Contrarian Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 (edited) You know what I find interesting, all you MAGAs and right-wing populists on this website. ---> All you do is bait, rant, swear, there are 1-2 that you can actually have a conversation with, however, the rest are sex talks, gender talks, and putting up wallpapers done by Paint. When there is to do real work, like post a thread about your side, crickets. I will do it, even though, I think Biden, considering the VP that he had and his age, has done an OK job. but, like every politician, things are starting to come out and are popular in the news now. It does not concern him directly, is about Hunter Biden, still. ⬆️ Trending via USA Today House GOP: Hunter Biden, and others got $1.3M from a business associate linked to China Edited March 16 by Contrarian edit design Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 10 minutes ago, Contrarian said: You know what I find interesting, all you MAGAs and right-wing populists on this website. ---> All you do is bait, rant, swear, there are 1-2 that you can actually have a conversate with, however, the rest are sex talks, gender talks, and putting up wallpapers done by Paint. When there is to do real work, like post a thread about your side, crickets. I will do it, even though, I think Biden, considering the VP that he had and his age, has done an OK job. but, like every politician, things are starting to come out and are popular in the news now. It does not concern him directly, is about Hunter Biden. ⬆️ Trending via USA Today House GOP: Hunter Biden, and others got $1.3M from a business associate linked to China Did you read your cite? Quote “It is unclear what services were provided to obtain this “It is unclear what services were provided to obtain this exorbitant amount of money,” said the chairman, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky.” said the chairman, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky. Hilarious that Comer believes $1.3M was an “exorbitant amount of money,” despite not knowing what it was for. Seems like peanuts for negotiating large corporate acquisitions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted March 16 Author Report Share Posted March 16 Just now, robosmith said: Did you read your cite? Hilarious that Comer believes $1.3M was an “exorbitant amount of money,” despite not knowing what it was for. Seems like peanuts for negotiating large corporate acquisitions. If we were to replace this news and say: House Democrats: Donald Trump Jr., others got $1.3M from business associate linked to China you would be screaming here about an investigation? Am I correct? so why so soft on your side? B I A S. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, Contrarian said: If we were to replace this news and say: House Democrats: Donald Trump Jr., others got $1.3M from business associate linked to China you would be screaming here about an investigation? Am I correct? No, but I am "screaming" about Kushner getting $2B investment from Saudi Arabia despite being an inexperienced and FAILED investment manager. MBS had to overrule his advisory board to PAYOFF Kushner. 1 minute ago, Contrarian said: so why so soft on your side? B I A S. Why are you INVENTING STRAWMAN ARGUMENTS? BIAS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted March 16 Author Report Share Posted March 16 (edited) 31 minutes ago, robosmith said: Why are you INVENTING STRAWMAN ARGUMENTS? Is not Strawman, you are soft on MSNBC and everything that has to do with your aisle. I don't blame you, is a rough world in polarized American Politics, you need a group there to make it. 😎 Edited March 16 by Contrarian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 1 hour ago, Contrarian said: You know what I find interesting, all you MAGAs and right-wing populists on this website. ---> All you do is bait, rant, swear, there are 1-2 that you can actually have a conversate with, however, the rest are sex talks, gender talks, and putting up wallpapers done by Paint. When there is to do real work, like post a thread about your side, crickets. I will do it, even though, I think Biden, considering the VP that he had and his age, has done an OK job. but, like every politician, things are starting to come out and are popular in the news now. It does not concern him directly, is about Hunter Biden, still. ⬆️ Trending via USA Today House GOP: Hunter Biden, and others got $1.3M from a business associate linked to China If a Chinese owned company wires a total of $1.3 million over many years to several people who have accounts at Chase bank, then since I have a Chase credit card, it’s “linked” to me? Is that how this works? I have no interest in Hunter Biden. If he broke laws he can go to jail. I don’t really care. But the information presented is extremely vague. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 (edited) 42 minutes ago, Contrarian said: Is not Strawman, you are soft on MSNBC and everything that has to do with your aisle. I don't blame you, is a rough world in polarized American Politics, you need a group there to make it. 😎 Quote you would be screaming here about an investigation? Am I correct? IS A STRAWMAN argument. I don't give a crap about $1.3M chump change. Esp Don Jr. (or Hunter Biden) who do NOT WORK for the GOVERNMENT. OTOH, Kushner did work for the government and his $2B PAYOFF from MBS is outrageous. Edited March 16 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted March 16 Author Report Share Posted March 16 (edited) 38 minutes ago, robosmith said: IS A STRAWMAN argument. I don't give a crap about $1.3M chump change. Esp Don Jr. (or Hunter Biden) who do NOT WORK for the GOVERNMENT. OTOH, Kushner did work for the government and his $2B PAYOFF from MBS is outrageous. I agree is outreagous, but 2 wrongs don't make it right. Is true what brother @Rebound says too, is still vague and early. but is still not looking good, as the Democratic Party still does not have someone serious to challenge Biden. Who, Buttigieg? Please, the latest scandals probably sealed his political career. Gavin Newsom? Nothing, crickets. Will be Old Joe with scandals vs MAGA with scandals. Edited March 16 by Contrarian edit design Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 7 minutes ago, Contrarian said: I agree is outreagous, but 2 wrongs don't make it right. Is true what brother @Rebound says too, is still vague and early. but is still not looking good, as the Democratic Party still does not have someone serious to challenge Biden. Who, Buttigieg? Please, the latest scandals probably sealed his political career. Gavin Newsom? Nothing, crickets. Will be Old Joe with scandals vs MAGA with scandals. Polls from yesterday show Biden beating Trump by 5 points. Virtual tie with Dethantis; just a 1 point advantage. There is a lot of whispering about Joe, but he's been underestimated by people like you for a long time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Contrarian Posted March 16 Author Report Share Posted March 16 37 minutes ago, robosmith said: Polls from yesterday show Biden beating Trump by 5 points. Virtual tie with Dethantis; just a 1 point advantage. There is a lot of whispering about Joe, but he's been underestimated by people like you for a long time. He is an 81-YEAR-OLD MAN. So if he wins, he will be 86 YEAR OLD. Do you feel proud about that? That your party was focused on Pelosi all this time instead of finding a serious young canditate for the future? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 9 minutes ago, Contrarian said: He is an 81-YEAR-OLD MAN. So if he wins, he will be 86 YEAR OLD. Do you feel proud about that? That your party was focused on Pelosi all this time instead of finding a serious young canditate for the future? I don't care how old he is. I AM PROUD of his accomplishments. Beating Trump chief among them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.