Jump to content

TUCKER CARLSON AND THE JAN. 6 VIDEO


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Mako said:

You put zip ties on them. It takes a few seconds.

How do you reach through the door she’s trying to smash down in order to apply zip ties? She wasn’t going to just hold her hands out and let them put handcuffs on her.  
 

OBVIOUSLY, you didn’t see the video of her climbing up furniture to crawl through a door she’d just smashed. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hodad said:

1. You are utterly delusional to claim he wasn't there to overturn the election. That's was the explicit goal of the "Stop the steal" nonsense Chansley and other loons were spouting on social media. And the threatening note he left for Pence after they took the chamber is just icing on this crap cake.

He was described as a violent loonie intent on inflicting carnage, they all were, the video doesn't show police looking stressed or acting with a sense of urgency. Chadsley had a calm demeanour and was apparently quite polite with the police and vice versa.

Quote

Chansley and other loons were spouting on social media. And the threatening note he left for Pence after they took the chamber is just icing on this crap cake.

You're just quoting MSM and Dem liars for all I know. Do you have a cite for his laundry list of insurrectionist posts? The text from his violent letter? 

We're showing video, you're just running your mouth and quoting known liars. 

Quote

2. Because that's exactly why he was there. 

If he was there to kill people then why does he look like he's calm and polite? Why are all the police so calm? They're not even on guard at all. 

If the scenario was anything like the violent mayhem the Dems described it wouldn't be like that at all. 

In other words, they lied and you're covering for them.

Quote

3. Nobody looks like they should be shot when just walking around, but put them in a mob breaking through doors to get to the legislators on the other side and it's a different story. He's simply lucky he wasn't with the Babbitt group. And frankly, he's lucky to be in prison, where a raving loon has access to mental health treatment.

Lots of people looked like that in Aug 2020. They attacked Secret Service personnel with actual weapons. How many were killed? 

Quote

4. Outnumbered and overwhelmed, the police didn't fend off much of anything after the intial breach, until the last line of defense at the babbit shooting. They surrendered the non-essential spaces. But they surely spent those hours trying to get the insurrectionists to leave. 

The handful of police scattered across a wide front were overwhelmed. 

Pelosi wanted them to be overwhelmed at that point, she planned it that way. 

Quote

5. Blah, blah,

The most intelligent thing you've ever said, by far.

Quote

conspiracy nonsense.

When a leftard says "conspiracy" that has come to mean that it's true. Thanks for officially verifying it.

Quote

Ray Epps, like thousands of others, was crazy enough to believe Fox's lies, but not crazy enough to break into the capitol building.

Ray Epps displayed a clear intent to have others commit the exact sin that Nancy Pelosi wanted them to commit when she intentionally left the capitol buildings scantily protected. 

They pushed their way past a handful of guys inside, and then someone was killed to create the impression that it was necessary to kill people to protect her evil hide. 

Quote

Like the rest of the mob that opted not to enter, he hasn't been prosecuted.  

Do you even know what sedition is you stupid little man? 

The whole purpose of this episode was to prove that there was an organizational structure behind the mob, otherwise it was just a riot and Trump wasn't involved. His words alone are not actionable - they were too peaceful. He even used the word peaceful at key moments that the Dems were really hoping they could use against him.

If guys like Epps were in the crowd, working for the proud boys and whomever else like good little lieutenants and sergeants, to motivate their troops, then maybe there's something to it, but the Eppses of the crowd were working for the FBI. 

Epps was clearly a motivator, working for someone. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hodad said:

Another Internet tough guy, second guessing the professional LEOs, the witnesses on site and multiple investigations. 

When those being chased by the mob have retreated as far as they can, they have a right and a duty to defend themselves and those in their protection. When one is part of a mob besieging our elected officials the first one through the barricade gets shot. And the next one gets shot. And every one after gets shot. Until they stop attacking.

Not a threat. Jeebus. WTF do you propose the mob intended to do with our legislators once they got to them? Were they breaking through barricades to bring them cupcakes? 

Your fantasies about what may have happened aside, can you please tell me why one of the many cops standing around couldn’t have put zip ties on Babbitt. I hope we can all agree that arrest is better than killing. We don’t want to live in a police state right?

