said later, will post my view and respond via bullet points dismantling your argument that "THE FBI HID THE LAPTOP".

That's what democracy is about. We agree to disagree. 

but also in democracy there are courts, federal courts, which said there was no valid argument towards "Fake" elections. 

Maybe the Supreme Court did not hear it because those people are such professionals, why would a referee from a major league come down and ref something that the Federal Courts can handle?!

We can also continue to disagree, as long as your actions do not become that of the hooligans on January 6th. 

I will be civil...as long as you will. If you begin to belittle or insult me...you'll get it choked back down your throat.

The laptop has never been to court. To do so now would cause all sorts of social upheaval. But none of that refutes or reduces the fact that had the info in the laptop been given to the American electorate, it is highly unlikely Ol' Joe would be POTUS right now.

THUS...a "fraudulent" election.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

THUS...a "fraudulent" election.

Sure, sports fan. Like an Edmonton Oilers fan that loses the game with the Vancouver Canucks and goes out swearing, saying: "If it wasn't for that play, we would have won, corrupt NHL". 😄

My suggestion is to move on passed the mob sports anger type of thinking, because it's OK to snap on people like me AS LONG AS YOU HAVE THE DATA, the LOGIC, the information, I presented you above 3 different States FEDERAL JUDGES, not nobodies, dismissing cases, and you are still ranting about stuff with just an opinion of a random Joe somewhere in Canada. 

We will see what you said in the other thread later today or tomorrow, just make sure you respond better than this. 

Edited by Contrarian
edit design
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Contrarian said:

Sure, sports fan. Like a Edmonton Oilers fan that loses the game with the Vancouver Canucks and goes out swearing, saying: "If it wasn't for that play, we would have won, corrupt NHL". 

My suggestion is to move on passed the mob sports anger type of thinking, because it's ok to snap on people like me AS LONG AS YOU HAVE THE DATA, the LOGIC, the information, I presented you above 3 different States FEDERAL JUDGES, not nobodies, dismissing cases, and you are still ranting about stuff with just opinion of a random Joe somewhere in Canada. 

We will see what you said in the other thread later today or tomorrow, just make sure you respond better than this. 

We're not talking about a fcking game here. We're talking about a Presidential Election.

You keep lobbying me to "move on". FCK THAT! Biden can and will finish his term for a number of reasons. That does not mean we have to ignore what was done and admit that the "deep state conspiracy" happens to have been exposed as true.

And ZERO of what you keep harping about, has jack squat to do with that laptop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

Can you cite where and when Fauci said that he knew the source of Covid? I Googled that comment as a direct quote and no responses came up.  

Rather than call you out as a bald-faced liar, I’d like you to show us where and when Fauci said that.  Or, just admit the truth, which is that you made it up.  
 

How do you trace Covid-19 to its origin? I do not know. I do know these things:

1) There have been other pandemics before which were naturally-occurring;

2) The lab leak can only be ascertained through process of elimination. Only by comparing the genetic structure to naturally occurring Covid can scientists conclude that Covid came from a lab.  It’s yet another classic Republican conspiracy theory: “Aha!!! It cannot be proved, so it must be true!”  How do you prove it? By disproving every other possibility.  

Yes well...why don't you lobby for an independent study of the bug? I mean...the Chinese already destroyed all their data. So take 2 scientists from 1 camp and 2 scientists from the other...and let the chips fall where they may.

Then at least, we can find out if The Rona was man made or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Can you cite where and when Fauci said that he knew the source of Covid? I Googled that comment as a direct quote and no responses came up.  

Rather than call you out as a bald-faced liar, I’d like you to show us where and when Fauci said that.  Or, just admit the truth, which is that you made it up.  
 

How do you trace Covid-19 to its origin? I do not know. I do know these things:

1) There have been other pandemics before which were naturally-occurring;

2) The lab leak can only be ascertained through process of elimination. Only by comparing the genetic structure to naturally occurring Covid can scientists conclude that Covid came from a lab.  It’s yet another classic Republican conspiracy theory: “Aha!!! It cannot be proved, so it must be true!”  How do you prove it? By disproving every other possibility.  

1) I looked for about ten minutes and couldn't find any of his January/February 2020 video where he described the origin of covid, when he said "We know covid comes from....", but just remember, Google is his friend. If Trump was the one who said it it would be easy to find.

I will eventually find it. It's definitely out there.

I just looked again, I can't find any video with him saying the word "pangolin" or using the term "intermediary species", but if you can find a video with him saying those things, that's the one. My Google search is bombarded with less relevant videos. 

