Jump to content

TUCKER CARLSON AND THE JAN. 6 VIDEO


Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Hodad said:

Many, many posts later and you are still just asking the exact same stupid questions, as if no one has ever replied to you. Consider starting a blog if you just want to broadcast. Your behavior is like flying a banner to let everyone know that engaging with you is pointless--literally pointless. This kind of trolling is a quick way to get on people's ignore list.

You still bloviate instead of answering the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, robosmith said:

IT CAN BE A LIE. Plausibility does not make it true nor mean that the advocate actually believes it.

Policy requires them to escort any prisoner to a particular place for BOOKING thereby removing them from the battle.

Nope. She broke in ILLEGALLY as the spear head for a dangerous MOB. Unfortunate but killing her SAVED LIVES.

That's your job. Licking the boots of the FASCISTS who tried to OVERTHROW the election.

Please provide evidence for your statement about escorting a prisoner to a particular place.

Should cops assume that small unarmed women who never threatened anyone are about to commit murder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You don't have the credibility to make accusations, stupid. 

No one in the world really believes that a handful of almost completely unarmed people tried to overthrow the US gov't. It's just a Demmie talking point.

That's just propaganda you thick fark. It's right outta the "one-party law" playbook for dictators. 

Every single person on that list is also a frothing-at-the-mouth Russian collusion troll. They don't even have 1 IQ point combined.

1) If he's a "filmmaker", where's the "video"?

2) Are you saying that one man's description of what Chansley, the self-appointed leader of no army at all anywhere, said, along with "an ominous warning from an unnamed woman somewhere in Georgia", is proof that there was an actual rebellion of some sort? There's no carnage or anything left over from it?

Do you know what 300M people look like? How hard it is to fight them unarmed? That's 10,000 football stadiums full of people opposing them. Did two unarmed people really take all of those people on? 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532

The FBI absolutely was the source of the Dems'/MSM's disinformation/censorship campaign, plain and simple. They had the laptop for almost one full year when they were out there telling lies

You should be alarmed that all the people on your surprisingly thorough list of stooges/disinformants went along with the FBI's plot. That's effin' scary. 

Instead of just lying on the internet, you should be asking yourself: "Are all of those people that stupid, or that invested in controlling elections?" 

It's one or the other.... 

Seditious is an adjective describing people who commit sedition, jackass, not describing people who are doing other things. FYI attacking a building is absolutely not a seditious activity anymore than it's a loquacious activity, although one could cut have cut through those serried rows of police at the capitol while armed with only deadly Robbie Burns limericks. 

So your argument is that this enormous mob could not have overtaken the 300 million citizens of the United States?  
 

Hmm.  Well, it certainly seems that they overtook the United States Capitol, both the Senate and House chambers, and they caused every member of Congress to flee for their lives, during the transfer of Presidential power.  Those are facts.
 

If the rioters remained there until midnight on Jan 6, could Joe Biden have been able to legally become President? Because the law says the votes must be counted on the 6th.  Not the 5th, not the 7th.  
 

What if the rioters continued past the House and Senate chambers, found the Senators and Congressmen, and killed Mike Pence and all the Democrats? Now what?  
 

Those are real scenarios.  The officeholders and their staffers certainly feared for their lives. Even Josh Hawley was caught on tape running from the rioters. So he was just as afraid as any of them.  
 

Crime involves motive and intent. The intent behind the riot was to prevent Joe Biden from becoming President and ensure that Donald Trump remained President. The motive was Donald Trump himself, who falsely claimed that his election was “stolen,” who told his followers to come to Washington on Jan 6, and who encouraged them to March to the Capitol and “Stop the Steal.”  And, by the way, they did march peacefully to the Capitol.  There was no violence on the March to the Capitol.  They peacefully marched and THEN they tried to “Stop the steal,” just as Trump had commanded them to do.  

Edited by Rebound
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mako said:

Please provide evidence for your statement about escorting a prisoner to a particular place.

Should cops assume that small unarmed women who never threatened anyone are about to commit murder?

They should assume that the MOB she is leading through that broken down door will do WHAT THEY WERE CLAIMING THEY WOULD DO.