How many people did the “howling mob” you describe actually kill?

If Byrd had been white and Babbitt black and left wing would you still be eager to kill her?

Edited by Mako
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

How do you reach through the door she’s trying to smash down in order to apply zip ties? She wasn’t going to just hold her hands out and let them put handcuffs on her.  
 

OBVIOUSLY, you didn’t see the video of her climbing up furniture to crawl through a door she’d just smashed. 

 

Has your brain shut down or something? Once she got through the door one of those burly cops could have easily held this small woman and put zip ties on her.

Wow you guys are desperate to justify this completely unnecessary murder. I guess you like the idea of killing those you disagree with.

Edited by Mako
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Mako said:

Has your brain shut down or something? Once she got through the door one of those burly cops could have easily held this small woman and put zip ties on her.

Wow you guys are desperate to justify this completely unnecessary murder. I guess you like the idea of killing those you disagree with.

What about the 50 guys  behind her, one cop is going to put zip ties on all of them as well? 

"Wait your turn guys, just line up over there while I send for more zip ties."

Reality is not one of your specialities.

Edited by Aristides
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Mako said:

Has your brain shut down or something? Once she got through the door one of those burly cops could have easily held this small woman and put zip ties on her.

Wow you guys are desperate to justify this completely unnecessary murder. I guess you like the idea of killing those you disagree with.

Once the barricade was breached and a mob started streaming through, it would have been impossible to arrest them.  

Edited by Rebound
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

He was described as a violent loonie intent on inflicting carnage, they all were, the video doesn't show police looking stressed or acting with a sense of urgency. Chadsley had a calm demeanour and was apparently quite polite with the police and vice versa. 

 

He was a QAnon celebrity (who believes he is some sort of shaman) dressed in horns and an animal skin, covered in body paint, carrying a spear, hooting and howling on the senate dais -- oh, and he traveled across the country to overturn an election.

Jeebus. There was never any question that he was a loon. It's alarming that you think this is healthy behaviour. BTW, they've since confirmed his mental health issues and he has gotten some help while imprisoned.

Quote

You're just quoting MSM and Dem liars for all I know. Do you have a cite for his laundry list of insurrectionist posts? The text from his violent letter? 

He's largely deplatformed at this point, but you don't become a QAnon celebrity without posting a lot of insane nonsense. I'm surprised you don't know him from 4Chan. 

As for the note, you should know that, it's heavily documented as part of his case. Here comes the airplane!

"Later, Chansley — also known as Jake Angeli —  comes down to the Senate floor wearing his trademark fur hat with horns: “You guys are f*cking patriots,” he says to the group of intruders.

“Look at this guy. He’s covered in blood. God bless you,” he says, pointing to a man lying propped against the foot of the dais,  a few drops of blood on his shirt. “I got shot in the face with some kind of plastic bullet,” the supine man says, declining an offer of medical help.

As Chansley climbs to the vice president’s chair, a lone police officer delicately tries to get him and the others to leave.

“Is there any chance I can get you guys to leave the Senate wing?” he asks politely. “I just want to let you guys know this is like the sacredest place,” he says.

“I’m gonna take a sit in this chair because Mike Pence is a f*cking traitor,” Chansley says, calling on another rioter to take a picture of him.

He then scrawls a note for Pence: “ITS ONLY A MATTER OF TIME / JUSTICE IS COMING!” it says, an apparent reference to claims by the mob that Pence betrayed Trump by intending to certify the election results."

note-640x400.jpg

What is "justice" for "traitors," BTW? 

 

Quote

We're showing video, you're just running your mouth and quoting known liars. 

Yes. That's probably the absolute stupidest element of this whole thread. You people are dumb enough to think that video of not much happening erase the video and testimony of violence and chaos. Functional adults should not be that logically impaired. Chansley is on video in the vanguard that's breaking into the capital. He's one of the first in the building. He's on video in the senate chamber. He's on video leaving the note to Pence. -- Oh, but no big deal, because documented liar Tucker farking Carlson showed video of him walking around in a hallway as the police eye him.?

Quote

If he was there to kill people then why does he look like he's calm and polite? Why are all the police so calm? They're not even on guard at all. 

If the scenario was anything like the violent mayhem the Dems described it wouldn't be like that at all. 

