Michael Hardner Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 2 minutes ago, CdnFox said: It isn't. It's similar but it's not. I disagree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 Furthermore, Trudeau did the same thing, using inexact language to leverage the ambiguity. Who needs 'em.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 Just now, Michael Hardner said: I disagree. Well you're wrong. this isn't an 'opinion' thing. the words do not mean the same thing. Saying "i disagree" is just saying " i don't like that i' m wrong and will pretend otherwise". I explained it in detail, a few look ups on the dictionary should confirm for you, there is a huge difference in that one implies intent and one does not, and that's just fact. Of course - as a liberal supporter you may not choose to recongnize facts as being relevant to a discussion (Snicker!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, Michael Hardner said: Furthermore, Trudeau did the same thing, using inexact language to leverage the ambiguity. Who needs 'em.. THis is exact language. In fact its very precise - it expressly says he's doing something that hurts canada without adding any meaning he doesn't intend. But yes, trudeau (both of them) are famous for giving obscure answers to questions and making obscure statements. Not really relevant here tho Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 (edited) Weird how in a school, a place where kids are supposed to learn about the real world, citing basic facts like "men are different from women" is forbidden. How many women are in the NHL? NBA? NFL? CFL? MLB? MLS soccer? Euro soccer in the premier leagues or lower? There are at least 200M women in their prime playing those sports all over the world and not one is a threat to contribute - even at the minor league level, but we have to chant "Women are the same!" or there's something wrong lol. Now a kid is being forced to change schools as a result. This is just a sad proof of the fact that leftardism has gone too far. Compare those 200M women to the nation of Croatia, with a grand total of 4 million men and women between 0-100, which was able to field a soccer team that made it to the WCF in 2018, Euro Championship final, and WC quarter final in 2022. Would the best women's team, made with the elite female players from every country in the world, make it to the MLS quarter final once in 50 years? The field of mathematics simply can't make room for the theory that "men and women are the same". It's not within ten deviations from the mean. Edited March 16 by WestCanMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverFever Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Weird how in a school, a place where kids are supposed to learn about the real world, citing basic facts like "men are different from women" is forbidden. How many women are in the NHL? NBA? NFL? CFL? MLB? MLS soccer? Euro soccer in the premier leagues or lower? There are at least 200M women in their prime playing those sports all over the world and not one is a threat to contribute at the minor league level, but we have to chant "Women are the same!" or there's something wrong lol. Now a kid is being forced to change schools as a result. This is just a sad proof of the fact that leftardism has gone too far. ^ “It’s a shame that Ossama bin Laden was murdered in his home just for eating some felafel” ”It’s a shame that Harvey Weinstein was arrested just for making Hollywood movies” ””It’s a shame that Jeffrey Epstein went to jail just for visiting a tropical island” To quote Seinfeld, “you yadda-yadda’d the most important part”. Lies by omission are still lies you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 4 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: ^ “It’s a shame that Ossama bin Laden was murdered in his home just for eating some felafel” ”It’s a shame that Harvey Weinstein was arrested just for making Hollywood movies” ””It’s a shame that Jeffrey Epstein went to jail just for visiting a tropical island” 1) TBH, that's exactly how leftists form their narratives around every story. "M Brown was a gentle giant - if you're a decent person you'll peacefully burn and loot your way across the country in honour of MB!" "Trump referred to immigrants as animals!" "Cuomo's biggest flaw is that he grabbed some butts." "Trump is a rapist, Clinton and his wife are feminists." "Jan 6th is only comparable to Jan 6th, Pearl Harbour, the plague, the holocaust, Nagasaki, Naziism in Germany, and the meteor that killed the dinosaurs!" 2) A child was gaslighted by teachers, he said something completely true, and he got kicked out of his school. If he got mad it's understandable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 Yes men are different with women. Women are more intelligent with bigger hearts with much lower crime rates. If women rule the world there will be no more wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverFever Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 7 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: 1) TBH, that's exactly how leftists form their narratives around every story. "M Brown was a gentle giant - if you're a decent person you'll peacefully burn and loot your way across the country in honour of MB!" "Trump referred to immigrants as animals!" "Cuomo's biggest flaw is that he grabbed some butts." "Trump is a rapist, Clinton and his wife are feminists." "Jan 6th is only comparable to Jan 6th, Pearl Harbour, the plague, the holocaust, Nagasaki, Naziism in Germany, and the meteor that killed the dinosaurs!" 