Did you HEAR them saying "Hang Mike Pence" and "Where's Nancy?"

Seems like YOU'RE OBLIVIOUS to the REALITY of who was BEHIND Babbitt.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, robosmith said:

They should assume that the MOB she is leading through that broken down door will do WHAT THEY WERE CLAIMING THEY WOULD DO.

Did you HEAR them saying "Hang Mike Pence" and "Where's Nancy?"

Seems like YOU'RE OBLIVIOUS to the REALITY of who was BEHIND Babbitt.

So no evidence for your statement about escorting a prisoner to a particular place.

Please provide evidence Ashli Babbitt made some kind of threat.

Of course we shouldn’t shoot someone for threats other people may or may not have made.

Always fun watching you squirm. 

Edited by Mako
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mako said:

So no evidence for your statement about escorting a prisoner to a particular place.

There is evidence. Google it.

1 hour ago, Mako said:

Please provide evidence Ashli Babbitt made some kind of threat.

She helped to BREAK DOWN THE DOOR in defiance of the LAW.

1 hour ago, Mako said:

Of course we shouldn’t shoot someone for threats other people may or may not have made.

Always fun watching you squirm. 

I'm not squirming, I'm TEACHING you about things of which you're ignorant.

Although you're a very poor student because you STILL don't acknowledge the INTENT of the MOB Babbitt led.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is evidence. Google it.

She helped to BREAK DOWN THE DOOR in defiance of the LAW.

I'm not squirming, I'm TEACHING you about things of which you're ignorant.

Although you're a very poor student because you STILL don't acknowledge the INTENT of the MOB Babbitt led.

Yeah, and if Trump's recent post on Truth Social is anything to go by, he's hoping there are a lot more people dumb enough to die for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, robosmith said:

There is evidence. Google it.

She helped to BREAK DOWN THE DOOR in defiance of the LAW.

I'm not squirming, I'm TEACHING you about things of which you're ignorant.

Although you're a very poor student because you STILL don't acknowledge the INTENT of the MOB Babbitt led.

You beclown yourself as usual. Making statements without evidence.

Some of the protesters just walked around. They had no intention to harm anyone. The protesters sometimes outnumbered the police, but the protesters didn’t kill anyone.

You think cops should murder people for breaking a door?

The next time a white cop kills a nonviolent black protester you’ll cheer the cop on. Should we kill everyone in a crowd of protesters because some of them are violent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Mako said:

You beclown yourself as usual. Making statements without evidence.

Some of the protesters just walked around. They had no intention to harm anyone. The protesters sometimes outnumbered the police, but the protesters didn’t kill anyone.

You think cops should murder people for breaking a door?

The next time a white cop kills a nonviolent black protester you’ll cheer the cop on. Should we kill everyone in a crowd of protesters because some of them are violent?

I think the cops should do whatever is necessary to keep a violent MOB intent on hanging Mike Pence out of the House Chamber.

You're the one who is clownishly DENYING THE OBVIOUS INTENT OF THE MOB.

And pretending their INTENT is OTHER THAN what THEY SAID.

They didn't kill anyone cause they COULD NOT GET IN NOR FIND their TARGETS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you, Kevin McCarthy and Tucker Carlson

Quote

Certain political leaders inspire grudging respect or even fear from their opponents, but let’s face it: House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) is not among them. His latest political gambit, a ham-handed attempt to rewrite the history of the Capitol insurrection in collaboration with Fox News host Tucker Carlson, was not just a spectacular faceplant. It turned out to be a service to all of us.

The McCarthy-Carlson collaboration put Jan. 6 back on the top of the news agenda, reminding everyone of Trump’s refusal to acknowledge his 2020 defeat, the violent reaction of his radical supporters and the craven response of Republican politicians who fed deranged conspiracy theories to their base to save their own political skins.

More important, it created an opportunity to revisit the actual events of that day. Some people watched Carlson’s fantasy depiction of Jan. 6 as a peaceful protest where Trump supporters strolled into the Capitol and took selfies while milling around. But a much larger audience likely saw multiple news reports on TV, newspapers and the internet in which both journalists and Republican leaders reiterated the ugly truth about that day’s attack on democracy.