In other words, they lied and you're covering for them.

I don't know if he was there to kill people, or what he would have done if he had caught Mike Pence, but he was 100% there to overturn the election and he definitely chose to attempt that through violence and chaos. They overwhelmed police broke through the goddamn doors. You simply lied (again) when you claimed he wasn't there to overturn the election.  

Quote

Lots of people looked like that in Aug 2020. They attacked Secret Service personnel with actual weapons. How many were killed? 

Link? Like most of your claims, there is no documentation and it will likely turn out to be another lie, but let's see. 

I know of one person who did "threaten" the Secret Service in August 2020. He was "armed" with a comb and was promptly shot. Gee, that's inconvenient for the lame point you were trying to make. 

Quote

The handful of police scattered across a wide front were overwhelmed. 

Pelosi wanted them to be overwhelmed at that point, she planned it that way. 

The most intelligent thing you've ever said, by far.

When a leftard says "conspiracy" that has come to mean that it's true. Thanks for officially verifying it.

Ray Epps displayed a clear intent to have others commit the exact sin that Nancy Pelosi wanted them to commit when she intentionally left the capitol buildings scantily protected. 

They pushed their way past a handful of guys inside, and then someone was killed to create the impression that it was necessary to kill people to protect her evil hide. 

Did Q tell you that? Your unsupported accusations are as entertaining as always. Stupid, but entertaining.

Quote

Do you even know what sedition is you stupid little man? 

The whole purpose of this episode was to prove that there was an organizational structure behind the mob, otherwise it was just a riot and Trump wasn't involved. His words alone are not actionable - they were too peaceful. He even used the word peaceful at key moments that the Dems were really hoping they could use against him.

If guys like Epps were in the crowd, working for the proud boys and whomever else like good little lieutenants and sergeants, to motivate their troops, then maybe there's something to it, but the Eppses of the crowd were working for the FBI. 

Epps was clearly a motivator, working for someone.

Seriously, get some farking help before you end up doing something as stupid as the shite you say

conspiracy wall

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Mako said:

Your fantasies about what may have happened aside, can you please tell me why one of the many cops standing around couldn’t have put zip ties on Babbitt. I hope we can all agree that arrest is better than killing. We don’t want to live in a police state right?

How many people did the “howling mob” you describe actually kill?

If Byrd had been white and Babbitt black and left wing would you still be eager to kill her?

How much would would a woodchuck chuck? 

Your inane questions and naive suppositions are pretty damn tiresome. It's like talking to a child. You have video evidence. You have statements from witnesses--politically friendly witnesses, I might add.  You have multiple reports from multiple investigations. They all indicate that Byrd acted reasonably and properly--perhaps heroically--in defending our legislators.

The bottom line is that when people can't retreat any further, they have every right to defend themselves. Police (and regular citizens) operate under that principle and will be uncharged or acquitted all day every day in any jurisdiction in this country. If you don't accept that basic right to self defense, fine. I don't care much. You just end up looking foolish.

Enjoy your armchair quarterbacking. Then go pound sand. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/6/2023 at 10:06 PM, Nationalist said:

Sooo...Chubaka guy was peacefully escorted around the capital and the police even opened the doors for him. That baaad ol' dangerous guy...

Start at around 10 minutes.

The great "insurrection".

What horseshit.

You’ve bee suckered by Fox’s fake news again I see. 
 

Prosecutors call out Fox News’ Jan. 6 spin for omitting damning footage of “QAnon shaman”

New court filing refutes Tucker Carlson's attempts to reframe the attack on the Capitol as peaceful
 

Prosecutors on Sunday said that Fox News host Tucker Carlson's segment showing "QAnon shaman" Jacob Chansley at the Capitol on Jan. 6 omitted key footage.

Carlson, who received exclusive accessto thousands of hours of footage from the attack on the Capitol from House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., last week aired a segment showing Chansley walking through the Capitol accompanied by police officers, one of whom at one point opened a door for him.

"Virtually every moment of his time inside the Capitol was caught on tape," Carlson said on Monday. "The tapes show the Capitol Police never stopped Jacob Chansley. They helped him. They acted as his tour guides."