 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11824905/Emails-Dr-Fauci-commissioned-February-2020-paper-disprove-COVID-leaked-Wuhan-lab.html

That's about Fauci citing his own study and pretending that it's from other scientists. Not 100% OT, but germane and probably even more important.

2) My point isn't "IT WAS 100% FROM A LAB LAK! ANYTHING ELSE IS IMPOSSIBLE". My point is that 1) it was a massive conflict of interest for Fauci to unilaterally declare the intermediate animal species theory the champion, and 2) for the unholy alliance of the Dems/TNI/Google/Twitter/FB/CNN to ban people from social media for saying "BSL4 lab". 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/24/2023 at 4:46 PM, WestCanMan said:

Comme ci, comme ca.

It's kinda good to have an outlet, but at the same time it's frustrating to be exposed to such a low level of opinions. 

Look at Contrarian for example, trying to make the case that conservatives are engaged in culture wars to the detriment of us all.

He has no answer for why the POTUS, PMOC, VP and the last Dem presidential candidate are so free with baseless accusations of terrorism, racism, misogyny, etc against anyone who disagrees with them. It's nothing short of fear and hate mongering on a grand scale. How can their daily invective not be considered the greatest sins of this "culture war"? 

He has no answer, but he'll go on all day pretending that his wiggly replies are the real deal.  

Dear God, no.

I'll admit to getting information off of FB or in this forum that I'd never see on the news, but I always let things simmer for a week or so before I talk about them as if they're real.

Eg, BSL4 info came out much faster on social media than it did on the MSM and even Fox News, even with the bans in place. There were rumours that Fauci funded GOF research for a long time on FB, it seemed like too much to believe. Until he talked to Rand Paul about it I was highly skeptical.

Looking back, we now know that Fauci knew on Day 1 of his covid speeches that he had funded GOF research on that virus, so his assertion that it came from the wild was a massive conflict of interest. 

Has CNN or CTV ever even mentioned that? How is that not one of the most important revelations of the 21st century? 

That's not to say that it's 1,000% BSL4, but we never should have been forbidden from taking about it. Ditto for HCQ. Maybe it never would have worked, but it was worth a shot, and we never should have heard lies like "It causes blindness and kills people." By comparison to HCQ the new vaccines are absolutely lethal. 

Anyone who gets all their info from CNN/CTV/CBC is just living ioff of the mushroom treatment. 

The MSM is crap, dude. Nothing but crap.

They'll play down Trudeaus scandals for 2 years, let Trudeau lie about them at the end and not say" boo", they ignore them for the last 6 months before the election, and then after the election CBC has the gall to say: "They need to get rid of the PC leader, he couldn't even beat Trudeau after all of his scandals." 🤣

 

Don't let the importance of this moment go unnoticed: 

Joe22Adolf22Biden.thumb.png.790ccfbb73551e70c4e6dbd953536300.png

We're not in Kansas anymore.

That is a terrible man with a lot of hatred in his heart, a few miserable years left to live, and he is a big fan of war. 

Lets make this clear.... I do not possess your passion on this topic. I know, someone says covid, and you are instantly fired up, foaming at the mouth, and ready for a fight. I shrug my shoulders and move on. 

I have an immediate and allergic response to hyperbole no matter who says it? Understood? Internet forum posters (which you seem to fit this pattern) always are claiming that the end is near... What this end is.. they can never say. Nothing just happens.. nahh.. They have to use words like revolution, slam, vicious, earth-shaking, revelation, conspiracy. The traffic light at xyz street failed... it can't be that simple. It is an omen of things to come.. or more likely, it is the xyz party or leader conspiring against those poor, unsuspecting souls who are simply working hard and are now being shat upon. 

Edited by impartialobserver
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Lets make this clear.... I do not possess your passion on this topic. I know, someone says covid, and you are instantly fired up, foaming at the mouth, and ready for a fight. I shrug my shoulders and move on. 

I have an immediate and allergic response to hyperbole no matter who says it? Understood? Internet forum posters (which you seem to fit this pattern) always are claiming that the end is near... What this end is.. they can never say. Nothing just happens.. nahh.. They have to use words like revolution, slam, vicious, earth-shaking, revelation, conspiracy. The traffic light at xyz street failed... it can't be that simple. It is an omen of things to come.. or more likely, it is the xyz party or leader conspiring against those poor, unsuspecting souls who are simply working hard and are now being shat upon. 

You mean like this sort of crap?

https://www.politico.com/news/2021/08/09/climate-change-scientists-report-disastrous-502799

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Popular Now

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,538
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    mercurygermes
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...