The episode has also further discredited Fox News as it reels from extraordinary revelations showing network executives and personalities privately acknowledging in emails and texts that claims of a stolen election were preposterous even as they amplified those claims on the air. It’s long been argued that Fox News is in no real sense a news organization but is instead a propaganda machine that advances the interests of the Republican Party. That’s never been more clear than it is today.

McCarthy probably thought it was shrewd to give Carlson access to the surveillance footage. Instead, his decision helped reinforce an accurate understanding of Jan. 6, undermined the status of the right’s most important media outlet and reminded the electorate of the rotten core at the heart of the GOP. It’s quite an accomplishment. 


 

1.png
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2023 at 3:22 PM, BeaverFever said:

Lol yeah ok lets unpack this moronic Claim:

You wouldn't know the difference between m0ronic and brilliant for the same reason that an ant couldn't tell the difference between a Lada and a Lamborghini as they roll overhead

Quote

1) Out of all the “angry and riotous mobs” at the Capitol Epps was the only person there who suggested anyone enter the capitol. It never would have occurred to anyone m. if only Epps hadn’t said anything!

Epps is the only 'seditious' person in those videos as far as I've seen. That's a fact. There are probably more but I didnt see them, I just saw rioters. 

I never said that "no one would have gone into the capitol if not for him", that's just another one of your lies. 

Quote

2) Apparently suggesting that another grown adult do something makes you responsible for any decisions they make. ALL THE MOBS WERE UNDER HIS MIND CONTROL. ALL OF THE HUNDREDS WHO ENTERED THE CAPITOL DID SO BECAUSE HE TOLD THEM. HE ALONE IS RESPONSIBLE. 

1) You're just not a smart guy Beave. You're missing the whole point about Epps:

If it was really an insurrection and the crime of sedition is really on the table for anyone, then Epps is front and center.

If he's not being charged then it's because he was working as an agent provocateur and his job was to get people to cross that threshold in order to flesh out an FBI/Pelosi narrative - it's that simple.

2) FYI you're countering the Dem narrative, dude. If people were all just mad enough to kick in the front door anyways, and they didn't have coaching from behind, then it wasn't an insurrection. It was just an angry protest where some windows got busted and nothing more. 

People liek Epps would have been a key component of an insurrection. You can't just have all generals and captains and no sergeant

 

Pelosi and the Dems needed that door to be kicked in, because she needed attention drawn away from 11th-hour truckloads of hundreds of thousands on one-party votes, secretaries of state who unilaterally made changes to election laws, etc. 

When they say "the thin blue line" they don't mean this thin:

Epps.thumb.png.7b3c5da36b27b9715cc284f29200a4c0.png

That was an invitation to attack, and Epps knew right where to be. Pelosi wanted some people to push through there, bust the doors, because she knew that they had enough cops to stop the unarmed advance once they opened firs and started killing people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2023 at 9:24 AM, Rebound said:

So your argument is that this enormous mob could not have overtaken the 300 million citizens of the United States?  

My argument is that there were 75M Trump voters, most of whom have one or several guns, and if there was an actual insurrection then they would have brought guns. At least one gun, right? 

Bringing zero guns to a place where there are hundreds of police who are all armed with real bullets is not an actual attempt to overrun it. 

Quote

Hmm.  Well, it certainly seems that they overtook the United States Capitol, both the Senate and House chambers, and they caused every member of Congress to flee for their lives, during the transfer of Presidential power.  Those are facts.

Those aren't facts at all. 

You obviously have no clue what "overrun" looks like. FYI it's not "cops walking around calmly while people line up between the velvet ropes". 

Only a really stupid person would actually believe what you just said.

Quote

If the rioters remained there until midnight on Jan 6, could Joe Biden have been able to legally become President? Because the law says the votes must be counted on the 6th.  Not the 5th, not the 7th.  

Secretaries of state unilaterally changed other voting laws for that election, and what you're talking about is not something that Americans would suffer. "Awwww, shucks. We didn't count the votes so Trump gets to stay in power ?."

Quote

What if the rioters continued past the House and Senate chambers, found the Senators and Congressmen, and killed Mike Pence and all the Democrats? Now what?