But Justice Department prosecutors involved in the seditious conspiracy trial of five Proud Boys leaders including Dominic Pezzola said in a court filingover the weekend that the video only shows four minutes of Chansley inside the Capitol after he had already been inside for over 40 minutes.

"Prior to that time, Chansley had, amongst other acts, breached a police line at 2:09 p.m. with the mob, entered the Capitol less than one minute behind Pezzola during the initial breach of the building, and faced off with members of the U.S. Capitol Police for more than thirty minutes in front of the Senate Chamber doors while elected officials, including the Vice President of the United States, were fleeing from the chamber," the filing said.

Prosecutors added that Chansley "was not some passive, chaperoned observer of events for the roughly hour that he was unlawfully inside the Capitol."

The filing added that Capitol Police officers had been overwhelmed by the rioters and were trying to minimize the damage.

 "For a period that afternoon, those defending the Capitol were in triage mode — trying to deal with the most violent element of those unlawfully present, holding those portions of the Capitol that had not yet been seized by rioters, and protecting those Members and staffers who were still trapped in the Capitol," the filing said.

Prosecutors said that "it is true that a sole officer, who was trying to de-escalate the situation, was with Chansley as he made his way to the Senate floor after initially breaching the Chamber."

"But the televised footage fails to show that Chansley subsequently refused to be escorted out by this lone officer and instead left the Capitol only after additional officers arrived and forcibly escorted him out," the filing added.
 

https://www.salon.com/2023/03/13/prosecutors-call-out-fox-news-jan-6-spin-for-omitting-damning-footage-of-qanon-shaman/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hodad said:

He was a QAnon celebrity (who believes he is some sort of shaman) dressed in horns and an animal skin, covered in body paint, carrying a spear, hooting and howling on the senate dais -- oh, and he traveled across the country to overturn an election.

So what if he was qanon? Can people be arrested just for being Demtards now? No. 

Nothing you wrote there says "violent" or "intent on murder", and the overturn election BS is unsubstantiated in all of your posts.

Quote

Jeebus. There was never any question that he was a loon. It's alarming that you think this is healthy behaviour. BTW, they've since confirmed his mental health issues and he has gotten some help while imprisoned.

Almost everyone who voted for Biden is mentally deficient. Can we lock them all up?

Quote

He's largely deplatformed at this point, but you don't become a QAnon celebrity without posting a lot of insane nonsense. I'm surprised you don't know him from 4Chan. 

You can't be a leftard without posting nonsense. Look at your own history ffs. You're basically retarded, but I've never said you need to be locked up.

Quote

What is "justice" for "traitors," BTW? 

In your case it means just lying on the internet all day. It's different for everyone.

Quote

Yes. That's probably the absolute stupidest element of this whole thread. You people are dumb enough to think that video of not much happening erase the video and testimony of violence and chaos. Functional adults should not be that logically impaired. Chansley is on video in the vanguard that's breaking into the capital. He's one of the first in the building. He's on video in the senate chamber. He's on video leaving the note to Pence. -- Oh, but no big deal, because documented liar Tucker farking Carlson showed video of him walking around in a hallway as the police eye him.?

The stupidest element of this thread is that you were shown carefully edited content with fake riot noise added to it for two years and you never noticed.

Have you ever seen video of the mob approaching to capitol before they got to the barricades? No, so you don't have perspective of how many people there were or how many cops there were when they approached.

In every video I see, there's a "wall of cops" that's 1-deep, with about 6-10 feet between them all. 

Is that enough, do ya figger, when "everyone knew there was gonna be a "seditious mob" [sic] of white supremacist terrorists approaching because Trump was trying so hard to incite violence and murder"?

Here in Canada we had cops shoulder-to-shoulder, several layers deep, watching the Freedom Convoy for weeks, including days long after the police knew for a fact that none of them had violent tendencies at all.

Contrast that with 1 layer of police, 10 feet apart, protecting the capitol when they were allegedly expecting thousands of dangerous insurrectionists.... 

You're just completely retarded if you think that:

-The Dems and the FBI had all this evidence about a suspected insurrection

-and they chose to protect the capitol with a handful of cops outside

-they suddenly felt like they needed 20,000 national guard the next day, after seeing how calm everyone was while they were milling around in the capitol and how easy it was for the police inside to handle that crowd. 