2) A child was gaslighted by teachers, he said something completely true, and he got kicked out of his school. If he got mad it's understandable. You’re still lying by omission here buddy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 6 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: Yes men are different with women. Women are more intelligent with bigger hearts with much lower crime rates. If women rule the world there will be no more wars. That's not even true though. You might say "on average", but unlike the sports example, where 0/200,000,000 women can make the 3rd division in a man's sport, millions out of 200,000,000 men would crack the top 20% of "kindest, and least prone to crime." Just keep it real C2015. It is what it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 4 minutes ago, BeaverFever said: You’re still lying by omission here buddy cite? What did he do, punch someone? Pee standing up during school assembly? Why should teachers gaslight a student? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I am Groot Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: 1. Well the policy was set based on the Charter and the challenge is rights based so.... Anyway can we move on from this point or are you going to continue to repeat it ? I don't accept the Charter as any kind of guide to the reality of human rights as its interpretation is too open to manipulation. But if it bothers you we can move on. 21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: 2. Calling someone a "cow" ... where does it come from to insult someone that you don't know so deeply ? If you're not deeply offended then what is it ? If your feelings aren't hurt then .... why ? She is representative of an attitude popular among the fashionably dumb (including much of our academia) that challenges the legitimacy of every part of Western society and all that we derive from it, including our belief in fundamental justice, those freedoms you spoke of, scientific rationality, and democratic politics. At heart, I detest dumb people who are dumb not because of a lack of intellect but ideological blindness and fanaticism. As a nationalist, I of course, also have contempt for those who, blinded by their ideological views, suggest that almost everyone in the country is not a legitimate citizen of this nation - one they also contest the legitimacy of. In short, I've always been a judgemental bastard and I judge her as a waste of skin tissue. 21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: 3. Does this happen ? What you are missing is the requirement for rigid ideological conformity which is enforced in dictatorships by the state and state associations (like phony unions in Russia and phony churches in China), and in Canada by ideological zealots in a variety of organizations with state power, like the law societies, medical associations, teacher associations and unions, or in this case, by a school board. It is the ideological requirement to never question doctrine that I am speaking of. And it's particularly appalling in education given academics pioneered the idea of tenure, supposedly to allow for free thought and the ability to challenge prevailing thinking. 21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: 5. I have to put up with Poilievre hyperbole ... saying that Trudeau is a traitor etc. Trudeau saying that the Convoy was a fringe minority... Listen - don't put too much stock in what politicians say. Putting up with what others say isn't the point. You can call Poilievre names if you want and argue against the convoy. But if your social views don't match that of the social justice types who are currently in charge of most institutions you'll lose your job if you express them. Or, as in this place, be banished from school, and, in effect, forced into solitary confinement. Isn't it interesting that we've said solitary is a bad place to put murderers but it's fine to put a sixteen year old student who dared to question doctrine. Because questioning doctrine is 'dangerous'. 21 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: 6. Yeah, I think maybe psychology and medical do this kind of thing. They want to prevent their members from doing things like endorsing "conversion therapy", quackery and so on... They want to enforce commitment to views on things like transgenderism which were considered ridiculous, unprofessional and outrageous less than a decade ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I am Groot Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 On 3/14/2023 at 11:16 PM, Americana Antifa said: First, Peterson was wrong about the bill. It didn't say it's illegal to misgender people. It said that you can't legally discriminate against people based on gender identity, the same way you can't discriminate based on race, sex, ethnicity, nationality, sexual orientation and age. Our society discriminates against people based on these things