They didn't. It wasn't possible because they were unarmed. They were unarmed because it wasn't an insurrection. You don't know that because you're stupid.

Quote

 Those are real scenarios.  The officeholders and their staffers certainly feared for their lives. Even Josh Hawley was caught on tape running from the rioters. So he was just as afraid as any of them.

If the police were completely unafraid of the people who entered the capitol, then the senators didn't need to worry too much.

1) It's possible that in all that chaos there was a James Hodgkinson type, 20 running wasn't a bad idea,

2) they might have been running after they heard the gunfire, not knowing that it was all just part of Pelosi's plan

Quote

 Crime involves motive and intent. The intent behind the riot was to prevent Joe Biden from becoming President and ensure that Donald Trump remained President.

Liar. The motive was anger. 

The part about "preventing ? from becoming president" is just your own stupid assumption.

Quote

The motive was Donald Trump himself, who falsely claimed that his election was “stolen,” who told his followers to come to Washington on Jan 6, and who encouraged them to March to the Capitol and “Stop the Steal.”  And, by the way, they did march peacefully to the Capitol.  There was no violence on the March to the Capitol.  They peacefully marched and THEN they tried to “Stop the steal,” just as Trump had commanded them to do.  

Blah, blah, blah. My God you're a credulous little hypocrite.

Do you remember the Dems and the FBI committing crimes to try to get Trump removed from office? Did that bug you? 

Did all the years of Dem-induced rioting not bug you? If not, then why were these 3 hrs so bad? 

Did the Dem-inspired terrorist attack at the congressional baseball game not bug you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

My argument is that there were 75M Trump voters, most of whom have one or several guns, and if there was an actual insurrection then they would have brought guns. At least one gun, right? 

Bringing zero guns to a place where there are hundreds of police who are all armed with real bullets is not an actual attempt to overrun it. 

Those aren't facts at all. 

You obviously have no clue what "overrun" looks like. FYI it's not "cops walking around calmly while people line up between the velvet ropes". 

Only a really stupid person would actually believe what you just said.

Secretaries of state unilaterally changed other voting laws for that election, and what you're talking about is not something that Americans would suffer. "Awwww, shucks. We didn't count the votes so Trump gets to stay in power ?."

They didn't. It wasn't possible because they were unarmed. They were unarmed because it wasn't an insurrection. You don't know that because you're stupid.

If the police were completely unafraid of the people who entered the capitol, then the senators didn't need to worry too much.

1) It's possible that in all that chaos there was a James Hodgkinson type, 20 running wasn't a bad idea,

2) they might have been running after they heard the gunfire, not knowing that it was all just part of Pelosi's plan

Liar. The motive was anger. 

The part about "preventing ? from becoming president" is just your own stupid assumption.

Blah, blah, blah. My God you're a credulous little hypocrite.

Do you remember the Dems and the FBI committing crimes to try to get Trump removed from office? Did that bug you? 

Did all the years of Dem-induced rioting not bug you? If not, then why were these 3 hrs so bad? 

Did the Dem-inspired terrorist attack at the congressional baseball game not bug you? 

Unfortunate that (some) Canadians have NO IDEA what a contingent election is NOR that Trump didn't POTENTIALLY NEED guns to throw the election to Republican House caucuses. All he had to do was prevent the EC vote from proceeding on Jan 6th. That's why the Trump sympathetic SS was so anxious to drive Pence out of town.

I think it's strange that some right wingers here believe they know what was happening when it's OBVIOUS they don't have a CLUE because they don't pay attention to ALL of the evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

 

If he's not being charged then it's because he was working as an agent provocateur and his job was to get people to cross that threshold in order to flesh out an FBI/Pelosi narrative - it's that simple.

 

 

 

Unsuspecting more ons are often caught up in undercover stings. You might call it entrapment. Fact is that if you decide to break the law, it doesn't matter if you were set up by an undercover agent, you still broke the law. And what's more, this type of entrapment is fully legal. So please.... Whine as loud as you can about this. If Ray told your dumb assed friends to attack the capital, and your dumb assed friends complied...... Well, youve seen the end result... 