Honest to God, if you piece together all of the things that you think you 'know' about Jan 6th, it adds up to: Pelosi is completely retarded or she wanted rioters to get into the capitol. It's one or the other. 

We had already established that you were a really stupid guy before this topic came up, now I'm at a loss for words to describe your minuscule intellect. 

Summary...

Hodad (paraphrasing): "You can clearly see from the chart below that intelligence services were aware that a violent insurrection was about to occur because of all the violent rhetoric on 4chan and at the qanon whitehouse (which is actually a brown tent on the happy hunting grounds of the great plains). 

conspiracy wall

Pelosi used everything at her disposal to prevent the impending carnage, but the mob of "seditionists" (lol) was so heavily armed that they cut through the battalions of tanks and humvees like butter.

It can only be compared to 9/11 and Pearl Harbour. The carnage couldn't even be shown on TV it was so bad. Some old dudes had stokes or heart attacks just from watching it. It's possible that they drowned in all the blood. 

When it was all over, Chuck Schumer wrote a song about how the capitol withstood the incredible barrage of gunfire:

 

O say can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hail'd at the twilight's last gleaming, Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight O'er the ramparts we watch'd were so gallantly streaming? And the rocket's red glare, the bomb bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that the hag was still there,
O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

On the shore dimly seen through the mists of the deep Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes, What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep, As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses? Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam, In full glory reflected now shines in the stream,

'Tis the star-spangled banner - O long may it wave O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore,
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a Country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wash'd out their foul footstep's pollution. No refuge could save the hireling and slave

From the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave, And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

O thus be it ever when freemen shall stand
Between their lov'd home and the war's desolation!
Blest with vict'ry and peace may the heav'n rescued land Praise the power that hath made and preserv'd us a nation! Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto - "In God is our trust,"
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave."

 

Did I get it right Hodad? Is that how it al happened? 

Edited by WestCanMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

So what if he was qanon? Can people be arrested just for being Demtards now? No. 

Nothing you wrote there says "violent" or "intent on murder", and the overturn election BS is unsubstantiated in all of your posts.

 

No, I told you exactly why he was locked up. It's not a farking mystery. It's right here in the charges and acknowledged in his guilty plea.

But he is clearly loon and he was certainly there to overturn the election. Honestly, I didn't think a real person would be dumb enough to argue that the rioters weren't trying to overturn the election. WTF do you think they were breaking down the doors and chasing legislators to do? 

Quote

Almost everyone who voted for Biden is mentally deficient. Can we lock them all up?

You can't be a leftard without posting nonsense. Look at your own history ffs. You're basically retarded, but I've never said you need to be locked up. In your case it means just lying on the internet all day. It's different for everyone.

 

Fair enough. Remember that time I lied about the FBI releasing statements they never released, or that time I claimed repeatedly to have watched security footage 6 days before it was released, or that time I said that the Jan 6 mob wasn't trying to overturn the election? 

Oh, wait...

 

Quote

Have you ever seen video of the mob approaching to capitol before they got to the barricades? No, so you don't have perspective of how many people there were or how many cops there were when they approached.

In every video I see, there's a "wall of cops" that's 1-deep, with about 6-10 feet between them all. 

Is that enough, do ya figger, when "everyone knew there was gonna be a "seditious mob" [sic] of white supremacist terrorists approaching because Trump was trying so hard to incite violence and murder"?

 

Sorry to stop you mid-rant, but why are you tagging words that are already correct? This one is a puzzle. And yes, Trump did his best to convince these already unstable people that this was a moment of existential crisis and then loosed them on the capitol. He's fully responsible. It was malicious and deliberate.

Quote

Here in Canada we had cops shoulder-to-shoulder, several layers deep, watching the Freedom Convoy for weeks, including days long after the police knew for a fact that none of them had violent tendencies at all.

Contrast that with 1 layer of police, 10 feet apart, protecting the capitol when they were allegedly expecting thousands of dangerous insurrectionists.... 

You're just completely retarded if you think that:

-The Dems and the FBI had all this evidence about a suspected insurrection

-and they chose to protect the capitol with a handful of cops outside

-they suddenly felt like they needed 20,000 national guard the next day, after seeing how calm everyone was while they were milling around in the capitol and how easy it was for the police inside to handle that crowd. 