all the time. In particular, our society and every level of government discriminate between males and females due to the obvious biological and anatomical differences between them. As it should. Pretending some guy who says he's now a girl is a woman, based on a weird new interpretation of that word does not in any way, shape or form invalidate the simple biology that they are not female. Or that females are weaker than males or subject to victimization both due to that weakness and to male biological imperatives and instincts regarding breeding. This is what trans supporters keep ignoring or dismissing. On 3/14/2023 at 11:16 PM, Americana Antifa said: However, Peterson regularly promotes the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, which is a Nazi theory. Bullshit. The Left need to stop flinging that word around for everything they don't like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 2 minutes ago, I am Groot said: 1. Putting up with what others say isn't the point. 2. But if your social views don't match that of the social justice types who are currently in charge of most institutions you'll lose your job if you express them. Or, as in this place, be banished from school, 3. They want to enforce commitment to views on things like transgenderism which were considered ridiculous, unprofessional and outrageous less than a decade ago. 1. I don't detest or hate them, except in extreme cases. 2. You can do, yes. It's due to the context of said social views. Another student could make validated statements about the student in this case, backed up by religious teachings and similarly be suspended. It's context. 3. Yes gay marriage too. Tomorrow who's going to fuss. Certainly gay marriage doesn't seem to raise an eyebrow anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITIZEN_2015 Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: That's not even true though. You might say "on average", but unlike the sports example, where 0/200,000,000 women can make the 3rd division in a man's sport, millions out of 200,000,000 men would crack the top 20% of "kindest, and least prone to crime." Just keep it real C2015. It is what it is. It goes without saying that I meant on average rather than every single woman is more intelligent and kinder and less violent than every single man. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 1 minute ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: It goes without saying that I meant on average rather than every single woman is more intelligent and kinder and less violent than every single man. True, buy my example wasn't just 'on average'. It's a case of them being 0-fer-200,000,000. Mathematics doesn't have any examples of going 0/200M in things that are 'the same'. If every atom in the universe was a coin and you flipped them all at the same time, a billion times a day, you'd never get 200M heads or tails in a row if you did it for a billion years. If there was even one woman who played a minor role in an elite league, or an average role in a minor league team that would be something, but Manon Rheaume is about the closest they've come, and she wasn't even an avg minor leaguer. She was just a gimmick at best. https://www.hockeydb.com/ihdb/stats/pdisplay.php?pid=4537 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeitgeist Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 2 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: Yes men are different with women. Women are more intelligent with bigger hearts with much lower crime rates. If women rule the world there will be no more wars. But which soldiers will guarantee the peace, male or female? How many of the engineers who build the structures and infrastructure that most people would consider comfortable and well-equipped are female? Valuing one gender over the other causes problems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: It goes without saying that I meant on average rather than every single woman is more intelligent and kinder and less violent than every single man. the evidence is that women are MORE violent than men, not less. They are MORE likely to instigate dometic violence for example. Men are just much better at it, and when men fight someone's more likely to get hurt. But i haven't' seen any research that shows women are significantly less violent. They're just not as likely to do damage. Men do commit more violent crime if it helps but that doesnt' mean they're more violent as people. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-are-more-violent-says-study-622388.