 

https://mccaul.house.gov/media-center/news/dallas-skyscraper-bomb-plot-suspect-says-he-understands-charges

Edited by CrakHoBarbie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You wouldn't know the difference between m0ronic and brilliant for the same reason that an ant couldn't tell the difference between a Lada and a Lamborghini as they roll overhead

Epps is the only 'seditious' person in those videos as far as I've seen. That's a fact. There are probably more but I didnt see them, I just saw rioters. 

I never said that "no one would have gone into the capitol if not for him", that's just another one of your lies. 

1) You're just not a smart guy Beave. You're missing the whole point about Epps:

If it was really an insurrection and the crime of sedition is really on the table for anyone, then Epps is front and center.

If he's not being charged then it's because he was working as an agent provocateur and his job was to get people to cross that threshold in order to flesh out an FBI/Pelosi narrative - it's that simple.

2) FYI you're countering the Dem narrative, dude. If people were all just mad enough to kick in the front door anyways, and they didn't have coaching from behind, then it wasn't an insurrection. It was just an angry protest where some windows got busted and nothing more. 

People liek Epps would have been a key component of an insurrection. You can't just have all generals and captains and no sergeant

 

Pelosi and the Dems needed that door to be kicked in, because she needed attention drawn away from 11th-hour truckloads of hundreds of thousands on one-party votes, secretaries of state who unilaterally made changes to election laws, etc. 

When they say "the thin blue line" they don't mean this thin:

Epps.thumb.png.7b3c5da36b27b9715cc284f29200a4c0.png

That was an invitation to attack, and Epps knew right where to be. Pelosi wanted some people to push through there, bust the doors, because she knew that they had enough cops to stop the unarmed advance once they opened firs and started killing people.

The Epps conspiracy theory is just another right wing fever dream. He was Trump loving kook just like you and paid the price for it when his fellow extremists turned on him when he turned himself in. 

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

Unsuspecting more ons are often caught up in undercover stings. You might call it entrapment.

I knew you did time. I blame the sneaky pigs.

Quote

Fact is that if you decide to break the law, it doesn't matter if you were set up by an undercover agent, you still broke the law. And what's more, this type of entrapment is fully legal.

If it was just entrapment, guess what...

They'd be charging Epps with sedition. 

Are you saying that it would be a good idea for the FBI/Pelosi to use a guy like Epps to incite people to enter the capitol, knowing that some would get killed and others would be locked in jail, and why? 

Quote

So please.... Whine as loud as you can about this. If Ray told your dumb assed friends to attack the capital, and your dumb assed friends complied...... Well, youve seen the end result... 

Why are the Dems/FBI trying to get people to commit treason? 

Why did they leave the perimeter of the capitol buildings virtually unprotected, just to get enough people to get in so that they could charge them criminally? What did they satnd to gain from that, aside from distracting people from the Dems' 2020 election crimes?

Why didn't they do the same to Antifatards who attacked federal buildings for over 100 days straight? Why didn't they even bother to charge anyone for overrunning a Settle police station, declaring sovereignty over part of Seattle, and then killing a 16-yr-old black kid there? Why wasn't Raz Simone put in jail for declaring war from his "autonomus zone" during the "Summer of Love"?

Consider these to be rhetorical questions from your POV, we both know that you're too stupid and brainwashed to answer them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

The Epps conspiracy theory is just another right wing fever dream. He was Trump loving kook just like you and paid the price for it when his fellow extremists turned on him when he turned himself in. 

Why would you choose to use the term 'conspiracy theory', while knowing that it has a 100% track record of blowing up in your leftard face?

If you want to use it correctly, say something like "the insurrection conspiracy theory", "the Ukrainian collusion conspiracy theory", "the Russian collusion conspiracy theory", etc...

Class dismissed. 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Why would you choose to use the term 'conspiracy theory', while knowing that it has a 100% track record of blowing up in your leftard face?

If you want to use it correctly, say something like "the insurrection conspiracy theory", "the Ukrainian collusion conspiracy theory", "the Russian collusion conspiracy theory", etc...

Class dismissed. 

What a joke. I’m giving you a complement when I call your bogus BS conspiracy gibberish a “theory”.  Theories are well thought out hypothesis based on empirical evidence, logic and observations.
 