Honest to God, if you piece together all of the things that you think you 'know' about Jan 6th, it adds up to: Pelosi is completely retarded or she wanted rioters to get into the capitol. It's one or the other. 

We had already established that you were a really stupid guy before this topic came up, now I'm at a loss for words to describe your minuscule intellect. 

 

Wow, you are rarely at a loss for words. Between the endless bloviating and incessant lying the words practically tumble from your fingertips like verbal diarrhea. 

I'm sure your schtick plays great with the rest of the nutters, but back in the land of rational thought we just look at your fact-free, paranoid conspiracy garbage and laugh at you. It takes a "special" kind of person to keep at it. How you find the perseverance to get up in the morning, strap on your velcro shoes and sandwich board and trudge down to a busy intersection and hand out pamphlets is truly inspiring.

 

Quote

<snipped the pure nonsense, as it seems you've been day drinking >

 

Edited by Hodad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

"Prior to that time, Chansley had, amongst other acts, breached a police line at 2:09 p.m. with the mob, entered the Capitol less than one minute behind Pezzola during the initial breach of the building, and faced off with members of the U.S. Capitol Police for more than thirty minutes in front of the Senate Chamber doors while elected officials, including the Vice President of the United States, were fleeing from the chamber,"

Oh My! They "faced off with members fo the U.S. Capital Police for more than thirty minutes"

Sounds scary man. Someone quick...shoot that woman!

This was the "insurrection" that never happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I'm not so sure that's what Carlson said Beave.

Only if you try really hard to twist his words 180 degrees:

In a text message sent on November 17, 2020, anchor Tucker Carlson said “Sidney Powll is lying,” referring to the far-right attorney who primarily spread the Dominion fraud claims, calling her a “f–cking b–tch.”

Carlson, who’s now drawing scrutiny for downplaying January 6 and continuing to sow doubt in the 2020 election, also told his staff about Trump, “I hate him passionately,” and said in a January 2021 text message, “We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights … I truly can’t wait.”

“What he's good at is destroying things … He's the undisputed world champion of that,” Carlson added about Trump in a text message sent in January 2021, after the unknown person he was texting with noted the ex-president’s failed business ventures.

 

In other text messages to an unknown recipient, Carlson asked whether there was “real evidence of significant voter fraud,” to which the person responded there was “not the amount to swing the election to Biden” and Carlson responded, “Yep. All true.”

Carlson also said the Dominion “software s–t is absurd,” said Powell was “making everyone paranoid and crazy, including me,” and told Powell herself in a text message on November 17, 2020, “If you don’t have conclusive evidence of fraud at that scale, it’s a cruel and reckless thing to keep saying.”

Fox Corporation chair Rupert Murdoch suggested to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott on January 21, 2021, after President Joe Biden’s inauguration, “Maybe Sean [Hannity] and Laura [Ingraham] went too far” in their post-election coverage, saying Fox was “still getting mud thrown at us” for its coverage and asking if it was “unarguable that high profile Fox voices fed the story that the election was stolen and that January 6th an important chance to have the result overturned.”

Scott described far-right attorney Rudy Giuliani’s fraud claims, which involved Dominion, as “terrible stuff damaging everybody” to Murdoch in a November 19 email, to which Murdoch responded, “yes Sean and even [Jeanine] Pirro agrees.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/03/08/sidney-powell-is-lying-new-fox-news-dominion-documents-show-tucker-carlson-murdoch-and-more-disputing-2020-election-fraud-here-are-their-wildest-comments/amp/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rebound said:

Only if you try really hard to twist his words 180 degrees:

In a text message sent on November 17, 2020, anchor Tucker Carlson said “Sidney Powll is lying,” referring to the far-right attorney who primarily spread the Dominion fraud claims, calling her a “f–cking b–tch.”

Carlson, who’s now drawing scrutiny for downplaying January 6 and continuing to sow doubt in the 2020 election, also told his staff about Trump, “I hate him passionately,” and said in a January 2021 text message, “We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights … I truly can’t wait.”

“What he's good at is destroying things … He's the undisputed world champion of that,” Carlson added about Trump in a text message sent in January 2021, after the unknown person he was texting with noted the ex-president’s failed business ventures.