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverFever Posted March 16 Report Share Posted March 16 (edited) 3 hours ago, WestCanMan said: cite? What did he do, punch someone? Pee standing up during school assembly? Why should teachers gaslight a student? You obviously didn’t read the article. Or any of the comments on the 11 pages of this thread. You’re parroting false claims and spouting opinions without getting ANY of the facts, typical MAGA. Edited March 16 by BeaverFever Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 17 Report Share Posted March 17 3 hours ago, BeaverFever said: You obviously didn’t read the article. Or any of the comments on the 11 pages of this thread. You’re parroting false claims and spouting opinions without getting ANY of the facts, typical MAGA. You're obviously reading something into this that isn't there. He said some words which were true, although they were contrary to the school's new policy of gaslighting students, then he was banned from school. The school took themselves and their high-handed ban so seriously that when he showed up for class he was charged criminally for trespassing. Again, did he do anything violent? Did he make any threats? Because if he did, I missed that part, and it was certainly a glaring omission from the Fox article. Why don't you enlighten instead of just making more baseless accusations? From what I recall reading the trannies were scared because he has the same opinion as he'd learn in science class, and science is antithetical to leftist dogma, so they claimed that they were afraid of him. Now the trannies don't have to hear his words, so they aren't dropping dead from anxiety anymore, but the girls still have to share their change rooms with biological males. Comprende? Do you have a cite which shows that he did something violent or made a threat? Or are his beliefs just different from those of the trans? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeaverFever Posted March 17 Report Share Posted March 17 1 hour ago, WestCanMan said: You're obviously reading something into this that isn't there. He said some words which were true, although they were contrary to the school's new policy of gaslighting students, then he was banned from school. The school took themselves and their high-handed ban so seriously that when he showed up for class he was charged criminally for trespassing. Again, did he do anything violent? Did he make any threats? Because if he did, I missed that part, and it was certainly a glaring omission from the Fox article. Why don't you enlighten instead of just making more baseless accusations? From what I recall reading the trannies were scared because he has the same opinion as he'd learn in science class, and science is antithetical to leftist dogma, so they claimed that they were afraid of him. Now the trannies don't have to hear his words, so they aren't dropping dead from anxiety anymore, but the girls still have to share their change rooms with biological males. Comprende? Do you have a cite which shows that he did something violent or made a threat? Or are his beliefs just different from those of the trans? You’re still lying by omission and leaving out all his unauthorized disruptive protests inside the school including blocking students from entering the bathroom and the many warnings he received Saying he’s being punished simply for expressing an opinion is LIE and you know it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Perspektiv Posted March 17 Report Share Posted March 17 14 hours ago, CITIZEN_2015 said: Yes men are different with women. Women are more intelligent with bigger hearts with much lower crime rates. If women rule the world there will be no more wars. I don't understand how there would be less wars. Women tend to be territorial, typically. Men on average, tend to score slightly higher on IQ tests than women. Are vastly better represented as mathematicians, as economists, as Nobel prize winners. I could go for hours, like engineers and the like. Some would say due to sexism, but why do men tend to score higher on testing? Sexism? Or that men typically tend to be predisposed to love to work on stuff, typically making them better at it. When you look at geniuses, they tend to be much better represented in men. Maybe you're eluding to emotional intelligence? Women tend to score higher regarding empathy. This shouldn't be a surprise, as instinctively they tend to be more maternal, which is why they are best represented in roles where helping others is involved like nursing, administration, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CdnFox Posted March 17 Report Share Posted March 17 4 hours ago, BeaverFever said: You’re still lying by omission and leaving out all his unauthorized disruptive protests inside the school including blocking students from entering the bathroom and the many warnings he received Saying he’s being punished simply for expressing an opinion is LIE and you know it. Where are you seeing that he blocked people from entering a bathroom and held protests inside the school? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted March 17 Report Share Posted March 17 6 hours ago, BeaverFever said: You’re still lying by omission and leaving out all his unauthorized disruptive protests inside the school including blocking students from entering the bathroom and the many warnings he received Saying he’s being punished simply for expressing an opinion is LIE and you know it. Cite please Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 17 Report Share Posted March 17 10 hours ago, BeaverFever said: You’re still lying by omission and leaving out all his unauthorized disruptive protests inside the school including blocking students from entering the bathroom and the many warnings he received I never saw that anywhere, you could have just posted a link instead of being snotty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.