However none of the MULTITUDE of baseless,  half-baked implausible one-liner conspiracy claims that you’re constantly shrieking has enough substance to fill a single square of toilet paper…assuming anyone even wanted to devalue toilet paper by using it for such a disgusting job….

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

The Epps conspiracy theory is just another right wing fever dream. He was Trump loving kook just like you and paid the price for it when his fellow extremists turned on him when he turned himself in. 

Ray Epps… Ha ha, I love how you people eat your own young. You’d sell out your mothers for a buck if you could.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

What a joke. I’m giving you a complement when I cal your bogus BS conspiracy gibberish a “theory”.  Theories are well thought out hypothesis based on empirical evidence, logic and observations.
 

However none of the MULTITUDE of baseless,  half-baked implausible one-liner conspiracy claims that you’re constantly shrieking has enough substance to fill a single square of toilet paper…assuming anyone even wanted to devalue toilet paper by using it for such a disgusting job….

Here's a short list of "crazy qanon alt-right conspiracy theories" that have become established as facts:

-Shadow bans

-BSL4 lab

-FBI crimes in Russian collusion show trial

-Hillary's Russian collusion

-Hillary/Sussman/FBI collusion

-Fauci GOF research/BSL4 conflict of interest

-pseudovax side effects

-pseudovax covid deaths by the thousands in Canada

-Smollett hoax

-Joe's knowledge of Hunter/Ukraine and Hunter/China

-Joe payouts from China

-FBI election interference re: Hunter laptop

-FBI's plot to kidnap Whitmer and "unravelling of said kidnapping" as an October surprise

-MSMedia/Dem/Big Tech collusion (riots, baseball shooting, laptop story, covid disinformation...)

 

Re: the last item, every major news item of the last 5 years has featured a laundry list of lies from Dems/Libs and their MSM lackeys, and an alarming percentage of them also include accompanying crimes from the FBI.

The overall covid story is just one perfect example of a single topic which featured a "laundry list of lies". 

Trudeau's perfection/Trump's abject failures include:

-Trudeau saying "covid won't affect Canadians much" in Jan 2020 = "Perfect!"/Trump already fighting covid in Jan 2020 (eg. flight ban) while the Dems were ignoring it = "Not enough!"

-Trudeau flight ban from India = "Solid!"/Trump flight ban from China = "Racist!"

Trudeau gave away tons of PPE to China and got garbage back/Trump opened a new N95 mask facility in the US

-Trudeau poached 1.9 million 3rd world charity vaccines = "Saviour!" (Not racist? Not an example of white privilege?)/Trump Op Warp Speed = "Not good enough"

-Trudeau allowed Chinese travellers to wander free 'til March 16 2020 then clamped down on Canadian citizens 7 days later/Trump clamped down on foreign travellers before he clamped down on US citizens

-Trudeau went along with every single false covid narrative and was ultimately wrong about everything/Trump questioned the source of covid, looked for all kinds of possible treatments, etc

-Trudeau went full fascist, inspired demonstrations all across Canada, beat & jailed protesters, froze bank accounts, called Canadians racists and misogynists for no reason/Trump never name-called, didn't freeze bank accounts, never had to beat or jail any peaceful protesters, never inspired covid division at all, never forced Americans to do anything. 

This is a short list of covid failures/successes which is completely accurate, and is also completely the opposite of what we heard from the MSM in the US and Canada.

 

Face it Beave, the MSM is complete garbage with no redeeming qualities whatsoever and you've been their stooge useful idjit every single second of every single day, going so far as to name-call others who had the rights of every issue. 

Edited by WestCanMan
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Here's a short list of "crazy qanon alt-right conspiracy theories" that have become established as facts:

-Shadow bans

-BSL4 lab

-FBI crimes in Russian collusion show trial

-Hillary's Russian collusion

-Hillary/Sussman/FBI collusion

-Fauci GOF research/BSL4 conflict of interest

-pseudovax side effects

-pseudovax covid deaths by the thousands in Canada

-Smollett hoax

-Joe's knowledge of Hunter/Ukraine and Hunter/China

-Joe payouts from China

-FBI election interference re: Hunter laptop

-FBI's plot to kidnap Whitmer and "unravelling of said kidnapping" as an October surprise

-MSMedia/Dem/Big Tech collusion (riots, baseball shooting, laptop story, covid disinformation...)