 

In other text messages to an unknown recipient, Carlson asked whether there was “real evidence of significant voter fraud,” to which the person responded there was “not the amount to swing the election to Biden” and Carlson responded, “Yep. All true.”

Carlson also said the Dominion “software s–t is absurd,” said Powell was “making everyone paranoid and crazy, including me,” and told Powell herself in a text message on November 17, 2020, “If you don’t have conclusive evidence of fraud at that scale, it’s a cruel and reckless thing to keep saying.”

Fox Corporation chair Rupert Murdoch suggested to Fox News CEO Suzanne Scott on January 21, 2021, after President Joe Biden’s inauguration, “Maybe Sean [Hannity] and Laura [Ingraham] went too far” in their post-election coverage, saying Fox was “still getting mud thrown at us” for its coverage and asking if it was “unarguable that high profile Fox voices fed the story that the election was stolen and that January 6th an important chance to have the result overturned.”

Scott described far-right attorney Rudy Giuliani’s fraud claims, which involved Dominion, as “terrible stuff damaging everybody” to Murdoch in a November 19 email, to which Murdoch responded, “yes Sean and even [Jeanine] Pirro agrees.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/03/08/sidney-powell-is-lying-new-fox-news-dominion-documents-show-tucker-carlson-murdoch-and-more-disputing-2020-election-fraud-here-are-their-wildest-comments/amp/

What part of that says Carlson thinks the Jan. 6th report is anything but a lie?

He doesn't like reporting on Trump. OK. I sometimes get tired of hearing about him.

He doesn't believe the Dominion accusations. Again...OK. How does that mean he thinks the Jan. 6th report was anything but a pack of lies? That the charges on these people has been anything short of illegal?

Try to stick to 1 track at a time...ok?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

As but one example of the many things he privately messaged, he said that Sydney Powells stolen election claims were “insane”. Meanwhile on air he’s telling his gullible audience members that they’re true. 
 

 


 

 

Carlson never said such things on air. He's always been skeptical of the Powell accusations

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

As but one example of the many things he privately messaged, he said that Sydney Powells stolen election claims were “insane”. Meanwhile on air he’s telling his gullible audience members that they’re true. 
 

 


 

 

What exactly is the point here?

Carlson doesn't like Trump? FOX put Sydney Powell on TV to make her case? That some at FOX did not believe the 2020 election was stolen, even though they reported on the accusations?

What about any of that, has to do with what Carlson exposed about the Jan. 6th events?

Well? Nothing actually. So again...

What exactly is the point here?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

What part of that says Carlson thinks the Jan. 6th report is anything but a lie?

He doesn't like reporting on Trump. OK. I sometimes get tired of hearing about him.

He doesn't believe the Dominion accusations. Again...OK. How does that mean he thinks the Jan. 6th report was anything but a pack of lies? That the charges on these people has been anything short of illegal?

Try to stick to 1 track at a time...ok?

Which Jan 6 report are you referring to? Have you read this report? Can you provide a link to the text of this report, so that we can read it and determine whether it is a “pack” of lies or not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Which Jan 6 report are you referring to? Have you read this report? Can you provide a link to the text of this report, so that we can read it and determine whether it is a “pack” of lies or not?

Hasn't watched or read it, "But on FOX they said..."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

What part of that says Carlson thinks the Jan. 6th report is anything but a lie?

He doesn't like reporting on Trump. OK. I sometimes get tired of hearing about him.

He doesn't believe the Dominion accusations. Again...OK. How does that mean he thinks the Jan. 6th report was anything but a pack of lies? That the charges on these people has been anything short of illegal?

Try to stick to 1 track at a time...ok?

Dude are you slow or something?  What Rebound posted proves Tucker reports things to you that he knows are false.  The whole time he was saying those things in private and mocking the election conspiracies and insulting Trump, he was going on TV every night and whipping gullible suckers like you into a frenzy telling you the exact opposite of what he actually believes.
 

Why would you still believe anything he says?  Tucker clearly thinks viewers like you are dullards and in his own words he only cares about ratings and Newscorp’s stock price. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,712
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    nyralucas
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Jeary earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Gaétan earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Dictatords earned a badge
      First Post
    • babetteteets earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...