 

Re: the last item, every major news item of the last 5 years has featured a laundry list of lies from Dems/Libs and their MSM lackeys, and an alarming percentage of them also include accompanying crimes from the FBI.

The overall covid story is just one perfect example of a single topic which featured a "laundry list of lies". 

Trudeau's perfection/Trump's abject failures include:

-Trudeau saying "covid won't affect Canadians much" in Jan 2020 = "Perfect!"/Trump already fighting covid in Jan 2020 (eg. flight ban) while the Dems were ignoring it = "Not enough!"

-Trudeau flight ban from India = "Solid!"/Trump flight ban from China = "Racist!"

Trudeau gave away tons of PPE to China and got garbage back/Trump opened a new N95 mask facility in the US

-Trudeau poached 1.9 million 3rd world charity vaccines = "Saviour!" (Not racist? Not an example of white privilege?)/Trump Op Warp Speed = "Not good enough"

-Trudeau allowed Chinese travellers to wander free 'til March 16 2020 then clamped down on Canadian citizens 7 days later/Trump clamped down on foreign travellers before he clamped down on US citizens

-Trudeau went along with every single false covid narrative and was ultimately wrong about everything/Trump questioned the source of covid, looked for all kinds of possible treatments, etc

-Trudeau went full fascist, inspired demonstrations all across Canada, beat & jailed protesters, froze bank accounts, called Canadians racists and misogynists for no reason/Trump never name-called, didn't freeze bank accounts, never had to beat or jail any peaceful protesters, never inspired covid division at all, never forced Americans to do anything. 

This is a short list of covid failures/successes which is completely accurate, and is also completely the opposite of what we heard from the MSM in the US and Canada.

 

Face it Beave, the MSM is complete garbage with no redeeming qualities whatsoever and you've been their stooge useful idjit every single second of every single day, going so far as to name-call others who had the rights of every issue. 

LMAO I bet you have that list of conspiracies scribbled all over the walls of your studio apartment  and rant at it every night  

 

image.gif.3f142cdb5d101e6c9c5009429a7a01aa.gif

The things you list are either conspiracy nonsense NOT proven to be true - for example all it 2 of the Whitmer kidnappers were convicted) or in the case of smollet just some random thing that happened that nobody disagrees about.   “The MSM” is hundreds if not thousands of independent news outlets and reporters worldwide the fact that you think they’re all secre Controlled by some insidious dark force proves you’re a kook. Of course except when they report something that’s convenient for you rhen you uave no problem believing them even though that disproves the conspiracy theory. 
 

The only stooge here is you, you fall for right wing lies because as am uneducated high school dropout who was probably bad at school their whole life you have never developed critical thinking skills or a base level of knowledge and understanding of rhe world amd how it works. Your lack of education almost certainly held you back in life and you’ve probably spent most of your time at the bottom of society’s pecking order as a sexually unsuccessful male working sh-t jobs for sh-t money. This explains your well-established grudge against women and society in general and why you’re so susceptible to anti-social and anti-establishment narratives such as your conspiracy gibberish. 

image.gif

Edited by BeaverFever
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

We need a Prog to English dictionary.

Something like...

Conspiracy theory: Name describing the condition where it becomes preferable to ignore the obvious.

As in...

 'Don't believe your lying eyes, it's a conspiracy theory."

qQ93nmT.jpg

Tell us how the world is really flat and lizard people living under the earth’s crust secretly rule the planet   
 

“Don’t believe your lying eyes “ lol that implies that there’s convincing evidence in plain sight as opposed to your baseless made up nonsense about “liberal infiltrators” sleeper agents in school textbook publishers running false flag operations to discredit republicans.
 

Its always amusingwhen someone with a devoted faith-based belief in something like stolen elections or Noahs Ark or the Prophet Mohammad’s  magical flying horse ride claims doubters are “disbelieving their lying eyes” or not “thinking critically”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...